Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52073 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#49328 Jan 24, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Says who? You are supremely uneducated. Jews don't believe in the devil.
are you claiming to be Jewish ?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#49329 Jan 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
She falsely maligned straight people who more than treated her kindly, idiot. Are you really that dense?
You maligned *a straight customer*, not *all straight people*.

One would have to be some kind of moron to confuse the two.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#49330 Jan 24, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
You can move away from yourself.
does that sentence really make sense in your mind ?
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#49331 Jan 24, 2014
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>

They denied service. You're a liar.
wrong again.
They were willing to sell them anything they wanted except a wedding cake.
Angel

Aurora, CO

#49332 Jan 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Science is allowing older and older couples to bear children.
Many infertile couples have corrective surgery that enables them to bear children.

-----this is Gods natural way? Science?
That whole be fruitful and multiply thing was for when the planet was EMPTY.

Ss couples? Not ONE, ZERO, have every mutually procreated.
No gay dares to answer?

-------we don't need to. There are enough children out there that your people threw away. And you claim that that is the fruit God blessed you with that we have no claim to, and you toss them away like trash?
No credibility.

“Christmas Spirit”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#49333 Jan 24, 2014
Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point.
Wait, Was someone seriously trying to defend incest? Wow.
The fundamentalists like Earth Angel will leep through massive amounts of mental gymnastics to defend ALL the atrocities of their deity. The fact that he raped and impregnated a 12 year old girl, the fact that he commits genocide on a regular basis, the fact that he lies, the fact that asks for sacrifices in his honor. And by "fact" I do actually mean, "according to their stupid book".

They're vile people, willing to excuse all sorts of horribleness in the name of their deity.
Angel

Aurora, CO

#49334 Jan 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution protects my right for expression of my faith.
<quoted text>
Marriage is a critical expression of the Christian faith. It is symbolic of Christ (the Bridegroom and the Church (the Bride).
The union of a man and woman is a representation of made in the image of God.
The baker only refused to make a wedding cake.
You don't know what you are talking about again.
<quoted text>
That wasn't the issue idiot. Go back and learn context.
Damn you are stupid.
You better take a break pal, your gonna burst a vessel.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#49335 Jan 24, 2014
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not an issue at all. Christians are a massive, largely-integrated group that has been dominant in society. Gay people are a small minority, not united as a group, and have been a persecuted minority. The comparison is silly.
aw poor gays in such a small group when something is asked of them.
But suddenly they have a lot of power if some baker doesn't jump for them.
can't have it both ways gays either you're a small powerless group or your not.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#49336 Jan 24, 2014
Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, punk? Oh my.
We have been supporting your lazy fat divorced bastard welfare families with our wealth for decades. "Uh, I dunno who da father is."
now your wealthy too !!!
so i guess you'll be breaking ground on that gay hospital any day now right ?
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#49337 Jan 24, 2014
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
You maligned *a straight customer*, not *all straight people*.
One would have to be some kind of moron to confuse the two.
wow you're going to get that picky over such a small grammar error ?
keep in mind what goes around comes around.

“Christmas Spirit”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#49338 Jan 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
People who violate morality do not negate the rights of those who are moral.
By your standard, ss couples have failed to measure up to marriage. Their breakup rate is much higher than straights.
You only need a lawyer for a contract. You attempt to radically dumb down marriage to a contract because homosexuals cannot equate to marriage on any other level.
This is the bottom line you will never ever get past; ss couples are only ever a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
NOTHING you say or do will change that fact.
NOTHING you say or do will change the fact that gays can and do marry. NOTHING you say or do will ever affect gays in any way, shape or form. You're insignificant to us, and happily we all know that you already know this! Smile.

“Christmas Spirit”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#49339 Jan 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The gay couple deliberately chose that bakery to demand that the owners accept their 'faith' in a fallacious marriage. That is unconstitutional.
It would be no different than a Christian demanding that an atheist pray, right?
It would be completely different dolt. The bakery is a business, beholden to laws. A Christian and an atheist are people, not businesses.

Any other ridiculously stupid "comparisons" you'd like to try dipsh*t?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#49340 Jan 24, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
wrong again.
They were willing to sell them anything they wanted except a wedding cake.
Irrelevant. The baker makes wedding cakes. They requested one. They were denied service.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#49341 Jan 24, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
aw poor gays in such a small group when something is asked of them.
But suddenly they have a lot of power if some baker doesn't jump for them.
can't have it both ways gays either you're a small powerless group or your not.
How do they suddenly have a lot of power?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#49342 Jan 24, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
wow you're going to get that picky over such a small grammar error ?
It's not a grammar error, EA.

“Christmas Spirit”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#49343 Jan 24, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
Normally when i read posts like this i think its a gay deliberately trying to miss the point.
But i do respect you so i'll try saying it in another way. More graphic then i would like.
it was night. No night lites in those days. Bedrooms were dark.
Again i think a drunk can be so drunk that he can't even see or even tell that the person next to him in a totally dark room is his daughter.
Further i do indeed believe such a drunk is still capable of full sex with orgasm.
Blood lines in those days only concerned themselves with the male side. Wrong as that may be by standards of today it is what they followed in those days. So to follow their blood line the dad still needed to have a male child.
That is what it was about plain and simple NOTHING more then that.
There was no sexual pleasure intended in that act.
This was not two sexually perverted sisters looking for sexual pleasure.
To look at it that way is wrong and out of context.
If you want to believe otherwise that is up to you.
But what you're suggesting is not the way it was. Nor the reason of why it was.
TRANSLATION: Incest is good if done for the right reason. Got it.
Angel

Aurora, CO

#49344 Jan 24, 2014
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
The fundamentalists like Earth Angel will leep through massive amounts of mental gymnastics to defend ALL the atrocities of their deity. The fact that he raped and impregnated a 12 year old girl, the fact that he commits genocide on a regular basis, the fact that he lies, the fact that asks for sacrifices in his honor. And by "fact" I do actually mean, "according to their stupid book".
They're vile people, willing to excuse all sorts of horribleness in the name of their deity.
Yea, I kinda feel sorry for them. Sad really.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#49345 Jan 24, 2014
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality is not a sexual defect, it's just a sexual difference. That one trait is better understood than another is irrelevant to this discussion.
I notice that you again ignored the religious element of the discussion. Do you support businesses being allowed to discriminate against customers on the basis of their religion?
<quoted text>
There is no vast distinction. Relationships are relationships. You do not discriminate against straight couples incapable of producing after their kind (because you know the argument is disingenuous).
<quoted text>
I have given the whole facts the entire time. They denied service because the customers were gay. It's that simple. You try to wipe that away but you can't. You fail.
When an orientation utterly fails to reproduce, it is a failure of mating behavior. You need to educate yourself.

You ignored context.

"Relationships are relationships"? Yes, but there are different kinds of relationships. Do you know who we tell that?

You again gave partial information. You lied and distorted.

Man up punk!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#49346 Jan 24, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
We know. You even use children, demanding they not be considered as a part of marriage, then claiming them to pretend you are a family, except for depriving the child of one parent gender.
Makes me sick.
You need to ask why you are foolishly attempting to equate to a relationship you fail at, and not establishing your own relational identity.
Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm
You have lost your credibility to discuss marriage.
Your response again fails to address my post.

Let the adults handle this, blondie.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#49347 Jan 24, 2014
Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/09/25/ov...
Really with the name calling? How old are you. You make yourself so small with that.
Look at the date on your reference.

Like I said, idiot.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 min Into The Night 58,839
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 20 min Canada sold to Ru... 213,134
has anyone ever had sex with an animal? (Jul '12) 1 hr Raydot 6
Ask Amy 4-30-16 1 hr Raydot 5
The right brand and right quality to have a goo... 1 hr kathmads 3
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Pasquali 8,095
last post wins! (Dec '10) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 1,972
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages