I am not a climatologist & neither are you.<quoted text>
Many physicists have examined what is supposed to happen when the GHGE operates- they find that it violated proven laws of physics and thermodynamic. What the GHGE is supposed to do is be a resonating energy system (a perpetual motion concept) which does not exist.
Having done searches for a credible experiment that proves that the greenhouse gas effect exists many lines have been examined. The searching included E-mails to the National Academy of Science(NAS), more that 50 major technical universities, many individuals at each of these universities and others , not one has been able to provide a credible experiment.
The only reply was from the Manager of the Energy department at NAS which said that they accepted the UN-IPCC reports without examining whether it was mathematically or scientifically correct. This is gross malfeasance. Every other scientific organization that has accepted the greenhouse gas effect by consensus has done the same thing.
Every projection using Computer Models used by the UN-IPCC have failed . Almost every day new findings are available that shows that the UN-IPCC reports are pure fairly -tales, totally corrupt. Even an entry below from the IPCC 4 edition shows this.
Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighb...
Still awaiting that proof Dave. Or are you just talk like Woodidiot?
You read the denier sites & post theory sh*t.
Last week, I shoved every one down your throat as being wrong.
CO2 is a greenhouse as & the greenhouse gas effect exists. The vast majority of scientists agree with that.
Why are Earth Temperatures not the same as the moon's?
Scientists have measured the radiation levels with varying concentrations of CO2.
This idea you present that there is no greenhouse gas effect is dumber than sh*t.