Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 50,029

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42150 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The whole point of mating behavior is procreation. It is pointless for duplicate genders to engage in mating behavior.
Wife just showed me a picture of two lesbian former co-workers. One had the bride's dress, the butch a tux.
That would be a counterfeit bride and groom attempting an impostor marriage. Was anyone fooled but you?
Snicker.
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>i'm amused at how confounded you are over the reality that people sometimes have relationships for reasons other than procreation or sex. And that they sometimes are committed enough to each other to the the extent that they wish to form a domestic partnership wherein both parties are legally considered each other's next of kin is a concept that utterly eludes you. What is it really that troubles you so much about this concept, KiMare? It is becoming a reality in this country as it already has in many, many others. Nothing you, or those of your ilk, can say will change that. Homosexuality is nothing new. Committed and monogamous homosexual relationships are nothing new either. How does same-sex marriage affect you personally to the extent that you seem so threatened by it? What is it that drives your relentless, but futile crusade? All of your rehearsed little verbiages and catch phrases only serve to make you look myopic and hell-bent on staying that way. Why is this so important to you? There really is little that would explain your passion for this topic and the energy and time you pour into it. You're doing a fine job convincing yourself that you're right, but so far haven't managed to change a single mind to your way of thinking. So come clean, KiMare. Tell us what's really motivating you.
You are not amused by anything I say because it disintegrates your denial.

Nor have I ever indicated there are no other relationships apart from procreation. Or even that marriage only entails procreation.

I simply and accurately note that ss couples do not equate to marriage, or are ever capable of creating biological kinship.

You have to use gay troll attacks and ad homoan deceit and lies to respond.

Why is that necessary for a legitimate cause?
Huh

Owatonna, MN

#42151 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
But in the end, no matter how the Constitution is twisted, ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
ss marriage is an oxymoron. And there is not one thing you can do to change that.
The Constitution has to be "twisted" to get what you want. If we follow the Constitution SSM will be legal...

AND NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU NAZI PIGS THINK.....SSM WILL BE LEGAL AND YOU ODL FARST WILL BE WORM FOOD.....BYE LOSER.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42152 Sep 22, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Since it is the government that grants married status, they are all that matters.
Nothing
I repeat, NOTHING
you have written has ANY resemblance to science. Science is made up of facts. All you have is unsubstantiated opinion, and evidently, you never learned the difference. That makes YOU the idiot.
Only a gay would assert that the government is all that matters.

Your unvalidated opinion does nothing to provide a reasoned response. Do you have one?

Otherwise, that makes YOU the idiot.

“well, really...”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#42153 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, with slander like that, you really are the leader of a pack of gay wolves!
Owie!
Ohhh sweetie, I'm sorry...did the truth sting too much? I slander no one, I didn't even hit the tip of the iceberg yet. I know all about you...it is quite fascinating.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#42154 Sep 22, 2013
LeaderOfThePack2 wrote:
<quoted text>
No problem, I assumed that was what happened. I am sure you know I support your marriage 100% and wish you all happiness.
I have to wonder why a Pastor, a supposed man of God chooses to spend all of his time on Topix posting hateful lies. Why use unregistered names to copy and paste from hate sites for years...then use a registered profile to supposedly "learn more"...only to then deem himself a "gender authority" because he has 3 nipples and tell everyone else how they should live and what they should believe?
KiMerde spends ALL of his time on forums railing against gay marriage, with an extra special disdain for gay men. His own marriage has to be a complete mess, I certainly would not take his word on anything to do with relationships - he clearly knows nothing. I wonder who his wife seeks out for companionship...
I see nothing slanderous here. Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#42155 Sep 22, 2013
And still, no law in the US requires procretion ability or intent, nor even ability to have sex, and sterile couples continue to get married, and have sex or not.

Marriage remains a fundamental right of all persons. Gender is still not a valid restriction.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42156 Sep 22, 2013
LeaderOfThePack2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ohhh sweetie, I'm sorry...did the truth sting too much? I slander no one, I didn't even hit the tip of the iceberg yet. I know all about you...it is quite fascinating.
I embrace the truth. Why would that sting?

You don't know squat.

But hey, go for it!

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42157 Sep 22, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
And still, no law in the US requires procretion ability or intent, nor even ability to have sex, and sterile couples continue to get married, and have sex or not.
Marriage remains a fundamental right of all persons. Gender is still not a valid restriction.
From start to finish, ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
And there is not a single thing you can say or do to change that.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#42158 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
From start to finish, ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
And there is not a single thing you can say or do to change that.
From start to finish, hubby and I are legally married.

There's not a single thing you can say, or do, to change that.
haha

United States

#42159 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>From start to finish, ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
And there is not a single thing you can say or do to change that.
Ss couples have babies all the time , your point is pointless, BTW ss couples are better parents than some baby momma getting pregnant by baby dayy every other year

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#42160 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
From start to finish, ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
And there is not a single thing you can say or do to change that.
Fortunately, your prejudice doesn't change the fact your requirements have nothing to do with the legal requirements of marriage. Procreation and ability to have sex are pointless when it comes to the fundamental right of marriage belonging to all persons.

Sterile opposite sex couples will remain sterile, and fully married, just as same sex couples who marry remain fully married.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42161 Sep 22, 2013
haha wrote:
<quoted text>
Ss couples have babies all the time , your point is pointless, BTW ss couples are better parents than some baby momma getting pregnant by baby dayy every other year
Lol, sorry to inform you, but no ss couple has ever procreated.

Zero. Zip. Not a single one ever in all of human existence.

Idiot.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42162 Sep 22, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately, your prejudice doesn't change the fact your requirements have nothing to do with the legal requirements of marriage. Procreation and ability to have sex are pointless when it comes to the fundamental right of marriage belonging to all persons.
Sterile opposite sex couples will remain sterile, and fully married, just as same sex couples who marry remain fully married.
100% barren and desolate.

A pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.

Clearly not equal and clearly not the same.

Even a child can tell the difference.
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42163 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
But in the end, no matter how the Constitution is twisted, ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
ss marriage is an oxymoron. And there is not one thing you can do to change that.
You are right, because it doesn't exist. The State only cares about legal marriages, and there is only one kind. Marriage..... like the one the government gave you... same one everyone else gets... marriage.

The government grants the same benefits, rights and privileges to all legally married couples. You are no better/worse than any other married couple. You hate that. What you hate worse is being made to look like a fool by the State. Awwww.......... But doesn't that play conveniently into your persecution complex. You religiturds LOVE to claim persecution... Look at my persecution merit badge! I'm a "real" Christian.

Anyhow, since the benefits/privileges/rights of marriage come from the State, all that matters to me is what THEY think. Not you.

We get that you have an issue with homosexuality. Well, it usually stems from a lack of information, but I realize now, since this study came out
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/09/20/you-c... that people such as you prefer the voices in your head over the facts.

You'll adapt sooner or later, or you'll just die one day. You can't avoid both.

If you can't change your mind, are you sure you still have one?

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#42164 Sep 22, 2013
How many os couples over the age of 55 reproduce? How many who have had an operation or accident that renders them sterile reproduce? Yet, they still get married.

As even anti-gay Justice Scalia recognizes, procreation has never been a requirement for marriage to remain a fundamental right of all persons, in any state or federal law.

Gender is irrelevant to the fundamental right of marriage. Anti-gay prejudice does not change that well recognized fact of law.

And yet gay people continue to reproduce and raise children. Denial of legal equality provides nothing to os couples, while harming the families of ss couples.
Little Joe

Indianapolis, IN

#42166 Sep 22, 2013
The people we vote into office will face God on judgment day for their sins. Same sex marriage is against the laws of God just like abortion is. God is telling mankind that this lifestyle that this country is living will burn in hell for ever....Leviticus 18:22....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42167 Sep 22, 2013
Neil An Blowme wrote:
<quoted text>You are right, because it doesn't exist. The State only cares about legal marriages, and there is only one kind. Marriage..... like the one the government gave you... same one everyone else gets... marriage.
The government grants the same benefits, rights and privileges to all legally married couples. You are no better/worse than any other married couple. You hate that. What you hate worse is being made to look like a fool by the State. Awwww.......... But doesn't that play conveniently into your persecution complex. You religiturds LOVE to claim persecution... Look at my persecution merit badge! I'm a "real" Christian.
Anyhow, since the benefits/privileges/rights of marriage come from the State, all that matters to me is what THEY think. Not you.
We get that you have an issue with homosexuality. Well, it usually stems from a lack of information, but I realize now, since this study came out
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/09/20/you-c... that people such as you prefer the voices in your head over the facts.
You'll adapt sooner or later, or you'll just die one day. You can't avoid both.
If you can't change your mind, are you sure you still have one?
You are right. A manipulated law states that opposite gendered couples are the same as duplicate gendered couples. And they deny the other numerous distinctions that follow.

Which brings us to your 'study'. The basic study asserts that strongly held belief systems hinder open-mindedness. I agree. Your silly attempt to equate extreme differences in relationships is a perfect example.

As to their examples, I don't know about the specific time frame they use for jobs, but I do know that the real job situation is deplorable, and the truth is being disguised by the left. And as to global warming, you must have missed the information this week that information was exaggerated about global warming.

As to the situations in the Middle East, neither party has room to boast of smart moves, do they?

Just a note, the left would call your categorization of religious people hate language and bigotry. But of course, you will ignore THAT information and hang on to your passionate beliefs, right?

Smirk.
Neil An Blowme

Hoboken, NJ

#42168 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, sorry to inform you, but no ss couple has ever procreated.
Zero. Zip. Not a single one ever in all of human existence.
Idiot.
Aha! Now I see why your kind are so against stem cell research. How many more years before that becomes a moot point? It WILL happen. Then what excuse will you use? As if procreation is a requirement anyway... omg. so what? who cares?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42169 Sep 22, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
How many os couples over the age of 55 reproduce? How many who have had an operation or accident that renders them sterile reproduce? Yet, they still get married.
As even anti-gay Justice Scalia recognizes, procreation has never been a requirement for marriage to remain a fundamental right of all persons, in any state or federal law.
Gender is irrelevant to the fundamental right of marriage. Anti-gay prejudice does not change that well recognized fact of law.
And yet gay people continue to reproduce and raise children. Denial of legal equality provides nothing to os couples, while harming the families of ss couples.
Been over this, and you are smart enough to know this in spite of your denial.

There is a vast difference between a medical condition or age preventing normal procreation, and a couple that is totally incapable of reproduction within their orientation. It is a sad commentary on our SC that Scalia is not aware of the differences.

As I have noted many times, at it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

freshroast666@gmail.com

#42170 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The whole point of mating behavior is procreation. It is pointless for duplicate genders to engage in mating behavior.
Wife just showed me a picture of two lesbian former co-workers. One had the bride's dress, the butch a tux.
That would be a counterfeit bride and groom attempting an impostor marriage. Was anyone fooled but you?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
You are not amused by anything I say because it disintegrates your denial.
Nor have I ever indicated there are no other relationships apart from procreation. Or even that marriage only entails procreation.
I simply and accurately note that ss couples do not equate to marriage, or are ever capable of creating biological kinship.
You have to use gay troll attacks and ad homoan deceit and lies to respond.
Why is that necessary for a legitimate cause?
kimare, why is this so important to you, personally? How does it negatively affect you in any way?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min harmonious 1,115,070
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr Frijoles 69,490
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Who 46,993
Grocery Coupon and saving your pennies 1 hr Susan 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr WelbyMD 178,583
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr PEllen 98,344
A short math question. I will reply with answer... 5 hr Whats the Bulb An... 8

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]