Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments (Page 1,542)

Showing posts 30,821 - 30,840 of47,002
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35814
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>I'm glad you finally figured out that homosexuality involves sexual desire toward the same sex.
And you figured out that its not the act that makes a homosexual. It's sexual attraction just as it is for heterosexuals.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35815
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>No because marriage is between a man and woman. Would homosexuals need to sign that mandate? If not, why not?
Thank you.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35816
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>No because marriage is between a man and woman. Would homosexuals need to sign that mandate? If not, why not?
Your answer was no.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35817
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

a clown wrote:
You are so self involved.
You would be the perfect clonesexual.
Yes, then you can go #$## yourself!!!!
<quoted text>
You're a troll bigot that can't defend homosexuality.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35818
Nov 1, 2012
 
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>Now do you believe that blood brothers should have the same right to marry as homosexuals do? Is one a bigot if they don't want blood brothers to marry?

See the Elijah and Milo Peters brothers in my previous post.
That's a separate question that you can pose to society. Unrelated homosexuals wanting to marry isn't comparable to you wanting to marry your mom, dad, brother, sister or ant other blood relative.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35819
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>The Peters Twins

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePetersTwins

If they wanted to marry each other would that be OK with you and the rest of the homosexual community? If you say NO you are probably a bigot.
I don't believe in bigots.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35820
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
And you figured out that its not the act that makes a homosexual. It's sexual attraction just as it is for heterosexuals.
No sheeit Maynard! Should brothers marriage be allowed? How about sisters?
a clown

Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35821
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

We want to know you better.
So tell us:
Why are you such a useless POS?
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a troll bigot that can't defend homosexuality.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35822
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>No sheeit Maynard! Should brothers marriage be allowed? How about sisters?
Have incest laws thrown out and you would have a valid question.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35823
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a troll bigot that can't defend homosexuality.
Homosexuality doesn't need defending any more than heterosexuality or bisexuality or asexuality need defending.
Dick Withers

Brampton, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35825
Nov 1, 2012
 
Can I have a sandwich kouncilman Kevin
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35826
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
Have incest laws thrown out and you would have a valid question.
We also have laws in Minnesota banning homosexual marriage and homosexual civil unions. We don't need to throw those laws out because homosexual marriage would discriminate against incest marriage and polygamy.

We now need a state constitutional amendment in Minnesota to protect traditional marriage (one man and one women) from perverted liberal judges and legislators. We don't need someone like the biased homosexual Judge Vaughn Walker to decide homosexual marriage for the people. The people in Minnesota will decide.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35827
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Homosexuality doesn't need defending any more than heterosexuality or bisexuality or asexuality need defending.
Sure it does because it's a 100% perverted behavior.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35828
Nov 1, 2012
 
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>We also have laws in Minnesota banning homosexual marriage and homosexual civil unions. We don't need to throw those laws out because homosexual marriage would discriminate against incest marriage and polygamy.

We now need a state constitutional amendment in Minnesota to protect traditional marriage (one man and one women) from perverted liberal judges and legislators. We don't need someone like the biased homosexual Judge Vaughn Walker to decide homosexual marriage for the people. The people in Minnesota will decide.
What you don't have is a law against the same sex act.(Stricken down in Lawrence vs Texas) Like I said throw out the incest law and you will have a valid argument.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35829
Nov 1, 2012
 
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>Sure it does because it's a 100% perverted behavior.
Opinion noted.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35830
Nov 1, 2012
 
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
What you don't have is a law against the same sex act.(Stricken down in Lawrence vs Texas) Like I said throw out the incest law and you will have a valid argument.
I have an argument because of the current Minnesota law that doesn't need to be struck down. The sodomy laws should be put back in place. The perverted thinking judges on the court, like Kennedy, perverted Bowers v. Hardwick in their perverted Lawrence v Texas opinion.
deezyouknow

De Forest, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35831
Nov 1, 2012
 
well after this I can see it... https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35832
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>I have an argument because of the current Minnesota law that doesn't need to be struck down. The sodomy laws should be put back in place. The perverted thinking judges on the court, like Kennedy, perverted Bowers v. Hardwick in their perverted Lawrence v Texas opinion.
Ok so have sodomy laws put back in place and you will have a valid argument. Otherwise it's a waiting game until your state laws are eventually overturned. Let the record show that courts tend to rule in favor of things that are supported as non hostile by cultural climate and social trends.

“ain't she sweet?”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35833
Nov 1, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>You've missed the point, as usual.

A relationship is NOT just sex. Being a homosexual is NOT just about sex.

It many states it ALREADY is marriage. That's the law. Your feeble-minded opinion doesn't change that. When marriage equality becomes federally recognized, you'll still be wrong.

Live with it. Or not.
And how long ago was it that interracial marriages were deemed unnatural and illegal? At least up until the '60s if not more recently in history down in the bible belt.

Ignorant bigoted people always want to impose their morality on the rest of us who don't share their personal moral code.....or religion.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35834
Nov 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure it does because it's a 100% perverted behavior.
Actually, its not. Its a perfectly natural form of sexuality.

Feel free to join us in the 21st century when you're ready...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 30,821 - 30,840 of47,002
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

37 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 24 min Nostrilis Waxman 1,033,725
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 28 min Frijoles 64,980
snapchat gay names 50 min Aussieboy123 6
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Rogue Scholar 05 167,404
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr OzRitz 42,937
Who Dodged the SHOE Better? 2 hr throw more shoes 16
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr prognosticator 96,013
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••