No, you simply made a ridiculous argument that makes no sense at all.KiMare wrote:
Her test did not address the sexual attraction confusion.
Hardly a 'theory'.
She simply did not address the glaring difference between orientations.
There is no explanation for homosexuality in evolution. Zip.
It is clear that the redundant sex organs in a ss relationship are pointless and a conflict of design.
Honey, those are facts.
Who said anything about expectations?
I simply noted the avoidance of an obvious distinction.
Oh, and your failure to address obvious scientific evidences too.
By the way, you have a butt bugger stuck on your nose.
The conclusion of Hooker's study was THERE ARE NO DISCERNABLE PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES. THAT is scientific evidence.
By the way, you have shit for brains. I'm sure your pretzel logic was born out of a need to twist reality to fit your narcissistic personality. It's sad, really. You have no idea just how stupid you look.