Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

[Just Think]

Dolan wrote:

<quoted text>
All that I want to ask is this....
Name me one law that 'regulates'- a "choice" about
a sexual lifestyle. Laws regulate how we function in
society...not about whether you like hotdogs
or i like pie. Plenty of non-dism laws on the
books, which allow for your lifestyle "choice". What
you do in a sexual environment, as it is with me...
your business. Don't need any laws to regulate
your sexual choice...or mine.
You follow the same societal rules as the rest of
us...which is to keep order in how society operates.
Your sexual choices is not a society-ordered function...
yours is only sexual...

zzzzzz....sexuality isn't a choice.

[Bruser]

NEWTOWN SIDES WITH NRA: VOTES FOR ARMED GUARDS IN SCHOOLS

by JOHN NOLTE 1 Feb 2013

When the rubber hits the road, when the stark and very real choice is either empty political posturing with useless gun control laws or doing something practical to protect your children, the only people laughing at the NRA are a media determined to protect anything and everything involving Barack Obama. Today the Newtown Board of Education made the only choice any parent can: It voted to put armed guards in its schools:

The vote, for now, only represents a request — it still needs to clear budget and logistical boundaries since the guards would come from the town's police resources as opposed to the school board itself. But the plan 'would put two eyes and ears -- one armed, one unarmed -- at each Newtown school,' reports Bronxville Patch's Davis Dunavin. The guards, officially called school resource officers (SROs), were already a fixture at all Newtown schools in the wake of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, but until this vote they were budgeted only to be a presence at middle and high Schools, according to NBC Connecticut.

The current push for gun controls by The State and its media is nothing more than another front in the relentless culture wars against Red State Americans and Bitter Clingers. None of the proposed laws would have stopped the Sandy Hook murderer, which should tell you everything you need to know.

Meanwhile, in Democrat-run Chicago, there's a Newtown every month. But the only solution to that problem would be admitting harsh gun control laws and liberalism run amok have failed. So the media would rather Chicago's monthly Sandy Hook goes on than ever admit to such an inconvenient truth.

The NRA proposed putting armed guns in schools, and now the school board closest to this tragedy agrees.

Liberals always depend on others to defend them, and yet oppose sane ideas. Strange people those!

[Rainbow Kid]

Bruser wrote:

NEWTOWN SIDES WITH NRA: VOTES FOR ARMED GUARDS IN SCHOOLS
by JOHN NOLTE 1 Feb 2013
When the rubber hits the road, when the stark and very real choice is either empty political posturing with useless gun control laws or doing something practical to protect your children, the only people laughing at the NRA are a media determined to protect anything and everything involving Barack Obama. Today the Newtown Board of Education made the only choice any parent can: It voted to put armed guards in its schools:
The vote, for now, only represents a request — it still needs to clear budget and logistical boundaries since the guards would come from the town's police resources as opposed to the school board itself. But the plan 'would put two eyes and ears -- one armed, one unarmed -- at each Newtown school,' reports Bronxville Patch's Davis Dunavin. The guards, officially called school resource officers (SROs), were already a fixture at all Newtown schools in the wake of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, but until this vote they were budgeted only to be a presence at middle and high Schools, according to NBC Connecticut.
The current push for gun controls by The State and its media is nothing more than another front in the relentless culture wars against Red State Americans and Bitter Clingers. None of the proposed laws would have stopped the Sandy Hook murderer, which should tell you everything you need to know.
Meanwhile, in Democrat-run Chicago, there's a Newtown every month. But the only solution to that problem would be admitting harsh gun control laws and liberalism run amok have failed. So the media would rather Chicago's monthly Sandy Hook goes on than ever admit to such an inconvenient truth.
The NRA proposed putting armed guns in schools, and now the school board closest to this tragedy agrees.
Liberals always depend on others to defend them, and yet oppose sane ideas. Strange people those!

It will work if they issue bulletproof vests to all the Gay and Hispanic children

[Not Yet Equal]

Just Think wrote:

<quoted text>
zzzzzz....sexuality isn't a choice.

Additionally, marriage does not require sexual expression. It is independent of sexual behavior. People locked up in prison remain married or can get married, even when sex is impossible.(Turner)

Same with people who are paralyzed or otherwise incapable of sexual function. Marriage is a fundamental right of the individual. Like free speech remains a right even if you can't talk. It is a fundamental civil right of the individual.

[TXgurl]

Mother Superior wrote:

Agreed... Marriage should not be about sex.
Yet you argue for "same SEX marriages"
You contradict yourself.
FAIL!
<quoted text>

Same sex as in gender, not having sex... geeze, when you see "sex" on a form you fill out do you think it means having sex, or what sex you are?

[Just Think]

TXgurl wrote:

<quoted text>
Same sex as in gender, not having sex... geeze, when you see "sex" on a form you fill out do you think it means having sex, or what sex you are?

Its an idiot troll...don't even try reasoning with it...

[Dusty Mangina]

Mother Superior wrote:

Agreed... Marriage should not be about sex.
Yet you argue for "same SEX marriages"
You contradict yourself.
FAIL!
<quoted text>

Oh, Momma Inferior, that was a really lame argument. I'll have "nun" of your nonsense.

What do Nuns do in cucumber gardens?

Push-ups.

[Mother Superior]

I assume you do squat thrusts.
Bless you my dear.

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, Momma Inferior, that was a really lame argument. I'll have "nun" of your nonsense.
What do Nuns do in cucumber gardens?
Push-ups.

[Dusty Mangina]

Mother Superior wrote:

I assume you do squat thrusts.
Bless you my dear.
<quoted text>

Religiously, fervently and vociferously.

[Mother Superior]

vociferously?
I learned a new word today.
It's good to keep in top physical condition.
Bless you once again my dear.

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text>
Religiously, fervently and vociferously.

[Not Yet Equal]

"The conservative movement, to which I subscribe, has as one of its basic tenets the belief that government should stay out of people’s private lives. Government governs best when it governs least - and stays out of the impossible task of legislating morality. But legislating someone’s version of morality is exactly what we do by perpetuating discrimination against gays."

“There has always been homosexuality, ever since man and woman were invented. I guess there were gay apes. So that's not an issue. The Republican Party should stand for freedom and only freedom. Don't raise hell about the gays, the Blacks and the Mexicans. Free people have a right to do as they damn well please."

"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay." Conservative Icon, WW 2 hero, AZ Senator, and Republican Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater

[KiMare]

Not Yet Equal wrote:

"The conservative movement, to which I subscribe, has as one of its basic tenets the belief that government should stay out of people’s private lives. Government governs best when it governs least - and stays out of the impossible task of legislating morality. But legislating someone’s version of morality is exactly what we do by perpetuating discrimination against gays."
“There has always been homosexuality, ever since man and woman were invented. I guess there were gay apes. So that's not an issue. The Republican Party should stand for freedom and only freedom. Don't raise hell about the gays, the Blacks and the Mexicans. Free people have a right to do as they damn well please."
"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people just because they're gay. You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay." Conservative Icon, WW 2 hero, AZ Senator, and Republican Presidential candidate Barry Goldwater

"Discriminating against gays and distorting marriage are two distinct issues."

Kimare'a

[Dusty Mangina]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
"Discriminating against gays and distorting marriage are two distinct issues."
Kimare'a

Yet you choose to do both.

Again, your inner lesbian is mortified with your archaic behavior.

[KiMare]

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;

A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears anything wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

[outsider]

A person stumbling on to this site would immediately
come to the conclusion that the pro SSM folks are haters. Does not speak well for your cause.

[Dusty Mangina]

KiMare wrote:

The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears anything wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

fruits and nuts have nothing to do with marriage equality. You are barking up the wrong tree, fruitcake.

[muddy galhole]

Woof Woof!!!

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text> fruits and nuts have nothing to do with marriage equality. You are barking up the wrong tree, fruitcake.

[shiny girlstick]

barking up the wrong fruitcake!!!

[KiMare]

Dusty Mangina wrote:

<quoted text> fruits and nuts have nothing to do with marriage equality. You are barking up the wrong tree, fruitcake.

Which makes my point that gay couples have nothing to do with marriage.

Smirk.

[Rules Of Evidence]

outsider wrote:

A person stumbling on to this site would immediately
come to the conclusion that the pro SSM folks are haters. Does not speak well for your cause.

And you would be one deluded,clueless S.O.B.! The truth of the matter is that it is just the opposite! But then that's to be expected! I know lets vote away a couple of your rights and see how you feel fool!