Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1600280 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

United States

#1140099 May 22, 2014
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical republican reply. Whenever they can't articulate an intelligent reply they call it communist. Galt another McCarthy child. All of my comments have come from sources that have won noble awards on economics and or consultants to American corporations. Now how about Galt???
"noble awards on economics"??????....

ROTFLMFAO at your ignorance.....
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#1140100 May 22, 2014
Oh look!

Hillary gets to vote!

"Woman, 92, without photo ID gets state approval to vote"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/05/22/wo...
Bernard Forand

Greenwich, CT

#1140101 May 22, 2014
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
Socialist SpermBall for sure!
<quoted text>
Your lack of intelligence increases with each of your comments. Name me one sovereignty that does not have socialism within its constructs. Perhaps you prefer the way of anti social polices. A hermit? A dying conscript for existence Such as you demonstrate with your diminishing intelligence. Your corrupted topix judgement indicates your lack of self esteem.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#1140102 May 22, 2014
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical republican reply. Whenever they can't articulate an intelligent reply they call it communist. Galt another McCarthy child. All of my comments have come from sources that have won noble awards on economics and or consultants to American corporations. Now how about Galt???
Actually, his observation about you/your source was dead nuts spot on, commie.

That website is most certainly socialist and you yourself has admitted to being an avid socialist.

Truth hurts, eh, commie?

Have a nice day, "Bernard".

ROTFLMAO!!!
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#1140103 May 22, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
"noble awards on economics"??????....
ROTFLMFAO at your ignorance.....
Old "Bernard" Foreskin sure is a piece of work!

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#1140104 May 22, 2014
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Funny....
... all you ever bring is bad news... er... opinions!!!!
See? This is why you (and most liberals) are so confused.

After posting three sources and quoting each of them - The Chicago Tribune, The Washington Examiner and the Harvard website (showing the poll of young voters turning away from Democrats)- you want to think it's still my "opinion" rather than "facts".

You really have to pop that bubble of denial sooner or later.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#1140105 May 22, 2014
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Your lack of intelligence increases with each of your comments. Name me one sovereignty that does not have socialism within its constructs. Perhaps you prefer the way of anti social polices. A hermit? A dying conscript for existence Such as you demonstrate with your diminishing intelligence. Your corrupted topix judgement indicates your lack of self esteem.
What a weak and boring argument. Your other comments are baseless and simply venting your frustration & anger.

Snore.....
Patrick n Angela

United States

#1140106 May 22, 2014
Nostrilis Waxmoron wrote:
<quoted text>
What difference does it make?
President Bush had both 9-11 tragedy and the stock market crash on his watch.
Benghazi will most likely not hurt Sec. Clinton in the hands of republican polemists
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1140107 May 22, 2014
Hello fellow working people, retirees, and rightwing domestic terrorists.
How is everyone today?
help

Belgrade, Serbia

#1140108 May 22, 2014
Urgent help for the people in Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia victims of devastating floods!
No Surprize

Largo, FL

#1140109 May 22, 2014
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Your lack of intelligence increases with each of your comments. Name me one sovereignty that does not have socialism within its constructs. Perhaps you prefer the way of anti social polices. A hermit? A dying conscript for existence Such as you demonstrate with your diminishing intelligence. Your corrupted topix judgement indicates your lack of self esteem.
SCAPEGOATS ANYONE?

Socialism does not work, as endless historical attempts have demonstrated. Millions killed, more than all religious wars combined. And... In order to overcome this problem, those attempting to institute socialist systems, find scapegoats or someone to blame..

Hitler blamed the Jews and gassed them.
Mao blamed the intellectuals and "re-educated" them.
Stalin blamed the Bolsheviks and sent them to the gulag.
Pol Pot blamed the shopkeepers and suffocated them.
Obama bin Lying blames the rich.

Help fight against left-winger bagger insanity... Occupy Obama!!

It's the culture..
Realtime

Deland, FL

#1140110 May 22, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
The Arizona congressional candidate who claimed last week that “99 percent” of mass shootings in the United States were perpetrated by Democrats is under fire again for statements in which he allegedly compared Arizona police to the Nazi’s elite SS guard.
According to the Arizona Republic, Republican congressional candidate and hotel owner Gary Kiehne was complaining to reporters about the difficulties he faced trying to get employees through police checkpoints during the 2011 Wallow Fire. He reportedly said that the police manning the checkpoints were like Nazi SS agents and all too willing “to shoot you and me.”
A campaign spokesman for Kiehne, Chris Baker, wrote in an email to the Republic that his candidate was taken out of context. He said that Kiehne “always wondered how German soldiers in [World War II] could turn on their own people with martial law, but after seeing martial law implemented during the Wallow Fire, he understood how it could happen.”
Upon learning of the comments, the Arizona Police Association and the Arizona Fraternal Order of Police both called for Kiehne to withdraw from the race. In a letter, the Fraternal Order of Police said that the candidate had “lost any and all credibility,”
“It’s rare that a candidate for the United States Congress makes a statement as repugnant and offensive as your comments to the Arizona Republic,” the letter continued.“We need adults in office, Mr. Kiehne. For that reason alone, you should terminate your campaign immediately.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/05/22/az-poli...
How about Florida house member Chas VanZandt who's convinced that Common Core will turn students gay.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#1140111 May 22, 2014
Patrick n Angela wrote:
<quoted text>
President Bush had both 9-11 tragedy and the stock market crash on his watch.
Benghazi will most likely not hurt Sec. Clinton in the hands of republican polemists
Anyone who has a functioning brain (which would exclude you!) knows that 911 was being planned and worked on for years before Bush took office. Bill Clinton's mess you idiot.

Keep being wishful, zombie liberal.
Bernard Forand

Greenwich, CT

#1140112 May 22, 2014
Angela wrote:
<quoted text> Does this mean your Thursday quotient of unemployed baby daddies ready to pump you full of more illegitimate welfare tickets has already been met today?
You are an fine example of the definition of naive. Observe the creators of welfare; One example; Wal-Mart that pay less than living wages to their employees. Thus those employees become eligible for welfare programs. Average cost to communities that have Wal-Mart stores is $900,000 per store, for subsidizing Wal-Marts pay rolls with welfare programs for their employees. How about the efforts by republicans to keep wages at levels below living wages? Hmmm... That is what you support, then you cry and cry why,why.. Simple because thats what you vote for. Over and over again. NAIVE!

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#1140113 May 22, 2014
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you're cherry picking Carol. The bottom line is that no WMD were found and American lives and treasure were wasted to bolster George W's ego. As the Downing Street memo stated;
"Military action was now seen as inevitable, Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
A separate secret briefing paper for the meeting said Britain and the United States had to "create" conditions to justify a war.
And you're just gullible enough to believe he never had them and never used them and wouldn't develop them again as soon as the world wasn't watching anymore to unleash them here in our country with a vengeance paying the selected "delivery man's" family handsomely.

You forgot to mention that part.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#1140115 May 22, 2014
Homer wrote:
Hello fellow working people, retirees, and rightwing domestic terrorists.
How is everyone today?
Us hard working patriotic people are just fine, but you leftwing domestic terrorist Democrat Obama voting sponges have been whining all day long, son.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1140116 May 22, 2014
Patrick n Angela wrote:
<quoted text>
President Bush had both 9-11 tragedy and the stock market crash on his watch.
Benghazi will most likely not hurt Sec. Clinton in the hands of republican polemists
Don't forget the housing market collapse and the collapse of the banks, plus 2 unpaid for wars, etc etc etc

And now much like Hitler he is also a failed painter.
Democrat liars

Chicago, IL

#1140117 May 22, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So your claim is that health insurance was always affordable??
This coming from a person whose premiums are subsidized by the tax payers.
Now that's really funny.
The LA Times has been as friendly as possible to the Obama administration, but they can't ignore this. Today they broke the story that another massive lie around Obamacare has been told to the Congress and the American people. As you know "If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan" was ranked as the biggest lie of the year by the Washington Post. Well here comes an early contender for this years award.
The Republicans have been accusing the Obama administration of building into Obamacare an insurance plan for the insurance companies. A bailout if the insurance companies lost money under Obamacare. Their claim was that in the law was something called the temporary risk corridor program. Under that Republicans said the administration had allowed themselves a way to take tax dollars and bailout an insurance company that lost money. But the administration and the Democrats have denied that. Apparently the administration and the Democrats had been telling the truth...and didn't like it.
The LA Times reports that late last week hundreds of pages of new regulations were added to Obamacare. Their reporters went through it and found a few key paragraphs. The change in regulations essentially provides insurers with another backup: If they keep rate increases modest over the next couple of years but lose money, the administration will tap federal funds as needed to cover shortfalls. This could be hundreds of billions of dollars!
This is a classic bait and switch. The middle class will feel like they're getting a break on insurance premiums. As long as they don't look at the governments check book, they'll believe the Affordable Health Care Law is working. It only unravels if they realize they are paying double for their insurance, because the increase is being charged to their account in the form of more debt.
The Republicans are expected to go nuts over this, and the Democrats will point at the scene they are making and say 'look how fanatical those people are'. I would warn Republicans against making a big deal out of this. In the medical field it's called bedside manner. You're about to inform the patient (America) that it has a potentially fatal disease (debt). They are going to get a 2nd opinion from the Democrats that will contradict your diagnosis. If you come off as raving lunatics, the patient will believe the diagnosis of the other doctor who is telling them they're fine. Conservatives don't have the luxury of showing anger anymore. They have been rightly angry over a number of scandals, but it turns the middle off. It's vital that the middle hears and comprehends what your message is.
Read more: http://www.wvoc.com/onair/jonathon-kelly-4968...
Bernard Forand

Greenwich, CT

#1140118 May 22, 2014
Homer wrote:
Hello fellow working people, retirees, and rightwing domestic terrorists.
How is everyone today?
Right wing terrorist are spewing their nonsense as usual. Its all they have left. Anything constructive? Nope. Nada A Thing. Just same old, same old mud raking with no substance of intelligence.
Democrat liars

Chicago, IL

#1140119 May 22, 2014
Homer wrote:
Hello fellow working people, retirees, and rightwing domestic terrorists.
How is everyone today?
How are you today liar?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
congradulations CHICAGO 21 min Whatever 4
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 28 min Junket 11,297
dead in a freezer in a freaking hotel man. i sw... 31 min Whatever 21
News Some in Cicero take issue with flying of Mexica... (Oct '08) 1 hr Okay 1,573
Coffee with Jesus. 2 hr Beelzsabub 4
Whatever became of Vida? 3 hr Motorcycle Hag 7
Black lives matter??? 4 hr Sup 7

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages