1. First, gays are making the claim it is the same to impose an imposter relationship on marriage. Clearly you have no answer to the fundamental essence of marriage, a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.<quoted text>
It would be up to you to prove they are not, since you are the one making the claim.
So, in detail, please outline all of the ways that any gay couple's union today is substantially different that ANY straight person's union today.
Good luck with that.
2. If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by a imposition on marriage
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'
Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
That should give you a start.