Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52083 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#36492 Dec 31, 2012
mary-jo wrote:
<quoted text>GOD BLESS YOU TOO AND TRUST ME BEING WITH ANOTHER WOMAN IS NOT A SIN-- ITS A IF IT FEELS GOOD DO IT WORLD WE LIVE IN--GET WITH THE TIMES- WOMEN HAVE BEEN DOING EACH OTHER FOR EVER SO YOU REALLY NEED TO DEAL WITH IT .. AND DONT KNOCK IT TILL YOU TRY IT.. YOU REALLY WILL LIKE IT!!AND HUBBY WILL LOVE WATCHING TOO!!
And you will burn in hell for all eternity. Sorry but that is your future.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#36493 Dec 31, 2012
Jeb Wilson wrote:
this is a disgusting thread. i agree man all you freaks talk about sex sex and more sex, with the same gender. i tell you what man we would of killed all of you in nam. we didnt put up with that.
Amen
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#36494 Dec 31, 2012
Southern Lady01 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible never mentions the Torah & God never destroyed two cities due to tattoos as he did with Sodom & Gomorrah over homosexuality. Why do you keep trying to draw the focus off the subject @ hand? If you want to discuss other things in the Bible then start another topic to discuss whatever you want to talk about. This is about homosexuality. Let's stay on subject.
If 'homosexual' appears anywhere between your 'bible's covers; your 'bible' is one of the fakes the rednecks rewrote and copyrighted beginning in 1952
.
Of course; if you used Thee Authorized King James Bible; you couldn't use it to bash gay people because:
http://etb-history-theology.blogspot.com/2012...

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#36495 Dec 31, 2012
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
If 'homosexual' appears anywhere between your 'bible's covers; your 'bible' is one of the fakes the rednecks rewrote and copyrighted beginning in 1952
.
Of course; if you used Thee Authorized King James Bible; you couldn't use it to bash gay people because:
http://etb-history-theology.blogspot.com/2012...
I would guess that you have never read the bible, or you do not understand the English language. The King James Bible makes these references also. The word HOMOSEXUAL was not used until much later as a reference to the homosexual act, but is explicit in reference to man with man, and woman with woman. I guess you are just grasping at straws, as that is what you brain is filled with:

1.1 Leviticus 18 and 20
1.2 References to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible


2 Passages from the New Testament

2.1 Romans 1
2.2 Other Epistles
2.3 Matthew 8; Luke 7
2.4 Matthew 19:12
2.5 Acts 8

I guess you do not consider Abortion as Murder of an unborn,
right????
What an ignorant post on your part.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#36497 Dec 31, 2012
Southern Lady01 wrote:
<quoted text>
Amen
You support killing homosexuals? Seriously?

Yeah, that's some fine Christian love...

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#36498 Dec 31, 2012
Jeb Wilson wrote:
this is a disgusting thread. i agree man all you freaks talk about sex sex and more sex, with the same gender. i tell you what man we would of killed all of you in nam. we didnt put up with that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah...we get it. We got it the first 60 times you posted it. It was pathetic then, its pathetic now.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#36499 Dec 31, 2012
Southern Lady01 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you will burn in hell for all eternity. Sorry but that is your future.
Sounds like a pretty vicious religion you follow.
Neighbor

Naperville, IL

#36500 Dec 31, 2012
Rainbow: Read Liviticus in the Bible. No, it does not use the word "homosexual", but it does make it very clear.

Personally, I don't give thought or concern on anyone's sexuality. However, I do respect Christains, and I do respect religions people follow. It is "Freedom Of Religion". So poking a Christain for their religious beliefs is just as bad as poking a homosexual for their beliefs. Either one pushing their beliefs in my face is rejected by me.

I have life long gay friends, and I don't care about that. I have life long devout Christain friends too. It's hard to be a good Christain, and I "imagine" it can be hard to be openly gay. To invade the beliefs of either side in an attempt to impose your view over theirs is wrong. To say the Bible does not find homosexuality wrong is not correct as well.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#36502 Dec 31, 2012
Bruser wrote:
<quoted text>
I would guess that you have never read the bible, or you do not understand the English language. The King James Bible makes these references also. The word HOMOSEXUAL was not used until much later as a reference to the homosexual act, but is explicit in reference to man with man, and woman with woman. I guess you are just grasping at straws, as that is what you brain is filled with:
1.1 Leviticus 18 and 20
1.2 References to Sodom and Gomorrah in the Bible
2 Passages from the New Testament
2.1 Romans 1
2.2 Other Epistles
2.3 Matthew 8; Luke 7
2.4 Matthew 19:12
2.5 Acts 8
I guess you do not consider Abortion as Murder of an unborn,
right????
What an ignorant post on your part.
All of your references describe the natural psychological state of straighties in primitive biblical terms
.
Gay people are not involved in the abortion squabble because we are exempt from the curse:
.
++++++++++
Genesis 3:16> Unto the woman HE said, "I will greatly multiply thy sorowe and thy conception. In sorow thou shalt bring forth children: and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and hee shall rule ouer thee."
++++++++++
.
To help you figure this out; gay people don't bear children and we are all created equal; not subservient to an opposite sex
WF RedBird

Marion, IL

#36504 Dec 31, 2012
Get them Rainbow Kid
haRveys MoThEr

Westville, IL

#36505 Dec 31, 2012
so your saying let the gays rule the world and there will be no more children?
paint it gray

Saint Louis, MO

#36506 Dec 31, 2012
Nope. We need kids around for..........
haRveys MoThEr wrote:
so your saying let the gays rule the world and there will be no more children?
Neighbor

Naperville, IL

#36507 Dec 31, 2012
Rainbow... You've drifed away from reality a bit. You see, it makes no difference at all what your opinion is of religion or the Bible. Those who accept their Bibble accept it. Those who don't, don't. You will never win someone over by attacking their Bible. You should know that.

Live your life as you believe & see fit. Respect other for what they believe. Else your rejected and will remain so.
Gays Run the World

Alpharetta, GA

#36508 Dec 31, 2012
haRveys MoThEr wrote:
so your saying let the gays rule the world and there will be no more children?
Just because we run the world doesn't mean the end of straighties
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-54_DrYDb1b4/TjwBKaj...
.
We'll populate our hetero breeding farms with prime specimens
Another Truth

San Luis Obispo, CA

#36509 Dec 31, 2012
Gays Run the World wrote:
<quoted text>
Just because we run the world doesn't mean the end of straighties
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-54_DrYDb1b4/TjwBKaj...
.
We'll populate our hetero breeding farms with prime specimens
Just don't get those "specimens" from the McDonald's mens room like factless does!

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#36510 Dec 31, 2012
MARY JO wrote:
<quoted text>REALLY SHE SHOULD TRY IT (PROB A FAT HOG AND CANT GET THE DOG TO LICK HER UNLESS SHE SMEARS PEANUT BUTTER ON IT) WHAT EVER LARD ASS DONT WANT YOU SITTING ON MY FACE ANYWAY
Feel free to never, ever respond to me, you sad little troll.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#36511 Dec 31, 2012
Neighbor wrote:
Rainbow... You've drifed away from reality a bit. You see, it makes no difference at all what your opinion is of religion or the Bible. Those who accept their Bibble accept it. Those who don't, don't. You will never win someone over by attacking their Bible. You should know that.
Live your life as you believe & see fit. Respect other for what they believe. Else your rejected and will remain so.
You share good advice; but remember; it works both ways; sugar

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#36512 Dec 31, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your condition of infertility is so low, the government doesn't address it. You are using that to allow a relationship that 100% infertile.
Silly stupid.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Actually you just did a gay twirl diversion (lied) to avoid the point. Gay couples are 100% infertile.
Your percentage of 'impaired' fecundity is incorrect and exaggerated.
Your percentage of gays/bi's is also incorrect and exaggerated even more.
Perhaps that is why you didn't simply reference your point???
Gay couples have every right to establish their own relationship rights, just like married people did years and cultures ago.
Kind of makes you wonder why it has taken so long everywhere for that to happen anywhere...
Smirk.
SoReally wrote:
<quoted text>
My reference to infertile couples came from the CDC. I'm sure they are lying. Look it up.
Also, ABC reported this last year that there are an estimated 9 million people (4% of the US population) who identify as homosexual, bisexual or transgender...Which is a lower percentage than what I initially stated. But I'm sure they lied as well.
Of course, to you anything anyone says is a moot point, because you are a bigot. Does it make you feel like you are smart to put "smirk" at the bottom of every post you make? Because it really just makes you look like an arrogant, close-minded fool who is out of touch with reality.
You 'adjusted' the term on fertility. There is a difference between infertility (your word), and the words used in the study,'difficulty with fertility'.

I agree fully with GLBT being 4%. You said 4 to 12% gay. Significant difference...

You failed to answer my question. Why has gay 'marriage' failed so miserably to establish itself and spread. In any culture. Anywhere. At any time. I know, what about right now? Less than 30 years in human history is less than a second. I suspect homosexuality will be cured before this goes anywhere. It it isn't cured, the historical record has been failure very quickly.

Hardly a bigot. I am a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian.

I sink the knife of reality to the hilt into the belly of denial and deceit and twist it with a smirk.

I have spent my life addressing denial personally and professionally. I'd love to hear an honest assessment of where I am 'close minded'.

Smile.

I mean Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#36513 Dec 31, 2012
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>
All of your references describe the natural psychological state of straighties in primitive biblical terms
.
Gay people are not involved in the abortion squabble because we are exempt from the curse:
.
++++++++++
Genesis 3:16> Unto the woman HE said, "I will greatly multiply thy sorowe and thy conception. In sorow thou shalt bring forth children: and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and hee shall rule ouer thee."
++++++++++
.
To help you figure this out; gay people don't bear children and we are all created equal; not subservient to an opposite sex
Sounds like gender bigotry to me. Segregation is illegal.

Since you clearly doubt faith, I presume you prefer scientific fact.

Marriage is the cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Homosexuality is a violent and direct conflict with mating behavior, the fundamental expression of survival. You are a evolutionary defect. Subservient to humanity.

Smirk.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#36514 Dec 31, 2012
Rainbow Kid wrote:
<quoted text>If 'homosexual' appears anywhere between your 'bible's covers; your 'bible' is one of the fakes the rednecks rewrote and copyrighted beginning in 1952
.
Of course; if you used Thee Authorized King James Bible; you couldn't use it to bash gay people because:
http://etb-history-theology.blogspot.com/2012...
I don't care about your little link. It has nothing to do with what the Bible says. He had the translation done by scholars & he just chose to have it translated exactly as it was written. So if a homosexual had the KJV of the Bible translated that should be even more proof that what is in the Bible is the truth. When even a homosexual lets the destruction of 2 cities, due to homosexuality being an abomination unto God, stay in the Bible when he could have had it removed, that should be even more proof that it's wrong & same sex marriage is as much an abomination as homosexual acts are. So all you did was help me prove my point re: homosexuality in the Bible. So thank you for your little link. God always makes a way to get his point across even by using the "enemy". Lol. Thanks again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr John Galt 1,348,786
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Guru 207,745
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr PEllen 101,442
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr PEllen 7,341
Word (Dec '08) 4 hr PEllen 5,659
last post wins! (Apr '13) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 624
last post wins! (Dec '10) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 1,604
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages