Comments
75,441 - 75,460 of 97,900 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76443
Nov 29, 2012
 
j_m_w wrote:
I keep seeing this on Facebook:
"PLEASE place your mouse over my name above (DO NOT CLICK), a window will appear, now move the mouse on “FRIENDS" (also without clicking), then down to "Settings", click here and a list will appear. REMOVE the CHECK on "COMMENTS & LIKE" and also "PHOTOS" by clicking on each one. By doing this, my activity amongst my friends and family will no longer become public.
Thank you very much for doing this. Now, copy and paste this on your wall.
Once I see this posted on your page I will do the same for you."
WTF, Facebook? People can't control their own privacy settings?
I think I've seen that before, like a couple of years ago. I ignored it.

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76444
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Exactly! You have no idea what their "Intent" is do you? Are they there to make me breakfast or bash me in the head with a bat and take my cereal? I dont know, so to keep innocent dogooders safe, I lock my doors and installed a doorbell so they can announce themselves.
When people circumvent these standard practices, then I have to assume their "Intent" is to attack me unaware, dispatch me with whatever means necessary (read kill me) and then take whatever they want.

The man said he had been robbed of his weapons, is it not logical to believe that these people were carrying them? So he was in danger, he was afraid for his life and had every right to shoot them.

How the hello can you defend punks who steal what you work so hard to buy? Their life is not worth more than mine, and if they break into a home and they get shot, too damn bad.

You live in a fantasy world if you think that the people who break into your home will leave you unmolested if you simply tell them to take whatever they want. That only empowers them to do more, because you are telling them they are safe from you trying to either stop them or trying to escape and call the cops. Hell, you may as well as just called them up and invited them over to rob you.
Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? How do you know what their "intent" is? How much do people hate to get to a place where they shoot them dead when you're in no danger? How paranoid do you have to be in order to be so afraid to lose a possession that it's worth more than a life? I'm not saying give your stuff out, but there's a lot of room in between those two extremes.
It's too bad common sense has been lost for some.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76445
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I've been around the block a few times myself.
And I have seen people walk away from justifiable homicide.
That man and his false show of bravado will not stand up to the scutiny of truth, I do believe.

Since: Mar 09

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76446
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I'm mostly with Race and Sub on the shooting thing. I do think it was cold-blooded of the guy to finish off the intruders the way he did, but at the end of the day, they broke the law. He felt threatened and did what he had to do to protect himself.

Since: Mar 09

Miami, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76447
Nov 29, 2012
 

“A Programmer is not in IT!”

Since: Feb 09

Neda, stay with me!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76448
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

I have to agree about the kill shots, but just like road rage, or Berny Getz (sp) he was beyond pissed off, it was a total release of frustration/anger/impotence. He was running on adrenaline and in total fight or flight mode, and he was fighting.
Too easy to stand on the sideline and judge when he should have stopped, and he probably should have, but I can relate to his inability to see that line himself.
j_m_w wrote:
I'm mostly with Race and Sub on the shooting thing. I do think it was cold-blooded of the guy to finish off the intruders the way he did, but at the end of the day, they broke the law. He felt threatened and did what he had to do to protect himself.

“Fort Kickass”

Since: Sep 09

Bloomington, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76449
Nov 29, 2012
 
j_m_w wrote:
I'm mostly with Race and Sub on the shooting thing. I do think it was cold-blooded of the guy to finish off the intruders the way he did, but at the end of the day, they broke the law. He felt threatened and did what he had to do to protect himself.
Yeah, same. It was really easy for them to just *not* be there. I don't think the law will see it that way, but *shrug*.

Toj

“Equality”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76450
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

RACE wrote:
Exactly! You have no idea what their "Intent" is do you? Are they there to make me breakfast or bash me in the head with a bat and take my cereal? I dont know, so to keep innocent dogooders safe, I lock my doors and installed a doorbell so they can announce themselves.
When people circumvent these standard practices, then I have to assume their "Intent" is to attack me unaware, dispatch me with whatever means necessary (read kill me) and then take whatever they want.
The man said he had been robbed of his weapons, is it not logical to believe that these people were carrying them? So he was in danger, he was afraid for his life and had every right to shoot them.
How the hello can you defend punks who steal what you work so hard to buy? Their life is not worth more than mine, and if they break into a home and they get shot, too damn bad.
You live in a fantasy world if you think that the people who break into your home will leave you unmolested if you simply tell them to take whatever they want. That only empowers them to do more, because you are telling them they are safe from you trying to either stop them or trying to escape and call the cops. Hell, you may as well as just called them up and invited them over to rob you.
<quoted text>
I'm not defending the punks. They belong in jail -- just not a grave.

Toj

“Equality”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76451
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

RACE wrote:
Exactly! You have no idea what their "Intent" is do you? Are they there to make me breakfast or bash me in the head with a bat and take my cereal? I dont know, so to keep innocent dogooders safe, I lock my doors and installed a doorbell so they can announce themselves.
When people circumvent these standard practices, then I have to assume their "Intent" is to attack me unaware, dispatch me with whatever means necessary (read kill me) and then take whatever they want.
The man said he had been robbed of his weapons, is it not logical to believe that these people were carrying them? So he was in danger, he was afraid for his life and had every right to shoot them.
How the hello can you defend punks who steal what you work so hard to buy? Their life is not worth more than mine, and if they break into a home and they get shot, too damn bad.
You live in a fantasy world if you think that the people who break into your home will leave you unmolested if you simply tell them to take whatever they want. That only empowers them to do more, because you are telling them they are safe from you trying to either stop them or trying to escape and call the cops. Hell, you may as well as just called them up and invited them over to rob you.
<quoted text>
And I've actually been robbed. You really shouldn't assume you know what path people have been on in life.

If someone is that paranoid to lie in wait for the robbers, shoot them and then shoot them again after lying bleeding to death -- why wouldn't they install ADT or something similar? Not enough money? Sell a gun or two out of the arsenal.

I think they're paranoid people who don't stop and think for a minute. Hmmm, people have been robbing me. I think I'll install a security system and put 911 on speed dial. Make sure my locks are good. I'll also make sure I have personal protection on me IN CASE I NEED IT.

Toj

“Equality”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76452
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

PEllen wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Vigilantes affirmatively assume teh role of teh police/ sherrif and pursue people they consider to be wrong doers.
This guy defended himself and his house from a forceable felony as it was occurring. Big difference
I seriously cannot entertain your viewpoint. The way that whole thing was set up in that situation was murder to me and I feel you're defending a murderer by painting a broad picture on any home robberies. Free country and all that -- think what you wish.

Toj

“Equality”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76453
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

j_m_w wrote:
I'm mostly with Race and Sub on the shooting thing. I do think it was cold-blooded of the guy to finish off the intruders the way he did, but at the end of the day, they broke the law. He felt threatened and did what he had to do to protect himself.
If you truly believed someone was going to rob your house, would you wait for them INSIDE to shoot them if you were afraid for your life? Really? And NOT call the police. Really?
PEllen

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76454
Nov 29, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
If you truly believed someone was going to rob your house, would you wait for them INSIDE to shoot them if you were afraid for your life? Really? And NOT call the police. Really?
You can do a heck of a lot more legally to an intruder once he is in your premises than you when he is on the front porch

“Fort Kickass”

Since: Sep 09

Bloomington, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76455
Nov 29, 2012
 
Toj wrote:
<quoted text>
If you truly believed someone was going to rob your house, would you wait for them INSIDE to shoot them if you were afraid for your life? Really? And NOT call the police. Really?
Not saying I'd do what he did. I don't even own a gun. But it's hard for me to feel sympathy for the deceased.

“WE WON TOPIX! YAY!”

Since: Jun 09

Schaumburg, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76456
Nov 29, 2012
 
PEllen wrote:
<quoted text>You can do a heck of a lot more legally to an intruder once he is in your premises than you when he is on the front porch
OK- now you're just scaring me!

What have you been up to?!
PEllen

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76457
Nov 29, 2012
 
Toj wrote:
L1: Purchase a firearm. Invite her over but make sure there's no evidence of that invitation. When she's inside your home, shoot her dead. I hear it's perfectly fine to shoot for a kill if someone is in your house.

Pellen responds:
No, and you are exaggerating. You can shoot an intruder on your premises, not someone you have invited in. There is a difference

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76458
Nov 29, 2012
 
Now it turns out, they think the two teens were related to a bunch of other home burglaries. The house they robbed on Wednesday, they stole 8 prescription medicines (including drugs for diabetes).

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76459
Nov 29, 2012
 
by the way, here's a pic of the two teens. Not exactly what you'd picture, eh?

http://www.startribune.com/local/181189391.ht...

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76460
Nov 29, 2012
 
Oops. Six bottles of meds, not eight. Also:

"Schirmers said his department or the sheriff's office had 19 "contacts" with Kifer this year, ranging from traffic stops to reports of suspicious activity or theft.

"Police had contacts of a similar nature with Brady, Schirmers said, though he declined to be specific, citing Brady's status as a juvenile when killed."

I'm sorry they died, and I think the guy was wrong to kill them the way he did, but they were living a high-risk lifestyle.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76461
Nov 29, 2012
 
PEllen wrote:
Pellen responds:
No, and you are exaggerating. You can shoot an intruder on your premises, not someone you have invited in. There is a difference
No, no, no, you're confusing this with vampires! They have to be invited in before they can bite you! ;)

Toj

“Equality”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76462
Nov 29, 2012
 
PEllen wrote:
Toj wrote:
L1: Purchase a firearm. Invite her over but make sure there's no evidence of that invitation. When she's inside your home, shoot her dead. I hear it's perfectly fine to shoot for a kill if someone is in your house.
Pellen responds:
No, and you are exaggerating. You can shoot an intruder on your premises, not someone you have invited in. There is a difference
That's why you have to make sure there's no evidence of it!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 min ABC 49,422
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min sonicfilter 1,099,363
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 17 min Jacques from Ottawa 177,277
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 31 min Mothra 46,281
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 43 min TRD 68,341
Abby 8/24/14 1 hr RACE 13
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 68,925
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••