Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 51,235

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37167 Jan 21, 2013
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Explain:
1. Two butch lesbians attracted to each other.
2. Two LL (Lipstick and Lace) lesbians attracted to each other.
Your ONE scenario falls apart when compared to the variety of lesbian couples that exist.
Everything that spout on every forum is nothing more than opinion.
Or, as I refer to them, geriatric troll droppings.
Troll on, Mangina Man
Two really gay lesbians, and two barely gay lesbians.

Snicker.
the fact king

Mattoon, IL

#37169 Jan 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Two really gay lesbians, and two barely gay lesbians.
Snicker.
Your wife REALLY likes it when I put it in her *ss but BARELY like it when I make her lick it clean......SNICKER
the fact king

Mattoon, IL

#37170 Jan 21, 2013
the fact king wrote:
<quoted text>Hey KiMare your wife's half pound of cortex was "WIRED" to suck me off last night..... After that she was "WIRED" to let me put it in her ass......Quite the little (well other than her p*ss) wifey you got there...SNICKER
That ho likes it balls deep.........

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37172 Jan 21, 2013
Before you can equate gay unions to marriage, you have to prove they are the same type of relationship.

Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are a direct defective conflict with the primary goal of evolution.

Bottom line? There is no relationship more opposite marriage.

:-)
Not

Belleville, IL

#37173 Jan 21, 2013
Hello
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37174 Jan 21, 2013
Not wrote:
Hello
C'mon out wherever you are
Professor Bubblegum Shoe

Alpharetta, GA

#37175 Jan 21, 2013
banfatjan wrote:
darwin was the 1st meth head
No
.
Darwin died in 1882; 37 years before the Japanese invention of meth in 1919
Blame society

Oak Lawn, IL

#37176 Jan 21, 2013
Everyone thinks they have every right....

Since: Nov 08

Clinton, Illinois

#37177 Jan 21, 2013
Ever since I moved to Clinton, I've found more people that screw their own cousins and second cousins and even have had children by their own relatives, than I've found damage to the "supposed christian society" that wants to believe so much in their own piety, that anyone different from them can't possibly contibute to society. Gays aren't the problem, it's the ignorant douche rockets that think t's cool tolive your life getting high and drunk in their parent' basements, instead of being something better than their hick-assed predecessors.
baboon

United States

#37178 Jan 21, 2013
the liberal wrote:
<quoted text>Only if you hold it for me :)
do you like Sasquatch?

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

#37179 Jan 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Two really gay lesbians, and two barely gay lesbians.
Snicker.
As I thought, you really have no answer and I just blew your question out of the water.

Troll on Mangina Man.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

#37180 Jan 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Before you can equate gay unions to marriage, you have to prove they are the same type of relationship.
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are a direct defective conflict with the primary goal of evolution.
Bottom line? There is no relationship more opposite marriage.
:-)
Geriatric troll droppings, Mangina Man.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37181 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Two really gay lesbians, and two barely gay lesbians.
Snicker.
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
As I thought, you really have no answer and I just blew your question out of the water.
Troll on Mangina Man.
Dream on. This is what happens when a idiot tries to reason instead of just troll.

1. I used YOUR argument about mating attraction, and YOU discounted it.

2. Fact of the matter is, your setting doesn't happen. A masculine lesbian wants to be in charge, or in heterosexual language, chauvinistic. Likewise, a feminine lesbian wants a masculine partner.

Next.

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37182 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Before you can equate gay unions to marriage, you have to prove they are the same type of relationship.
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are a direct defective conflict with the primary goal of evolution.
Bottom line? There is no relationship more opposite marriage.
:-)
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Geriatric troll droppings, Mangina Man.
That's more like it, troll.

No argument because you have no defense against even simple basic science.

How's it make your position look, you don't have religion and now you don't have science.

Snicker.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

#37184 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

2. Fact of the matter is, your setting doesn't happen. A masculine lesbian wants to be in charge, or in heterosexual language, chauvinistic. Likewise, a feminine lesbian wants a masculine partner.
Next.
Snicker.
What a load of horse shit. I know lesbian couples of all varieties. How utterly naive of you to assume that lesbian couples come in one flavor (a butch and a fem).

Your opinions become more delusional by the minute. Please ring the charge nurse and ask her to up your meds.

Troll on, Mangina Man.

“Marriage equality for all”

Since: Jul 07

Illinois

#37185 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
That's more like it, troll.
No argument because you have no defense against even simple basic science.
How's it make your position look, you don't have religion and now you don't have science.
Snicker.
Troll on, Kuntmare, Mangina Man.

Since: Mar 07

Woodford, VA

#37186 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
......
2. Fact of the matter is, your setting doesn't happen. A masculine lesbian wants to be in charge, or in heterosexual language, chauvinistic. Likewise, a feminine lesbian wants a masculine partner.
Next.
Snicker.
Why snicker? What you posted just isn't true. How many lesbian couples so you think - as a percentage of the lesbian population - adhere to this specific stereotype?

Hint:

I have met only one couple that even comes close. One. Out of hundreds.

Why do you pretend that your opinion is fact, when you obviously don't have any basis for your words?

Since: Mar 07

Woodford, VA

#37187 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
Before you can equate gay unions to marriage, you have to prove they are the same type of relationship.
.......
It would be up to you to prove they are not, since you are the one making the claim.

So, in detail, please outline all of the ways that any gay couple's union today is substantially different that ANY straight person's union today.

Good luck with that.
hmmmm

Saint Louis, MO

#37188 Jan 22, 2013
Sheeez jon jon you sure like the word mangina.
Why would that be?
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Troll on, Kuntmare, Mangina Man.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37190 Jan 22, 2013
KiMare'a wrote;

Dream on. This is what happens when a idiot tries to reason instead of just troll.

1. I used YOUR argument about mating attraction, and YOU discounted it.

2. Fact of the matter is, your setting doesn't happen. A masculine lesbian wants to be in charge, or in heterosexual language, chauvinistic. Likewise, a feminine lesbian wants a masculine partner.

Next.

Snicker.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Why snicker? What you posted just isn't true. How many lesbian couples so you think - as a percentage of the lesbian population - adhere to this specific stereotype?
Hint:
I have met only one couple that even comes close. One. Out of hundreds.
Why do you pretend that your opinion is fact, when you obviously don't have any basis for your words?
Mongrel Jonnyboy must have a contagious comprehension problem.

Nowhere have I limited lesbians to these two types. I was simply responding to MJ's question about those two types. In fact, I have noted in previous posts, the spectrum involved.

Just a heads up, sociologists have distinguished over 200 distinctions between masculinity and femininity. We all fall at varying places within our gender and orientation.

Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Teaman 1,141,576
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 12 min DrT 48,378
This guy is GOD to Piano Legs & the Malignant M... 13 min Bilbo Alinsky 13
The Road to Perdition is strewn with the corpses 17 min StillfuckingWorth... 12
comparison 56 min FROM WWII 2 NOW 4
Obama Plays Boss of America...............excel... 59 min The Author 2
Amy 11-22 2 hr Mister Tonka 6
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr jacques Ottawa 180,613
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:50 pm PST

NBC Sports12:50PM
Rob Gronkowski fined $8,268 for bouncer move
NFL 1:30 PM
Colt McCoy 'pushing' Robert Griffin III, Gruden says
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Week 12 Preview vs. Jags
NBC Sports 9:51 AM
Colts cut return man Griff Whalen, sign RB Zurlon Tipton
NFL10:14 AM
Colts promote Zurlon Tipton, waive Griff Whalen