Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#93736 Nov 18, 2013
unitE us

Toj

“Where is Everyone?”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#93737 Nov 18, 2013
des·e·crate
transitive verb \ˈde-si-ˌkr āt\

: to damage (a holy place or object): to treat (a holy place or object) with disrespect

Above - that's from Webster's Dictionary.

First of all, it was not the American flag and you know it. The fact that it has a likeness to the American flag (and not an exact replica) that is being used to show equality is NOT something that damages nor disrespects the flag.

If you think otherwise, ask yourself why. Is it the subject matter that damages it? The thought of equality that damages it?

I am grateful for all the good men and women who have served for our country and fought for freedoms.

Toj

“Where is Everyone?”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#93738 Nov 18, 2013
Sublime1 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't agree with edog's post. However, I also don't think it's appropriate to interject national symbols ... symbols that are supposed to unit us ... into a highly divisive political issue.
Can't some things be above politics? Does something that many folks on both sides of the issue find sacred, such as the United States flag, really need to be rainbow? It's something revered in this country. Can't one get the point across that they support gay marriage by just using the standard rainbow flag?
The rainbow flag, as you know, is a symbol of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) pride and LGBT social movements. It has been in use since the 1970s. The colors reflect the diversity of the LGBT community, and the flag is often used as a symbol of gay pride in LGBT rights marches.

It is used worldwide, people.

“Checks and Balances”

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#93739 Nov 18, 2013
Sublime1 wrote:
<quoted text>I don't agree with edog's post. However, I also don't think it's appropriate to interject national symbols ... symbols that are supposed to unit us ... into a highly divisive political issue.

Can't some things be above politics? Does something that many folks on both sides of the issue find sacred, such as the United States flag, really need to be rainbow? It's something revered in this country. Can't one get the point across that they support gay marriage by just using the standard rainbow flag?
Yes, I think one can get their point across without changing the colors of the flag. However, I will support someone's right to create a piece of art that represents their feelings and ideology. That is the beauty of our country. We don't imprison or kill people for displaying drawings that we don't like.

IMO, I think that when people use statements or images for shock value, they lose much of the message because people are too focused on the shock. Not everyone shares my opinion, though, and they are free to express themselves however they like. They just have to be prepared for any reactions from their audience.

“Checks and Balances”

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#93740 Nov 18, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
<quoted text>If you supported desecrating the American flag and national symbols, then yes. But from what I know of you, you don't. So you're okay in my book. Just wish you weren't such a liberal.
I am not ashamed to be called a moderate.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#93741 Nov 18, 2013
Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
The rainbow flag, as you know, is a symbol of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) pride and LGBT social movements. It has been in use since the 1970s. The colors reflect the diversity of the LGBT community, and the flag is often used as a symbol of gay pride in LGBT rights marches.
It is used worldwide, people.
Thanks Captain Obvious. Um, nice try, but no cigar.

Race wasn't complaining about you using a mere rainbow flag and none of my comments were directed at your use of a mere rainbow flag (your reading comprehension must have caused you to miss that).

Race was complaining about your use of a modified form of our nation's flag and my comments were directed at why it's not really appropriate to use a modified form of our nation's flag to further and show support for an individuals political view point, especially on a highly divisive issue.

If you want to show support using a flag of some sort, you don't need to use a modified form of our nation's flag ... something that many folks find sacred. You have the option of using the traditional LGBT flag. If you don't care if you offend folks, like the morons who protest and hold signs that say god hates gay people, then do what you wish ... It's a 1st Amendment right to be offensive in many circumstances.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#93742 Nov 18, 2013
ScarletandOlive wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I think one can get their point across without changing the colors of the flag. However, I will support someone's right to create a piece of art that represents their feelings and ideology. That is the beauty of our country. We don't imprison or kill people for displaying drawings that we don't like.
IMO, I think that when people use statements or images for shock value, they lose much of the message because people are too focused on the shock. Not everyone shares my opinion, though, and they are free to express themselves however they like. They just have to be prepared for any reactions from their audience.
No one, least of all me, is talking about imprisoning or killing folks or saying that it’s not someone’s 1st Amendment right to display such a flag.

What I am saying is that some things like our nation’s flag should not be used in in such a manner. Just like someone who is against gay marriage should not take our nation’s flag and use the stars to spell out “god hates gays,” regardless of whether this represents their feelings and ideology. It's just not appropriate (which is not the same as saying it is illegal).

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#93743 Nov 18, 2013
If you cant see that taking an American flag and substituting the stripes with rainbow stripes, then running it up a flag pole as a statement telling all the world that you are not just an american, but a GAY american is a desecration, then I submit you to be a total moron.
NO, it is not an American flag, but it is being used as a substitute for one, and that is the desecration.

The American flag is to be the top most flag on any flag pole, below it you can fly whatever the hello you want. By that flag being topmost, the person is stating that they care not a sheit for the lives and blood of the people who died giving them the right to be suchanasshole.

Are you sure your not sam? You seem to have a real problem admitting when your wrong.
Toj wrote:
des·e·crate
transitive verb \&#712;de-si-&#716;kr &#257;t\
: to damage (a holy place or object): to treat (a holy place or object) with disrespect
Above - that's from Webster's Dictionary.
First of all, it was not the American flag and you know it. The fact that it has a likeness to the American flag (and not an exact replica) that is being used to show equality is NOT something that damages nor disrespects the flag.
If you think otherwise, ask yourself why. Is it the subject matter that damages it? The thought of equality that damages it?
I am grateful for all the good men and women who have served for our country and fought for freedoms.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#93745 Nov 18, 2013
A noted observer wrote:
<quoted text>Well, Captain Oblivious, a modified form of the American flag is NOT *the* American flag.
Thanks Captain Obvious II for explaining to all of us that she didn’t use “the” red white and blue, American flag. Had you not come out of your paint huffing stupor to explain this, we would have never figured this out.
A noted observer wrote:
<quoted text>Should politicians wear flag pins as they do? Isn't that sort of a modified flag used for political purposes, Captain Oblivious?
Apparently you are too effing dumb to realize that a non-modified American flag is not sort of like a modified American flag.

“reign in blood”

Since: May 09

Wilmington, IL

#93746 Nov 18, 2013
squishymama wrote:
The first picture stunned me.
http://galleries.apps.chicagotribune.com/chi-...
Such unbelievable destruction

“The two baby belly, please!”

Since: Sep 09

Evanston IL

#93747 Nov 18, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Such unbelievable destruction
Despite your jerkiness, I was really worried about you.

The photos of just the slabs and flooring of several homes makes me wonder about the construction of those houses. They just desintegrated...

Toj

“Where is Everyone?”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#93748 Nov 18, 2013
squishymama wrote:
<quoted text>
Despite your jerkiness, I was really worried about you.
The photos of just the slabs and flooring of several homes makes me wonder about the construction of those houses. They just desintegrated...
The news channel I was watching mentioned they were "manufactured homes".

“reign in blood”

Since: May 09

Wilmington, IL

#93749 Nov 18, 2013
squishymama wrote:
Despite your jerkiness, I was really worried about you.
The photos of just the slabs and flooring of several homes makes me wonder about the construction of those houses. They just desintegrated...
Well, a house isn't gonna hold up too well when an F4 tornado passes through it. A different tornado hit my area, I think it was an F2. Luckily it hit the next town over and my only damage was a busted fence post.

But you have a point about the construction. They use fewer nails and cheaper-grade materials than they used to. And still housing prices are ridiculously high.

“...,to wit”

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#93750 Nov 18, 2013
squishymama wrote:
The first picture stunned me.
http://galleries.apps.chicagotribune.com/chi-...
O dpn' think I have see anything that so exemplifies a twisting motion than that photo. Stunned is a good word

“...,to wit”

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#93751 Nov 18, 2013
I don't

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#93752 Nov 18, 2013
I see dog made it through the storms. Thought I'd change my icon to cheer him up.
Wait, that's to cheer ME up.

“I Am Mine”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#93753 Nov 18, 2013
dog, race...

So exactly what constitutes a desecration of the flag and lady liberty in your book? Any depiction that supports a position you don't share? OR ANY artistic deviation?

Is famed artist Peter Max offensive?

https://www.google.com/search...

Peter Max has painted for six U.S. Presidents and his art is on display in Presidential Libraries and in U.S. Embassies. Max has painted our Lady Liberty annually since America's Bicentennial and in 2000 a collage of his Liberties adorned over 145 million Verizon phone books.

“reign in blood”

Since: May 09

Wilmington, IL

#93754 Nov 18, 2013
Mister Tonka wrote:
dog, race...
So exactly what constitutes a desecration of the flag and lady liberty in your book? Any depiction that supports a position you don't share? OR ANY artistic deviation?
Is famed artist Peter Max offensive?
Okay, Scarlet actually summed it up perfectly. When you use a depiction of our flag or national symbols in such a way to create "shock value," you are taking away from your issue and instead pzzing people off.

That is counter-productive to the very thing you are trying to get support for.

Instead, I, and half the country that agrees with me, are more UNlikely to support your cause BECAUSE of the way you're presenting your case. When you turn the United States flag into a rainbow, when you turn our symbols for freedom and justice into lesbian porn, I, and many others like me, find your actions, and therefor your cause, deplorable.

Maybe more than 30% of states would support gays, if you people didn't act that way?

Think about it.

You want respect? Show America some respect.

Instead you're shoving it in our faces how much you hate America because a majority of Americans don't share YOUR views. Turn it around. Show respect, and you might get some.

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#93755 Nov 18, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, Scarlet actually summed it up perfectly. When you use a depiction of our flag or national symbols in such a way to create "shock value," you are taking away from your issue and instead pzzing people off.
That is counter-productive to the very thing you are trying to get support for.
Instead, I, and half the country that agrees with me, are more UNlikely to support your cause BECAUSE of the way you're presenting your case. When you turn the United States flag into a rainbow, when you turn our symbols for freedom and justice into lesbian porn, I, and many others like me, find your actions, and therefor your cause, deplorable.
Maybe more than 30% of states would support gays, if you people didn't act that way?
Think about it.
You want respect? Show America some respect.
Instead you're shoving it in our faces how much you hate America because a majority of Americans don't share YOUR views. Turn it around. Show respect, and you might get some.
Ahhh. Poor puppy. Whine some more, I'm still able to control the laughter.
cheluzal

Plant City, FL

#93756 Nov 18, 2013
I'm confused. I don't see anything gay-related in Toj's flag avatar. Is that a separate issue or did it get changed?
What I see is an American flag-esque heralding free speech, something our nation used to be founded on.

I am very patriotic and love my country, but I'm not psycho offended by every little thing. Throwing a real flag on the ground and steppin on it (looking at you, Lil Wayne) or burning it, sure, but to make use of one to promote the very values that were once accepted in this nation...please.

We are getting offended by everything lately. Our nation is no longer recognizable. We should be happy the 3 colors are right! We should put the same energy into protecting the Constitution that is being raped.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 min Dale 184,991
free server newcamd cccam abox (Jun '11) 4 min arabtera 2
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghost 1,191,682
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 42 min red and right 51,516
abby03-03 1 hr Shari23 4
abby03-02-15 1 hr Mister Tonka 5
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr scirocco 69,123
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:21 am PST

Bleacher Report 6:21AM
Shutdown CB Headlines Bears 2015 Free-Agent Big Board
NFL 6:51 AM
Pat McAfee jokingly begins recruiting Ndamukong Suh
Bleacher Report 8:11 AM
Luck Says Goodbye to the Neckbeard
Bleacher Report 8:57 AM
Colts Punter Trying to Recruit Suh
Bleacher Report 9:47 AM
Insider Buzz: Mutual Interest Between Andre Johnson and Indianapolis Colts