Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1459028 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1078554 Feb 12, 2014
new yawk wrote:
In fact, central Africans are/were nomads. "Villages," don't/didn't exist there, except for those created to house Indo-Europeans. Current thinking is that the European focus on creating permanent homes for nomadic peoples has condemned those peoples to a life of suffering and squalor. Much like Texas come to think of it.
where did you get this information? nomadic jungle tribes? not usually...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1078556 Feb 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So cite the rule or order where Sebilius told hospitals whom to admit. Where Sebelius told insurance companies what their networks should be.
But hey, at least you admitting that Obama is using the power granted by Congress to make changes to the ACA.
Yesterday you freakin morons were having a fit about Obama circumventing Congress.
wrong again.....the ObamaKKKare legislation contained specific dates and did not grant the power to change those dates.....

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1078557 Feb 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I have news. The ACA is not insurance.
Galt is not interested in the truth in any way....
WOODtick57IQ

Satellite Beach, FL

#1078560 Feb 12, 2014
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>the ACA will pay people for services provided like lawn mowing?!?
do you enjoy lying openly?
"lying"? Did you say, "lying openly"?... LOL... Barack Hussein Obama: "Lie of the Year" ... LOL
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1078562 Feb 12, 2014
“Frankly, Rand Paul spending a lot of time talking about the mistakes of Bill Clinton does not look like a big agenda for the future of the country,” Rove said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/11/karl...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1078563 Feb 12, 2014
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
dance around this....
Most of NSA’s data collection authorized by order Ronald Reagan issued
Confusing though it may be, the order remains the primary authority under which the country’s intelligence agencies conduct the majority of their operations.
Neither the office of Attorney General Eric Holder nor that of Director of National Intelligence James Clapper would comment about 12333.
Under its provisions, agencies have the ability to function outside the confines of a warrant or court order, if approved by the attorney general. Its Section 2.5 effectively gives the attorney general the right to authorize intelligence agencies to operate outside the confines of judicial or congressional oversight, so long as it’s in pursuit of foreign intelligence – including collecting information of Americans.
“The Attorney General hereby is delegated the power to approve the use for intelligence purposes, within the United States or against a United States person abroad, of any technique for which a warrant would be required,” 12333 reads.
... blah... blah... blah...
so FOX whine all you want. won't make a bit of difference.
<spam>
Your argument reads:
"The Attorney General hereby is delegated the power to approve the use for intelligence purposes, within the United States or against a United States person abroad, of any technique for which a warrant would be required,” 12333 reads.
The Constitution says:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
So, if your argument is against what is written in the Constitution, which is right?
(Start your response with your answer to this question.)
Here's the factual history, dumbass. I know these facts aren't in your indoctrination sessions.
Reagan never authorized violating the 4th Amendment to the Constitution and spy on American citizens without complying with the requirements specified in the 4th Amendment.
If you disagree, cite the event.
The Patriot Act allowed surveillance of international communication to specific terrorist organizations identified, and domestic communication specifically tied to the intelligence gained from the subject communications. There are no known cases of spying on Americans without evidence associating them with terrorist organizations.
If you disagree, cite the event.
What is happening now is exactly like what Hitler and Stalin and every mass murdering dictator did, spying on the population in general. This is a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment. Using the office of President to intentionally (assuming Obama has ever read the Constitution in his life and actually knows what's written in it) violate the Constitution is rebellion against the constitutional republic - treason. Additionally, there are existing laws preventing one agency from sharing someone's personal information with any other agency without complying with the requirements specified in the 4th Amendment. Obama (assuming he's actually in charge of anything) is in blatant violation of that law and should be sent to prison.
The NDAA of 2010 assumes Congress has the authority to give the President the authority to violate the 5th Amendment to the Constitution and just "disappear" anyone at his whim, just like Stalin did to eliminate any opposition to any part of his government when he murdered about 20 million Russians. That unconstitutional law is still in effect in every NDAA since.
CZars_R_US

Orlando, FL

#1078566 Feb 12, 2014
new yawk wrote:
The "LAW" says that when the little red man is holding his or her hand up you must not cross the street or you will be guilty of a legally punishable offense. That's the LAW. In reality, however, there's a little jaywalker in all of us. "Jay Walker, Texas Ranger!" (Pitching a new idea for a vapid, ridiculous, TV show, just in case any Hollywood Jews might be reading this.)
Two RAYSIS post in the last 3. You on a roll.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1078567 Feb 12, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
the Obama news media has imposed a complete blackout on news of the Obama disaster in Syria.....
watch foreign news services to learn the truth....
wow.

you're really losing it son.....
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1078568 Feb 12, 2014
The Florida man on trial for shooting and killing 17-year-old Jordan Davis over an argument about loud music cried in court on Tuesday when he talked about his puppy.

During the first day of testimony, Michael Dunn told defense attorney Cory Strolla that he had chosen a hotel in Jacksonville for his son’s wedding that was pet friendly because he had a 7-month-old puppy at the time.

“We brought crates, food, things like that specifically for him,” Dunn explained, adding that all of his children were grown but the dog, Charlie, was like a child to him.

When Stolla asked the dog’s name, Dunn’s tears briefly interrupted his testimony as he wiped his face.

“His name is Charlie,” Dunn replied, choking up.

He later testified that he returned to his hotel room to care for the puppy instead of calling the police after killing Davis. He also ordered a pizza and said he had an alcoholic drink to calm down.

Dunn contacted the police the next day.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1078570 Feb 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I have news. The ACA is not insurance.
bullshit....

Medicaid is not insurance, but ObamaKKKare is crummy welfare insurance paid for by the taxpayers.....

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1078572 Feb 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbwaiter a couple of posts ago: "If you read the text to ObamaKare, you'll see where it states specifically "The Secretary will determine...." everything. "
Dumbwaiter above: "Congress doesn't have the authority to give anyone the power to rewrite any law."
So, did or did not Congress give Sebelius authority to make changes or not.
Read carefully, dumbass:

Congress doesn't have the authority to grant anyone the authority to violate the Constitution.
If you are confused about this, read the Constitution.

Do, you agree that the US government is being run like a village in the middle of Africa, right?
WOODtick57IQ

Satellite Beach, FL

#1078573 Feb 12, 2014
new yawk wrote:
<quoted text>
(See post above, chubby)
No, Fatazz.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1078574 Feb 12, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
<spam>
Your argument reads:
"The Attorney General hereby is delegated the power to approve the use for intelligence purposes, within the United States or against a United States person abroad, of any technique for which a warrant would be required,” 12333 reads.
The Constitution says:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
So, if your argument is against what is written in the Constitution, which is right?
(Start your response with your answer to this question.)
Here's the factual history, dumbass. I know these facts aren't in your indoctrination sessions.
Reagan never authorized violating the 4th Amendment to the Constitution and spy on American citizens without complying with the requirements specified in the 4th Amendment.
If you disagree, cite the event.
The Patriot Act allowed surveillance of international communication to specific terrorist organizations identified, and domestic communication specifically tied to the intelligence gained from the subject communications. There are no known cases of spying on Americans without evidence associating them with terrorist organizations.
If you disagree, cite the event.
What is happening now is exactly like what Hitler and Stalin and every mass murdering dictator did, spying on the population in general. This is a blatant violation of the 4th Amendment. Using the office of President to intentionally (assuming Obama has ever read the Constitution in his life and actually knows what's written in it) violate the Constitution is rebellion against the constitutional republic - treason. Additionally, there are existing laws preventing one agency from sharing someone's personal information with any other agency without complying with the requirements specified in the 4th Amendment. Obama (assuming he's actually in charge of anything) is in blatant violation of that law and should be sent to prison.
The NDAA of 2010 assumes Congress has the authority to give the President the authority to violate the 5th Amendment to the Constitution and just "disappear" anyone at his whim, just like Stalin did to eliminate any opposition to any part of his government when he murdered about 20 million Russians. That unconstitutional law is still in effect in every NDAA since.
since it has not been found unconstitutional, it means it is not considered an unreasonable search.

try to think for your self one time...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#1078575 Feb 12, 2014
new yawk wrote:
<quoted text>
So... um... equatorial Africa is a "jungle" eh? Perhaps to a Chinese... I believe any explanation I might offer at this point would be wasted on you. However, since you brought it up...
Perhaps you're confusing it with South America? A common mistake. Speaking of common mistakes, how's the little woman?
Central Africa is...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1078576 Feb 12, 2014
new yawk wrote:
In fact, central Africans are/were nomads. "Villages," don't/didn't exist there, except for those created to house Indo-Europeans. Current thinking is that the European focus on creating permanent homes for nomadic peoples has condemned those peoples to a life of suffering and squalor. Much like Texas come to think of it.
racist g.arbage....
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1078577 Feb 12, 2014
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/11/man-wan...

longtime anti-choice extremist is believed to have sexually fondled an 11-year-old girl in a Washington state grocery store and attempted to lure her outside.

The Seattle Times reported Tuesday that police are currently looking for 58-year-old Curtis Anton Beseda — who served more than a dozen years in federal prison for firebombing abortion clinics in the 1980s and 90s — on charges of child molestation and that a $250,000 warrant has been issued for his arrest.

On Saturday, a man believed to be Beseda approached an 11-year-old girl who was waiting for her father outside a restroom located in a Snohomish, WA Fred Meyer grocery store. Pressing his body against hers and grinding his pelvis into her backside, the man fondled her buttocks and thighs while whispering in her ear that he would buy her the drink she was carrying if she would just follow him outside.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1078578 Feb 12, 2014
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
But you aid the ACA gave the Secretary the authority to determine everything.
Were you lying??
And what does your wife needing an abortion have to do with anything?
It would help your credibility if you could cite an executive order that violated the Constitution, then provided the text from the Constitution to support your contention.
Obviously, that wasn't included in your indoctrination sessioins. Must be because there weren't any.
But, if you know of one, please show it to us.

Since: May 11

Carlisle, PA

#1078579 Feb 12, 2014
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
it costs Dave's lawn care service $25 in materials and labor to mow a lawn.....
Dave's customer has taxpayer-subsidized ObamaKKKare lawn insurance that will pay Dave $20 to mow the lawn....
Dave is overjoyed at the additional customers who will use his service....
Increased volume reduces the per hour costs.

Galt never ran anything other than his mouth or he would know these things
CZars_R_US

Orlando, FL

#1078580 Feb 12, 2014
new yawk wrote:
<quoted text>
I do. Particularly when there's a big-breasted redhead sprawled naked in my lap while the summer sun beats down on her sweaty, freckled body, pounding up and down like Lucifer's tail at a KISS concert.
Sexist too. You Libs are something!!!

Since: May 11

Carlisle, PA

#1078581 Feb 12, 2014
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It would help your credibility if you could cite an executive order that violated the Constitution, then provided the text from the Constitution to support your contention.
Obviously, that wasn't included in your indoctrination sessioins. Must be because there weren't any.
But, if you know of one, please show it to us.


We're not talking about any executive order.

Did or did you not say the ACA gave Sebelius the power to decide everything.

It is a simple GD question., Quit running from it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Word (Dec '08) 5 min GEORGIA 6,839
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 min CrunchyBacon 104,532
Triple Word Game (Dec '11) 8 min GEORGIA 1,026
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 10 min GEORGIA 2,284
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 12 min GEORGIA 3,456
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min Jacques in Ottawa 231,109
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 41 min SweLL GirL 9,865

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages