You're a total moran: I like this from the comments:
Forensic use of DNA technology in criminal cases began in 1986, this case was in 1975. It is a shame so many people are taking this out of context. Many rape cases before 1986 were often mishandled or the defendant proven innocent based off of the fact that we did not yet have DNA testing at the time. That was Hillary Clinton's point. What is sad is you are politicizing the rape of a 12 year old girl for political smearing. THAT is what I find offensive. The court documents are online as well, you might read them to know what you are talking about."
The job of a defense attorney is to defend her client; you fking idiot. Hillary will be the next president no matter how much you sniff her panties. Get used to it. You rightwingers have been trashing the Clintons for 30 years, there's nothing left that we don't already know.
Find a candidate! HA! You've got no one who can beat her!!
I take it that "hilarious" knows more than the jury that convicted the turd? She is basically telling the jurors they were wrong and that she is right? She knows the turd did not rape the 12 year old? That any one convicted of rape prior to 1986 should be freed because there is no DNA evidence? "hilarious" knows this case was mishandled? Of course in your sick mind the jury was right when they exonerated oj of murder.