Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Olive Oil

Buffalo, NY

#1162292 Jul 7, 2014
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
You wish to repeal the 14 Amendment or did you fail 9th grade civics?
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
That's what I stated about anchor babies, they're American Citizens via an illegal act committed by their mothers crossing The Border to drop their anchors.

Did I mention anything about repealing the 14th Amendment ...

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#1162293 Jul 7, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney lost because evangelicals would not support a member of the LDS Church.....
And any Republican running in 2016 will lose because America will not support a racist, war-mongering shill for the wealthy.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162294 Jul 7, 2014
Olive Oil wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I called him a "Blind Melon Chit-Lin" ...
Not a Watermelon, not a Chitterling, a Chit-Lin as in a little chit - Known as a play on words, silly lily.
Let me break it down for you further to dispel your delusions:
Blind Melon Chitlin ... A chit head who can't see the truth.
That's MY MEANING within the usage. And if you don't like it ... Oh Well.- Your Problem
You cabeza crazy chit-lin !
Lily loves the unjustified, incorrect use of the race card.

Then she proceeds to chastise others for what her party started.

The left downright lied about Bush and Clinton/Gore were the very first presidents to openly demean a sitting president by badmouthing his policies, while on foreign soil no less.

Lily and the other libtarded morons here certainly are hypocrites and Blind Melon Chitlins for sure.

DOH!

Did I use the word Chitlins?

Now I'm certain the thread moron DumbDave will chime in I'm a racist!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#1162295 Jul 7, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
14-year old girls should not be "sexually active".....
Previous to WWII 14 yoa girls were marrying men in their twenties and out in the farm route even older..

Wasn't it Willie Robertson who recently said, "son, ya gotta getem when they're about 14."

Wasn't it Willie's wife who recently said, "our first child was born out of wedlock."

Do try to keep up with the real word eh John.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162296 Jul 7, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
States decide that. I thought everything was great as long as it was decided by the State?
Most staters require parental consent for those under 18. Most of those have an option to go before a judge to avoid parental notification.
Waas up lapdog?

Call anyone a racist yet today?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162297 Jul 7, 2014
Dumb Dave, Sily the Vodka hag or Grey Boast for sure:
Oily Olives wrote:
<quoted text>
Shaddupa you face.

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1162298 Jul 7, 2014
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor women, and men, and children, often do not have any money, food, shelter or transportation ..... thus your question tends to ignore this.
Unlike some of the other posters, you do seem to occasionally realize that many people are poor.
Grinding poverty nixes health care, cutting food stamps and Medicaid speeds this process
peace
Have a few more minutes. But your post gives me an opportunity to share this story.

My daughter's friend worked for the government and took applications for food stamps and government assistance. There were strict guidelines as to who can and who cannot qualify.

She would almost break down in tears sometimes because people who were really poor, hungry and homeless and were begging for help didn't qualify while others who owned fancy cars did.

This system is broken. If it's not fixed and there isn't reform soon, all of the bleeding hearts in the world won't help those who really need it.

Everyone wants their tax dollars to help those who are really in need. Almost everyone.

But food and shelter, I would think, is more important than birth control. Especially when anyone can walk into Planned Parenthood supposedly and get them for free already.

Surely, you would agree.

“No Tea for Me”

Since: Nov 13

Centennial, Co

#1162299 Jul 7, 2014
Now that Hobby Lobby can mandate what their employees do with their health care I guess they will also mandate what they do on their vacation and with their holiday bonus's

Hobby Lobby will mandate what their employees eat since they spend "their" paycheck on food~ No Soup For You~

Eating red meat is against Hobby Lobby's religion SOooooo...No Burger King for if you work for Hobby Lobby....You are spending the pay check they provide you with so they can mandate what you do with it....

The Supreme Court has lost their collective minds....their latest ruling sets a terrible president against FREEDOM! and a citizens right to chose what's best for THEM!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#1162300 Jul 7, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservatves are more concerned about stopping illegal immigration than about controlling the personal lives of others.....
Republicans own illegal immigration__what conservatives are you speaking about?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162301 Jul 7, 2014
Only a mature person like Lily would say this:
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
He's fat enough to be three people
Guess what sag jowl, most fat people are liberals like you, because they are lazy and don't exercise like upper class people who are self-sufficient. You really are an idiot.

Not one of my conservative froiends have a "fat" problem, but every one I know that if a leftard is fat.

You might be skinny, but that is due to your addiction to hard liquor.

How's your neighbors in that "high class" neighborhood, lowlife?

Baawwaahhh!!!!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#1162302 Jul 7, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney lost because evangelicals would not support a member of the LDS Church.....
Yeah, and that he was an arrogant lying pos.

Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann laughing at him probably didn't help.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162303 Jul 7, 2014
Nostrilis Waxmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
And any Republican running in 2016 will lose because America will not support a racist, war-mongering shill for the wealthy.
Mark Rich?

Hillary Clinton for sure.

Vernon Jordon?

You really are an idiot.

Your wealth card is as overplayed and ridiculous as your race card, Commie Democrat.

Nobody is buying that snake oil anymore Obamabot zero.

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1162304 Jul 7, 2014
But, yes, Galt, it really is extremely unfortunate that some people can't see the bigger picture despite their personal beliefs and a great leader like Romney slipped through our fingers.

However, he, himself, was responsible for letting several golden opportunities slip through his own fingers in two of the debates.

You can't blame that on anyone else but him. Like O'Reilly said, Romney just didn't want it bad enough...it was his for the taking.

I kind of have to agree with him.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#1162305 Jul 7, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
Have a few more minutes. But your post gives me an opportunity to share this story.
My daughter's friend worked for the government and took applications for food stamps and government assistance. There were strict guidelines as to who can and who cannot qualify.
She would almost break down in tears sometimes because people who were really poor, hungry and homeless and were begging for help didn't qualify while others who owned fancy cars did.
This system is broken. If it's not fixed and there isn't reform soon, all of the bleeding hearts in the world won't help those who really need it.
Everyone wants their tax dollars to help those who are really in need. Almost everyone.
But food and shelter, I would think, is more important than birth control. Especially when anyone can walk into Planned Parenthood supposedly and get them for free already.
Surely, you would agree.
My daughters friend???

ROFLMAO
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162306 Jul 7, 2014
KarlVIIIII wrote:
Now that Hobby Lobby can mandate what their employees do with their health care I guess they will also mandate what they do on their vacation and with their holiday bonus's
Hobby Lobby will mandate what their employees eat since they spend "their" paycheck on food~ No Soup For You~
Eating red meat is against Hobby Lobby's religion SOooooo...No Burger King for if you work for Hobby Lobby....You are spending the pay check they provide you with so they can mandate what you do with it....
The Supreme Court has lost their collective minds....their latest ruling sets a terrible president against FREEDOM! and a citizens right to chose what's best for THEM!
How appalling individuals can make up their own minds about religious freedom.

That must drive you nuts, commie!

What about that 9-0 vote where Obama subverted the constitution with his Labor (Union) appointments?

North Korea is the place for you son!

I'll pay for your ticket so you can leave the USA son!
Olive Oil

Buffalo, NY

#1162307 Jul 7, 2014
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Lily loves the unjustified, incorrect use of the race card.
Then she proceeds to chastise others for what her party started.
The left downright lied about Bush and Clinton/Gore were the very first presidents to openly demean a sitting president by badmouthing his policies, while on foreign soil no less.
Lily and the other libtarded morons here certainly are hypocrites and Blind Melon Chitlins for sure.
DOH!
Did I use the word Chitlins?
Now I'm certain the thread moron DumbDave will chime in I'm a racist!
Lily is one of the main race baiters on this thread.
She swallowed the leftist racists propaganda whole.
And became A Blind Melon Chit-Lin.
Lily has no business calling anybody Racist or Crazy ...
Leave them to the misery of their own making.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1162308 Jul 7, 2014
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Republicans own illegal immigration__what conservatives are you speaking about?
Were you born a liar or did your stupidity develop after all the drugs as a youth?

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1162309 Jul 7, 2014
Nostrilis Waxmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
And any Republican running in 2016 will lose because America will not support a racist, war-mongering shill for the wealthy.
You mean like John Kerry and Barack Obama?

Kerry voted for the war in Iraq and Obama is a war president and they both shill for the wealthy when it comes to donations - much more than Republicans.

“No Tea for Me”

Since: Nov 13

Centennial, Co

#1162310 Jul 7, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
But, yes, Galt, it really is extremely unfortunate that some people can't see the bigger picture despite their personal beliefs and a great leader like Romney slipped through our fingers.
However, he, himself, was responsible for letting several golden opportunities slip through his own fingers in two of the debates.
You can't blame that on anyone else but him. Like O'Reilly said, Romney just didn't want it bad enough...it was his for the taking.
I kind of have to agree with him.
You got to be kidding right? Romney a delusional whack job that believes Missouri is the Garden Of Eden among other whacked out schit?

Since: Jan 11

Bordentown, NJ

#1162311 Jul 7, 2014
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Really??
Point out one thing Lily stated that is not correct.
Because she said it perfectly. You asshats want to change basic women's rights already codified in US Law by the Supreme Court ruling.
The SC ruled abortion to be legal and Constitutional. You seem to think that can be ignored.
Tell us how 50 different sets of rules for women nationwide can be constitutional.
Same with the same-sex marriage issue. You nitwits want to make basic Civil Rights a State by State decision. Strictly Unconstitutional.
C'mon, Teabag, for once don't walk away from your dumb commentary.
One thing? Like conservatives want to bring back slavery? That thing?

I hate to break the news to you, but there are 50 sets of criminal laws, traffic laws, contract laws, divorce and custody laws, liquor laws. Should I go on?

The supreme court ruled a state can't ban gay marriage. The supreme court also ruled for extending federal benefits to same sex marriage, now get this, where it is legal.

Roe v. Wade decision protected against banning abortion. It doesn't prevent regulation just like guns can't be banned, but the states can regulate their use.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 5 min L Morales 71,239
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Guru 182,073
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr Religionthebiglie 51,284
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr OzRitz 49,316
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr moe 98,875
Is Vanessa Hudgens A PORN-STAR ?? (Oct '07) 7 hr Jenny Derin 187
Holiday Greetings 8 hr Scrooge and Cratchit 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Breaking Down Colts' Game Plan vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Can't-Miss Picks and Matchup Guide
Bleacher Report 8:09 AM
Breaking Down Bears' Game Plan vs. Vikings
NBC Sports 9:15 AM
Lance Briggs "happy" with Robbie Gould's comments
Bleacher Report11:45 AM
Complete Week 17 Preview for Vikings vs. Bears