Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52072 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48757 Jan 18, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
It was the Pastor's building. He had a right to be there. He broke no crime, drama queen. And performing a SS Marriage is not against the law, therefore NOT illegal.
Cling to your argument, Earth Anal, it just continues to expose your lunacy. Further, every post you make wins converts for marriage equality. There's a reason your side is losing this battle, and you're the reason.
your atemps to dodge this will never work
i'll just keep asking you to choose one every time you post a dodge
its NOT his building its the property of the church
he has no right to be there unless he's on church business
it is a crime to be in a church doing something illegal
YOU are one of many that said the church can say NO
well ??? they said no to gay marriage
therefore he was doing it against the law.
The church has the LEGAL right to decide what is legal or not legal in their church.
so now that yur dodge once again failed
answer which one you choose ONE or TWO

1 ) should the pastor/priest be defrocked and that marriage be annulled
2 ) if the marriage stands then pastor/priest be allowed to marry IN THAT CHURCH against that churches wishes.
Hence the gay agenda. Forcing churches to have gay marriages allowed when its against their religion.
THERE IS NO OTHER REAL CHOICE HERE
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48758 Jan 18, 2014
QUEST
you still haven't really answered it. You pretty much dodge it like Dusty does. The littles points don't matter it boils down to just this

1 ) does the church win - should the priest be defrocked and the gay marriage be annulled. Because it was the 2nd time against this church that marriage was performed without the church allowing it.

2 ) Does the marriage stand and the priest/pastor be allowed to perform gay marriages.
If so then it opens the door to a LEGAL PRECEDENT that a church which is against gay marriage with rules against gay marriages can be forced to have gay marriages against it.

Hence the gay agenda
Forcing churches that do not want to perform gay marriages because its against their beliefs to allow gay marriages in their church.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#48759 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
your atemps to dodge this will never work
i'll just keep asking you to choose one every time you post a dodge
its NOT his building its the property of the church
he has no right to be there unless he's on church business
You really don't understand the rights/responsibilities of a pastor, do you?

The rest of your idiocy is dismissed. You're seriously trolling or retarded. In your case, it's difficult to tell.
LLL

Austin, TX

#48760 Jan 18, 2014
Church and Government should be two different things.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48761 Jan 18, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
You really don't understand the rights/responsibilities of a pastor, do you?
The rest of your idiocy is dismissed. You're seriously trolling or retarded. In your case, it's difficult to tell.
another dodge
answer the question

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#48762 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
your atemps to dodge this will never work
i'll just keep asking you to choose one every time you post a dodge
Keep asking, Buford. There's no argument here because you're misrepresenting the facts and the chronology.

Every church has the right to deny marriage to any couple, for any reason. Even in the case the you're attempting to use, "the church" wasn't forced to marry anyone. A pastor willingly performed the ceremony, fully knowing that he may be censured at a future date by his denomination.

1. You're trolling, or
2. You're retarded.

Which is it, Earth Anal? It has to be one of the two. I'll keep asking because you keep dodging the question.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48763 Jan 18, 2014
LLL wrote:
Church and Government should be two different things.
i agree now convince Obama that.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48764 Jan 18, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
K
mine is a legit on topic question
yours is just typical BS dodge you lose all respect by it

1 ) does the church win - should the priest be defrocked and the gay marriage be annulled. Because it was the 2nd time against this church that marriage was performed without the church allowing it.

2 ) Does the marriage stand and the priest/pastor be allowed to perform gay marriages.
If so then it opens the door to a LEGAL PRECEDENT that a church which is against gay marriage with rules against gay marriages can be forced to have gay marriages against it.

Hence the gay agenda
Forcing churches that do not want to perform gay marriages because its against their beliefs to allow gay marriages in their church.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#48765 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
mine is a legit on topic question
No, it isn't, and I'm not the only one who has pointed that out to you.

1. You're trolling, or
2. You're retarded.

Which is it, Earth Anal? It has to be one of the two. I'll keep asking because you keep dodging the question.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48766 Jan 18, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
.
if you're going to whine like a little girl and dodge it
then there is no point in discussing it or anthing else with you.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#48767 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
if you're going to whine like a little girl and dodge it
then there is no point in discussing it or anthing else with you.
What's to discuss? You're an idiot.
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#48768 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
show me where i said the pastor/priest was forced
you missed entirely what i was talking about
are you trying to be like Dusty ?
"I've already PROVED by definition it was by force and more to the point how it open the door to it happening again and again LEGALLY"

Honey, the only thing you have proven is that you are at best a half wit. The government has no jurisdiction over who a church marries. DAMN you are thick-headed!
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#48769 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
mine is a legit on topic question
yours is just typical BS dodge you lose all respect by it
1 ) does the church win - should the priest be defrocked and the gay marriage be annulled. Because it was the 2nd time against this church that marriage was performed without the church allowing it.
2 ) Does the marriage stand and the priest/pastor be allowed to perform gay marriages.
If so then it opens the door to a LEGAL PRECEDENT that a church which is against gay marriage with rules against gay marriages can be forced to have gay marriages against it.
Hence the gay agenda
Forcing churches that do not want to perform gay marriages because its against their beliefs to allow gay marriages in their church.
1. Why should the marriage be annulled? They have a license. They are married.

2. No, it does not open a LEGAL PRECEDENT because the government has no jurisdiction over who a church marries.
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#48770 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
i agree now convince Obama that.
What the hell does Obama have to do with this? Being a constitutional law professor, I'm sure he is well aware of the separation of church and state.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#48772 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
if you're going to whine like a little girl and dodge it
then there is no point in discussing it or anthing else with you.
Good, stop discussing it.
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48773 Jan 18, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
"I've already PROVED by definition it was by force and more to the point how it open the door to it happening again and again LEGALLY"
hey glad you saw the light.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48774 Jan 18, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Why should the marriage be annulled? They have a license. They are married.
2. No, it does not open a LEGAL PRECEDENT because the government has no jurisdiction over who a church marries.
1 ) because he married them in a place he legally was not suppose to therefore he volatilized his license to marry.
2 ) do you even know what the term LEGAL PRECEDENT means ? The government already has tons of jurisdiction over churches. Just look at those nuns who didn't want to give out birth control. The government is going to force them to do it.

AGAIN this is about the gay agenda.
we disagree if they gay agenda will be successful or not.
I hope the church wins. I hope the government doesn't change any laws to favor gays over the church.
But that doesn't change the gay agenda and that is what i'm posting about
Both you and Dusty want to find loopholes about other items in what i wrote.
Even going so far as to claim i said things i never said in those post.
I then had to dummy down what i wrote just for you two,.
Fact still remains its a choice of two.
are you on the side of the church ? or of the priest ? Notice i never said the government in those two choices. That is part of your dodge.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Earth Angel

Racine, WI

#48775 Jan 18, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Good, stop discussing it.
buzz off i'll post what i want and it no longer includes you.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
ratto

Deerfield, IL

#48778 Jan 18, 2014
Saluki Rod wrote:
I wonder how long it'll take the Neo-Nazi Far Right Christians to mobilize against this? It's just letting gays be married, what's the big freaking deal? I'm straight, and see no harm to society.
Oh, come on Saluki, you are straight? Don't you want a little dick shoved up your ass right now? Yea, now, don't you?

You don't seem that bright either. Nazi's were atheists and socialists, but don't let those little facts stop you from spewing your hate.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#48779 Jan 18, 2014
Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
buzz off i'll post what i want and it no longer includes you.
So you'll continued to post mis-information (that's what you've done, even if you don't realize it) and you're going to ignore me?

Thank you, you've just made my work here a whole lot easier.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Gunner 1,396,272
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 13 min GEORGIA 8,924
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 20 min Chicagoan by Birth 217,014
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 33 min Into The Night 60,166
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 55 min RJS 8,497
Chicago has the Worst Women 1 hr Beyond Arrogant 15
Who's this Fauxcahontas? 2 hr Go Blue Forever 30
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr CrunchyBacon 102,551

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages