Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52086 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37277 Jan 27, 2013
TXgurl wrote:
Hey Kimare/Watchmann/Gregory... Here is a post by you on your blog. Seems like you like to talk the talk, but not walk the walk...
Narcissism
“Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live.”
Oscar Wilde
Since you are asking others to live as you wish to live, aren't you being narcissistic?
And as far as you saying you are not a christian but a "barbarian" that is a lie, too... most of your posts on your blog are about religion and how a man is dominant over women. That brings up another enigma... since you say you are a hermaphrodite, isn't that a problem? You don't have a husband to dictate over the female part of you and tell her what to do.
Interesting you bring narcissism up...

You are asking the country, including the single birthplace of every type of relationship in existence, to pretend that gay couples (as opposed to every other type of loving relationship) is the same as marriage. This ignores the basic distinction that marriage fulfills evolution's primary goal, and gay unions are a direct defective failure of it.

It is YOUR claim that is narcissistic blondie.

All of my posts are about faith married to reason and logic (that's a double pun). I'm not religious as you have discovered and cannot handle.

Apart from any religion, why is it that human history has males as primary leaders in every culture (with very short term rare exceptions)?

Smile.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#37278 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
..........
Yet it's not, of course, since most folks engage in the mating behavior loooong before they marry, if they even choose to marry, with no restrictions other than their own choices and beliefs.

And, of course allowing gay folks the ability to legally marry won't change the mating habits of a single straight person.

It WILL, however, be a good thing for that gay couple, and for their children.

You have children, you should be able to understand this.

I understand your overwhelming need to prove you are right, but you have yet to prove that children with unmarried parents do better than those whose parents make that formal commitment. You have yet to prove that sending a message to gay youth that the healthy good idea.

You have never proven that elderly couples are more secure if they never legally marry.

I know you kike the sound of these words and concepts you have created in your own mind, but all the smirking in the world won't help to make them rational in the real world. The smirks don't help families and children.

What is your purpose in the world if it is not to help others?

It is just to stand as the Watchman who judges but never acts, secure in the knowledge that you alone MUST be right, as harm falls on those around you?

That's just sad. And nothing to smirk about.
Get Over It

Tempe, AZ

#37279 Jan 27, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet it's not, of course, since most folks engage in the mating behavior loooong before they marry, if they even choose to marry, with no restrictions other than their own choices and beliefs.
And, of course allowing gay folks the ability to legally marry won't change the mating habits of a single straight person.
It WILL, however, be a good thing for that gay couple, and for their children.
You have children, you should be able to understand this.
I understand your overwhelming need to prove you are right, but you have yet to prove that children with unmarried parents do better than those whose parents make that formal commitment. You have yet to prove that sending a message to gay youth that the healthy good idea.
You have never proven that elderly couples are more secure if they never legally marry.
I know you kike the sound of these words and concepts you have created in your own mind, but all the smirking in the world won't help to make them rational in the real world. The smirks don't help families and children.
What is your purpose in the world if it is not to help others?
It is just to stand as the Watchman who judges but never acts, secure in the knowledge that you alone MUST be right, as harm falls on those around you?
That's just sad. And nothing to smirk about.
And as usual,a post that has the ring of truth to it ! To me,it's just common sense,logic and plain Ol humanity towards others! They really have nothing,especially the poster you were replying to! Anyway,great post!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37280 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet it's not, of course, since most folks engage in the mating behavior loooong before they marry, if they even choose to marry, with no restrictions other than their own choices and beliefs.
And, of course allowing gay folks the ability to legally marry won't change the mating habits of a single straight person.
It WILL, however, be a good thing for that gay couple, and for their children.
You have children, you should be able to understand this.
I understand your overwhelming need to prove you are right, but you have yet to prove that children with unmarried parents do better than those whose parents make that formal commitment. You have yet to prove that sending a message to gay youth that the healthy good idea.
You have never proven that elderly couples are more secure if they never legally marry.
I know you kike the sound of these words and concepts you have created in your own mind, but all the smirking in the world won't help to make them rational in the real world. The smirks don't help families and children.
What is your purpose in the world if it is not to help others?
It is just to stand as the Watchman who judges but never acts, secure in the knowledge that you alone MUST be right, as harm falls on those around you?
That's just sad. And nothing to smirk about.
Of course there are foolish violations of mating behavior. The simple reality is, in higher life forms, the constraint of marriage is intended to honor the integrity of the person and protect the fruit. Social facts show that the the results of mating behavior outside of marriage have devastating effects. Hardly a point of argument in your favor.

The health of children in a default situation is dependent on as closely as possible having the role models of mothers and fathers. That is proved by the base rating of single parents, only recently superseded by lesbian couples in the largest, latest and most scientific study to date on all family types.

I have no need to 'prove' I am right. As a cynic, reality and truth are my base line. You are diverting from your inability to logically argue with the point made in my post you responded to. Your claim is simply a cheap ad homoan attack.

Address the point I made in my previous post, and then we can move on to the followup issues.

Smile.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#37281 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
Well then. If YOU said it, who are we to question your authority? We temporary forgot about your omnipotence.
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37282 Jan 27, 2013
What is your all the same person your new counter, to deflect?

Why don't you pull up the posts where I told you, you had enough grease in your hair to crank a school bus? Lesbian? I don't know but I am sure your some kind of queer!

If you are a woman and if you are the woman in that video than lesbianism is your only hope for romance, at least with the light on.

Now that your so talking so much tell about all the nasty diseases reserved for primarily homosexuals!
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
?????? Are you kidding me? I am not looking for "Lukes" affection. You, Luke, Samatha, Lone Gunmen... you are all the same person. You need to quit pretending. No way I would go for a loser like you, anyways. Besides, I am a lesbian and a soon to be happily married one at that, so YOU don't flatter yourself.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#37283 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
You are funny when you make shit up. "direct defective violation".... hahahahahahahaha No malice aforethought in THAT science is there?

More old KiMerde. Settling into the twilight of his life and becoming more irrelevant with each passing day.
really

AOL

#37284 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Sitting right next to me laughing at you trying to bully me...
Why does a legitimate cause need to resort to such tactics...
Snicker.
Is she washing your feet with her hair Oh Exalted One?
really

AOL

#37285 Jan 27, 2013
Brenda Lee Johnson wrote:
Don't flatter yourself, Luke is notorious for getting women fuzzy headed and ducking out! I know of at least 6 women he has and none of them have ever even been able to kiss him I am embarrassed for you, what a joke.
<quoted text>
Of course Luke hasn't kissed them, he only likes boys!
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37286 Jan 27, 2013
No, I have never had the compulsion to lick another mans ass or let him stick his dick in mine.
really wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course Luke hasn't kissed them, he only likes boys!

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37288 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
What is your all the same person your new counter, to deflect?
Why don't you pull up the posts where I told you, you had enough grease in your hair to crank a school bus? Lesbian? I don't know but I am sure your some kind of queer!
If you are a woman and if you are the woman in that video than lesbianism is your only hope for romance, at least with the light on.
Now that your so talking so much tell about all the nasty diseases reserved for primarily homosexuals!
<quoted text>
Really? No man will have me? I have been married twice as a cover-up to me being a lesbian... I left both of them, neither of them left me. I also have 3 biological children, all made the good old fashioned way. I could go out and find a man right now... if I wanted one... but I don't. And I showed your quotes, you thought that woman in the video was cute ;)
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37289 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
No, I have never had the compulsion to lick another mans ass or let him stick his dick in mine.
<quoted text>
Thank goodness
.
You would break your back trying to get into that position

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37290 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
What is your all the same person your new counter, to deflect?
Why don't you pull up the posts where I told you, you had enough grease in your hair to crank a school bus? Lesbian? I don't know but I am sure your some kind of queer!
If you are a woman and if you are the woman in that video than lesbianism is your only hope for romance, at least with the light on.
Now that your so talking so much tell about all the nasty diseases reserved for primarily homosexuals!
<quoted text>
Oh, and please do tell me what diseases are set aside JUST for lesbians... I would like to know. hahaha

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37291 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Sitting right next to me laughing at you trying to bully me...
Why does a legitimate cause need to resort to such tactics...
Snicker.
Does she know about your affair, Greg? I found a letter online from one of your church members about how you took a woman from her husband and had a 14 year affair with her. I bet she knows... but she bows down to her almighty husband who does all of her thinking for her.

“Free to buy cake”

Since: Jul 07

wherever I like.

#37292 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke's appearances are amazingly timed to radical events in Kimare's posts. Funny how that happens. Sometimes you just want to be more smarmy than usual, but you don't want it tied to your registered profile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37293 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
Jane Do0do0 wrote:
<quoted text> You are funny when you make shit up. "direct defective violation".... hahahahahahahaha No malice aforethought in THAT science is there?
More old KiMerde. Settling into the twilight of his life and becoming more irrelevant with each passing day.
School is in session. I'm not sure if this is for an adult or a child based on your comprehension skills.

The fundamental goal of evolution is survival of the fittest. That is only accomplished by procreation.
-An inability to procreate stops survival.
-A lack of desire to procreate stops survival.

Gay couples fail on the second point. That makes them a direct defective failure. Simply a fact.

After a desperate search to explain homosexuality's place in evolution because of that basic failure, the most likely explanation is an epi-marker mistake (defect).

Why do you hate the truth? Will that change it?

Smile.
really

AOL

#37294 Jan 27, 2013
Marengo Jon wrote:
Cool Hand Luke's appearances are amazingly timed to radical events in Kimare's posts. Funny how that happens. Sometimes you just want to be more smarmy than usual, but you don't want it tied to your registered profile.
So you have noticed that too? I thought I was the only one.
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37295 Jan 27, 2013
It might be because 98% of the country are heterosexual and if they don't hate foogots, it's only because they are not aware of the facts.
That's funny you say that because I had the idea Kimare was pro- homosexual, I am glad I am wrong.
Marengo Jon wrote:
Cool Hand Luke's appearances are amazingly timed to radical events in Kimare's posts. Funny how that happens. Sometimes you just want to be more smarmy than usual, but you don't want it tied to your registered profile.
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37296 Jan 27, 2013
We know the feces eating data includes lesbians also!

Written by: Sarah Albert editor, GayHealth.com

In a recent study, WSW demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of bacterial vaginosis (BV), hepatitis C, and HIV risk behaviors compared to non-WSW.

"The assumption that women who engage in sex with other women are not at risk of STI's is clearly incorrect," said Katherine Fethers, M.D., lead author of the study from the Sexual Health Unit at Alice Springs Hospital in Australia.

A total of 1,408 women who reported ever having sex with another woman were compared with 1,423 women who had never had sex with a woman. The women had all attended the Sexual Health Center. Only seven percent of the WSW or 283 women reported no sex with a male in the past 12 months (exclusive WSW)-- 25 percent of these WSW reported never having had sex with a man. Results were published in the October issue of the journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

While genital warts and gonorrhea were found more often in WSW, BV was significantly more prevalent among WSW than controls (eight percent versus five percent), as was hepatitis C (five percent versus less than one percent). BV is a common condition marked by disruption of naturally occurring bugs (flora) in the vagina and is associated with PID (pelvic inflammatory disease), adverse pregnancy outcomes and enhanced HIV sexual transmission. There is no clear explanation as to why the rates are higher among WSW but researchers point to higher rates of smoking among WSW, oral sexual practices or female-to-female transmission as possible factors.

Women should make no assumptions about their risks for STI's. Often, women assume that because they are only sexually active with women they are safe from STI's. "You can't assume anything. You are part of a big chain of sexual transmission. You may think you are choosing your partners carefully but you never know," said Jeanne M. Marrazzo, M.D., the Assistant Professor of Medicine (Infectious Diseases) at the University of Washington in Seattle. "Women who are sexually active with both men and women need to know that they are at the same risk for herpes and other infectious diseases as any heterosexual woman might be. There are many cases of women who have never been sexually active with a man but who get STD's as well," she said.

High-risk behaviors were also noted more frequently in WSW as well as exclusive WSW. "In the Australian study WSW reported more high-risk behaviors, including drug use and sex with a bisexual or gay man, and this is very important," said Dr. Marrazzo. WSW also reported more male sexual partners compared to the control group, and they were significantly more likely to report more than 50 lifetime male sexual partners.* To attribute the high rates of STI's and risky behavior only to the WSW who were also sexually active with men would be simplifying this research. Both the entire WSW group and the exclusive WSW group were compared to the control group. There were some disturbing findings about exclusive WSW, said Dr. Marrazzo. The greatest number of BV cases were found among the exclusive WSW group (10 percent) and hepatitis B was also more common in exclusive WSW.

This is not the only study that points to high risks of STI's for WSW. "We have a study coming out probably in the next month in the International Journal of AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Diseases and the results are the same as the Australian study," she said. "Data for 20,000 women visiting the Seattle clinic were analyzed," she added.

It is a major problem that women don't know their risks and they don't get regular gynecological care. Findings will be based on a physical exam and questionnaire. Thus far, BV has been highly prevalent and concordant in lesbian couples.
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, and please do tell me what diseases are set aside JUST for lesbians... I would like to know. hahaha

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37297 Jan 27, 2013
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
Does she know about your affair, Greg? I found a letter online from one of your church members about how you took a woman from her husband and had a 14 year affair with her. I bet she knows... but she bows down to her almighty husband who does all of her thinking for her.
Hardly a 'letter', don't you think. You might also want to read it again.

No adultery and no affair. He was living off a woman with four boys he was not married to. She booted him, and he demanded I require her to take him back. She made a choice and he blamed it on me.

Just a heads up, I knew her for about 6 years in Hawaii and have not seen her since. I officiated the funeral of the father of her sons and have had two of them visit (one for an extended time) since leaving Hawaii.

This is what happens when a troll has no real argument and resorts to ad homoan attacks. You end up looking real bad...

Next.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min Rogue Scholar 05 196,976
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Nuculur option 1,275,653
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 9 min Doug77 6,414
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 18 min IB DaMann 54,509
Hillary fires up crowd in Iowa. 3 hr Pianolegs blows GAS 5
Florida sheriff is similar to Sheriff Apairo. 3 hr Im DA JUDD 2
Black lives matter 3 hr NO THEY DON-T 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages