Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
935,041 - 935,060 of 1,101,542 Comments Last updated 5 min ago
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1017749 Nov 3, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"lyinglin"
You are saying president nobama is gay?
Peace
KMA
Obama gives Reggie Love a blumpkin....
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1017751 Nov 3, 2013
Bud wrote:
<quoted text>

Plus you have the real risk of loosing your doctor or hospitals you have confidence in.
ObamaKKKare doesn't care about that...the fools think that doctors from Bangladesh are as good as those trained in America...
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1017752 Nov 3, 2013
Awwwww..... too bad cons don't know many overseas doctors are already being used to save money and time...

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#1017753 Nov 3, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Snowblind has no conception of what is LIBERAL. Yet we know what such creatures are that support austerity for their constituents.
I am a LIBEERAL as defined by the dictionary. Not by the intoxicated opinionated Teabaggers Foxy Tabloids.
Liberal adj
1. broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others
2. progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual
3. generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset
My great-aunt was liberal in her bequests.
4. generous in quantity: large in size or amount
a liberal helping
5. not literal: not limited to the literal meaning in translation or interpretation
a liberal interpretation of the rules
6. culturally oriented: concerned with general cultural matters and broadening of the mind rather than professional or technical study
a liberal education
7. of political liberalism: relating to a political ideology of liberalism
n (plural lib·er·als)
liberal person: somebody who favors tolerance or open-mindedness
[14th century. Via French < Latin liberalis < liber "free"]
Word Key: Synonyms
See generous.
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Now to define the state of existence for Tea addicts, we just have to access the acronyms of these definitions. For example #1 “Broad Minded” acronym “Closed Minded”
#2 “tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others” acronym; Intolerant of the views of others and standards of behavior in others. LOL That sure sounds like a BIGOT to me.
Now I think you can do the rest all by yourself and expose yourself as to what you really are.
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.” Winston Churchill. LOL sounds like a liberal…
Todays "libs" are nazis.

LIV libs can't cut it in the real world, they need their masters to dictate their every step.
Oblama is the new Hitler.

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#1017754 Nov 3, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Hard to imagine what calamities would have befallen this land had Jesse Sharptons and Magic Negros been running things during the Revolutionary period in America.
We are only now getting a small taste of it.
I can imagine. it's called Zimbabwe.

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

#1017755 Nov 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
feed 'em Moochelle's carrots and apple slices...
Don't forget the arugula
LCNLin

United States

#1017756 Nov 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
ObamaKKKare doesn't care about that...the fools think that doctors from Bangladesh are as good as those trained in America...
Galt's proctologist is from India?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1017757 Nov 3, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt's proctologist is from India?
Patrick illustrates why people dislike homosexuals...

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#1017760 Nov 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
Changes to Social Security are on the horizon because the massive retirement and disability program is projected to run dry in 2033. At that point, Social Security would only collect enough taxes to pay about three-fourths of benefits. If Congress doesn't act, benefits automatically would be cut by about 25 percent.
http://news.msn.com/us/poll-older-americans-n...
Now let's see...who keeps saying Social Security is a great government-run program and doesn't need reform? And accused their opposition of wanting to kill grandma for suggesting it?
And who keeps saying it must be reformed to be sustained?
Why do most liberals willfully ignore the obvious?
Why is it that ringers always focus on waste from social welfare yet totally ignore waste elsewhere.

Fact (1) America and most western countries have an aging population. The birth rates are in negative territory so unless you open the borders to Mexico & have mass migration the balance of those working will not be enough to finance those who don't.
Countries with the same problems have increased the retirement age.
For every self funded retiree will be 10 that rely on social welfare.

Fact (2) Why is it that ringers totally ignore Wall St Welfare to concentrate on poor. Leaving the 4%'ers a free ride ??? WHY
The GFC cost on average around $120,000 each American household and the best answer you can come up with is Obama wastes on welfare or its government run program so Wall St would do better.

Well we all have seen how Wall St does better, then asks taxpayers to bail them. I think your money would be safer with the government!

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#1017761 Nov 4, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying fool, every attempt to limit the power of the trial lawyers was beaten back by dums.$100K a year for medical malpractice insurance, you own it.
The Republicans idea of tort reform was to cap awards for malpractice.

In other words, you want the government to tell you what your eyesight is worth, what your daughter's life is worth.

As long as Republicans insist on caps, there will be no deal with Democrats on tort reform.

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#1017762 Nov 4, 2013
killtaker wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are admirable beliefs....
But can you speak for all the people who CLAIM to need help?
Do they all need help or are some just loafers?
My educational background is in ethics and the social sciences.
And I can tell you that people cheat. And it does not matter what socio-economic group they are in.
The better angels of our nature nudge us to ignore the cheaters...
To press on...
But for how long RealDave? I have a family too...
I am not going to sacrifice my family just to allow someone to cheat...will you?
No one is in favor of cheats. Show me a single post where someone defends cheaters.

But you people trash the entire programs. You know it so don't try to pretend you don't.

Read the posts here about the "moochers". They aren't talking cheats, they are talking recipients.

Just like the Food Stamp debate in Congress. The Republicans claim there are too many cheats & cut funding when they should increase funding for compliance enforcement.

Why not complain about the cheats in government contracting in general. How much do military contractors cheat. How do Senators & Congressmen "cheat" by directing projects to their supporters?

Right Whiner posters here want Food Stamp recipients to wear a neon sign on their head identifying them as "moochers".

What bout the people "stealing" millions through income tax fraud.

The entire Republican Party has taken up the cause of the evil, moochers, worthless 47%. You know it.

I

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#1017763 Nov 4, 2013
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
How do yo feel about fatfu*ks waddling down the street stuffed with EBT food gabbing on their Obamaphones?
I'm evidently not a bigoted f*ck like you, Since I don't know what this person's situations is so I don't pass judgement.

.

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#1017764 Nov 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
at your age, Medicare for sure....
Nope. No SS, No Medicare.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1017765 Nov 4, 2013
Bud wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you assume the plans that have been cancelled were crappy? I got some news for you they weren't. My wife and I had a great Cadillac plan but we received cancellation notice that ACA made it no longer compliant. Now I have a plan with higher deductibles higher co-pays higher premiums. My old plan didn't have a cap. But now I have pre/post natal care though my wife and I are past that part of our life. We don't need pediatric care and the list goes on. We pay for something we will never use.
Plus you have the real risk of loosing your doctor or hospitals you have confidence in.
spam

and not very good spam. must be a right wing chain email. again.
Patriot

Boulder, CO

#1017766 Nov 4, 2013
In Obama’s America, Our Military must forsake their Constitutional Oath in favor of blind allegiance to their Illegal commander

And whether it’s top nuke commanders being removed for failing to play ball with the global elite, or just silencing potential whistleblowers, top military generals are now speaking out about the ‘mass purge’ within the United States military...

http://intellihub.com/2013/11/03/top-generals...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1017767 Nov 4, 2013
Bud wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't drink the koolaid...not all plans were crappy you a making assumptions based on democratic talking points.
though somewhat different from making assumptions based on a right wing chain email.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#1017768 Nov 4, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The Republicans idea of tort reform was to cap awards for malpractice.
In other words, you want the government to tell you what your eyesight is worth, what your daughter's life is worth.
As long as Republicans insist on caps, there will be no deal with Democrats on tort reform.
There you go again, Democrat, telling half-truths, liar.

It's not that simple, simpleton.

The Democrat special interest group pushed hard to kill this reform because of the outrages fees they charge. Doctors are for it.

An good example of how ridiculous the fees are is your Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards, the Democrat louse that cheated on his dying wife.

There was an award of $25 million for one case, and your creep received fees of 33%.

Juries were making ludicrous awards.

Another example is, after Edwards won a large verdict against a trucking company whose worker had been involved in a fatal accident, the ---> North Carolina legislature passed a law prohibiting such awards unless the company had specifically sanctioned the employee's actions <---.

As usual, Democrats, the fascist Party of NO, would not compromise on the federal level.

Democrats are not interested in lowering health care costs, they are interested in power and socialism - government control.

You are a goddamn liar and an idiot!
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1017769 Nov 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Which makes it even more ironic. Democrats refused to accept health care reform similar to Obamacare under Nixon when most Republicans were on board.
It could have been implemented with a lot less confusion and less government intrusion back in 1974.
Democrats are quick to accuse Republicans of not placing health care reform as a priority when, in fact, Republicans under both Nixon and Bush, Sr., came up with the idea first.
You can play ancient history all you want Carol, but let's just cut to the chase and ask why the GOP has been wasting time and money attempting to repeal a law that was their idea in the first place?
The answer is easy. It's because Barack Obama signed it into law and they took a blood oath to obstruct anything that came out of his White House.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1017771 Nov 4, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think this president and this administration is looking out for us?
Do you deny your party's culpability in contributing to the economic crisis and a lack of leadership since the economic crisis?
It would help to know exactly where you stand and your perspective.
Sure Carol, it was the Democrats fault that a Republican run Congress did nothing to regulate mortgage brokers, mortgage backed securities or credit default swaps. But keep blaming Fannie and Freddie were victims of these unregulated brokers and the rating agencies who were paid by them to rate their toxic loans AAA.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#1017772 Nov 4, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>The Magic Negro's ability to shut up the families of Benghazi victims is chilling, isn't it?

He let them all die as part of his helping Al Qaeda in Libya, covered it up with a childish story about some stupid YouTube video and then goes on to tell us he's going to investigate it and never does and then he tells the families of the victims to shut up. And they have, so far.

We are in trouble, folks.
"Shut up"?

Why? There is nothing to hide, right?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 min Pippa 97,967
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 18 min litesong 46,382
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 24 min LRS 177,529
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 37 min KiMare 49,508
Abby 9-2 44 min Pippa 11
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr RACE 4,667
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr RACE 1,263
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••