Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193367 Aug 28, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
All you're doing is proving that everyone involved in the worldwide Intel lied to the Democrats too or that they were the only ones too stupid to know they were being lied to.
Did the UN lie to them too?
Stop insisting on proving how dumb your side can be.
Quit yer lying, you stupid old hag!!

The rest of the world didn't believe Bush. He stampeded stupid Americans like you into a war with his lies, all of which have been proven. No WMD's, no nothing.

The UN refused to authorize Bush's stupid war, you idiot.

France, Russia, Mexico, Canada, China, Germany, Brazil and most other nations of the world saw it for wat it was..........open aggression.

BTW, how did it work out??

We lost, and the Middle East is on fire, thanks to stupid Repugnants.

Iraq War was the biggest disaster of this new century. And we will reap the poison it created.

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1193368 Aug 28, 2014
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>He didn't have any to get rid of. The UN was bullied and lied to my our government, you recall Colin Powell with his pictures going before the UN. All lies and they lied to Congress to get the Democrats on board.
Our government had nothing to do with the UN or its resolutions regarding Saddam's WMDs. The first resolution was in 1991. That was during Clinton's presidency if you recall.

Resolution 687 Bans Iraq WMD ::: April 3, 1991
Shortly after Iraq is ejected from Kuwait by an international military coalition, the United Nations Security Council passes its first resolution addressing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in Iraq. Resolution 687 states that Iraq must destroy its presumed stockpile of WMD, and the means to produce them. It also limits the country's ballistic missile capability.

Resolution 715 Demands Compliance ::: Oct. 11, 1991
Responding to Iraq's consistent efforts to interrupt or block inspection teams, the U.N. Security Council passes Resolution 715. The resolution says Iraq must "accept unconditionally the inspectors and all other personnel designated by the Special Commission".

'Defensive' Biological Weapons ::: May 1992
Iraq officially admits to having had a "defensive" biological weapons program. Weeks later, UNSCOM begins the destruction of Iraq's chemical weapons program. Progress is halted in July when Iraq refuses an inspection team access to the Ministry of Agriculture.

Denial and Acceptance ::: 1993
Inspections are again held up when Iraq attempts to deny UNSCOM and the IAEA the use of their own aircraft in Iraq. In late 1993 Iraq accepts resolution 715.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php...

And on and on it went for another ten years. The heat just got hotter under Saddam's attempts to defy the world.
Grey Ghost

Berryville, VA

#1193369 Aug 28, 2014
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
Democrats War on Women continues:
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, without naming any names, claimed in a new book that male colleagues made off-color remarks about her appearance – with one even allegedly squeezing her stomach and telling her:“Don't lose too much weight now. I like my girls chubby.”
The 47-year-old Democratic New York senator discussed her new book,“Off the Sidelines,” in an interview with People, which published the excerpts.
In 2010, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid reportedly called her “the hottest member.”
As usual you are clueless, she didn't name anyone. But they sound like you chauvinistic baggers who treat women as objects and give them no respect. They are suppose to curtsy when you appear. You treat them all as if their name was CAROL who teaches curtsy classes knee pads and all.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

East Hartford, CT

#1193370 Aug 28, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid Waxman!!
Even Repugnants know women hate them!!
""Women Don't Think The GOP Cares About Them, Internal Report Confirms""
"A new internal Republican report confirmed that women are not fans of the GOP, and Republicans have more work to do if they want the female vote.
The report, which was obtained by Politico, found that although Republicans have tried to improve outreach to female voters, women still believe the party is "stuck in the past" and "intolerant." Forty-nine percent of women polled for the report looked on the GOP unfavorably. Only 39 percent felt that way about the Democratic Party.
The study was commissioned by two conservative groups: Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS and the American Action Network.
It offered a stark picture of how women view the Republican Party as a whole. Women are "barely receptive" to the party's policy proposals, the report said, in part because Republicans "fail to speak to women in the different circumstances in which they live."
The report drew its conclusions from focus group discussions and a poll of 800 registered women voters. In top issue areas, such as health care, the economy and education, the poll found that Democrats held a huge advantage. For example, when considering which side "wants to make health care more affordable," the women surveyed chose the Democratic Party by a 39 percent margin. They also said that a policy of equal pay for equal work would "help women the most.""
----------
Stupid right wing mopes!!
Stupid Nutsack!!

This is a Democrat woman complaining who would be hanging around with Democrat men, dumbass.

In 2010, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid reportedly called her “the hottest member.”

ROTFLMAO!!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193371 Aug 28, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you just a teeny weeny bit curious what the UN meant by "serious consequences" if Saddam had thumbed his nose up at them and the rest of the world one more time?
Because if there's any criticism on my part of Bush taking down Saddam's regime when he did, it's not knowing what those "serious consequences" would have been.
But, even so, the UN gave him 15 resolutions and years of time to get rid of his WMDs. They probably would have been surprised too.
Tale your alzheimers elsewhere, you crazy old hag!!

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1193372 Aug 28, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
the source i cited was where i saw it.
FOX has become low entertainment for the the rest of the media. it's like 'Oh there's FOX doing it again.' so the next thing you know it's been put up for the edification of the rational masses so we can all have a giggle.
Maybe you should seek out different sources. Or actually watch the video of that "confrontation".

I found it very easily. Wasn't anything like you or your source implied.
Boca Loca

Palm Coast, FL

#1193373 Aug 28, 2014
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you on this one; why can't parents make breakfast and lunch for their own children?
Second question: was she white?
I overheard a young woman say she couldn't put her boyfriends name on the babies birth certificate because then he'd have to pay child support. Both white.
lily loves the race card (and her vodka, of course).

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193374 Aug 28, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama's just doing what he promised the Russians he would do...be more "flexible".
Wonder what he gave them in exchange for taking a dive and giving them the title of world power.
Why are you ancient alzheimers patients all eager for war??

Because you don't have to go, that's why.

It's easy to talk tough when you're in a nursing home wasting your life on Topix, like Nobraina and Carol are..........
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1193375 Aug 28, 2014
The most interesting news about Fox News is that for some years now it has been damaging the right far more than the left. As a pair of political analysts wrote at Reuters last year,“When the mainstream media reigned supreme, between 1952 and 1988, Republicans won seven out of the ten presidential elections,” but since 1992, when “conservative media began to flourish”(first with Rush Limbaugh’s ascendancy, then with Fox), Democrats have won the popular vote five out of six times. You’d think they’d be well advised to leave Fox News to its own devices so that it can continue to shoot its own party in the foot.

The notion that Fox News has been defeated would seem absurd if you judge solely by the numbers. The year just ended was the network’s twelfth in a row as the most-watched cable-news network. Its number of total viewers surpasses CNN and MSNBC combined. As the longtime Rupert Murdoch–Fox News watcher Michael Wolff wrote of the cumulative 2013 ratings,“Nobody has come close to competing” with Ailes.“He gets larger, everybody else gets lesser.” But as Wolff also observed,“The cable audience, for all the attention heaped on it for its theoretical political sway, is not that large.” To put it mildly. As the overwhelming leader in its field, Fox draws just over a million viewers in prime time—a ­pittance and a niche next to even the ever-declining network newscasts, of which the lowest rated (CBS Evening News) still can attract a nightly audience as large as 8 million.

Fox News’s political sway in the real world, as opposed to its power to drive MSNBC viewers and their fellow travelers nuts and to generate ridicule from late-night comics, is also on the wane. Speaking to the Television Critics Association in Los Angeles in January, Jeff Zucker, the former NBC chief executive now trying to revive CNN (averaging a mere 568,000 prime-time viewers in 2013), complained like countless before him that Fox is an arm of the GOP “masquerading as a cable-news channel.” It doesn’t take rocket science to figure that out: No fewer than five Republican presidential hopefuls, not to mention Karl Rove and Glenn Beck, were on-camera as paid Fox personalities at the start of the 2012 election season; Murdoch is a GOP donor; and Ailes is a former Republican political operative whose partisan record extends back to his big break as Richard Nixon’s media guru in 1968. But there’s nothing in Fox’s viewership numbers, either in magnitude or in demographic hue, to suggest that there’s a significant number of voting-age Americans who at this point do not already know that Fox News is a GOP auxiliary and view it, hate-watch it, or avoid it accordingly. The masquerade that Zucker seems to find a revelation was unmasked years ago.

http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/fox-news-201...

and now some nutjob will castigate me for obsessing on FOX while they obsess on my obsession.

if you want me to quit taking shots at FOX....quit acting like it matters.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193376 Aug 28, 2014
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Homer...No doubt Galt will be the one with the deepest bunker. California would be wasted real quick.
Nobraina is no more in CA than you are.

He's been in PA forever, watching his boy Corbett lose the upcoming election..........

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193377 Aug 28, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Lois Lerner's emails still exist....Koskinen should be directed to find them or face a contempt charge......
and Lois Lerner was a c
areer Civil Service slug (like you)......not a Presidential appointee....
Lois Lerner was a perasonal appointee of George Bush.

. Laura didn't like it at all.

I see you're as ignorant as ever, nursing home boy..........
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1193378 Aug 28, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should seek out different sources. Or actually watch the video of that "confrontation".
I found it very easily. Wasn't anything like you or your source implied.
3 of your Topix ilk tried to tell me that incident never happened. maybe you should explain to them how easy it was to find, and the next time they won't end up looking the fool.

though extremely doubtful on the latter.

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1193379 Aug 28, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Sadam could have been controlled through sanctions & subversion by helping his enemies within Iraq.
To keep an eye on or to promote regime change can all occur without an INVASION.
What part of that don't you whiners get.
The UN had been repeatedly denied access to many of Saddam's facilities and scientists.

The first UN resolution was passed in 1991. There were 15 more to come. That should tell you something if you used your brain instead of parroting your brainwashing.

Saddam admitted early on he had WMDs but destroyed them. Yet UNSCOM was still denied total access to prove this over and over again.

Ten years later, the UN finally got to the point of issuing "serious consequences" if Saddam did not comply with their demands.

Again, this should tell you something if you could think for yourself.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193381 Aug 28, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, let's try this....
If you're going to insist Bush lied to the Democrats about Saddam, there are only three scenarios to prove you're right.
1. Bush changed the worldwide Intel information of which they were privy hoping they wouldn't find out.
2. The UN lied to them too.
Or...
3. They really weren't as easily duped as you must think and knew exactly what the rest of world knew and used the excuse of being lied to for political advantage.
Now you have to pick the one that backs up your claim.
Bush lied about intel that th eUN never spoke of, you idiot.

Bush lied in the State of the Union, openly lying about what the British intel had discovered.

Look up the yellowcake issue, you stupid FOXBOT alzheimers patient.

But wait, there's more!!
----------

""Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war""

"WASHINGTON (CNN)-- President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001, according to a study released Tuesday by two nonprofit journalism groups.

"In short, the Bush administration led the nation to war on the basis of erroneous information that it methodically propagated and that culminated in military action against Iraq on March 19, 2003," reads an overview of the examination, conducted by the Center for Public Integrity and its affiliated group, the Fund for Independence in Journalism.

According to the study, Bush and seven top officials -- including Vice President Dick Cheney, former Secretary of State Colin Powell and then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice -- made 935 false statements about Iraq during those two years.

The study was based on a searchable database compiled of primary sources, such as official government transcripts and speeches, and secondary sources -- mainly quotes from major media organizations. ""

----------

And you're a worse liar than Bush, you stupid old hag!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1193382 Aug 28, 2014
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
In August, Rush lost four radio stations in three weeks.
name one example where Limbaugh "lost" a station rather than moving to a competing station.....

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193383 Aug 28, 2014
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
The old idiot Grey Ghost talking to himself again:
<quoted text>
Waxman's obsession with Ghost continues.

Waxman wants to bear Ghost's children!!

HAHAHAHAHAHHA

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1193384 Aug 28, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, let's try this....
If you're going to insist Bush lied to the Democrats about Saddam, there are only three scenarios to prove you're right.
1. Bush changed the worldwide Intel information of which they were privy hoping they wouldn't find out.
2. The UN lied to them too.
Or...
3. They really weren't as easily duped as you must think and knew exactly what the rest of world knew and used the excuse of being lied to for political advantage.
Now you have to pick the one that backs up your claim.
""Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war""

And Carol is a worse liar than Bush.

But then, she's got alzheimers, like Reagan!!
No Surprize

Largo, FL

#1193385 Aug 28, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you ancient alzheimers patients all eager for war??
Because you don't have to go, that's why.
It's easy to talk tough when you're in a nursing home wasting your life on Topix, like Nobraina and Carol are..........
We can tell more about a loser like nuc by what you say about others than we can by what others say about you old timer..

Are you a Type II diabetic??

It's the culture...
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#1193386 Aug 28, 2014
Signs the Progressive 'we did not build that economy' economy is on fire!

'Kia to open $1-billion
auto factory in Mexico'

http://lucianne.com/thread/...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1193387 Aug 28, 2014
Mugsy wrote:
<quoted text>
You totally missed the gist of what I was saying, which honestly doesn't surprise me being the misguided goon that you are. Please tell me where I specifically said it was ok to lie? The point is the Democrats believed that WMD's were a threat through their own admission coupled with the Intel Bush gathered, and thus signed off on it. In other words, nobody put a gun to their heads to endorse the war as they could have opposed it. That said, you're just another obstinate liberal regurgitating the same drivel, huh? Trying thinking for yourself sometime as you might feel better.
bushie boy told them son.

the same way bushie boy tried to tell the UN.

Does that help?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 11 min IBdaMann 51,386
want 31 min piyush91 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 40 min wojar 184,799
Dear Abby 2-26-15 49 min Kuuipo 8
wishes 3 hr iyya 1
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Not Yet Equal 51,332
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr David Morrison 99,159
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:18 am PST

Bleacher Report 7:18AM
Best Options to Replace Briggs This Offseason
Bleacher Report 8:12 AM
Buzz: Colts Eyeing Trades for Veteran WRs Including Marshall
Bleacher Report 1:14 PM
Could Bears Ever Get Fair Trade Value for Forte?
Bleacher Report 1:40 PM
Wayne Undergoes Surgery on Triceps
NFL 2:44 PM
Reggie Wayne had surgery, mulling Colts future