Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1418101 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Grey Ghost

Bumpass, VA

#1131656 May 5, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>The "cover up" exists in your mind too just for the fact that you have acknowledged that there was one. You libs make this Freudian slip all of the time and it is a dead giveaway that even you realize this as a "cover up". Plain and simple.
It basically only makes you feel better about just how phony it all is. That is your word for it not mine. It is a loser for your party as well it should be.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131657 May 5, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You would have to assume you have the infinite knowledge of a god to convince yourself of the accuracy of that statement you just made, moron.
So, just when did you begin to proclaim yourself a god?
Incognito claims to walk with Jesus son.

Perhaps you should clean your own house first....
LeosAnus

Palm Coast, FL

#1131658 May 5, 2014
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>We went to war with Iraq, dumbf*ck, a country that didn't harm us.
leosnananus done gots her babydaddies from Iraq while she ain't gots her fake teaching job on Mondays.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131660 May 5, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
7th grade civics... hmmmmmmm. I had civics in the 10th grade.
Is the United States a constitutional republic? Why, or why not?
What role does the constitution have in a constitutional republic?
Let's check your 7th grade civics knowledge.
lol! Actually son, you're more in a position to BE checked instead!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1131661 May 5, 2014
positronium wrote:
<quoted text>"Why conservatives so desperately need a scandal" A scandal already exists and it is you libs that recognize, acknowledge, and reinforce the fact that there exists a scandal in all of the liberal press.
not so liberal press....

What the batch of e-mails (most of which aren’t new, they can be read here) show is the opposite: that the CIA and the State Department assembled talking points pinning the attacks partly on the video, without any input from the White House.

.... Meanwhile, Republicans, and Krauthammer in this instance, are trying to pretend the White House played a role that we have no evidence, just our own suspicions, to believe they did.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/376867/w...

if anyone actually had proof, would we now need a select committee?

no. they have nothing, so.......the FOX debacle continues.
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#1131662 May 5, 2014
Science and...

you can always trust a professor....

'The University of Connecticut’s Health Center has alerted 11 scientific journals that studies they published that were performed by one of the university’s researchers may have included fabricated data.'

http://www.nutritionaloutlook.com/news/univer...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131663 May 5, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In 2008 the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment did secure the right of law-abiding, responsible adults to have handguns in their homes for protection. Yet the court went out of its way to acknowledge that most forms of gun regulation remain constitutionally permissible.“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited,” Justice Antonin Scalia, explained. In a sentence the NRA and many gun-rights extremists apparently missed, Scalia wrote that the Second Amendment is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
Let’s say that again: Justice Scalia, hero of the most intransigent conservatives in the country, stated unequivocally that restrictions of Second Amendment rights are constitutional.
Indeed, Scalia’s opinion in Heller warned that “nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt” on a wide range of gun laws, including bars on felons and the mentally ill from possessing guns, restrictions on guns in “sensitive places such as schools and government buildings,” or laws “imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.” These categories capture the vast majority of gun laws in America.
In short, there’s plenty of room under the Second Amendment for gun control.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02...
the Court decides. not right wing nutjobs. i'd think after all the GOP 'laws' that keep getting struck down for being unconstitutional you'd have figured that out by now.
so you may direct any questions to Judge Scalia. i'm just the messenger. though if you need more message just ask.
DBwhiner is really a certified reich wing nut job.

Nothing stands in the way of his opinion....

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1131664 May 5, 2014
forks_make_us_fat wrote:
Science!
you can always trust a scientist....
and....
'...The Cave Men Who Never Existed'
" On the July 16, 1971, NBC Nightly News, David Brinkley announced a stunning discovery:
"The outside world, after maybe a thousand years, has discovered a small tribe of people living in a remote jungle in the Philippines. Until now, the outside world didn't know they existed… and they didn't know the outside world existed. Their way of living is approximately that of the Stone Age."
http://www.livescience.com/4972-savage-hoax-c...
Hundreds of climatologists around the world today recognize global warming and you cite a news report from 1971 as evidence it's a hoax!
This wins the award for dumbass post of the day. Your only chance of getting beat is if Waxman shows up.
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#1131665 May 5, 2014
Science....

and always trust your politician....

'Energy Secretary Admits Yucca Mountain Data Fabricated'

http://www.senaahq.bravehost.com/nukedump/yuc...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131666 May 5, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You forgot to put the text from the Constitution into your post to defend your argument, moron.
Show us the text in the Constitution that allows restrictions on any right specified in the Constitution. As for the Second Amendment, I read "shall not be infringed".
What does "shall not be infringed" mean in the English language?
Funny thing is son, you only use your opinions to defend yours.

When you grow up, you might understand this..... someday!
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#1131667 May 5, 2014
Science!

and you can always trust our cancer researcher.....

'Sheng Wang, a former assistant professor and cancer researcher at the Boston University School of Medicine’s Cancer Center, fabricated data in two papers published in scientific journals, according to a report published Tuesday by the Boston Globe.'

http://dailyfreepress.com/2011/08/10/bu-cance...
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131668 May 5, 2014
harmonious wrote:
Poor Yeah, what a sap
Life Relationships Dating
After 19 years, American man finds out his wife was born a man
A 64-year-old American man wants to have his marriage annulled after he discovered that his Indonesian wife of 19 years had been born a man and had later undergone a sex change. The man, named Yeah[aka Fartsack} married Monica in 1993 despite legal difficulties raised by the Indonesian immigration authorities, Telegraph reported. It was a recent discovery that 48-year-old Monica had been born a man.
http://www.examiner.com/article/after-19-year...
lol! poor hammy.

He's trying to make a point without knowing what his point is!!!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131669 May 5, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what happens when the government is too big. The backlog was no more than 100,000 in 2008 under Bush's last year in office.
Look at the graph.
http://nation.time.com/2013/06/03/the-rise-an...
The backlogs began increasing dramatically at about the same time Obama was focused on his legacy - ObamaCare - instead. They peaked at almost 900,000 - just short of 1 million - in 2012. It's come down to around 800,000 presently.
Sorry but you can't lay the past six years, Obama's priorities and extenuating wars on Bush.
lol! Funny.

It looks like the article is blaming bushie boy for being backwards!!!! IOW, it's taken bushie boys mess to actually make progress!!!

Another mystery solved!

"...The downward slope is now steeper than at any time during the Obama administration.

To be sure, no one is yet measuring the drapes in a backlog-free department—as it still stands at more than 500,000 claims. Nevertheless, the trend line is striking—and it mirrors what many VA employees are saying behind closed doors. Barring any surprises, the decline in backlogged claims will only accelerate as an automated system finally replaces paper processing over the next two years.

Therefore, it’s important to understand where the backlog actually stands in relation to where it was—and to fully recognize its context...."
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131670 May 5, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
that's what they said about Watergate.....
the coverup is worse than the crime.....
Funny you should mention a '-gate'.

Bridge-gate seems much more real and factual than the Benghazi incident...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1131671 May 5, 2014
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>DBwhiner is really a certified reich wing nut job.
Nothing stands in the way of his opinion....
all well and good on an obscure internet forum.

real world; he's just another rabid FOXbot. a source of amusement, but little else.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131672 May 5, 2014
Incognito4Ever wrote:
<quoted text>
You should take a look at the TIME graph too.
http://nation.time.com/2013/06/03/the-rise-an...
VA backlogs in 2008: 100,000
VA backlogs in 2012: 900,000
Obama was too busy pushing his legacy down our throats and screwing up the ACA rollout to worry about fixing the antiquated system at the VA at the same time backlogs were increasing dramatically.
Seems that should have been his first priority. As well as the economy. And jobs.
lol! You should actually READ son.

You might not look as stupid...

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#1131673 May 5, 2014
Hey Waxy hurry up and finish doctoring up the judge its. See if you can beat forks for the dumbass post of the day. My monies on you.

Since: Mar 14

Orlando, FL

#1131674 May 5, 2014
Okay, reality check time for some of you on the left.

The homeless will NOT seek preventative care checkups under the ACA. They're worried about their next meal and will seek care in ERs the way they've always done in life and death situations.

The truly needy who lack transportation get around by city buses and can ride a bus to the nearest free health care clinic.

Many on welfare usually have a car, cellphone and a television. They can easily find their way to a free health care clinic.

It's the young people who couldn't sign up for the ACA because they don't have a job and/or couldn't afford it who will now be forced to seek care at these same clinics (or ERs) as well as those in the middle class who don't quite earn enough for government subsidies that the left should be concerned about.

Not to mention the economy is going to get worse.

The ACA was meant to give the government more power, social engineer our health care and raise our taxes.

The unintended consequences will become evident soon enough.

The employer mandate when millions more will lose their insurance and find themselves without affordable coverage will have to wait until after the elections. Obama knew it would sink the Democrats for sure.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131675 May 5, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama doesn't have a role in government other than to read prescripted messages from a teleprompter and sign documents as he's ordered to sign. I agree. Obama didn't have a clue about what was happening. He didn't know, or care whether what he said was a lie or not. He only knew that, in order for him to continue riding in the gold seat on the government gravy train, he had to obey his orders and repeat what he was told to repeat.
Should he have accidentally come across information that proved he was lying, then he would have known he was lying. Then, if he knew he was lying, he was committing treason.
Vallerie Jarrett is the President. Blaming Obama for anything is diverting from the real problem. He's just a smoke screen. He's not in charge of anything.
But, if he insists he's the President, then he gets the blame until he confesses that he doesn't have a clue what happens in government and all he's doing is what his handlers order him to do.
Son. You're just plain weird....
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1131676 May 5, 2014
Teaman wrote:
<quoted text>
Would there be a need for the hearings if there wasn't a cover up?
Prove there was a cover up.....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 min JRB 222,402
Word (Dec '08) 37 min PEllen 6,695
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 39 min PEllen 9,381
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 40 min PEllen 3,033
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 41 min PEllen 1,932
last post wins! (Apr '13) 1 hr They cannot kill ... 1,466
Jesus Christ is alive 1 hr Messenger 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr PEllen 103,452

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages