Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 51,285

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#41713 Aug 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
How childish and silly.
Indeed, you are.
Butter up

Wilmington, IL

#41714 Aug 21, 2013
Ban gay marriage.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
lickmytool

Mount Vernon, IL

#41715 Aug 21, 2013
Who want's to get into some scissor rubbing ?

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jan Payton Burno

Paris, IL

#41716 Aug 21, 2013
I will lick your tool for a cheeseburger and a bottle of Jim Beam.

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41717 Aug 21, 2013
FACT 1 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:

Marriage in every single culture in human history from start to finish.

SS couples being called married? Zero.

FACT 2 THAT GAYS REFUSE TO FACE:

Anal sex is 'unnatural'.

1. Your anus was not designed for intercourse.

2. Anal intercourse is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.

http://www.net doctor.co.uk/sexandrelationshi ps/analsex .htm

Please note;

1. I am not denying that some hetero couples also engage in anal sex.

2. I am asserting that the ONLY truly safe and natural sex is 'traditional' sexual practices within the bounds of a monogamous marriage. Sex that is not abusive to either person's body, is not degrading and carries no inherent risks for damage, infection or disease.

3. Ss gay couples need protection to HAVE sex. Monogamous married couples need protection not to procreate. An incredible distinction, clearly not equal intimately in any sense of the word.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Chester

Saint Louis, MO

#41718 Aug 22, 2013
Good one CDC!
CDC wrote:
Good one Chester!
<quoted text>

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41720 Aug 22, 2013
Sure. Why not.
lickmytool wrote:
Who want's to get into some scissor rubbing ?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#41721 Aug 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
hardly honey, I referenced the Regnerus study. The very fact that out of thousands of contacts, finding a stable ss couple was near impossible. That addresses the first point, and the study directly addresses the second. I noted the 'Cinderella Effect' which references the third point.
But interestingly, I was responding to three unsubstantiated claims made by a gay twirling troll. You tiptoed past that... interesting. Exposes your bias, doesn't it?
More anti-gay "twirl", distorting reality to fit your prejudice, just like the Regnerus "study". The American Sociological Associationís Supreme Court brief "destroys claims made that same-sex households are inferior when it comes to raising children, which is a major argument for those pushing Prop 8. The ASA especially calls out the Mark Regnerus study, which is the recent controversial study claiming children raised in same-sex households suffer adverse effects. Supporters of Prop 8 made this study a huge part of their arguments in spite of fact that it has been discredited."

Cinderella effect data is based on step parent and even mom's casual boyfriend data, not same sex families or adoptive straight families. These families are very different. The data does not hold up for adoptive parents.

You are attempting to compare families that have experienced divorce and re blending to families where the relationship of the parents has remained intact for the life of the child. Intact marriages are not the same as families of divorce and remarriage.

Adoption is not the same as a step child relationship:

"Although remarriage of a father or mother can have bad consequences for children, when a couple adopts a baby unrelated to either of them its prospects are much brighter... parents treat their adopted children just as well as biological children."

"Two recent studies help to clarify the issue of how well adoptive children are treated. The first, published in 2007, found that children in adoptive households are treated better than children in homes with two genetic parents."

Whatever the reasons for the Cinderella effect, it is now quite clear that it is not triggered by a lack of genetic relationship. After all, adoptive parents take better care of children than birth parents do. It seems that caring for children, related or not, involves a deep human need that is better satisfied by adoption than step-parenting." http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human...
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41722 Aug 23, 2013
Good one NYE!
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
More anti-gay "twirl", distorting reality to fit your prejudice, just like the Regnerus "study". The American Sociological Associationís Supreme Court brief "destroys claims made that same-sex households are inferior when it comes to raising children, which is a major argument for those pushing Prop 8. The ASA especially calls out the Mark Regnerus study, which is the recent controversial study claiming children raised in same-sex households suffer adverse effects. Supporters of Prop 8 made this study a huge part of their arguments in spite of fact that it has been discredited."
Cinderella effect data is based on step parent and even mom's casual boyfriend data, not same sex families or adoptive straight families. These families are very different. The data does not hold up for adoptive parents.
You are attempting to compare families that have experienced divorce and re blending to families where the relationship of the parents has remained intact for the life of the child. Intact marriages are not the same as families of divorce and remarriage.
Adoption is not the same as a step child relationship:
"Although remarriage of a father or mother can have bad consequences for children, when a couple adopts a baby unrelated to either of them its prospects are much brighter... parents treat their adopted children just as well as biological children."
"Two recent studies help to clarify the issue of how well adoptive children are treated. The first, published in 2007, found that children in adoptive households are treated better than children in homes with two genetic parents."
Whatever the reasons for the Cinderella effect, it is now quite clear that it is not triggered by a lack of genetic relationship. After all, adoptive parents take better care of children than birth parents do. It seems that caring for children, related or not, involves a deep human need that is better satisfied by adoption than step-parenting." http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41723 Aug 23, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
More anti-gay "twirl", distorting reality to fit your prejudice, just like the Regnerus "study". The American Sociological Associationís Supreme Court brief "destroys claims made that same-sex households are inferior when it comes to raising children, which is a major argument for those pushing Prop 8. The ASA especially calls out the Mark Regnerus study, which is the recent controversial study claiming children raised in same-sex households suffer adverse effects. Supporters of Prop 8 made this study a huge part of their arguments in spite of fact that it has been discredited."
Cinderella effect data is based on step parent and even mom's casual boyfriend data, not same sex families or adoptive straight families. These families are very different. The data does not hold up for adoptive parents.
You are attempting to compare families that have experienced divorce and re blending to families where the relationship of the parents has remained intact for the life of the child. Intact marriages are not the same as families of divorce and remarriage.
Adoption is not the same as a step child relationship:
"Although remarriage of a father or mother can have bad consequences for children, when a couple adopts a baby unrelated to either of them its prospects are much brighter... parents treat their adopted children just as well as biological children."
"Two recent studies help to clarify the issue of how well adoptive children are treated. The first, published in 2007, found that children in adoptive households are treated better than children in homes with two genetic parents."
Whatever the reasons for the Cinderella effect, it is now quite clear that it is not triggered by a lack of genetic relationship. After all, adoptive parents take better care of children than birth parents do. It seems that caring for children, related or not, involves a deep human need that is better satisfied by adoption than step-parenting." http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human...
1. Talk about gay twirl. Prop 8 was over LONG before the Regnerus study was done. Right off the bat you show deceit and ignorance!

2. Ss couples most often involve step children, not adopted children. The risk for the child? 100 times greater than in a biological home.

3. Ss couple homes will NEVER be comparable to natural families. One parent is ALWAYS missing. That is why ss couples don't qualify for marriage.

4. Again, you are being deceptive. The studies on adoptive parents showed that they spend more time with the child. Why? Because of the problems inherent in an adoptive situation. Children in an adoptive home statistically rate far below children in a natural home.

The bottom line? Ss couples always deprive a child of one gender, and at least one parent, to the detriment of the child!
lickmytool

Mount Vernon, IL

#41724 Aug 23, 2013
Come on time in my bunhole. yum yum.
youaresodumb

Mount Vernon, IL

#41725 Aug 23, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
More anti-gay "twirl", distorting reality to fit your prejudice, just like the Regnerus "study". The American Sociological Associationís Supreme Court brief "destroys claims made that same-sex households are inferior when it comes to raising children, which is a major argument for those pushing Prop 8. The ASA especially calls out the Mark Regnerus study, which is the recent controversial study claiming children raised in same-sex households suffer adverse effects. Supporters of Prop 8 made this study a huge part of their arguments in spite of fact that it has been discredited."
Cinderella effect data is based on step parent and even mom's casual boyfriend data, not same sex families or adoptive straight families. These families are very different. The data does not hold up for adoptive parents.
You are attempting to compare families that have experienced divorce and re blending to families where the relationship of the parents has remained intact for the life of the child. Intact marriages are not the same as families of divorce and remarriage.
Adoption is not the same as a step child relationship:
"Although remarriage of a father or mother can have bad consequences for children, when a couple adopts a baby unrelated to either of them its prospects are much brighter... parents treat their adopted children just as well as biological children."
"Two recent studies help to clarify the issue of how well adoptive children are treated. The first, published in 2007, found that children in adoptive households are treated better than children in homes with two genetic parents."
Whatever the reasons for the Cinderella effect, it is now quite clear that it is not triggered by a lack of genetic relationship. After all, adoptive parents take better care of children than birth parents do. It seems that caring for children, related or not, involves a deep human need that is better satisfied by adoption than step-parenting." http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human...
All the gay's should be fixed. Then their will be less aids !

“DoesTheNoiseInMy HeadBotherYou?”

Since: Jan 11

Big Sur California

#41726 Aug 24, 2013
youaresodumb wrote:
<quoted text> All the gay's should be fixed. Then their will be less aids !
And yet the vast majority of AID's cases world wide are of a heterosexual nature! So,is it now time to fix you so there will be less AID's? Say,yur kina stewpid aren't you? D-U-H

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41727 Aug 24, 2013
Opiate Of The Masses wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet the vast majority of AID's cases world wide are of a heterosexual nature! So,is it now time to fix you so there will be less AID's? Say,yur kina stewpid aren't you? D-U-H
And yet the vast percentage of AID's cases world-wide are within the 2% gay population. Moreover, the highest percentage increases are still within the gay culture.

You were saying something about stupid???

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#41728 Aug 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet the vast percentage of AID's cases world-wide are within the 2% gay population. Moreover, the highest percentage increases are still within the gay culture.
You were saying something about stupid???
I've said it before, KiMerde, and I'll say it again...

If you were truly concerned about STD's, then you'd be an advocate of SSM. Again, you reveal yourself to be nothing more than the TOPIX AssTroll.

At any rate, STD's have nothing to do with the forum...

Troll on, KiMerde.
blast

Micronesia, Federated States of

#41729 Aug 24, 2013
You dumb sh*ts homosexual is immoral and Aid's was born when gay sex began. what happen to the america that was built on God. America came to be from you ancestors who devote to God. Now look at you America...going down the gutter...soon China will beat you...We're facing the end of times and history repeats itself, as God destroyed Sodom & Gomorrah because homosexuality so will he destroy America.
Sparkle

Bellevue, WA

#41730 Aug 24, 2013
blast wrote:
You dumb sh*ts homosexual is immoral and Aid's was born when gay sex began. what happen to the america that was built on God. America came to be from you ancestors who devote to God. Now look at you America...going down the gutter...soon China will beat you...We're facing the end of times and history repeats itself, as God destroyed Sodom & Gomorrah because homosexuality so will he destroy America.
Got Stupid????? This morazz here Blast, got tons of it...I'm surprised he can even hold his head up with all that stupid between his ears
youaidslover

Mount Vernon, IL

#41731 Aug 24, 2013
Opiate Of The Masses wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet the vast majority of AID's cases world wide are of a heterosexual nature! So,is it now time to fix you so there will be less AID's? Say,yur kina stewpid aren't you? D-U-H
Came to the usa in the early 80s .Gay men in the new York and California suddenly began to develop rare opportunistic infections! Now I hope you get hiv 1 .And rot in hell.So the devil can butt f u 24-7!

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
youaidslover

Mount Vernon, IL

#41732 Aug 24, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
I've said it before, KiMerde, and I'll say it again...
If you were truly concerned about STD's, then you'd be an advocate of SSM. Again, you reveal yourself to be nothing more than the TOPIX AssTroll.
At any rate, STD's have nothing to do with the forum...
Troll on, KiMerde.
Rot in hell will the hiv 1 ,And the devil can push in your eye 24-7 !

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
youaidslover

Mount Vernon, IL

#41733 Aug 24, 2013
Sparkle wrote:
<quoted text>
Got Stupid????? This morazz here Blast, got tons of it...I'm surprised he can even hold his head up with all that stupid between his ears
When you die from hiv 1. You can have the devil between your buns ,24-7 !

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 min PEllen 98,879
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min Incognito4Ever 1,155,823
Chicago Pizza Blows 21 min Larry 4
Chicago police stop black motorists more, ACLU ... 51 min reality is a crutch 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IBdaMann 49,319
Is Vanessa Hudgens A PORN-STAR ?? (Oct '07) 1 hr moe 189
amy 12-25 2 hr RACE 2
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Jacques Ottawa 182,087
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:06 am PST

Bleacher Report12:06AM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Tennessee Titans: Complete Week 17 Preview for Tennessee
NBC Sports 3:43 AM
Jay Cutler on Bears: "Everyone could get axed"
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Complete Week 17 Preview vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center