Topix Chitown Regulars

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#80437 Feb 15, 2013
What the hello are you babbeling about tampon? Their your words, I even provided the post# where you said them. Now your going to say I am making them up? Talk about rejection of reality, you cant even admit you typed something....even when the post# is provided as proof!

Logic really eludes you dont it?
Sam I Am wrote:
<quoted text>
No crow, dum dum. You are being deliberately obtuse. I explicitly stated in the post I cited to that you can say whatever you want, and you can face how people will characterize and respond. I have said the same thing multiple times now. I would have hoped that you'd have something better to do with your time than fabricate dischord, apparently I was mistaken.
You haven't answered yet: Would you call a black person the N-word? It's your right to do so, right? No limitations on who can use what words, right? Would you do it?

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#80438 Feb 15, 2013
Not to dispute the veracity of the claims, but was the signing by Michael verified by an independent source? Any chance he was coached or encouraged? Did he initiate these conversations?
If we can get gorilla's to carry on an intelligent conversations, does that mean theirs hope for mutt?
Mimi Seattle wrote:
<quoted text>
Koko (gorilla) once blamed something on the cat. Another time when Penny (the researcher) had a guest, Koko got into the guest's purse and stole a lipstick. She then created art on a wall. When Penny asked her what happened, Koko signed "Michael did it." Michael was (he's dead now) another gorilla at the center.
Speaking of Michael, he was rescued from poachers who had taken him from the bush when he was like two. Talking to Penny one day he described watching the men with guns kill his mother and cut her head off. That was like 20 years after the fact. So, yeah just as smart as cats and dogs./eyeroll

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#80439 Feb 15, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't believe this is happening at all. Many openly gay people are gainfully employed and have a roof over their heads. You should stop getting your news from paranoidprogressives.com .
It DOES happen. The fact that it doesn't happen to every gay person doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#80440 Feb 15, 2013
AS: GOT IT! Thanks!

“bELieve”

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#80441 Feb 15, 2013
Hi all! So, some of you may remember me talking about how much I loved my sorority in college because it wasn't like a stereotypical sorority. We encouraged individuality and I didn't feel like a "stepford sister".

Well, National just informed us that they are revoking our charter at the end of this semester. They say it is due to low numbers (the membership numbers are exactly the same as when I was active 15 years ago), poor communication and not being competitive on campus. Apparently they said something in another letter about "alternative lifestyles". We (the alum) are not taking that to mean homosexual, but that our sisterhood does not look like the blonde, cheerleader type that is prevalent in chapters in the South. They are intelligent, charismatic and philanthropic, though. Many of my sisters are now lawyers, executives, entrepreneurs and otherwise successful women both in their personal and professional lives.

I am livid and I'm not the only one. RU is a really big university and that sisterhood made it smaller and more manageable, especially for those of us who lived out of state.

/vent over

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#80442 Feb 15, 2013
so sick your lawyer alum on them!
Jess in NJ wrote:
Hi all! So, some of you may remember me talking about how much I loved my sorority in college because it wasn't like a stereotypical sorority. We encouraged individuality and I didn't feel like a "stepford sister".
Well, National just informed us that they are revoking our charter at the end of this semester. They say it is due to low numbers (the membership numbers are exactly the same as when I was active 15 years ago), poor communication and not being competitive on campus. Apparently they said something in another letter about "alternative lifestyles". We (the alum) are not taking that to mean homosexual, but that our sisterhood does not look like the blonde, cheerleader type that is prevalent in chapters in the South. They are intelligent, charismatic and philanthropic, though. Many of my sisters are now lawyers, executives, entrepreneurs and otherwise successful women both in their personal and professional lives.
I am livid and I'm not the only one. RU is a really big university and that sisterhood made it smaller and more manageable, especially for those of us who lived out of state.
/vent over

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#80443 Feb 15, 2013
Jess, you know its all about money right? It's always about money.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#80444 Feb 15, 2013
Jess in NJ wrote:
Hi all! So, some of you may remember me talking about how much I loved my sorority in college because it wasn't like a stereotypical sorority. We encouraged individuality and I didn't feel like a "stepford sister".
Well, National just informed us that they are revoking our charter at the end of this semester. They say it is due to low numbers (the membership numbers are exactly the same as when I was active 15 years ago), poor communication and not being competitive on campus. Apparently they said something in another letter about "alternative lifestyles". We (the alum) are not taking that to mean homosexual, but that our sisterhood does not look like the blonde, cheerleader type that is prevalent in chapters in the South. They are intelligent, charismatic and philanthropic, though. Many of my sisters are now lawyers, executives, entrepreneurs and otherwise successful women both in their personal and professional lives.
I am livid and I'm not the only one. RU is a really big university and that sisterhood made it smaller and more manageable, especially for those of us who lived out of state.
/vent over
I am so sorry, Jess.:( What a shame!

“What's it to ya?”

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#80445 Feb 15, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe I'm missing something
You are being deliberately obtuse. Go back and re-read. "Ape" IS NOT A SPECIES you freaking moron. I never said we were the same species. "Ape" is a classification. Really, really, really, really, REALLY TSTI!

And, ftr, you are never, ever, EVER right about this. You have no knowledge whatsoever and *I* do. Go argue evolution with your pastor so that at least someone will agree with you.

“What's it to ya?”

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#80446 Feb 15, 2013
RACE wrote:
Not to dispute the veracity of the claims, but was the signing by Michael verified by an independent source? Any chance he was coached or encouraged? Did he initiate these conversations?
If we can get gorilla's to carry on an intelligent conversations, does that mean theirs hope for mutt?
<quoted text>
If you're really interested I will try to look into the information about Michael. As I recall, there was more than one person present,. I wasn't there of course, but I will try and check out the particulars when I get some free time.

“What's it to ya?”

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#80447 Feb 15, 2013
RACE wrote:
Not to dispute the veracity of the claims, but was the signing by Michael verified by an independent source? Any chance he was coached or encouraged? Did he initiate these conversations?
If we can get gorilla's to carry on an intelligent conversations, does that mean theirs hope for mutt?
<quoted text>
Here's a little something I just pulled up:

http://bushmeat.net/michael-and-me.htm

I didn't read through it yet, but from what a quick glance tells me it says some stuff about it.

“What's it to ya?”

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#80448 Feb 15, 2013
edogxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't see where your link said humans and chimps are the same species.
Because I didn't say that you imbecile.

Humans and other apes are not the same species, however we are all apes, which is not a species in an of itself, but rather a classification within the order Hominidae.

"Ape" is a classification, NOT a species. If you miss this, you are just being deliberately obtuse and contrary.
----------
Pay attention to where it says "FIVE SPECIES" on the order Hominidae.

Hominidae--5 species.
Genera:(plural of genus)
Gorilla, Pan (2 species-Bonobo (P. paniscus) and chimpanzee (P. troglodytes), Pongo pygmaeus, Homo sapiens, Homo floresiensis, Homo ??.

Distribution is Asian and African, worldwide since Pleistocene.
----------
http://bioweb.wku.edu/courses/Biol459/f2000/p...

http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/ac...

“bELieve”

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#80449 Feb 15, 2013
RACE wrote:
<quoted text>so sick your lawyer alum on them!
Actually, one has offered to take the case pro bono. It's not just about money - it's also about image and branding.

“bELieve”

Since: Jun 09

Location hidden

#80450 Feb 15, 2013
Sorry about the double post. I was at the post office and my phone said it didn't go thru.
PEllen

Chicago, IL

#80451 Feb 15, 2013
Jess in NJ wrote:
Hi all! So, some of you may remember me talking about how much I loved my sorority in college because it wasn't like a stereotypical sorority. We encouraged individuality and I didn't feel like a "stepford sister".
Well, National just informed us that they are revoking our charter at the end of this semester. They say it is due to low numbers (the membership numbers are exactly the same as when I was active 15 years ago), poor communication and not being competitive on campus. Apparently they said something in another letter about "alternative lifestyles". We (the alum) are not taking that to mean homosexual, but that our sisterhood does not look like the blonde, cheerleader type that is prevalent in chapters in the South. They are intelligent, charismatic and philanthropic, though. Many of my sisters are now lawyers, executives, entrepreneurs and otherwise successful women both in their personal and professional lives.
I am livid and I'm not the only one. RU is a really big university and that sisterhood made it smaller and more manageable, especially for those of us who lived out of state.
/vent over
Any chance this is about drugs or underage drinking?
One of teh big southern state schools suspended all Greek life last fall over teh drinking/hazing partying issue. My younger girl went to school due west of you and their school had that as an issue a couple years ago.

This might be an effort by National to voluntarily do something that the University was about to impose on them.

Toj

“Where is Everyone?”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#80452 Feb 15, 2013
RACE wrote:
Are you really this dense? To say that I cant say something because of how I will be perceived is the same thing as saying DON"T SAY THAT!
Your the one who is trying to muddy the point with "Well, yall can say what ya want but your gonna be percieved...."
Bottom line is both you and sam are trying to prevent me from using a word because it makes you uncomfortable. Your not physically trying to tape my mouth shut, you're trying to do it "Socially" But the end result is the same aint it?
<quoted text>
And I'm dense.

I've said over and over, if you feel the need to say it no one can stop you. It's a well known fact the term is offensive. You disagree or perhaps you are personally offended on how society views certain words and feel that someone is trying to take a word away from you.

It isn't me or Sam or anyone else taking this word away from you. We did not start the usage nor did we start the movement to stop its usage. You cannot be forced to say or not say words.

My personal choice is not to say that word and yes, to me it is offensive. I would not call a person of Mexican decent a wetback and I don't greet the people of Italian decent as wops. I would not call a Jewish person a kike. I wouldn't want to because I try not to offend people if I can help it, words (and others) have meaning and those words hurt people.

Toj

“Where is Everyone?”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#80453 Feb 15, 2013
Jess in NJ wrote:
Hi all! So, some of you may remember me talking about how much I loved my sorority in college because it wasn't like a stereotypical sorority. We encouraged individuality and I didn't feel like a "stepford sister".
Well, National just informed us that they are revoking our charter at the end of this semester. They say it is due to low numbers (the membership numbers are exactly the same as when I was active 15 years ago), poor communication and not being competitive on campus. Apparently they said something in another letter about "alternative lifestyles". We (the alum) are not taking that to mean homosexual, but that our sisterhood does not look like the blonde, cheerleader type that is prevalent in chapters in the South. They are intelligent, charismatic and philanthropic, though. Many of my sisters are now lawyers, executives, entrepreneurs and otherwise successful women both in their personal and professional lives.
I am livid and I'm not the only one. RU is a really big university and that sisterhood made it smaller and more manageable, especially for those of us who lived out of state.
/vent over
I'm sure you're sad to hear that news. What is the name of that sorority?

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#80454 Feb 15, 2013
If she said that, paired with other knowledge, she could become traceable, which is a bad thing,
Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sure you're sad to hear that news. What is the name of that sorority?
Sam I Am

Knoxville, TN

#80455 Feb 15, 2013
Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
And I'm dense.
I've said over and over, if you feel the need to say it no one can stop you. It's a well known fact the term is offensive. You disagree or perhaps you are personally offended on how society views certain words and feel that someone is trying to take a word away from you.
It isn't me or Sam or anyone else taking this word away from you. We did not start the usage nor did we start the movement to stop its usage. You cannot be forced to say or not say words.
My personal choice is not to say that word and yes, to me it is offensive. I would not call a person of Mexican decent a wetback and I don't greet the people of Italian decent as wops. I would not call a Jewish person a kike. I wouldn't want to because I try not to offend people if I can help it, words (and others) have meaning and those words hurt people.
Yeah, Race, you just got smacked down by the Tojmeister, Toj.O, the Tojenator!!! Suuuuuck it!!! No, seriously, have a great weekend. May your beer be warm and your guns jam.

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me! Charlie

#80456 Feb 15, 2013
Whatever, you say there is a movement to stop usage of the word, but so far it has only been applied to white people, for blacks its still an acceptable word to use.

Oh, and not to state the obvious, but would not a movement to stop the usage of the word effectively prevent me from saying it?

Yanno is some contries words are actually outlawed, I have no idea how this is enforced but to me the concept of passing a law that makes it illegal to make a series of sounds is asinine, cause thats all words are a simple series of sounds. Its just noise and it can be tuned out or ignored. The only sound I am aware of that has any power at all, is the sound of a crying child. No other sound has any power at all unless you give it power.

Cheers

Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
And I'm dense.
I've said over and over, if you feel the need to say it no one can stop you. It's a well known fact the term is offensive. You disagree or perhaps you are personally offended on how society views certain words and feel that someone is trying to take a word away from you.
It isn't me or Sam or anyone else taking this word away from you. We did not start the usage nor did we start the movement to stop its usage. You cannot be forced to say or not say words.
My personal choice is not to say that word and yes, to me it is offensive. I would not call a person of Mexican decent a wetback and I don't greet the people of Italian decent as wops. I would not call a Jewish person a kike. I wouldn't want to because I try not to offend people if I can help it, words (and others) have meaning and those words hurt people.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Grey Ghost 1,278,295
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 12 min IB DaMann 54,602
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr District 1 197,120
I Remember Mel Reynolds. 1 hr Indicted Again 1
News Should prostitution be less illegal-or more? 8 hr robert 4
"Slave clothes" My New, Original Work by Patric... 8 hr Outlaw Entitlements 2
Kim K has such a large azz, it turns me OFF. 9 hr Condoms unnecessary 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages