Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1418041 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1179835 Aug 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
So what happened, Dweeb??
More of your brainless melodrama!!
Obama won, and the Constitution is safe from the Mormons!!
The Constitution does not give the President the authority to grant amnesty to any person or group of people violating the law.
Please tell us why the Democrats are telling the country Obama plans to violate the Constitution and write his own immigration law this month.
You do realize that the difference between the United States of America and a dictatorship is, here in the United States of America the people write the laws, and in a dictatorship the head of state writes the laws and can select people to grant amnesty to after they violated the law, right?
So, tell us why the Democrats are telling the Country Obama will write his own immigration law this month. What's wrong with the people writing the laws?

You forgot to tell us why the Democrats have 2,700 tanks in the DHS. What's the plan?
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#1179836 Aug 4, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
Fox News analyst Juan Williams on Sunday confronted the CEO of the Heritage Foundation for his role in “demonizing” President Barack Obama to the point that many all-white tea partiers were calling for impeachment.
During a panel discussion on Fox News just moments after Rep. Steve King (R-IA) suggested impeaching the president, host Chris Wallace asked Heritage CEO Michael Needham if there was grassroots support for impeachment hearings.
“The trouble with a lawless president is it’s very difficult to constrain him because he doesn’t care about the law,” Needham opined.“He’s totally out of control.”
“He’s a lawless president?” National Journal‘s Ron Fournier interrupted.“Is that really a phrase you want? He’s a lawless president? Completely lawless?”
Needham argued that Republicans were suing Obama instead of impeaching him because “they’re trying to find a way to constrain a lawless president.”
Williams, however, said that it was exactly that kind of talk that was creating a groundswell for impeachment.
“You listen to Michael, and you understand why there are lots of Republicans who think,‘This man’s a demon, this guy’s awful, we got to get this guy out of here any way we can, he’s breaking the law,’” Williams explained.“I hear this on talk radio, I hear this in conservative columns, that people are saying they think this guy’s way over the line. And then they say, we got to find a way to get him.”
“And then you hear from Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann and others,‘Yes, we use the impeachment word,’” the Fox News analyst continued.“And then you come on and say,‘Oh, no. We’re not talking about impeachment, that’s the Democrats.’ All the Democrats are doing is taking advantage of the fact that you guys have demonized President Obama to this extent.”
Williams also pointed out that many minorities saw the impeachment talk as “an attack on the first black president,” and “it’s unfair so it’s going spur their turnout in midterms which is going to be critical in several races.”
Wallace interrupted to ask Williams to clarify whether or not racism was driving impeachment.
“Well, all I can do is look at the numbers,” Williams replied.“If you look at the core constituency of people, let’s say, who are in tea party opposition support of impeachment, there’s no diversity. It’s a white, older group of people.”
“I would say, if you just break it down as a matter of political analysis and say who is this group, it reminds me that the Republican Party has become almost a completely white party,” he observed.
Needham seemed shocked that he was being accused of “demonizing” the president.
“Because I’m saying the president of the United States is lawless, which by the way, the Supreme Court agreed with,” Needman remarked.“You’re the one demonizing people who are concerned about the fact we have a crisis of the Constitution!”
“The people who want him impeached, they’re all white!” Williams exclaimed.“And they’re all older. And guess what? They’re all in the far right wing of the Republican Party.”
“And he might have well just said,‘And they’re all racists,’” Needham quipped.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/03/fox-pun...
Phenomenal!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1179837 Aug 4, 2014
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
1.7 million souls in Gaza
even though Obama is pro-Hamas, Congress is overwhelmingly pro-Israel, on a bipartisan basis....

where does Frau Clinton stand???....
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#1179838 Aug 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
And here's Nobraina before Rmoney got creamed!!
Notice how he dropped that name after the election??
He also pretended to move to CA, but that's just another of his lies..........
I relly like to remind these asshats what they've said in the past..........kinda proves their ignorance.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Remember how he used to insult everything about CA?

Interesting how Romney lives in CA and MA; the two most liberal of blue states.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1179839 Aug 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
This is a reminder of how crazy these Teabagging mofos are..........
"If Obama is elected, Putin will invade Ukraine."

"Russia is the most significant geopolitical foe of the United States."

"The 80s called and they want their foreign policy back".

Well, the 30s called and they want their foreign policy back.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1179840 Aug 4, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress is the representation of the people, dumbass.
Originally, the constitutional republic consisted of two entities: the states, and the people. The states were represented by the Senate. The people were represented by the House of Representatives. Today, the states have no representation in government, and both the Senate and House of Representatives are chosen by the population.
Now that your lesson in American civics is over....
Laws in the United States are written by the people.
Furthermore, in the United States of America, the President does not have the authority to give amnesty to anyone or any group of people. He is limited to giving pardons to individuals. And, here in the United States of America, the laws are written by the people, and the President is prohibited from writing any law. Furthermore, the President is commanded by the Constitution to "take care the laws are faithfully enforced".
If you don't feel like an idiot now, it's because you are an idiot.
You didn't say "Congress is the representation of the people", idiot.

You said the people write the laws.

I've never seen anything like that happen.

Congress writes the laws they want, often ignoring the wishes of the people.

The people heavily support backround checks on guns. According to Gallup (the same ones who you used to predict Rmoney's win:).

Where is the law reflecting the will of the people??

You lose, as usual, you mindless twerp.

----------

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162083/americans-w...

""PRINCETON, NJ -- Sixty-five percent of Americans say the U.S. Senate should have passed the measure that would have expanded background checks for gun purchases, while 29% agree with the Senate's failure to pass the measure."
Lily Boca Raton FL

Boca Raton, FL

#1179841 Aug 4, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Because Valerie Jarrett is the actual President, and she is 100% Communist Party USA enemy of the United States and her sole purpose for existence is the destruction of the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America.
Obama is nothing more than an ignorant buffoon with an extraordinary talent to read a teleprompter and give the impression that he actually knows what he is saying. If he were not in politics, he'd be one of the best actors the world has ever seen. After all, all an actor does is convince you they are something they are not. There is no argument about Obama being a great actor. He's a pathological liar, and he has the remarkable ability to convince most people he actually believes what comes out of his mouth.
So if Svet goes to visit her Babushka; they probably won't let her back into the country; so will you join her in Norilsk?
Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1179842 Aug 4, 2014
Teaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Your allegiance to a terrorist group is baffling.
What does it matter if they didn't know which tunnels Israel knew about? Tunnels have one purpose and they shouldn't have been in any of them. I suppose they were on a humanitarian mission. LOL
If doing what you have to do in order to survive is a humanitarian mission then the answer is yes. And bombs have just one purpose and the Israelis have abused that power. You might just want to look up the word allegiance. I have an open mind between both parties here. If you choose to ignore how the Palestinians arrived at the point we are now then you aren't concerned about the real reasons.You ignore the abuse administered from Israel from day one. They are being held hostage in what was once their country by a band of expansionist hell bent to have all the land and run every last Palestinian from that land.

The atrocities have been flagrant from day one. Where do the Palestinians go from where they are, pushed and confined into a small corner with no ability go or move anywhere, relying entirely on water and power from the Israelis. Through the years there have been far more attacks on the Palestinians that the other way around. The Israelis are professional crybabies and use sympathy as one of their biggest tools to do their dirty deeds. I will vote that we never give those murdering liars another penny and that is the only language that they will understand. For that idiot NetaYAHOO to tell us to never second guess him again...The nerve of that fat lying punk.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1179843 Aug 4, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution does not give the President the authority to grant amnesty to any person or group of people violating the law.
Please tell us why the Democrats are telling the country Obama plans to violate the Constitution and write his own immigration law this month.
You do realize that the difference between the United States of America and a dictatorship is, here in the United States of America the people write the laws, and in a dictatorship the head of state writes the laws and can select people to grant amnesty to after they violated the law, right?
So, tell us why the Democrats are telling the Country Obama will write his own immigration law this month. What's wrong with the people writing the laws?
You forgot to tell us why the Democrats have 2,700 tanks in the DHS. What's the plan?
It's the 'Tanks for Zionists' plan. They all get sent to Israel, America's lords and masters.

----------

Read the news, Boehner told Obama to take Executive Action on the border!! DUH

""Boehner Encourages Obama To Take Executive Action, One Day After Voting To Sue Obama Over Executive Action""

""Hours before Congress broke for the August recess, House Republicans claimed that the President could use executive action to fix the border situation with unaccompanied children fleeing violence in the Central American countries of Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. In a press statement released Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and other House Republican leaders indicated that President Obama could address the crisis “without the need for congressional action,” a statement tinged with some irony given that just the day before, House Republicans had slammed the President with a lawsuit claiming executive overreach.
“This situation shows the intense concern within our conference – and among the American people – about the need to ensure the security of our borders and the president’s refusal to faithfully execute our laws,” the House Republican leadership press release stated.“There are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now, without the need for congressional action, to secure our borders and ensure these children are returned swiftly and safely to their countries.”""

----------

You walked right into that one, Dweeb!!

How's it feel to get hit in the face with a pile of sh it??
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1179844 Aug 4, 2014
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>

Contrary to your assertion laws aren't about morality but about maintaining order in society. Laws against theft and murder aren't addressing the immorality of these acts but rather the negative impacts they have on a functional society.
this is possibly the stupidest f*cking statement that Dupie has made in a career of stupid f*cking statements...
TSM

El Paso, TX

#1179845 Aug 4, 2014
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you show some visible signs of being a man and quit yourbitchin and whining loser, crybaby.
Grey, I see your Campaign and Chief is doing what he does Best ‘ Fundraising/Golf ‘ he’s not much at governing so focus on what you’re good at…..??
Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1179846 Aug 4, 2014
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he's short and had to buy a bride from Russia....so it's understandable.
It's idiots like old DB that will enable the Dems to win presidential elections for a long time. I still think we will do well in the midterm also. After all they are against everything and for nothing. Just the "FACT" that the nutso baggers have shown to be their leader is or should be enough proof for most sane people.
YYYY GUY

United States

#1179847 Aug 4, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution does not give the President the authority to grant amnesty to any person or group of people violating the law.
Many of these liberal idiots don't want the unknown millions of illegals granted amnesty. They're just supporting the D.C. regime because they have no choice. It's blasphemy to speak against the agenda.
Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1179848 Aug 4, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
this is possibly the stupidest f*cking statement that Dupie has made in a career of stupid f*cking statements...
Not to worry loser, your record is untouchable. Have you ever given any thoughts to opening up a charm school???

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1179849 Aug 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
So what happened, Dweeb??
You were so certain..........
It does explain your insanity over Obama beating your heroes twice in succession..........
Course, being a loser, you should be used to it.
You're running away from the issue, moron. Obama says he intends to declare a dictatorship this month. Do you think he'll need that massive war machine he built in the federal agencies to make it happen?

Never liked McCain since he co-authored the obviously unconstitutional Line Item Veto legislation in 1996. Constitutionalists never liked him. Social conservatives never liked him. How he got the nomination is still a mystery. Everyone on Earth knew he was a sure loser. Perhaps that's related to the RINO leadership in Congress sabotaging opposition to the Democrats' agenda.
The last election had so many locations where the Democrats were so stupid they programmed the voting machines to steal 100% of the vote, nobody knows how the election really went. An idiot knows that only the most stupid programmers will be so stupid they program the voting machines to steal 100% of the vote. The vast majority of voting machines were programmed to steal one in three or one in four votes. Nobody knows how the election went, even after Christie's sabotage. If you use statistics, assuming that most of the voting machines the Democrats programmed to steal votes weren't programmed by idiots to steal 100% of the vote, it looks like Romney may have actually won. Now, back to what you're running away from....

You're doing anything you possibly can to avoid discussing the topic. Obama says he will violate the Constitution and write his own law this month.
Actually, the Democrats are just testing the water to see if there will be a significant reaction to Obama declaring a dictatorship.
So, if there is a significant opposition to Obama declaring a dictatorship, do you think Obama will order the DHS to use those 2,700 tanks they have to enforce the dictatorship?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1179851 Aug 4, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
this is possibly the stupidest f*cking statement that Dupie has made in a career of stupid f*cking statements...
No, he was 100% correct.

It can be proven, nitwit. Pierre was right, again, you are the stupid one.

As usual, Nobraina/Galt has his head frmly planted inside his ass.

Looks like Carol's faux sense of morality is rubbing off on him..........

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1179852 Aug 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
It's the 'Tanks for Zionists' plan. They all get sent to Israel, America's lords and masters.
----------
Read the news, Boehner told Obama to take Executive Action on the border!! DUH
""Boehner Encourages Obama To Take Executive Action, One Day After Voting To Sue Obama Over Executive Action""
""Hours before Congress broke for the August recess, House Republicans claimed that the President could use executive action to fix the border situation with unaccompanied children fleeing violence in the Central American countries of Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. In a press statement released Thursday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and other House Republican leaders indicated that President Obama could address the crisis “without the need for congressional action,” a statement tinged with some irony given that just the day before, House Republicans had slammed the President with a lawsuit claiming executive overreach.
“This situation shows the intense concern within our conference – and among the American people – about the need to ensure the security of our borders and the president’s refusal to faithfully execute our laws,” the House Republican leadership press release stated.“There are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now, without the need for congressional action, to secure our borders and ensure these children are returned swiftly and safely to their countries.”""
----------
You walked right into that one, Dweeb!!
How's it feel to get hit in the face with a pile of sh it??
The Constitution says the President cannot write his own laws, moron. Now, who are you going to believe, the Constitution or RINOs who want amnesty but can't do it because it will be suicide for them?
I'd believe what's written in the Constitution. Perhaps you, and Obama, too, should read it at least once in your lives.

The Constitution does not give the President the authority to grant amnesty to any person or group of people violating the law.
Please tell us why the Democrats are telling the country Obama plans to violate the Constitution and write his own immigration law this month.
You do realize that the difference between the United States of America and a dictatorship is, here in the United States of America the people write the laws, and in a dictatorship the head of state writes the laws and can select people to grant amnesty to after they violated the law, right?
So, tell us why the Democrats are telling the Country Obama will write his own immigration law this month. What's wrong with the people writing the laws?
You forgot to tell us why the Democrats have 2,700 tanks in the DHS. What's the plan? Do you think Obama will need those 2,700 tanks in the DHS to declare his dictatorship?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1179853 Aug 4, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
"If Obama is elected, Putin will invade Ukraine."
"Russia is the most significant geopolitical foe of the United States."
"The 80s called and they want their foreign policy back".
Well, the 30s called and they want their foreign policy back.
If Bush is elected, Putin will invade Georgia and Ossetia..........

And Bush will do nothing..........no sanctions..........no support for Bush's Georgian alllies..........nada......... .

You wonder where Putin got the idea for Crimea..........

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1179854 Aug 4, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
No, he was 100% correct.
It can be proven, nitwit. Pierre was right, again, you are the stupid one.
As usual, Nobraina/Galt has his head frmly planted inside his ass.
Looks like Carol's faux sense of morality is rubbing off on him..........
And, as usual, you forgot to put the proof in your post.

So, do you think Obama will need those 2,700 tanks he has in the DHS to declare his dictatorship? Or, do you think Americans will just lay down while the Constitution goes away.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1179855 Aug 4, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You're running away from the issue, moron. Obama says he intends to declare a dictatorship this month. Do you think he'll need that massive war machine he built in the federal agencies to make it happen?
Never liked McCain since he co-authored the obviously unconstitutional Line Item Veto legislation in 1996. Constitutionalists never liked him. Social conservatives never liked him. How he got the nomination is still a mystery. Everyone on Earth knew he was a sure loser. Perhaps that's related to the RINO leadership in Congress sabotaging opposition to the Democrats' agenda.
The last election had so many locations where the Democrats were so stupid they programmed the voting machines to steal 100% of the vote, nobody knows how the election really went. An idiot knows that only the most stupid programmers will be so stupid they program the voting machines to steal 100% of the vote. The vast majority of voting machines were programmed to steal one in three or one in four votes. Nobody knows how the election went, even after Christie's sabotage. If you use statistics, assuming that most of the voting machines the Democrats programmed to steal votes weren't programmed by idiots to steal 100% of the vote, it looks like Romney may have actually won. Now, back to what you're running away from....
You're doing anything you possibly can to avoid discussing the topic. Obama says he will violate the Constitution and write his own law this month.
Actually, the Democrats are just testing the water to see if there will be a significant reaction to Obama declaring a dictatorship.
So, if there is a significant opposition to Obama declaring a dictatorship, do you think Obama will order the DHS to use those 2,700 tanks they have to enforce the dictatorship?
We're supposed to respond to your insane conspiracy theories??

I proved how crazy you were by posting your Rmoney stupidity.

Just so everyone knows to ignore the crazy Dweeb with his crazy theories and Russian lies.

Are you out for good, or are you still wearing the ankle bracelet I saw you with at Court??

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 13 min Rogue Scholar 05 222,397
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 15 min They cannot kill ... 9,380
Word (Dec '08) 16 min They cannot kill ... 6,694
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 17 min They cannot kill ... 3,031
last post wins! (Apr '13) 34 min They cannot kill ... 1,455
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 39 min PEllen 1,930
amy8-25-16 49 min PEllen 2
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 54 min PEllen 103,452

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages