Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1417671 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034872 Dec 4, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans do not need to discredit OBAMACARE, it is already discredited on its own.
lol! And yet, they try and try and try and try and try and....
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034873 Dec 4, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
You still believe the lying media that admitted it lied to you?
Where do you think Syria got its weapons, idiot?
Are you this stupid or are you an idiot?
lol! And yet, still no wmd proof!

Reich wingers.... the 'take my word because I don't lie' party!

I love this comedy channel!
LCNLin

United States

#1034874 Dec 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Your pal, Rachael Maddow, isn't too happy with Obama's Prolonged Detention speech.
"One of the most radical proposals for defying the Constitution that we have ever heard to the American people."
http://www.bing.com/videos/search... :-)D
Keep in mind, Obama's "enemies" aren't just foreign enemies...
Are you becoming a RINO?
Going soft on President Obama?

Rachael Maddow is to the left of President Obama.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034875 Dec 4, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Every Obamabot here is a frustrated poor underachieving liberal moron.
They are nasty, angry people who are easy prey for the Fascist Socialist Party run by Obama.
Facts and the truth simply do not matter to these haters who blame everyone for their being losers.
lol! And the reich wing nuts like you are scared, mindless, idiotic hold the line, no compromising wing nuts!

The only facts that matter to them are those they conjure up!
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#1034876 Dec 4, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a trip! So, now you're a libertarian? LOL!
Cannon is a Republican who once served as a policy adviser/analyst on the senate's Republican policy committee.

He's also, according to Forbes, one of Obama's chief antagonists re; the Affordable Care Act and certain other issues.

The Cato Institute began as a Libertarian think tank founded by Charles Koch__over time however the organization has swung so far to the right that it no longer resembles the Libertarian points of view.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034877 Dec 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Show us that report.
And, you're running away from this... again.
"The proposal shall not include any recommendation...."
Please tell us how that sentence forbids rationing. It merely forbids a recommendation in some "proposal" from some element you forgot to mention.
If you read the ObamaKare law, you will read "The Secretary will determine..." everything.
As the ObamaKare law is written, "The Secretary" will determine who gets health care, and who does not.
Any idiot can tell you that there is not an infinite source for health care. As the demand for health care increases, and the supply of health care does not match increased demand, then the statement of the law "The Secretary will determine" is the controlling statement. "The Secretary" will ration health care, you fucking moron.
Now, if you want to be taken seriously here, find the part of the ObamaKare law that defines the specifications "The Secretary" must satisfy to ration health care.
You can't. It doesn't exist. The rationing of health care is solely the subjective discretion of "The Secretary".
lol! You mean like how you run from masks son?

What will you think of next?

I love this comedy channel!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034878 Dec 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Today, the Democrats have driven the credibility of the United States in the world so far down, the United States has absolutely no influence over any situation anywhere in the world.
So, since it's obvious the Democrats have made the United States the clown in the room, just what is all that drivel you posted about?
In case you don't keep up with current events, Kerry just agreed to let Iran continue enriching Uranium, you moron, just to give the appearance that the US is some kind of a player in the game.
The US is sitting on the end of the bench, idiot.
lol! That's what happens when the reich wing, hostage taking terrorist take over son!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1034879 Dec 4, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
I realize you don't understand the difference between your money and the governments money, which is fine by me as long as you keep your sticky fingers out if my wallet, dumbass.
Neither does Obama.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1034880 Dec 4, 2013
If anyone was ever worried about whose side the military and police would be on in the worst case scenario of Marshal Law, this should reassure you.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search...

Attention All Men of Honor...

...taking the oath.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034881 Dec 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying frauds....
So, if I am talking to Joe over there about ObamaKare, what I say doesn't count if I'm not talking to Jane, right? You're a moron.
Tell us how "We have to pass it to find out what's in it" refers to "...right whiner lies while the bill was being debated & put to a vote..
It seems like Pelosi was saying "we have to pass it to find out what's in it."
lol! Maybe if you wore a mask they would take you seriously?

Nah!
123

Branchland, WV

#1034882 Dec 4, 2013
Worst president ever.
TSM

United States

#1034883 Dec 4, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> There is nothing in the ACA that said you could not keep your plan (assuming it was really a plan to begin with). There was eve a grandfather clause.
RealDave when the President said ‘If you Like your Plan you could Keep your Plan, Period’ no ambiguity no qualifiers (Period) so explain the cancellations and why the President Lied!!
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#1034884 Dec 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
How about 9 days ago?
A just-released report from the U.S. Treasury Department shows that the auto bailout continues to be a win-lose for General Motors versus taxpayers: While GM won billions, taxpayers have still lost big time.
The Wall Street Journal reported that taxpayers are expected to lose this year at least $10 billion on the bailout of GM due to the company’s failure so far to repay the money and the fact that Treasury has to close its books with the outstanding debt listing.
And GM hasn’t been the only big winner in the deal.
Taxpayers this year will be out a total of $15 billion because of the rescue of the trio GM, Chrysler Group and lender Ally Financial Inc., the Wall Street Journal reported.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/...
Never let it be said this administration isn't sharing the covers with big corporations.
The still undetermined losses are miniscule compared to the massive losses and surrounding legal clusterfk had the company been allowed to die in bankruptcy court.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034885 Dec 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, I remember when we were once a democracy and both sides had a voice in any major piece of legislation so the "fog of controversy" wouldn't be hanging over something which no one read.
The "fog" was intentional. There wouldn't have been any "fog" had both sides sat down together and come to a majority bipartisan consensus.
The Democrats wanted no part of a bipartisan consensus. They preferred a "fog of controversy". They didn't have to read it because they were the only ones who voted for it.
lol! You mean like finding wmd's in iraq son? That kind of 'fog?'
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1034886 Dec 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbass, I'll use your post to show you're an idiot. You stated the law forbids some "proposal" generated by some element you can't define and delivered to some other element you can't define from mentioning rationing.
I posted the actual language stating "The Secretary will determine..." everything. "Everything" includes rationing. There is no need for rationing to be mentioned in a proposal for rationing to be implemented because... you may need to write this down... "the Secretary will determine..." everything.
To refresh your memory, here's that post you can't answer again. Read the last paragraph over and over, if you need to. It says for you to post text from the ObamaKare law that defines the standards "the Secretary" must satisfy to implement the very obviously necessary rationing:
Please tell us how that sentence forbids rationing. It merely forbids a recommendation in some "proposal" from some element you forgot to mention.
If you read the ObamaKare law, you will read "The Secretary will determine..." everything.
As the ObamaKare law is written, "The Secretary" will determine who gets health care, and who does not.
Any idiot can tell you that there is not an infinite source for health care. As the demand for health care increases, and the supply of health care does not match increased demand, then the statement of the law "The Secretary will determine" is the controlling statement. "The Secretary" will ration health care, you fucking moron.
Now, if you want to be taken seriously here, find the part of the ObamaKare law that defines the specifications "The Secretary" must satisfy to ration health care.
You can't. It doesn't exist. The rationing of health care is solely the subjective discretion of "The Secretary".
Pay particular attention to the last paragraph. It requires you post the text of the ObamaKare law to argue against it.
Post the law, dumbass.
Here's that paragraph again:
Now, if you want to be taken seriously here, find the part of the ObamaKare law that defines the specifications "The Secretary" must satisfy to ration health care.
You can't. It doesn't exist. The rationing of health care is solely the subjective discretion of "The Secretary".
lol! Still wearing your mask I see son!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1034887 Dec 4, 2013
RAPID CITY, SD—Saying he had been very hard on himself recently over a series of small mistakes, local clinically insane man Isaac Whipple, 38, put things in perspective Monday morning by reminding himself that he is God.“I have a tendency to beat myself up over the tiniest little things, so when I’m feeling down like this it always helps to just sit down, take a deep breath, and remember that I am the Great God Almighty, Supreme Lord and Ruler of All Creation, and that nothing happens unless I will it,” the mentally ill Whipple told reporters, emphasizing that reminding himself he is immortal and holds sway over the lives of all living creatures “always calms [him] down a bit.”“I’m my own biggest critic and I tend to make mountains out of molehills, so it’s good to keep in mind the fact that I am a flawless and infallible being who controls everything that is and will ever be. I see all. I know all. I judge all. I am God. At the end of the day, that’s all that matters.” When reached for further comment, Whipple attributed his recent bout of insecurity to the tremendous stress involved in ruling over the pits of Hell, as he is also Satan.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/insane-man-g...
LCNLin

United States

#1034888 Dec 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Videos don't lie.
You, however, would rather believe a lie by a proven liar.
Have you become, at long last, a RINO, slowly moving into the JEB Bush and and Gov. Christie camp?

Say it ain't so .....

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1034889 Dec 4, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you becoming a RINO?
Going soft on President Obama?
Rachael Maddow is to the left of President Obama.
Exactly...

For someone like her to say Obama's "prolonged detention" proposal defies the Constitution in a way the American people have never heard before packs a pretty big wallop.

She may have been dissing him about detaining even potential threats such as gitmo prisoners but, again, Obama's enemies are both foreign and domestic - in other words, us.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1034890 Dec 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
If anyone was ever worried about whose side the military and police would be on in the worst case scenario of Marshal Law, this should reassure you.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search...
Attention All Men of Honor...
...taking the oath.
Aunt BattyLou becomes an Oathkeeper!!!!
Vodka

Satellite Beach, FL

#1034891 Dec 4, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly!!
Mixing too much vodka with politics results in an Obama Supported Disaster, and that certainly would be you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 hr Grand Birther 222,343
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr Go Blue Forever 103,437
last post wins! (Apr '13) 5 hr Hatti_Hollerand 1,448
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 hr Ize Found 70,939
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 9,371
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 3,023
Word (Dec '08) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 6,689

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages