“reign in blood”

Since: May 09

Braidwood, IL

#1 Jun 12, 2013
DEAR AMY: My 41-year-old son cheated on my daughter-in-law (for the third time) and then left her and my 6-year-old grandson. They were together for 20 years.

I adore my daughter-in-law, and I'm heartbroken. My son told me he never really loved her but stayed with her because he didn't want to break her heart and because she was such a great wife, mother and all-around good person. I'm so ashamed and disappointed in him.

I'm very close with my daughter-in-law. She says she couldn't have gotten through this without me. We talk every day.

Although I still love my son very much (naturally), I don't even want to talk to him right now. He already wants us to meet the woman he left my daughter-in-law for. I can't imagine meeting her, and I saw her picture on Facebook -- honestly, she looks like a prostitute.

I'm 100 percent on my daughter-in-law's side. She didn't deserve this and neither did my wonderful grandson. I raged at my son when I first found out; now he calls me and tells me how guilty he feels. Although I'm civil to him, I don't even want to hear his voice right now. Will I ever get over this anger at my son?-- Furious Mother

DEAR FURIOUS: I applaud your expression of friendship and concern for your daughter-in-law, but you should do this without becoming too intimately involved. Your daughter-in-law is lucky she can talk to you about this, but this will become a problem for you when you finally get to the point where you communicate with your son again -- and you will get to that point.

It's appropriate to rain down the "wrath of mom" upon your son's sorry head. There is no reason to shield him from your opinion. There is also no reason to spend time with his new squeeze before you are ready (although stalking her on Facebook is hardly mature behavior). Over time, however, your anger will not help this family -- and may actually stoke the flame and extend their challenges.

Be supportive, be understanding and do your best to be a true friend to this entire family. Urge them to pursue mediation with a professional.

DEAR AMY: My family and I live on a nice street with residents of all ages -- from young families to the elderly.

One of the neighbors has four nice children, but there is a problem: The kids are constantly going door to door fundraising. Soliciting for scouting and school projects, they are able to raise a great deal of money on our street alone. But over the last 10 years my husband and I have spent about $1,000 supporting them, and we simply cannot do it anymore.

Any advice on how to handle this and still maintain neighborly relations?-- Bothered Neighbors

DEAR BOTHERED: The way to handle this is with a smile -- and an iron will to resist the adorable entreaties of sweet-faced saleskids.

You could post a little "no solicitation" sign outside your door and then kindly explain what it means: "Do you see this little sign? It means we can't buy things. But I bet you're going to do well, and let me know how it goes!" Deal with this in a friendly, open and honest manner.

Not participating in these fundraising efforts actually teaches these kids something important -- that adults have to make tough choices sometimes and that you don't get everything you ask for, even if you ask nicely.

DEAR AMY: I was shocked at "Daring Dad's" interest in letting his 10-year-old son "explore the city" on his own and your suggestion that this was a good idea! What are you two thinking? Do you live in the 1950s or something?-- Appalled

DEAR APPALLED: I offered practical suggestions for how this father can foster his son's independence -- gradually and safely. The more savvy and responsible children are encouraged to be, the safer they will be when they venture out into the world.

“reign in blood”

Since: May 09

Braidwood, IL

#2 Jun 12, 2013
3- Crime rates in the 1950s were higher than they are today, dummass.

“Where is Tonka?”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#3 Jun 12, 2013
1 totally wrong amy, mom can feel any damn way she wants to about the situation. If son is cheating on his wife, why does mom have to accept that? Oh, and she is not stalking dummy, the son probably uploaded a bunch of pics of the floozy all over his FB page.

2 $8.30 a month is breaking your budget?

3 Youngsters need to learn about the seedy side of town somday.

“The two baby belly, please!”

Since: Sep 09

Evanston IL

#4 Jun 12, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
3- Crime rates in the 1950s were higher than they are today, dummass.
For once the dog is right about something.

:D <just teasing ya edog>

“reign in blood”

Since: May 09

Melrose Park, IL

#5 Jun 12, 2013
squishymama wrote:
:D <just teasing ya edog>
You're such a tease!

Palatine, IL

#6 Jun 12, 2013
LW2: The word is no. If you want to be polite, "I'm not interested, thank you."

LW3: Nah, most of us current parents grew up in the 1980s. And we still had much more freedom then, than certain aspects of society say children "should be" allowed to have nowadays.

“...,to wit”

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#7 Jun 12, 2013
My girls grew up in the 90's. My nice suburban neighbors were occasionally appalled at the amount of autonomy they had.The two of them are self sufficent capable young women who are not daunted by much and have decent street smarts.
They rode the bus with friends to and from the mall at 10-11;one flew to Europe witb 2girlfriends and. No grown ups just before she turned 13.


“Where is Everyone?”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#8 Jun 12, 2013
L1: Stay out of it but still be friendly to your ex daughter-in-law. It's not your decision, it's your son's. And it sucks. But it still is his decision and his life. You don't have to like his new squeeze, but you can still be polite.

As for the FB Amy, I agree with Race, it's probably on her son's FB page or, since he is friends on FB with the gf, it carries over. Some one give Amy a FB lesson.

L2: Why are your complaining about this? The kids are taking responsibility instead of their parents bringing it to work and doing it for them. Learn when to say "no" and when to say "I'd love to".

L3: There were some parents when I grew up even (in the 60s and 70s) that didn't let their kids wander. Some parents did. I think it's the same now except everything is more spread out and the parents are used to driving ev3erywhere so the kids don't get that kind of exposure much anymore.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min RoxLo 1,523,976
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr Jacques Ottawa 240,413
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr CrunchyBacon 105,141
A Little Ditty 14 hr Longfellow 1
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 15 hr TRD 71,285
A few ITEMS of interest. 17 hr Jocularity is Best 2
Look at Minn. Maine & Michigan. 17 hr EAT PORK 18

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages