Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52083 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

laughing man

UK

#40324 Jun 28, 2013
dog faced Rage Boi wrote:
<quoted text>
Now either 1) refute my initial points about conservatives or 2) answer my questions or I'll go at you like a pit bull every time you post on here!
Dang, how did I miss this piece of Nobel prose?
Im still laughing man

Oak Forest, IL

#40325 Jun 28, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Marvel at the Rage Boi who was gonna whup our asses.
I would ... butt (Get it??? LOL! I'm sure that's another term you're quite familiar with) you see: 1) he probably could whip all you conservative Christians talking point by talking point and 2) I'm still not done laughing at your lack of self-acceptance and projected self-loathing yet.

When people say it "sucks to be you" ...

They REALLY mean it!

I can't even accuse you of tearing the fabric of society now, because well ... we all know you'd NEVER tear fabric, you silly little freak!

Oh yeah ... you know I'm still laughing.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40326 Jun 28, 2013
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>did you miss me...
No.
Im still laughing man

Oak Forest, IL

#40327 Jun 28, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No.
Why so angry and bitter lately? Didn't you hear the news?

Your yellow-toothed wanker buddy laughing man made Exodus International close their (closet) doors. They admitted that he was living proof that their therapy was bogus.

And now? You and him can finally get married too!

Well, if you can get him to accept his sexuality first ...

He's been pretty "hard on" himself there ... especially after he found out about the whole legal marriage thing.

Good luck you guys!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40328 Jun 29, 2013
Can anyone tell me what's wrong?

SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.

Clearly not equal.

Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision???

Snicker.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#40329 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Can anyone tell me what's wrong?
SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not equal.
Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision???
Snicker.
What's wrong is that you're completely unable to evolve regarding social issues.
Even if it had been a unanimous decision, you'd still be the local asstroll, spouting your antiquated opinions.
Spillover

New Lenox, IL

#40330 Jun 29, 2013
Joe Miller LOST wrote:
<quoted text>
My God ... if you were any dumber we'd probably have to water you.
"Who the heck" is Joe Miller?
He's one of your conservative "HEROES" (like Joe Walsh) who was rejected by the people in his own state. He's a typical, hypocritical teaparty "conservative" who is against BIG GOVERNMENT ... unless BIG GOVERNMENT serves his interests if course. Then he's all for it!
Get that, genius? Or do you need pictures in your favorite color crayon?
Didn't Faux "news" tell you this? Or were they too busy LYING about how Romney was "surging in the polls" to that electoral "landslide" that never happened, telling you how you guys were gonna win more seats in the House, or take back the Senate?
Well?
Since you have so much to say to me ... start by answering those questions now that I answered yours. Or would you rather run and hide now since I just embarrassed the hell out of you in front of everyone?
I think we all know which one you'll chose here don't we?
Now how does this apply to what was said?
Again, since you're a typical, lazy, low-IQ conservative, I'll explain: A previous poster ("stupidity on parade") who is also obviously a typical, lazy, low-IQ, lying hypocrite said that "we don't run to the government or the court system". And in doing so, he LIED as response clearly proved.
He then LIED yet again and said "We don't live with an agenda" ... which was also proven false by my response.
As for what two men (who aren't you) do to each other that somehow bothers you? It's none of your business.
Do you think that sex is only for purposes of procreation? I submit that the fact that you came about is enough proof that not only can sex be for pleasure only, but that it can sometimes have disastrous consequences even among heterosexuals when they meet at family reunions!
Now jot this down: You not liking something doesn't automatically make it any of your business!
Period.
Even if it's something said by a fictitious carpenter who ended up with splinters or from one of your other plagiarized stories in your Babble, it's still none of your damn business.
See, I think the lying, racist, drug-addicted, pedophile named Rush Limbaugh who can't hold down a heterosexual marriage is far more offensive than what two consensual adults do with themselves behind closed doors, but you don't see me trying to stop him from broadcasting his hate-based bigotry do you?
And Sean Hannity is another one I find disgusting (who has yet to be waterboarded "for charity" like he said he would - 1,528 days ago. But you don't see me trying to stop his partisan B.S from existing do you?
Why? Because me not agreeing or liking something does not mean it has no right to happen or to exist.
I'm not that important (and just trust me on this one)...
Neither are you.
The Second Amendment assures that you can have your guns as long as it's part of (and I quote) a "well regulated militia" - it's in that thing called the Constitution that you so selectively like to read and quote. And if you don't like that part of that glorious document?
Leave! You won't be missed.
In fact, I'll bet the rest of our collective IQ raises at least 3 points as soon as your plane's wheels leave the ground.
As for me? I'll continue to "call you names" (and treat you the same way you guys treat anyone else who's not EXACTLY like YOU) every chance I get.
And there's nothing you can do about it.
Now either 1) refute my initial points about conservatives or 2) answer my questions or I'll go at you like a pit bull every time you post on here!
I don't need to refute anything. Every time you post you speak volumes.

ECHO

Paris, IL

#40332 Jun 29, 2013
WOW you sound like you need to get laid there butt crack?
Cookie Fudge

New Lenox, IL

#40333 Jun 29, 2013
Changing the subject and calling people names. Figures.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40334 Jun 29, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
What's wrong is that you're completely unable to evolve regarding social issues.
Even if it had been a unanimous decision, you'd still be the local asstroll, spouting your antiquated opinions.
I'm just curious.

Since the SCOTUS ruling equating ss couples with marriage, does that mean duplicate gendered couples will change to diverse gendered couples, or the other way around?

Will ss couples start mutually bearing children? I can't wait to see the change!

Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#40335 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm just curious.
Since the SCOTUS ruling equating ss couples with marriage, does that mean duplicate gendered couples will change to diverse gendered couples, or the other way around?
Will ss couples start mutually bearing children? I can't wait to see the change!
Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?
Those questions only have traction IF one accepts the unstated premise that "marriage" is identical to erotic activities or reproduction. That correlation doesn't come close to approaching unity.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40336 Jun 29, 2013
Joe Miller LOST wrote:
<quoted text>
My God ... if you were any dumber we'd probably have to water you.
"Who the heck" is Joe Miller?
He's one of your conservative "HEROES" (like Joe Walsh) who was rejected by the people in his own state. He's a typical, hypocritical teaparty "conservative" who is against BIG GOVERNMENT ... unless BIG GOVERNMENT serves his interests if course. Then he's all for it!
Get that, genius? Or do you need pictures in your favorite color crayon?
Didn't Faux "news" tell you this? Or were they too busy LYING about how Romney was "surging in the polls" to that electoral "landslide" that never happened, telling you how you guys were gonna win more seats in the House, or take back the Senate?
Well?
Since you have so much to say to me ... start by answering those questions now that I answered yours. Or would you rather run and hide now since I just embarrassed the hell out of you in front of everyone?
I think we all know which one you'll chose here don't we?
Now how does this apply to what was said?
Again, since you're a typical, lazy, low-IQ conservative, I'll explain: A previous poster ("stupidity on parade") who is also obviously a typical, lazy, low-IQ, lying hypocrite said that "we don't run to the government or the court system". And in doing so, he LIED as response clearly proved.
He then LIED yet again and said "We don't live with an agenda" ... which was also proven false by my response.
As for what two men (who aren't you) do to each other that somehow bothers you? It's none of your business.
Do you think that sex is only for purposes of procreation? I submit that the fact that you came about is enough proof that not only can sex be for pleasure only, but that it can sometimes have disastrous consequences even among heterosexuals when they meet at family reunions!
Now jot this down: You not liking something doesn't automatically make it any of your business!
Period.
Even if it's something said by a fictitious carpenter who ended up with splinters or from one of your other plagiarized stories in your Babble, it's still none of your damn business.
See, I think the lying, racist, drug-addicted, pedophile named Rush Limbaugh who can't hold down a heterosexual marriage is far more offensive than what two consensual adults do with themselves behind closed doors, but you don't see me trying to stop him from broadcasting his hate-based bigotry do you?
And Sean Hannity is another one I find disgusting (who has yet to be waterboarded "for charity" like he said he would - 1,528 days ago. But you don't see me trying to stop his partisan B.S from existing do you?
Why? Because me not agreeing or liking something does not mean it has no right to happen or to exist.
I'm not that important (and just trust me on this one)...
Neither are you.
The Second Amendment assures that you can have your guns as long as it's part of (and I quote) a "well regulated militia" - it's in that thing called the Constitution that you so selectively like to read and quote. And if you don't like that part of that glorious document?
Leave! You won't be missed.
In fact, I'll bet the rest of our collective IQ raises at least 3 points as soon as your plane's wheels leave the ground.
As for me? I'll continue to "call you names" (and treat you the same way you guys treat anyone else who's not EXACTLY like YOU) every chance I get.
And there's nothing you can do about it.
Now either 1) refute my initial points about conservatives or 2) answer my questions or I'll go at you like a pit bull every time you post on here!
Too wordy.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40337 Jun 29, 2013
Im still laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Why so angry and bitter lately? Didn't you hear the news?
Your yellow-toothed wanker buddy laughing man made Exodus International close their (closet) doors. They admitted that he was living proof that their therapy was bogus.
And now? You and him can finally get married too!
Well, if you can get him to accept his sexuality first ...
He's been pretty "hard on" himself there ... especially after he found out about the whole legal marriage thing.
Good luck you guys!
You ordered me to do something. I said "no". How do you figure that is "angry and bitter"? Enlighten us fruitloops.
laughing man

UK

#40338 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Can anyone tell me what's wrong?
SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not equal.
Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision???
Snicker.
I agree, the decision makes no sense whatsoever, so it must have been made solely on political grounds. Doesn't seem like much to gloat over.
Robert Rudford

New Lenox, IL

#40340 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm just curious.
...
Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?
Well, according to Darwin...
laughing man

UK

#40341 Jun 29, 2013
motorized mannequin wrote:
<quoted text>
What's wrong is that you're completely unable to evolve regarding social issues.
Even if it had been a unanimous decision, you'd still be the local asstroll, spouting your antiquated opinions.
Oh Jeez, there it is yet again, a card carrying imbecile with its Fundamentalist holiday carol "Der Sphincter will bring you to Enlightenment!"

They're like motorized mannequins.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#40342 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the difference between redumbant genders and marriage?
No. I mean the difference between reality and your delusions.
laughing man

UK

#40343 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm just curious.
Oh, and when will a gay anus turn into a vagina?
They're already too frickin' stoooooopid to know the difference. Maybe it's a form of spatial distortion, aka brain damage?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#40344 Jun 29, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Can anyone tell me what's wrong?
SCOTUS equated ss couples to marriage, but they still are a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage.
Clearly not equal.
Maybe it has to be a unanimous decision???
Snicker.
If you had paid attention in civics class, you would know better.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40345 Jun 29, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
If you had paid attention in civics class, you would know better.
Didn't work for you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min USAsince1680 1,346,414
News Rescue Groups Search for Cat in 'Disturbing' Bo... 1 hr Virginia Vegetarian 7
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Dr Guru 207,457
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Heretic 57,220
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr _Zoey_ 7,289
Purchasing power can influence elections. 4 hr BUBBABribedME 2
Malignant Narcissist Arrogant Emperor 4 hr WhoBelievesMTPant... 3
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages