Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52069 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38205 Mar 19, 2013
bobby wrote:
using the world 'never' shows a flaming character of retardation, as well as signs of abuse in practice, because there isn't any difference as to the question of definition for the word 'never'
because 'never' can be used and defined as 'rare'
but more commonly known as 'not ever'
as the real question is compared to the definitive 'never-ever'
it's the lazy & it's the neglect.
quit beating around the mulberry bush; what's your point?
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38206 Mar 19, 2013
using words like 'quit' shows signs of rage, oppression, narcissism.

empty responses such as 'what's your point?' shows signs of fury.

you are guilty of cruel and|or unusual punishment.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38207 Mar 20, 2013
bobby wrote:
using words like 'quit' shows signs of rage, oppression, narcissism.
empty responses such as 'what's your point?' shows signs of fury.
you are guilty of cruel and|or unusual punishment.
Thanks for elaborating, I understand your intentions perfectly.
intellectual GIANT

Saint Louis, MO

#38208 Mar 20, 2013
What's your point?
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
quit beating around the mulberry bush; what's your point?
Face Reality

Aniwa, WI

#38210 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course. That is why every culture that ever existed has done so with marriage.
However, imposing a defect on evolutionary mating behavior isn't a constriction, it is stupidity.
Smirk.
Those who believe they evolved from apes and slime are regressing to their previous condition.
The defect is perverse and the legalization of same sex marriage is a perversion of law.
Steve

United States

#38211 Mar 20, 2013
intellectual GIANT wrote:
What's your point?
<quoted text>
Really, it's not so much a point. Rather it's more of a giant mushroom shaped object.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38212 Mar 20, 2013
bobby wrote:
'marriage is the unique cross cultural tool to deal with the results of evolutionary mating behavior.'
i see clear signs of a psychotic episode.
first of all, marriage as a tool is simply an opinion, not primal fact.
saying the word 'constraint' simply shows shallow character.
saying the word 'unique' simply shows flaming character.
saying 'cross cultural tool' simply shows disgusting morales.
suggesting marriage deals with the results of evolutionary mating behavior is a key indicator of retardation in practice.
saying 'it' is a sign of laziness, preventing me to comment any further about the line.. other than needing to say both:
1. social resolution of marriage isn't enough to speak of the relationship, because social definition is vital as well too.
however, wasting time & effort bringing up the word 'constraint' is a fallacy compared to keeping focus on the resolution & definition - again a clear indication of flaming character & retardation in practice.
same sex parents are with the potential to ruin children's lives, as they might feel broken inside since their childhood.. causing a necessity for some form of tax return.
you used the word 'couples'..but given your previous actions, it is hard to warrant whether you intended to say parents or a couple without children.
2. if you were saying 'it' as in 'that' or 'everything' is what distinguishes marriage, blind to the resolution & definition of the character of each individual.. as well as the resolution & definition of each person when they are together (because of changes or neglect, if any) is something you are guilty of.
bobby,

The only thing you said that is reality based was 'clear signs of a psychotic episode', but relating to the accuser.

While I enjoyed the cleverness of your response, you and I both know it is a diversion from presenting a logical and reasoned response. Something you are incapable of doing because it is simple, pure, unadulterated, reality based truth.

In your next post, you note the difference between marriage and friendship. My point exactly.

Bazinga!
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38213 Mar 20, 2013
you are simply guilty of cruel punishment also.

using words like 'only' with a paragraph shorter than my first morning thought is a solid example of your shallow mindset.

to further prove said shallow mindset,
'my point exactly' is three words long without enough definition or resolution to fuel an ego - yet there it is.

if you asked me if i was disabled, i would point at your idiocy & say YES.

not only did i see humiliation, i see a potential threat.

showing of your hypocrisy as to the 'presenting a logical and reasoned response' only warrants the danger of mentioned threat since there isn't any definition or resolution spoken of from you as to the reason or logic behind, under, over, side, mid, forward, or backward your words to me.

perhaps psychotic is the length of definitions that could be thrown at your ugly physiology.

to further prove your fury of flaming character, you said 'reality based' when the correct context is 'reality-based'

from the ground to the sky, let this be a note of testimony & evidence.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38214 Mar 20, 2013
..further

i didn't state the difference between marriage and friendship, i compared them.

let's look together.
difference
compare
those two row of letters aren't lining up together as one.

you say the difference between marriage & friendship can be said in a single sentence, i am opposed.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38215 Mar 20, 2013
ugly?

certainly.!

when the difference between marriage & friendship cannot be said in a single sentence, even when it is the same exact couple.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38216 Mar 20, 2013
why not throw flames for an unnecessary comma?

yet stroking of character is my choice, since it is my half of the equation.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38217 Mar 20, 2013
you could blame the website for not allowing italics, but i could disgrace you for not knowing me well enough to use capslock or quotations.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38218 Mar 20, 2013
I have to give Bobby props for being an equal opportunity offender. CDC would be so proud.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38220 Mar 20, 2013
you rat traps function as if i am constantly crashing into a lower layer of NT society.

dont forget, societies are anarchy to that of civilization - simply because there was a creation put into existance other than civilization as a whole.

uniqueness & individuality can & does exist when civilization is without any form of society.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#38221 Mar 21, 2013
marriage is the social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife while friendship is a person attached to another by feelings of affection or personal regard

see it is possible in one sentence

smile
jojo666

Eureka, IL

#38223 Mar 21, 2013
wow good thing this country has nothing more to worry about than this!!!

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#38224 Mar 21, 2013
jojo666 wrote:
wow good thing this country has nothing more to worry about than this!!!
Equality is always a top priority.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#38225 Mar 21, 2013
jojo666 wrote:
wow good thing this country has nothing more to worry about than this!!!
I would hope that the idiots who run our country have some ability to multi-task.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#38226 Mar 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
marriage is the social institution under which a man and woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife while friendship is a person attached to another by feelings of affection or personal regard
see it is possible in one sentence
smile
Marriage is the social institution under which two consenting adults establish their decision to live as spouses.

See, I've made it even better.

As for friendships, you apparently have sex with your friends but the vast majority of us do not.

Always willing to help, Kuntmary.
bobby

Kankakee, IL

#38227 Mar 21, 2013
i don't think i would choose the word institution, & i also don't think i would use the word under.

but furthermore, your black & white definition of two words is dry & pale compared to definition gathered from an existance of relationship.

i mean duh,
anybody can write two definitions with a comma seperating the two lines.

truth be told, your definitions can be held as negligence since the amount of detail is shallow.

when words cannot express the full emotional value entailed in the resolution of the definitive situation, life would & should seem dull or lite.

because the definition of institution itself shows the possible shallow opportunity that breaches into life to trim or hold weight dragging emotions down.
..this is the definition i enjoyed,
'a well-established and structured pattern of behavior or of relationships that is accepted as a fundamental part of a culture.'

simply because the wording says 'well-established'.. you miss the point of the word 'structured'
it has an S .. to further prove a point of problem, the next word is 'pattern'
it has a P

we all know structured patterns are something like gears, and we all know gears have teeth, so why is it difficult to realize those gears are locked into a 'pre-set'
because no floating is generally acceptable when using presets.

we see the words 'well established' and we think 'oh there is a long list of room to move about'
but the next two words..
the S is a maze
the P is Yahoo! for sticking the tongue out
yes, seriously, it can be viewed like a nightmare where people think they are going off into some secret carnival to enjoy a really rare experience (as if they were VIP) but when they get there, the S and the P kicks in as they realize their freedom is being shackled, causing them to question whether they are going to be murdered as they are being held hostage.

by your view,
in marriage, the persons cannot be 'attached to another by feelings of affection or personal regard'
why? because the definitive has already been used to define friendship, and you can't use the definition twice expecting a difference.

but that is the problem with using labels to summarize resolution in the first place.
i see resolution as able to be definitive in & of itself.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 min jh4freedom 194,546
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 min Nathan 54,357
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min ChristineW 1,263,836
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Mister Tonka 100,298
Ask Amy July 31 3 hr Julie 6
abby7-31-15 6 hr mrs gladys kravitz 5
Amy 7-30-15 10 hr Mister Tonka 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages