A flawed premise at best. Maybe if you replaced the word "basic" with "primal". But even then, you would have to rely on a modern definition of marriage to make that statement work. Marriage today is better described as a social arrangement, and has been for centuries.At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Baseless and irrelevant. Nobody gives a damn about proper "mating behavior". Seriously, do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?Ss couples are a defective and total failure of mating behavior.
If part of a statement is wrong, then the statement as a whole is wrong.You claimed every single part of my statement was wrong.
Following your logic, we should start banning people from drinking anything other than water.Mating behavior is not just any old evolutionary trait you can take or leave. It is no different than saying we can take or leave breathing air, or drinking water.
Another broad, incorrect statement spawned from your own bias.Ss couple have never been even openly accepted in a single culture from start to finish.
Confusing cause with effect.Something that devastatingly exposes their lack of identity with marriage.
More baseless ranting.Humanity would digress to lower life forms...
Hey, I think your bias is showing again.no matter where you gay twirl to...
Sure. Go ahead and declare you're right. Because that's how debate works.I keep proving you wrong.
You know, I intended to be courteous when I first posted, but you ooze vitriol with every word you type. Tell me why I, or anyone for that matter, should continue taking you seriously.Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.