you are too stupid to understand this issue.<quoted text>
It's certainly not over. Michael Morrell testified under oath today.
Very interesting outcome.
Morell during his testimony Wednesday said,“no doubt it was a terrorist attack.” He said they just didn't know the motivations of those who carried out the attack because they hadn't been caught.
But earlier he testified:“We did not deliberately downplay the role of terrorists in the Benghazi attack in our analysis or in the talking points. And neither I, nor anyone else at the agency, deliberately misled anyone in Congress about any aspect of the tragedy in Benghazi.”
(Can't have it both ways. Either there was "no doubt it was a terrorist attack" or they DID downplay the role of terrorists in the attack.)
When asked about Susan Rice going on five networks to perpetrate the video lie, Morrell said he did not know the talking points would be used by then-U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice in her appearances on the Sunday shows.
Morrell said he did not know who took out the references to Al Qaeda in the talking points.
(But SOMEONE did take the references to Al Qaeda out of the talking points and SOMONE did tell Susan Rice to go on all those television shows and perpetrate a lie about a video.)
So how could the President of the United States not have known misleading and false information would have been perpetrated all over those newscasts and not make a public statement immediately denouncing the lie about a video?
No, it's certainly not over. But the liberal media will turn themselves into a pretzel still trying to convince some it is. And some will gladly ignore the inconsistencies in Morrell's testimony to protect corruption.
they tool out reference to AQ as there was no evidence suggesting it was them. this is what responsible statesmen do..
why are you still dancing on the graves of those brave americans that dies serving you?