Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1521952 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#1028219 Nov 21, 2013
Media photographers protesting the WH forbidding them of taking pics of events normally the press was allowed to photograph.

Such as the arrival of the second dog for the first family, meeting with Hilary, and visiting the crypt of Jesus.

http://www.nationaljournal.com/pictures-video...
DumbSince1680

United States

#1028220 Nov 21, 2013
I'm pleased the Senate broke 225 years of precedent.

I'm a moronic liberal communist.

I love power grabs and chaos when my dirtball Democrats subvert Democracy. I have no respect for minorities.

Hurrayy!!! Idiots like me got our way to further destroy rule, law and order.

I am an idiot. I will defend Obama even if he screws me because I'm too stupid to realize it.

Nyuk, nyuk. Woob, woob, woob. I'm a stooge!

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#1028221 Nov 21, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
this case aside, how do you feel about government agents enticing people to buy drugs in sting operations?
"John Galt"
"silly" would be upset to no end if government agents coerced a democrat in a sting operation.
Peace

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

#1028222 Nov 21, 2013
Waxman wrote:
Has anyone else noticed how government services have been failing since Obama became president?
Everything takes twice as long and errors are abundant.
The latest thing is even a real simple thing. I never used to get calls from telemarketers as I am always updated of the Federal No call list.
It's Obvious, that law is no longer executed. Why
did Obama even take the Oath of Office?
He had no intention of honoring his oath.
The mindless liberals...
LMAO. You think Obama is responsible for telemarketer calls? They were never going to comply with the do-not-call list.

The problem is with the phone companies who could, but won't, crack down on telemarketers. "Phone companies have never been particularly eager to do anything that reduces revenue and those telemarketers are some of "their more active customers".

Besides, "telemarketing represents a lucrative business opportunity.

In California, Verizon charges $2.50 a month to block calls from anonymous numbers, although this won't stop spoofed numbers. The company also charges $4 a month to block calls from up to a dozen local numbers, but this will still allow "800" numbers to get through."

"The FTC last month announced its biggest catch to date: Mortgage Investors Corp., a Florida home-refinancing company, agreed to pay a record $7.5 million fine for having made more than 5.4 million calls to people on the do-not-call list."

Lois Greisman, associate director of the FTC's division of marketing practices, which oversees enforcement of the do-not-call list "acknowledged that completely ending robocalls and do-not-call-list violations is about as likely as preventing spam from spilling into people's email in-boxes."

"You can never stop anything 100%," she said. "But the problem of spam has been substantially minimized by filtering technology. I'm hopeful that the same can happen with robocalls."

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/15/busin...
LCNFetus

United States

#1028223 Nov 21, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Which GOP the shut down nuts
or
the fetus is more important than poor people wing?
Me wit you man. Da man Obama tinks da 9 month old fetus s/b taken out and da chord snipped. Me be cool wit dat! Me not nuts. Us poo people s/b abel ta do anyting. Me votin' fo Obama. He gonna pay my motage!

Was up Bro?
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#1028224 Nov 21, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>

NEW CNN-ORC POLL: 47% want Obama to be in charge while 45% say the GOP should have more influence over the country.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/...
I gave up trying to correct all your non-quote insertions in the middle of quotes and mis-quotes so I was left with this above from your original post and decided to....

Post the exact quote and ask you to please use some integrity the next time you are quoting something. Quote verbatim and respond either before or after.

"Fifty percent believe that congressional Republicans will have more influence over the direction the nation takes in the next year while only 42% saying the President will have more influence, according to the poll. That's a change from November 2012, when more six in ten said Obama would have more influence in the year to come."

"The poll shows 47% want Obama to be in charge while 45% say the GOP should have more influence over the country.

"There is a hint of good news for the President - but only a hint - in those numbers, since that means that the number of Americans who support Obama in his struggles with the GOP is a bit higher than the 41% approval rating would suggest. But that number is also a step down in Obama's support, representing a four-point decline since the last time the question was asked just after Obama won re-election last year," Holland said

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1028225 Nov 21, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Correction. The poll said, "the President has less power than congressional Republicans when it comes to shaping events over the next year." And, given the obstructionist of Republicans in Congress that makes perfect sense. They have tied Obama's hands.
NEW CNN-ORC POLL: 47% want Obama to be in charge while 45% say the GOP should have more influence over the country.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/...
Pretty sad when only 47% of the country wants O'bama to be in charge...so in other words he isn't. What did you loons elect O'bama to do? nothing. 52% don't want O'bama in charge, sad state of affairs in the United States wouldn't you say.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028226 Nov 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
If you changed the name Obama to Hitler, you could say the exact same thing.
And yet, tea party is so synonymous with the beliefs of the nazis.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028227 Nov 21, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Dems did this to please their low-info voters like Yeah.
Dumb reason.
And the cons did it to appease their even lower life forms!
LCNFetus

United States

#1028228 Nov 21, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
a lot of comedy and trolls on thread repeating faux line for line.
LOL
Like whoa dood. Im wit yoo man. Does middle class peoples repetin' da faux line are tupid. I be hatin does witch people too cause oBammy tellen me two. Dan trolls, day be repetin da trut and we be hatin dat. we be wantin Mo Money fo doin notin!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1028229 Nov 21, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"John Galt"
"silly" would be upset to no end if government agents coerced a democrat in a sting operation.
Peace
I don't know if he was coerced, but he bought drugs from an undercover agent and I am against this; it's entrapment. Furthermore, I don't think it's anyones business if he takes drugs in his free time. I am against a police state and cops dealing drugs to trap people.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028230 Nov 21, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron, they are news sources. They are not political sites like your Daily Kos.
Get over your stupidity!
Son, their just as selective as you claim others are.

Besides, I don't recall people like Schutlz being called news sources.... unless you're a con.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028231 Nov 21, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
It was your stupid post that said Obama killed bin Landen so therefor he was in the military.
I see you cannot back up your idiocy
I must have been given the wrong 'intel' that he gave the order.

That being said, can you tell me who did issue the orders?
DumbSince1680

United States

#1028232 Nov 21, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO. You think Obama is responsible for telemarketer calls? They were never going to comply with the do-not-call list.
The problem is with the phone companies who could, but won't, crack down on telemarketers. "Phone companies have never been particularly eager to do anything that reduces revenue and those telemarketers are some of "their more active customers".
Besides, "telemarketing represents a lucrative business opportunity.
In California, Verizon charges $2.50 a month to block calls from anonymous numbers, although this won't stop spoofed numbers. The company also charges $4 a month to block calls from up to a dozen local numbers, but this will still allow "800" numbers to get through."
"The FTC last month announced its biggest catch to date: Mortgage Investors Corp., a Florida home-refinancing company, agreed to pay a record $7.5 million fine for having made more than 5.4 million calls to people on the do-not-call list."
Lois Greisman, associate director of the FTC's division of marketing practices, which oversees enforcement of the do-not-call list "acknowledged that completely ending robocalls and do-not-call-list violations is about as likely as preventing spam from spilling into people's email in-boxes."
"You can never stop anything 100%," she said. "But the problem of spam has been substantially minimized by filtering technology. I'm hopeful that the same can happen with robocalls."
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/15/busin...
Why lordie mercy! I is so smat just lik yoo.

Two expect da Obama guberment to make work what worked just fine for ten years before Obama twok office if just lame.

Wow! You err so smert just lek me!

Kin I get sum of yer weed?

I been Dumb sinc 1680 two!
Whatever

Scottsbluff, NE

#1028233 Nov 21, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
he list of people who won’t appear on “The O’Reilly Factor” just got longer.
Bill O’Reilly said Wednesday that former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin won’t come on his Fox News show.
“Sarah Palin won’t do this program. She won’t come on the program because she doesn’t want to mix it up. She doesn’t. She wants to give a speech, and nobody gives speeches here,” O’Reilly said during a segment with Fox News host Howard Kurtz.
Good for him! No one needs to listen to someone rattle off talking points.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028234 Nov 21, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Give it up. Everyone but a handful of radical Obama groupies are aware Bush flew these plans. Peddle your conspiracy theories to Raw Story.
Did you see the Dems lied too when they said you keep your doctor.
Not true either
I saw someone lying about showing bushie boy piloting an armed military aircraft son.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028235 Nov 21, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"uselesssinceforever "
You are the one with problems. You actually believe a raw rookie as president planned out to smallest detail and personally directed the raid by a Navy Seal team that rid the world of bin laden. Without his hands on activities the raid would have been a failure.
You, with your vast store of knowledge know far more than a blowhard like, Bongino, with 4+ years of experience. president nobama should appoint you to be in charge of presidential safety, you know all, not, you are a professioanl blowhard.
Peace
KMA
lol! You know? Even Patton wasn't a details guy.

More of a point and shove strategy.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1028236 Nov 21, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Golly gee whiz Yeahoo, what has Barack Hussein Obama killed? The economy, jobs, incentive to work, incentive to invest. 25=30% unemployment is the albatross hanging over his head. But he the Messiah, just ax "Obama Money".
Really son? So tell me... how did Obama kill the economy and jobs?

You know... as compared to they gang-buster years of... of... of... what year are you comparing it to son?
DumbSince1680

United States

#1028237 Nov 21, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO. You think Obama is responsible for telemarketer calls? They were never going to comply with the do-not-call list.
The problem is with the phone companies who could, but won't, crack down on telemarketers. "Phone companies have never been particularly eager to do anything that reduces revenue and those telemarketers are some of "their more active customers".
Besides, "telemarketing represents a lucrative business opportunity.
In California, Verizon charges $2.50 a month to block calls from anonymous numbers, although this won't stop spoofed numbers. The company also charges $4 a month to block calls from up to a dozen local numbers, but this will still allow "800" numbers to get through."
"The FTC last month announced its biggest catch to date: Mortgage Investors Corp., a Florida home-refinancing company, agreed to pay a record $7.5 million fine for having made more than 5.4 million calls to people on the do-not-call list."
Lois Greisman, associate director of the FTC's division of marketing practices, which oversees enforcement of the do-not-call list "acknowledged that completely ending robocalls and do-not-call-list violations is about as likely as preventing spam from spilling into people's email in-boxes."
"You can never stop anything 100%," she said. "But the problem of spam has been substantially minimized by filtering technology. I'm hopeful that the same can happen with robocalls."
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/15/busin...
Nobody cares what you think. That's why you are alone.

“Peace on Earth”

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

#1028238 Nov 21, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with you is you never know when to stop doubling down on your DUMB.
Rangel was found guilty by the Congress so he is according to you a criminal-he must resign.
Congress does not find people guilty of criminal offenses.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Buster Steinbeizer 240,350
Michael Hahn, Kim Goldman Hahn, The OJ Simpson ... (Apr '06) 3 hr guest 397
Obumbler Back To Community Organizing 3 hr CIA and FBI 6
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr Rose of Tralee 105,130
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 11 hr Moon Rhythm 10,577
Newbie HELP needed!!! 11 hr AmandaPTownGirl 3
women 12 hr John 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages