Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 50,616

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story
King Samir Shabazz

UK

#41361 Jul 15, 2013
Quest for Trayvon wrote:
<quoted text>
The federal government disagrees with you.
Accept it.
The Government is totally corrupt,(Black Panthers with billy clubs get a pass - operatives are sent to Florida to demonize Zimmerman), which means you're not really accepted at all.

Keep believing the Lie, stainboi.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
laughing man

UK

#41362 Jul 15, 2013
CDC wrote:
AGENDASLAME - Agendists are constantly hating on those with differing opinions.
<quoted text>
It's how mental cripples celebrate Diversity, don'tcha know? You show your superior bigotry by calling others bigots.

Such incredible intellectualism leads to bug chasing and hoarding samples of drapes.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41365 Jul 16, 2013
AGENDADRAPER - When the agendist becomes jealous of another persons drape samples.

Judged:

13

13

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41370 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare'a wrote; The hatred, ignorance and bigotry is all yours.
I simply and accurately point out that ss couples and marriage are not the same.
I simply and accurately point out that a child with their father and mother is nature's design. It is by far, the best setting for a child. No setting, absent at least one natural parent and always absent one gender, is equal.
I simply and accurately point out that marriage with it's benefits and protections, was primarily designed for mothers and their children.
You are not demanding equality, that is impossible. In a vain attempt to satisfy an innate insecurity, ss couples demand we accept their denial.
You can call your relationship anything you want to. But reality clearly calls it a bogus marriage.
<quoted text>
Too funny! Is that why you censored my post?
You can't even KNOW what it is like to be married with your duplicate partner!
LOL
You are hilarious and OBVIOUSLY uneducated. No surprise. Marriage was "designed" to legally keep property in the family. The women were considered part of the property.

Nature didn't "design" anything, you dolt.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41371 Jul 17, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
You are hilarious and OBVIOUSLY uneducated. No surprise. Marriage was "designed" to legally keep property in the family. The women were considered part of the property.
Nature didn't "design" anything, you dolt.
Wrong. Government participation was to secure support for the mother and children.

As to nature, among diverse genders, a mother and father are always required for children. You didn't know that?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41372 Jul 17, 2013
AGENDOLT - when the agendist has trouble understanding a different opinion then lashes out
with name calling ( example: dolt ).
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41373 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Government participation was to secure support for the mother and children.
Wrong, but that never stopped you from holding erroneous positions before. Do you really think you can bullshit everybody? I guess being a "pastor" has made you a little immune to facts, eh? Marriage was about property rights. The 'mother' was considered property, as were the children. This isn't a secret or new information. Anyone who has picked up a cultural anthropology textbook knows this.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41374 Jul 17, 2013
CDC wrote:
AGENDOLT - when the agendist has trouble understanding a different opinion then lashes out
with name calling ( example: dolt ).
Example: CDC, the queen dolt.

I understand the opinion. It is factually incorrect.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41375 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
As to nature, among diverse genders, a mother and father are always required for children. You didn't know that?
"Mother" and "Father" ??????????

Really?

Hardly the proper words to use. How about male and female? Do you really think fish have "fathers?" They came to be through sperm donation... hardly the same thing. But then semantics games are all you have.... and your phony, self-serving definitions. You're such a philistine.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41376 Jul 17, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, but that never stopped you from holding erroneous positions before. Do you really think you can bullshit everybody? I guess being a "pastor" has made you a little immune to facts, eh? Marriage was about property rights. The 'mother' was considered property, as were the children. This isn't a secret or new information. Anyone who has picked up a cultural anthropology textbook knows this.
I am aware that property was united under the husbands authority in early American law. I am not aware of wives being considered 'property'. If the husband died first, the wife retained possession of the property. Children were under the guardianship of the parents, and hardly equated to property.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41377 Jul 17, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
"Mother" and "Father" ??????????
Really?
Hardly the proper words to use. How about male and female? Do you really think fish have "fathers?" They came to be through sperm donation... hardly the same thing. But then semantics games are all you have.... and your phony, self-serving definitions. You're such a philistine.
Since you aren't quibbling about semantics, nature still requires both genders, a specific design.
LOVe

Las Vegas, NV

#41378 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you aren't quibbling about semantics, nature still requires both genders, a specific design.
GOD LOVES YOU..
Irving

UK

#41379 Jul 17, 2013
Like You Care wrote:
<quoted text>
You are hilarious and OBVIOUSLY uneducated. No surprise. Marriage was "designed" to legally keep property in the family. The women were considered part of the property.
Nature didn't "design" anything, you dolt.
Yep, homosexuals are one of Evolution's miserable failures.
progressive coffee table

UK

#41380 Jul 17, 2013
Herr Feratu wrote:
<quoted text> You're such a philistine.
Der Schlie▀muskel werden Sie zur Erleuchtung bringen!!!!

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41381 Jul 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I am aware that property was united under the husbands authority in early American law. I am not aware of wives being considered 'property'. If the husband died first, the wife retained possession of the property. Children were under the guardianship of the parents, and hardly equated to property.
OH, I see.... jumping into the MIDDLE of the marriage evolution, eh? Picking up where it serves YOUR purpose, eh?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41382 Jul 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you aren't quibbling about semantics, nature still requires both genders, a specific design.
Not a design... geez, but you are clueless.

By the way,'nature' has NOTHING to do with marriage.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41383 Jul 18, 2013
Irving wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, homosexuals are one of Evolution's miserable failures.
Really? Then why have there always been about 10% homosexuals across time and all cultures?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41384 Jul 18, 2013
AGENDASTANDING - when the agendist says they understand a different opinion buy actually are so caught up in their own warped world they
have completely lost all comprehension.
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Example: CDC, the queen dolt.
I understand the opinion. It is factually incorrect.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41385 Jul 18, 2013
CDC wrote:
AGENDASTANDING - when the agendist says they understand a different opinion buy actually are so caught up in their own warped world they
have completely lost all comprehension.
<quoted text>
Were you looking in a mirror when you typed that?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41386 Jul 18, 2013
Naked also!
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Were you looking in a mirror when you typed that?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 13 min RealDave 1,126,134
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 15 min Rogue Scholar 05 179,337
durban women lets explore your fantasies bbm pins 28 min slum ou 3
ISIS Plans to Blow Up an Entire American City a... 47 min obomba 102
'We Charge Genocide' Presents Report on Chicago... 56 min hands on AR 2
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr Frijoles 70,072
GOP Votes go 2 dem. votes. 1 hr hands on AR 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]