Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

[positronium]

Rose wrote:

There is no good argument against gay marriage.

How is that?

[positronium]

just saying wrote:

I, given the proper motivation, could make you chose to switch sides....

Explain?

[KiMare]

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
The question, Muntmare, was this:
What federal benefits does my Illinois Civil Union provide?
Can you answer the question? Seriously!? Can you just answer the frikkin' question?
You seem to think that civil unions are then answer, but you fail to admit that there are NO FEDERAL BENEFITS provide by state recognized civil unions.
So, Muntmare, it is YOU who failed to answer the question, oh genetically defective, mutated troll.
Troll on, MUNT!
I smell fish.........

Gay unions have been afforded many rights in the Federal arena. You know that.

You also know that gays can pursue legitimate rights under gay unions on a Federal basis, JUST THE SAME AS THEY ARE TRYING TO IMPOSE A FAKE RELATIONSHIP ON MARRIAGE.

I smell BS.

[excuse me but]

according to your own ideals of marriage - yours is not valid. Be careful what you wish for! Your marriage contains "redumdant" genders, did you "dumb it down"? The inablity to bear fruit... If your marriage did bear fruit, that would have been rather irresponsible of you. Did you intentionally impose your hereditary genetic defect on a child?

KiMare wrote:

Marriage has always described a distinct relationship. In fact, the evolutionary birth place of every single other human relationship. It is simply ignorant denial to pretend there is no difference. In fact, it is dangerous to do so.
There are numerous critical distinctions between the union of duplicate genders and marriage. You have to dumb down marriage to 'two people in a relationship' to equate gay unions to marriage.
Marriage is the only relationship that possesses the ponderous propensity to bear human fruit in a natural and beneficial way.
Gays can and have obtained needed rights through 'gay unions'.

[Mona Lott]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Gay unions have been afforded many rights in the Federal arena. You know that.

Are you smoking crack? Name one.

[KiMare]

excuse me but wrote:

according to your own ideals of marriage - yours is not valid. Be careful what you wish for! Your marriage contains "redumdant" genders, did you "dumb it down"? The inablity to bear fruit... If your marriage did bear fruit, that would have been rather irresponsible of you. Did you intentionally impose your hereditary genetic defect on a child?
<quoted text>

The straight man in me married. The lesbian would need to marry a man to be married.

Neither of my sons inherited my genetic mutations. However, like you and everyone else, they have other minor mutations.

[KiMare]

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you smoking crack? Name one.

http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/07/20/opm...

[the fact king]

All I know is that if you catch it young enough YOU CAN BEAT THE QUEER OUT OF A KID...........

[Mona Lott]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/07/20/opm...

Not all gay people are federal employees, dipshit. In fact, the overwhelming majority are NOT federal employees. Your example is bogus.

[Mona Lott]

the fact king wrote:

All I know is that if you catch it young enough YOU CAN BEAT THE QUEER OUT OF A KID..........

No you can't.

Too bad we can't beat the STUPID out of you.

[odumbo]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2012/07/20/opm...

Very interesting, now the taxpayer is on the hook for children of people that are sick beyond belief.
Great, another Obama improvement.
He has got to go before the entire country is dragged down to this level of sickness.

[KiMare]

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Not all gay people are federal employees, dipshit. In fact, the overwhelming majority are NOT federal employees. Your example is bogus.

You said name one. I did.

[KiMare]

odumbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Very interesting, now the taxpayer is on the hook for children of people that are sick beyond belief.
Great, another Obama improvement.
He has got to go before the entire country is dragged down to this level of sickness.

So much for 'no affect' on others, right?

Canada is already realizing the consequences on just insurance costs.

Sad.

[Mona Lott]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You said name one. I did.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/10/13/cling...

This list points out your lies.

[KiMare]

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/10/13/cling...
This list points out your lies.

Has nothing to do with our discussion.

I've made none of those claims.

I am not a Republican.

[Quest]

odumbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Very interesting, now the taxpayer is on the hook for children of people that are sick beyond belief.
Great, another Obama improvement.
He has got to go before the entire country is dragged down to this level of sickness.

Aren't we all on the hook for children of people who have large numbers of unplanned pregnancies already?

And the republican candidates seem to be against birth control.

Do you think that's sensible?

[Angel of Death]

I declare this thread dead.
R.I.P.

[Justice1313]

Under the CLOAK of priest, children have been molested.(The insurance companies payed out huge awards) Under the CLOAK of Karate teacher,(53) children have become victims while their parents of the ADULT class remained clueless.(He is in jail) One NJ. Governor, while under the CLOAK of being married, secretly preferred the young male aids in the Gov.'s office.(He has since stepped down and acknowledged his gay status)* WHO will make sure that the children don't become victims of ADULTS, who under the CLOAK of PARENTS, are using these children for their own entertainment for themselves and or others.*Many TV Ministries are rescuing children from across the globe from ADULTS WHO PREFER CHILDREN!*What adults do in private is not my concern. That is between the adults and their GOD. What adults do to CHILDREN is another matter.

[Say What]

Hetero wrote:

<quoted text>
Anal sex is demeaning my wife's ass (pun intended). I've been married to the same woman for over 30 years in a totally monogamous relationship and, I can assure you, her orgasmic intensity is often greater with anal than with vaginal. She also immensely enjoys the occasional rim job I give her.

Bump for KiMare!

[Go Blue Forever]

Take a moment, to see just what, MITT ROMNEY HAS PLANNED FOR THE AMERICAN WORKER... www.bainport.com ....please don't ignore the suffering of others....