Eed belongs to the Roman Catholic Church out of habit and family history, failing to recognize the Socialist nature of his Church...<quoted text>
Which is the point I was making. Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and still fit under the same tent without being diminished or a part of a "tiny religious cult".
You and I agree on these issues but you don't consider yourself as part of a "tiny religious cult" for not agreeing with Galt, do you?
Galt can disagree with both of us without saying these kinds of things which seem a bit irrational to me.
It shouldn't matter if we disagree on certain issues if we're all still under the same tent...should it?
Galt is making it more of an issue out of it than it really is in the whole scheme of things.
As much as I and others would like to see Roe v Wade reversed, it's not going to happen in one election cycle. It doesn't mean I and others still can't take a stand against it without being marginalized by other conservatives for doing so. Does it?
Galt is tired of losing elections because of nutty anti-abortion legislation that never survives court challenges...