Barack Obama, our next President

Nostrils Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
Baawwaaahh!!!!
Hi there thread liar!
You have already proven that your notion of a "fact" is a "claim" from a single source you find on a single, far left website, then proclaiming "facts are fun!"
dolt.

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly!!
Probably 'Whatever'.
Funny how these nitwits attack Leosnana for her grammar corrections.
Then one of them does the same.
Pretty likely the National Socialist is a 'she'.
But remember, she believes in diversity, so long as it's all white!!

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Evidently, uninformed Eed has no knowledge that parts of that video had been translated into Arabic & broadcast of Arab TV on September 8th.
I just love how GD stupid you right whiners are.

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama's attack on income inequality is an attack on the middle class, just like ObamaKKKare....
if the minimum wage is in creased to $12, or $15, what happens to the guy who has worked his way up, to that level and is suddenly demoted to minim um wage???...
talk about de-motivation....

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
QUOTE who="Nostrilis Waxman"
Does anyone know whatever happened to the slut Fluker?
----------
Waxman's personal War on Women continues.
Typical Repugnant.
A racist, woman hater, and closeted gay sockpuppet!!

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Bravo!

flack wrote:

<quoted text> From Bush's speech September 20, 2001. Read it and weep libtard.
(APPLAUSE)
Americans are asking, "How will we fight and win this war?''
We will direct every resource at our command--every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence, and every necessary weapon of war--to the destruction and to the defeat of the global terror network.
Now, this war will not be like the war against Iraq a decade ago, with a decisive liberation of territory and a swift conclusion. It will not look like the air war above Kosovo two years ago, where no ground troops were used and not a single American was lost in combat.
Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes visible on TV and covert operations secret even in success.
We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place until there is no refuge or no rest.
And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.
(APPLAUSE)
From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime. Our nation has been put on notice, we're not immune from attack. We will take defensive measures against terrorism to protect Americans.

Todd Martin wrote:

<quoted text>Was the part about Hillary accusing the Lewinsky scandal part of a right wing conspiracy mentioned? Or that her husband has probably left a trail of abortions from coast to coast. But, I'll give him honorable mention from never drowning a date. Meanwhile, I applaud your attempt to make slick willy appear the innocent victim, and hope that CEOs will use your argument when they too sleep with the underlings at corporate headquarters.

Nostrilis Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
The fluker was a 30 year old pawn used by their was on dividing people. I have no war on women, lying lowlife NAZI.

Nostrils Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
Baawwaaahh!!!!
Hi there thread liar!
You have already proven that your notion of a "fact" is a "claim" from a single source you find on a single, far left website, then proclaiming "facts are fun!"
dolt.

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>wasn't it after this speech that Bush was holding hands with King of Saudi Arabia?

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
...and now Obama supports and arms terrorists in countries like Syria

USAsince1680 wrote:

<quoted text>
I listened to him on Meet the Press this morning. What a nutcase. He went on and on about how Hillary wasn't qualified to run for President because her husband took advantage of "a young girl".
You know the one...the young innocent girl who admitted she deliberately pursued and seduced Clinton while at the same time she was sleeping with another man with whom she became pregnant and had an abortion. THAT "young girl".
Yes, PLEASE GOD let Rand Paul be the Republican candidate!

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
wow, there are so many inaccuracies, falsehoods and ignorance of historical facts, one doesn't really know where to begin.
Let's start with Reagan winning the cold war. The Soviet Union was still intact when Reagan left office. No one person can take credit for winning the cold war, but many contributed to winning it more than Reagan.
George Marshall probably did the most towards winning the cold war with his Marshall Plan.
President Kennedy stance against Soviet aggression during the Berlin Airlift and expansion of Soviet nuclear arsenal into Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis were significant victories in the cold war. That along with the deployment of SLBM during his administration was another milestone in the cold war.
I noticed you forget to mention that after his initial tax cuts, Reagan raised taxes every year during the rest of his presidency.
Or that he tripled the national debt