Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
937,121 - 937,140 of 1,100,625 Comments Last updated 2 hrs ago
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1019962 Nov 7, 2013
forks_make_us_fat wrote:
<quoted text>
HOw do you think Chelsea feels about the mess that surrounded her mommy and daddy and some strange chick that was not her mommy?
You know? I often wonder what bushie boy tells the wives and mothers of those soldiers who didn't come back from iraq.

Personally, I don't think he says a thing.

He must feel the pain he feels is the same as theirs.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1019964 Nov 7, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Damn straight!
Signed,
Tom Vitter, etal....
Hey lapdog, Obama just spit on the curb next to you!

Quick, go lick it up before Dumb Dave beats you to it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1019965 Nov 7, 2013
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1019966 Nov 7, 2013
forks_make_us_fat wrote:
<quoted text>
What if two adults don't want to pay taxes?
Are you going to allow the benevolent gubby mint permission to peek into their check book?
Give it a shot and let us know what happens son.

Looking forward to seeing you actually following through for once!
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1019967 Nov 7, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you make something up like you normally do son?
Wouldn't that make your life a whole lot easier?
Like your parents did with you?

Sorry, I don't make mistakes.
Laney F

New York, NY

#1019968 Nov 7, 2013
Emeem wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares what Obama's approval rating is? Tomorrow we celebrate three MORE years of his presidency that he ALREADY was elected to serve! You are one year too late with your useless stat.
One year too late also applies to what the outcome of the election would have been if Obammy's lies about ObammyCare had come to light. Or if the media hadn't been clinging to the story about the video instead of reporting the truth about Benghazi.(Not the low informed voters would have payed attention to that).

Obammy is screwing the general public but has time to kiss up to the unions. From today's NY Post:

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration sneaked in a rule that would let some labor unions off the hook for an ObamaCare tax.

After publicly rejecting the unions’ request for an exemption, the Department of Health and Human Services last week quietly gave the unions a pass on what would have been a massive tax hit.

The tax, known as the reinsurance fee, requires self-insured organizations, such as unions and some large companies, to pay $63 for each covered member and an additional $63 for each additional family member on a health plan.

The fee was expected to raise $25 billion over three years, with the funds going to insurance companies to offset the cost of covering pre-existing conditions and other mandatory benefits.

Sparing unions that expense will go a long way toward repairing President Obama’s strained relationship with labor.

The unions, originally key supporters of the president’s health-insurance law, have increasingly bucked ObamaCare as it threatens their finances and the generous policies enjoyed by some of their members.

Buried in the new rules is a proposal to exempt “certain self-insured, self-administered plans” from the fee in 2015 and 2016.
That description applies to many union plans, according to experts.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1019969 Nov 7, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
How High Black Turnout Gave Terry McAuliffe His Win in Virginia
African American voters turned out in huge numbers for the Virginia gubernatorial election, giving Terry McAuliffe a win and proving the "Obama model" can work without Obama.
One of the big questions of the next few years of politics is whether Democrats can replicate the “Obama model” of minority turnout without the presence of Obama on the ballot. If the Virginia gubernatorial election was a test case, then the early answer is a clear “yes.”
After all, the winner in last night’s election—Democratic fundraiser Terry McAuliffe—is a sleazy, corrupt influence peddler who pushed the boundaries on fundraising and enriched himself in the process. He’s the walking embodiment of Washington’s loose relationship with ethics, and an avatar for everything unseemly about the Clinton administration. There’s no reason he should have been a viable candidate for governor in Virginia. But, in a race against the state’s unpopular attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli, McAuliffe had a shot. And he won by a narrow margin of two-and-a-half percentage points, 47.7% to 45.2%. It was a dramatic shift from pre-election polling, which had McAuliffe up by seven points for most of the last week.
The explanation for that decline is straightforward. Overall, the electorate is broadly similar to where it was in 2009, when Virginians gave Republican Bob McDonnell a landslide victory of Democrat Creigh Deeds. It has the same proportion of older people to young people (nearly two-thirds of voters were over 45), and the same proportion of women of men. Likewise, the ideological profile of voters is close to where it was in 2009. Then, the electorate was 18 percent liberal, 42 percent moderate, and 40 percent conservative. This year, it was 20 percent of the electorate called itself liberal, 44 percent moderate and 36 percent conservative.
What’s more, Cuccinelli maintained the GOP’s traditional advantage with white and married women, winning the former by sixteen point spread of 54 percent to 38 percent, and the latter by a solid margin of 51 percent to 42 percent. This was a real change from the polls, which had the former Democratic Party leader with a huge lead among all women. McAuliffe’s actual advantage was with unmarried women, who he won 67 percent to Cuccinelli’s 25 percent.
Where the change from 2009 was most significant was among black voters. Then, African Americans were 16 percent were of the electorate, a significant drop from the 2008 election. This year, blacks were 20 percent of all voters, which means their turnout was exactly where it was in 2012. Put another way, for the second year in a row, African Americans turned out at a rate above their percentage of the population, and supported the Democrat by a 9-to–1 margin.
This is huge. For McAuliffe, what it meant is that—for almost every black voter who went to the polls—he could count on a vote, giving him crucial support in a tight race. To wit, more than 37 percent of his vote total came from African Americans. It’s not hard to see what the race would have looked like with 2009 numbers; a four percent drop in black turnout would have slashed roughly 80,000 votes from McAuliffe’s total, turning Ken Cuccinelli’s narrow loss into a slim victory.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/11...
another vote suppression fail.
you conservatives pretty much suck at everything anymore.
and the DeomKKKrat party is a black party, for better or worse...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#1019970 Nov 7, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently, you are safe and sound under your employer's insurance coverage. For now anyway. That could change in the next few years and it will be you who is paying more in premiums and deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses.
Until then, your delusional fantasy that Obamacare is anything but a major disaster that has ruined over 4 million people's lives already who now have no insurance because Obama didn't like the insurance plan they were perfectly happy with is off the charts.
What exactly would this president have to lie to you about before your feathers got even a little bit ruffled?
Apparently you are safe and sound under your husband's employers group plan and since you've already shared how much he earns, it appears that he'd qualify for a handsome subsidy through ACA.

You'd better pray he doesn't get hurt on the motor scooter before you "achieve" MediCare___or you'll be on Medicaid. Oh My!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1019971 Nov 7, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey lapdog, Obama just spit on the curb next to you!
Quick, go lick it up before Dumb Dave beats you to it!
Why should I take away one of your daily pleasures son?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1019972 Nov 7, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
See: "limousine liberal"
Limousine liberal (or latte liberal) is a deragatory term used to describe a rich liberal who considers themself a champion of the poor and downtrodden, but lives a lifestyle of wealth and luxury.
Limousine liberals can usually be identified by any combination of the following behavior:
- They support gun control, but they go everywhere surrounded by armed bodyguards.
- They have a soft-on-crime stance, but they live in gated, private communities where there is no threat of crime.
- They tell people to ride bikes and use public transportation to reduce oil consumption, while themselves traveling around the world in private jets and rented luxury SUVs.
- They join organizations like PETA because they believe that killing animals is wrong, but they wear expensive leather belts and shoes.
Limousine liberal is mostly an American term. In Austrialia, an equivalent term is "chardonnay socialist", while in France the equivalent term is gauche caviar (caviar left).
"Famous limousine liberals include such people as Arianna Huffington, Michael Moore, Martin Sheen, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, and Barbra Streisand."
In other words...hypocrites...do as I say, not as I do.

Are the top wealthiest in Congress who happen to be Democrats limousine liberals too?

Or McAuliffe - who raised bookoos more money than his opposition largely from corporations - a limousine liberal?

Are limousine liberals any different than wealthy conservatives to all liberals - or just the hypocritical ones?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1019973 Nov 7, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You got that right. I've got a solution. Stop paying all welfare. That will fix the "unemployment" problem and the illegal alien problem at the same time.
Work or starve.
If the democrats had not expanded the welfare rolls and the unemployment rolls, free phones rolls and the other crap he 'so called' give aways--- the Americans would have been demanding jobs. The O'bama would have had to do something, like get off his ass and correct the economy. But alas, he was able to pacify the people, make them lazy and at the same time, steal money to pay off the unions and to pay for his re-election. I never knew their were so many lazy Americans who wanted to sit on their asses and collect a check, instead of elevating themselves.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1019974 Nov 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is it in he Constitution that you can't get blown?
You have no idea of the relationship between the Clintons.
Between the Clintons have been several women. I just don't which Clinton is doing who.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1019975 Nov 7, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently you are safe and sound under your husband's employers group plan and since you've already shared how much he earns, it appears that he'd qualify for a handsome subsidy through ACA.
You'd better pray he doesn't get hurt on the motor scooter before you "achieve" MediCare___or you'll be on Medicaid. Oh My!
"handsome subsidy" = welfare...

not all people desire to be welfare bums...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1019976 Nov 7, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh...why don;t you just call them rich hypocrites..on par level with ignorant system fwee riders who think they're "entitleMental(case)ed " to bottles of champagne lifestyles on kool-aid packet budgets.
That's what I did.

Hypocrites are like birds of a feather apparently.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1019977 Nov 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Consenting adults.
I would not consent to sex outside my marriage but that's me.
Its up to those involved, not you.
Is that simple.
according to you: if your wife was sprayed by some naked penis on her face, she wasn't having sex with that man--it's ok davie--she was chasing the guy and he gave in. Don't blame her-she did not have sex with that guy.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1019978 Nov 7, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Apparently you are safe and sound under your husband's employers group plan and since you've already shared how much he earns, it appears that he'd qualify for a handsome subsidy through ACA.
You'd better pray he doesn't get hurt on the motor scooter before you "achieve" MediCare___or you'll be on Medicaid. Oh My!
We owe the government in taxes based largely on his salary and my former part-time salary...if that gives you any indication of his and our financial status.

His employer is going to insure their employees and spouses only through next year. When 2015 rolls around, we'll be expecting to pay more for ours - and your - coverage.

Must be nice...for you.

But I'm sure you would gladly reciprocate and pay more for mine if the shoe was on the other foot.

PDupont seems more than happy to pay more for yours too after he gets dumped into the exchanges.

That's very nice of him, don't you think?
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#1019979 Nov 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Consenting adults.
I would not consent to sex outside my marriage but that's me.
Its up to those involved, not you.
Is that simple.
Let me ask you this then....

Don't you think its strange that you don't care what people do in the bedroom but have an absolute cow with what rich WHITE, CONSERVATIVE people do with their money?

See anything wrong here?
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#1019981 Nov 7, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Why should I take away one of your daily pleasures son?
You couldn't take away anything from me without doing it behind my back, child.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1019982 Nov 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You claimed Monica was sought after by Clinton. That was a lie.
Monica pursued & Clinton said why not. Two adults.
You don't know the arrangement between Bill & Hillary. It really is none of your business.
It's something called character - not too high up on the list of admirable traits among liberals.

What exactly would Obama have to lie to you about to ruffle your feathers?

PDupont has gotten back to me on that yet.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#1019983 Nov 7, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Like your parents did with you?
Sorry, I don't make mistakes.
lol! Great son! So you're not human now!

wow...

I love this comedy channel!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Are ISIS and Obama in Cahoots??? 16 min joey 4
Diversity is a codeword for white genocide 36 min ABSOLUTELYjigsWON 3
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 40 min 40ish 4,673
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 41 min Frijoles 68,998
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 50 min danetoo 68,381
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr wojar 177,413
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr D-U-H 49,539
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr edogxxx 97,938
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••