Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52042 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Ace

Christopher, IL

#47439 Jan 2, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
Hang on...what do you mean "but guys like you are not interested in that"? I'm here to voice an opinion and to try and understand both sides of the arguement/debate. I've been to church and found it hypocritical but I still like to search both sides of an argument...I'm actually in the middle of it now.
BTW I'm not gay...I have 4 kids, 3 rabbits, 2 boobs and....well....you can figure the rest.
LOL. Gay marriage is only blessed in the eyes of man, not it the eyes of god.
Here is something many people won't want to hear that my church preaches. Heterosexual marriage is only recognized in the eyes of god if you are a christian, that makes perfect sense to me. Non-christian's is not living for god, so why should he give them his blessing?
So if you look at it in that sense, gay marriage is no worse off that non-christian heterosexual marriage.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47440 Jan 2, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
Hang on...what do you mean "but guys like you are not interested in that"? I'm here to voice an opinion and to try and understand both sides of the arguement/debate. I've been to church and found it hypocritical but I still like to search both sides of an argument...I'm actually in the middle of it now.
BTW I'm not gay...I have 4 kids, 3 rabbits, 2 boobs and....well....you can figure the rest.
lets see you called one person a bible thumper
and in another post you said you were going to spend the night reading from a hate site.
and you state church is hypocritical

my reference was about you looking for hate not looking for gay.
you certainly don't sound like someone looking at BOTH sides of the argument/debate
i think you made of your mind already
if anything its you being hypocritical in saying you're looking at both sides when clearly your not.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47441 Jan 2, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Gay marriage is only blessed in the eyes of man, not it the eyes of god.
Here is something many people won't want to hear that my church preaches. Heterosexual marriage is only recognized in the eyes of god if you are a christian, that makes perfect sense to me. Non-christian's is not living for god, so why should he give them his blessing?
So if you look at it in that sense, gay marriage is no worse off that non-christian heterosexual marriage.
Good point.
Many gays love to state that there are different churches preaching different things.
Here is a great example of it.
Some churches won't marry anyone not of that faith.
i've even seen one that required at least one be a member of that particular church.
some churches don't care if you of that faith just so long as you say you believe in God.
But you're right the bottom line is if you don't believe in God your marriage is a sham and NOT blessed by God. Even if you are married in a church.
And while all three types i mentioned do it differently the bottom line remains the same.
Gays just don't get that part.
Personally i think at least one should at least belong to that faith to be married in a church of that faith. Again that is my view.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47442 Jan 2, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text>
So if you look at it in that sense, gay marriage is no worse off that non-christian heterosexual marriage.
i totally agree.
i've said along the way to resolve this would have been to make a civil union fully equal in legal rights to a marriage.
I'm sure most Christians could live that.
The main issue for Christians is we don't want them married in a Church.
But gays refuse to fight to improve civil union to full legal benefits.
The problem really is gays want to be married in a church to defile churches.
Its a hate thing for them. And how is that in going to be blessed by God.

Since: Jan 14

Satellite Provider

#47443 Jan 2, 2014
Add me whatsapp +918906213889
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47452 Jan 2, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
yet did you notice the way he delivered his views? I think the Lord frowns upon nastiness and foul language doesn he?
and Dusty calls me foul language all the time yet i don't read you complaining about that.
Or any of the other gays and atheist who post swear words.
Yet if a Christian does it you're all over it.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47454 Jan 2, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
I find people who live and breath the bible to the point of obsession are scarey and mostly rude to others. That's why I called it hypocritical.
Thanks again
Being rude and scary is NOT the definition of Hypocritical.

Hypocrite is a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings

We go to church NOT because we are free of sin but rather because we ARE sinners.
We acknowledge we are sinners and ask God for forgiveness. That does not make us hypocrites because we do acknowledge our faults.
The real hypocrites are the ones that demand Christians to hold a standard they know no one including themselves can hold to.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47455 Jan 2, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
I could blow you ^o^
and you said you weren't gay
see now that proves you are a hypocrite.in the TRUE sense of the word.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47458 Jan 2, 2014
rabnew wrote:
<quoted text>
This is where I find it hypocritical. Christians (to my understanding) don't generally like to swear because it is unbecoming and God apparently doesn't like it. Atheists don't care....that's not to say it's right.
There are heaps of comments on this thread and admittedly I haven't read them all so maybe I've not come across as fair. Also I tend to miss things in my writings because my fingers tend to type ahead of my thoughts.
Look, if I've offended you with my wording I sincerely apoligise. Dusty has a really offensive approach to people. His problem
Dusty is a true hypocrite.
He claims not only to be a Christian but also to have worked for a church for 30 years.
and when it comes to swearing he's the biggest offender in here on either side.
I dont swear nor need to.
I can put someone down real easy without swearing.. I do it by telling them the truth.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#47460 Jan 2, 2014
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
i totally agree.
i've said along the way to resolve this would have been to make a civil union fully equal in legal rights to a marriage.
Too late, we have marriage equality. What part of that isn't getting through your thick skull?
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure most Christians could live that.
The main issue for Christians is we don't want them married in a Church.
Again, you brazenly attempt to speak for "most" Christians.
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
The main issue for Christians is we don't want them married in a Church.
Speak for your own Church. Many churches willingly perform any marriage and NO CHURCH HAS EVER BEEN FORCED to perform a SSM. NONE. NOT ONE. This is a really BS argument because NO CHURCH HAS EVER BEEN FORCED to perform a SSM.
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem really is gays want to be married in a church to defile churches.
Its a hate thing for them. And how is that in going to be blessed by God.
.
I'd be sarcastic about this, but you'd run with it because you're merely trolling. This is a lie, dearie, ain't nobody getting married just to piss off your congregation. Paranoid much?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#47461 Jan 2, 2014
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
I can put someone down real easy without swearing.. I do it by telling them the truth.
Will you be starting that any time soon?
Ace

Christopher, IL

#47462 Jan 2, 2014
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
and you said you weren't gay
see now that proves you are a hypocrite.in the TRUE sense of the word.
Angel you lost that one, rabnew said "SHE" wasn't gay lol
Ace

Christopher, IL

#47463 Jan 2, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text> Angel you lost that one, rabnew said "SHE" wasn't gay lol
Now just what normal american man would turn down a BJ from a sexy women like rabnew? I bet she could turn gay men straight!!!!:)

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47464 Jan 2, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text> Angel you lost that one, rabnew said "SHE" wasn't gay lol
i'm positive REAL TRUTH is straight.
but the back and forth was about oral gay sex
so when RABNEW offers oral sex its not much of a stretch to think its in reference for gay oral sex.
Just because i'm positive REAL TRUTH is straight doesn't mean RABNEW knows it too.
In any event i don't know too many straight women bluntly offering oral sex.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47465 Jan 2, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text> Now just what normal american man would turn down a BJ from a sexy women like rabnew? I bet she could turn gay men straight!!!!:)
i consider myself a normal straight American man with a certain degree of savoir faire
And i would turn down a BJ from a strange sexy woman.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47466 Jan 2, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Will you be starting that any time soon?
you been missing it all that time ?
maybe you should ask your b/f to explain it to you using sock puppets.

see insults especially to someone like you is all too easy and waste of my time.
i prefer conversations with ADULTS

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47467 Jan 2, 2014
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/01/02/rela...
here is a set back for gays ( that would be you Dusty ) who engage in anal sex.
i wonder if these 2 cured gays were still having unprotected anal sex.
yeah probably so. Fools never learn.

Maybe these doctors should be working on a cure for being gay.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#47468 Jan 2, 2014
Wingless Angel wrote:
Maybe these doctors should be working on a cure for being gay.
Maybe those doctors should be working on a cure for being an internet troll.
Wingless Angel

Kenosha, WI

#47470 Jan 2, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe those doctors should be working on a cure for being an internet troll.
if they do then you can volunteer as the test troll

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#47471 Jan 2, 2014
Wingless Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
And i would turn down a BJ from a strange sexy woman.
How about a sexy woman who isn't strange? ;-)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min Incognito4Ever 1,252,776
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 56 min red and right 192,564
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr USA people 54,013
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr nonattorney spoke... 99,937
9 dead 53 injured 3 hr Right Wing 10
abby7-7-15 5 hr mrs gladys kravitz 7
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 5 hr White_Lightning 6,156
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages