Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
dem

United States

#1016170 Nov 1, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>BTW, here's a list of riots in the US since 2009 (because of character limitatations; it doesnt get better for you :-)). What do they have in common? ALL occurred in straight leftist blue states with a high chimp population. Game, set, and match....:-)

2009 - Riots against BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant, January 7, 120 arrested, Oakland, California

2009 - College Fest riot, Kent State University, April 25, more than 50 arrested Kent, Ohio

2009 - Spring Jam/Dinkytown riot, University of Minnesota, April 25, Minneapolis, Minnesota

2009 - Palmer Fest melee, Ohio University, May 10, Athens, Ohio

2009 – L.A. Lakers riot, June 14, Fans riot in Downtown Los Angeles after Lakers win championship, Los Angeles, California

2009 - 2009 G-20 Pittsburgh summit protests, Sept. 24-25, 193 arrested

2010s[edit]2010 - University of Tennessee Lane Kiffin Riot. Students riot on the Knoxville campus following head football coach Lane Kiffin's announcement that he took the head coaching job at the University of Southern California.

2010 - University of Maryland basketball disturbance 2010, College Park, Maryland, March 3 following a game; 28 arrested.

2010 - Springfest Riot, April 10, 200 police disperse crowd of 8000 using tear gas, pepper spray, rubber bullets and bean bag rounds, near the campus of James Madison University; dozens injured; 30-35 arrested., Harrisonburg, Virginia

2010 – Santa Cruz May Day riot, May 1, 250 rampage through downtown Santa Cruz attacking 18 businesses, causing an estimated $100,000 in damages. 1 arrested. Santa Cruz, California

2010 – L.A. Lakers riot, June 17, Fans riot in Downtown Los Angeles after Lakers win championship, 50 arrested. Los Angeles, California

2010 – BART Verdict riot, July 8, Riot breaks out in response to verdict in the killing of Oscar Grant, BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant. About 100 businesses were damaged and 78 people were arrested, Oakland, California

2010 - Eugene Melee, Sept 25, Riot breaks out west of the University of Oregon campus as police use tear gas to break up a rowdy party. 9 arrested. Eugene, Oregon

2010 - Oakland Protest riot, Nov. 5, Police made more than 150 arrests as a crowd broke windows and knocked down fences, protesting sentence of former BART officer in shooting of Oscar Grant on New Years Day 2009 see BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant., Oakland, California

2011 - Pennsylvania State University Joe Paterno Riot. Students riot in protest of the decision of the Board of Trustees to fire head football coach Joe Paterno. State College, Pennsylvania

2011 - Occupy Wall Street (Brooklyn Bridge Protests). Demonstrators blocked the bridge and more than 700 people were arrested. Brooklyn, New York

2011 - Occupy Wall Street Oakland Protests Riots. October. Protesters shattered windows, set fires, and plastered buildings with graffiti. Riot police fired heavy amounts of tear gas on the protesters.

2012 NATO 2012 Chicago Summit May. Conflict between riot police. Dozens of demonstrators clubbed and arrested.

2012 Anaheim police shooting and protests Civil Unrest, July 28th. Violence erupted after multiple shootings in the neighborhood by police that included unarmed Manuel Diaz. 24 people were arrested

2012 - Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, October 12, Fans riot after a win at home against Upper St. Clair. Fans broke through a fence at the Bethel Park High School stadium.

2013 - Brooklyn Riots, March 9th. Riots erupt for several nights after the controversial shooting of Kimani Gray. Over 46 demonstrators were arrested.

2013 - Seattle May Day Protest Riots, May 1st, 17 Arrested as Seattle May Day Protests Turn Violent.
Morning, old man phaggot.
Laney F

New York, NY

#1016171 Nov 1, 2013
NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH wrote:
The ObamaCare disaster is manifesting itself straight out of the gate. If Obama and his minions cannot even create a working website for enrollments, what nightmare exists for the actual working (or non-working, more like it) model? The Tea Party was right all along. Everything about ObamaCare is a disaster. Just like the man its named for. Just like the man himself.
Obama is incapable of telling the truth. If not for the cover of the mainstream propaganda media and the cowardice of the Republican Party, any other President would have been impeached and convicted long ago. Heres a few instances where Obama has outright lied to the American people:
- Bengahzi
- the ObamaCare website
- you can keep your insurance policy and doctor
- the IRS Abuse scandal
- the NSA wiretaps
- the Stimulus Bill (no shovel-ready jobs)
- Fast and Furious
Read more at http://angrywhitedude.com/2013/10/administrat...
Obammy is finally good at something!!! He makes Pinnochio and Bernie Madden look honest.

Obamas mendacity is not limited to domestic policy. It operates in foreign affairs as well.

Several commentators this week recalled Democratic Sen. Robert Menendezs angry response to the Obama administrations attempt to block Senate passage of sanctions against Iran in December 2011.

Expressing disgust at the administrations bad faith to the Senate, Menendez noted that before the White House tried to defeat the legislation, it first forced senators to water it down, making them believe that the White House would support a weaker bill. In the end, despite the White Houses opposition, the Senate and House passed the watered-down sanctions bills with veto-proof majorities. Obama reluctantly signed the bill into law and then bragged about having passed crippling sanctions on Iran.

As was the case with Obamacare, the White House knows that most Americans wont support its policy of doing nothing to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

So the White House never says that this is its policy. Obama and his advisers insist that preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power is a central goal of the administration. But their actions move US policy in the opposite direction. And if they get caught on the lies after Iran gets the bomb, well, Obama wont be facing reelection, so he will pay no price for his duplicity.

Hmmmm....could that be what Obammy was referring to when he promised he'd be "flexible after election?"
dem

United States

#1016172 Nov 1, 2013
Laney F wrote:
<quoted text>Can you imagine if the Obammy lies had hit this hard (or the media had to actually discuss the Obammy lies) in 2012?

Like his repeated promises that Obamacare would not threaten anyone’s existing health insurance policies? Meanwhile, over the past two weeks, millions of Americans have received notices from their health insurance companies that their policies have been canceled because they don’t abide by Obamacare’s requirements.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board explained that Obama’s repetition of THIS LIE WAS NOT AN OVERSIGHT. It was a deliberate means of lulling into complacency these Americans who opted to buy their insurance themselves on the open market, in order to stick them with the burden of underwriting Obamacare.

In the editorialist’s words,“The [healthcare] exchanges need these customers [whose private policies are being canceled] to finance Obamacare’s balance sheet and stabilize its risk pools.

On the exchanges, individuals earning more than $46,000 or a family of four above $94,000 don’t qualify for subsidies and must buy overpriced insurance. If these middle-class Obamacare losers can be forced into the exchanges, they become financiers of the new pay-as-you go entitlement.”

Sure there is an outcry now about Obama’s dishonesty and the way he has used lying to take away from an unwilling public a right it would never have knowingly surrendered, but IT IS TOO LATE. There is no chance of revoking the law until at 2017, when Obama leaves office.

And by then, everyone will have been forced to accept what they consider unacceptable or be fined and lose all health coverage.
Eat sh it, gynger.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1016173 Nov 1, 2013
Emeem wrote:
<quoted text>
Your plan of paying cash for health care to avoid paying for insurance because its cheaper should make every intelligent person reading it shake their heads in disbelief. Some day you will thank Obama for the pre-existing conditions clause in Obamacare.
Another moran that drinks the libtard koolade. Can't any of you libtards take care of your self? Must you always have a nanny hold your hand!
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#1016174 Nov 1, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Little early to be so spaced out on that purple drank there-eh clueless hag?
LMAO!! That old crone is a real boozer......
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1016175 Nov 1, 2013
Grampy wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe because half of the uninsured are drug addicted diseased deadbeat lazy slackers...
And that is just on your side of the family.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1016176 Nov 1, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Carol thinks that redistribution of the wealth toward the wealthy is OK.
Carol;, its been going on for decades. Its been engineered that way.
Why don't you care about that?
Why don't you want a system where the increase in wealth is more evenly spread to nclude the Middle & Lower classes?
Why is it communism to change the distribution of wealth in include the Middle class and its OK to push the wealth to the wealthy.
Do you even know what a distribution is?
Do any of you right whiner dumbasses know?
Because communal-type living even in the colonial days - where everyone got to share the bounty of the harvest when only some wanted to do the work - didn't work then and hasn't worked since.

Even in ancient times, it was understood that if a man doesn't work, he doesn't eat.

It's not up to the government to take care of people who would gladly let someone else do it. There ARE people who have no qualms about taking advantage of others and even expect it.

The wealthy earn their money and represent only 1% of the entire population.

Most of us are content with what we have and take responsibility for ourselves and our actions so as not to be a burden on others.

What kind of country would we be had the pioneers and those who had to struggle to make ends meet held out their hands for the government to give them what others had worked hard for themselves or were forced to give the government their hard-earned money to take care of those who didn't want to take care of themselves.

In every poll and survey taken over the past week, only 6% say they are happy with the ACA. That's the 6% who are on the receiving end of someone else's hard work and hard-earned money.

No one wants people in need to be denied medical care. But the solutions were so much simpler and so much less costly than the ACA.

Obamacare is actually going to cost many people a lot more money who are not wealthy. How is that fair to them?

What's ironic is most liberals wouldn't freely give their own money to, say, women who kept having babies for more welfare out of their own pockets but are more than happy if someone else does.

There is something inherently wrong and even anti-American for the government to deliberately create a welfare state and a segment of the population who feel entitled to what others earn who don't feel they need to earn it themselves.

Why you and other liberals can't see that is a mystery.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1016177 Nov 1, 2013
Extreme Homes, not Homer Although can be pretty extreme sometimes.
dem

United States

#1016178 Nov 1, 2013
For such a crybaby old man Grampy sure is an old racist jagoff.
NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH

Nashville, NC

#1016179 Nov 1, 2013
Citizens recieving 100% government benefits should not be allowed to voteWe must first realize that voting isnt and never was a blanket right granted to everyone inside the U.S. border. The ability to vote has always had restrictions. For example, there are age restrictions to vote. You have to be 18 in order to vote. Why is 18 the magic number? Who knows but its a restriction. Convicted felons are also not allowed to vote in some places.(1) Early on in the history of the U.S. only white male landowners could vote. Our founders were afraid that those without land would vote to redistribute others land to themselves. This is a logical concept and this tells us that even our founders didnt see the right to vote as a blanket right with no caveats.

Unlike the other amendments in the Bill of Rights that apply to all persons in the United States, in order to vote you must be a citizen. Because you have to be a citizen in order to vote this means that voting itself is a privilege granted to those who choose to become a citizen.

Now, if there are restrictions on other rights like free speech and the 2nd Amendment pertaining to guns why cant there also be a restriction on the right to vote? This is only logical. Our founding fathers obviously saw that the right to vote could be restricted for fear of people redistributing things that arent theirs.

An able bodied person who receives benefits and is able to vote is like a child being able to vote their own rules and allowances. No parent would agree to that and its illogical. Ever heard a parent say,my house my rules? Why? Because any kid will vote for candy for breakfast, no curfews or bedtimes, and allowances paying more than the work they do is worth or not working at all (welfare).
What is happening today is that the Democrat party is bribing people for votes with someone elses money. It boils down to,vote for me if you want more welfare, more Medicaid, more unemployment benefits, more food stamps, more W.I.C. money, free birth control, free healthcare, free college education, etc. Essentially the non-producers are voting to redistribute the money from the producers to themselves. This entitlement mentality, this political ideology, is crippling America. This is exactly what our founders feared. Why should someone have the ability to tell me that I have to give them my money? This would be like me walking into a bank and holding a vote to redistribute the money in the vault to everyone who voted for it.

America now has more people receiving government handouts than are working. We now have more takers than makers.(2) There are more people on food stamps than at any time in history.(3) When does the madness end? The Democrats are cool with it because it means more votes for them.(4) If we continue down this path there will be even less producers and even more takers.http://www.debate.org/d ebates/Citizens-recieving-gove rnment-benefits-should-not-be- allowed-to-vote/1/

THIS IS HOW DEMOCRATS GETS VOTES BY BRIBING PEOPLE!

What is happening today is that the Democrat party is bribing people for votes with someone elses money. It boils down to,vote for me if you want more welfare, more Medicaid, more unemployment benefits, more food stamps, more W.I.C. money, free birth control, free healthcare, free college education, etc. Essentially the non-producers are voting to redistribute the money from the producers to themselves.
dem

United States

#1016180 Nov 1, 2013
Laney F wrote:
<quoted text>Obammy is finally good at something!!! He makes Pinnochio and Bernie Madden look honest.

Obama’s mendacity is not limited to domestic policy. It operates in foreign affairs as well.

Several commentators this week recalled Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez’s angry response to the Obama administration’s attempt to block Senate passage of sanctions against Iran in December 2011.

Expressing disgust at the administration’s bad faith to the Senate, Menendez noted that before the White House tried to defeat the legislation, it first forced senators to water it down, making them believe that the White House would support a weaker bill. In the end, despite the White House’s opposition, the Senate and House passed the watered-down sanctions bills with veto-proof majorities. Obama reluctantly signed the bill into law and then bragged about having passed “crippling sanctions” on Iran.

As was the case with Obamacare, the White House knows that most Americans won’t support its policy of doing nothing to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

So the White House never says that this is its policy. Obama and his advisers insist that preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power is a central goal of the administration. But their actions move US policy in the opposite direction. And if they get caught on the lies after Iran gets the bomb, well, Obama won’t be facing reelection, so he will pay no price for his duplicity.

Hmmmm....could that be what Obammy was referring to when he promised he'd be "flexible after election?"
Good for something?
Like destroying the Republican Party.

Lol

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1016181 Nov 1, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't keep it in a vault in the basement. They buy yachts! The boat show is on here in Ft Lauderdale this weekend; wait and see how much they drop there. They're buying more yachts and planes than ever; and also, Art Basel has never been more successful! They have so much cash to spend that they don't know what to do with it, so they build homes everywhere that they may spend only a day or two in. Your economic ignorance is appalling.
Hey LILLY!!!! Just who do you think builds them yachts? Who do you think builds those houses. The furniture, rugs, windows, etc... You are the ignorant one!
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#1016182 Nov 1, 2013
LMAO @ the greatest Gvt boondoggle in the history of the world........

October 31, 2013 6:41

Obamacare enrollments got off to very slow start, documents show

(CBS News) WASHINGTON - For 31 days now, the Obama administration has been telling us that Americans by the millions are visiting the new health insurance website, despite all its problems.

But no one in the administration has been willing to tell us how many policies have been purchased, and this may be the reason: CBS News has learned enrollments got off to an incredibly slow start.

Early enrollment figures are contained in notes from twice-a-day "war room" meetings convened within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services after the website failed on Oct. 1. They were turned over in response to a document request from the House Oversight Committee.

The website launched on a Tuesday. Publicly, the government said there were 4.7 million unique visits in the first 24 hours. But at a meeting Wednesday morning, the war room notes say "six enrollments have occurred so far."

They were with BlueCross BlueShield North Carolina and Kansas City, CareSource and Healthcare Service Corporation.

By Wednesday afternoon, enrollments were up to "approximately 100." By the end of Wednesday, the notes reflect "248 enrollments" nationwide.

The health care exchanges need to average 39,000 enrollees a day to meet the goal of seven million by March 1. The war room notes give a glimpse into some of the reasons customers had problems:

"Direct enrollment (signing up directly on an insurer's website) is not working for any issuers."
"Experian" credit reporting agency is "creating confusion with credit check information."
"Issuer phone numbers are not appearing correctly on the Pay Now page."

The notes leave no doubt that some enrollment figures, which the administration has chosen to keep secret, are available.

"Statistics coming in," said notes from the very first meeting the morning of Oct. 2. Contractor "QSSI has a daily dashboard created every night."

But head of CMS Marilyn Tavenner would not disclose any figures when Rep. Dave Camp, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, asked earlier this week.

"Chairman Camp, we will have those numbers available in mid-November," she said.

Health and Human Services told CBS News Thursday it's in no position to confirm or discuss enrollment figures because it doesn't have any. A spokesman suggested the numbers obtained by CBS News may not include all the different ways to enroll, such as paper applications. The spokesman also said that enrollment figures in Massachusetts' health care plan started off negligible but then skyrocketed as a deadline neared.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1016183 Nov 1, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they don't keep it in a vault in the basement. They buy yachts! The boat show is on here in Ft Lauderdale this weekend; wait and see how much they drop there. They're buying more yachts and planes than ever; and also, Art Basel has never been more successful! They have so much cash to spend that they don't know what to do with it, so they build homes everywhere that they may spend only a day or two in. Your economic ignorance is appalling.
Thanks for proving my point!!!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1016184 Nov 1, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Oughta be mandatory for high school graduation.
NO Excuses.
They did before the libtards got a hold of the education system.
dem

United States

#1016185 Nov 1, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text>Another moran that drinks the libtard koolade. Can't any of you libtards take care of your self? Must you always have a nanny hold your hand!
Listen to the tea bag idiot that spends everyday on topix, accomplishing nothing, showing everyone what a uninformed dope you are.
Hold my hand.
Get a job.
dem

United States

#1016186 Nov 1, 2013
Homer wrote:
Extreme Homes, not Homer Although can be pretty extreme sometimes.
I liked the extreme homer part.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1016187 Nov 1, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because communal-type living even in the colonial days - where everyone got to share the bounty of the harvest when only some wanted to do the work - didn't work then and hasn't worked since.
Even in ancient times, it was understood that if a man doesn't work, he doesn't eat.
It's not up to the government to take care of people who would gladly let someone else do it. There ARE people who have no qualms about taking advantage of others and even expect it.
The wealthy earn their money and represent only 1% of the entire population.
Most of us are content with what we have and take responsibility for ourselves and our actions so as not to be a burden on others.
What kind of country would we be had the pioneers and those who had to struggle to make ends meet held out their hands for the government to give them what others had worked hard for themselves or were forced to give the government their hard-earned money to take care of those who didn't want to take care of themselves.
In every poll and survey taken over the past week, only 6% say they are happy with the ACA. That's the 6% who are on the receiving end of someone else's hard work and hard-earned money.
No one wants people in need to be denied medical care. But the solutions were so much simpler and so much less costly than the ACA.
Obamacare is actually going to cost many people a lot more money who are not wealthy. How is that fair to them?
What's ironic is most liberals wouldn't freely give their own money to, say, women who kept having babies for more welfare out of their own pockets but are more than happy if someone else does.
There is something inherently wrong and even anti-American for the government to deliberately create a welfare state and a segment of the population who feel entitled to what others earn who don't feel they need to earn it themselves.
Why you and other liberals can't see that is a mystery.
"Carol, forever remains a slave to the rich" - Homer 2016

"Time to break the chains of bondage the rich hold over this great nation" - Homer 2016

"Eat the Rich" - Aerosmith
dem

United States

#1016188 Nov 1, 2013
NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH wrote:
Citizens recieving 100% government benefits should not be allowed to voteWe must first realize that voting isn’t and never was a blanket right granted to everyone inside the U.S. border. The ability to vote has always had restrictions. For example, there are age restrictions to vote. You have to be 18 in order to vote. Why is 18 the magic number? Who knows but it’s a restriction. Convicted felons are also not allowed to vote in some places.(1) Early on in the history of the U.S. only white male landowners could vote. Our founders were afraid that those without land would vote to redistribute other’s land to themselves. This is a logical concept and this tells us that even our founders didn’t see the “right to vote” as a blanket right with no caveats.

Unlike the other amendments in the Bill of Rights that apply to all persons in the United States, in order to vote you must be a citizen. Because you have to be a citizen in order to vote this means that voting itself is a privilege granted to those who choose to become a citizen.

Now, if there are restrictions on other “rights” like free speech and the 2nd Amendment pertaining to guns why can’t there also be a restriction on the “right” to vote? This is only logical. Our founding fathers obviously saw that the “right” to vote could be restricted for fear of people redistributing things that aren’t theirs.

An able bodied person who receives benefits and is able to vote is like a child being able to vote their own rules and allowances. No parent would agree to that and it’s illogical. Ever heard a parent say,“my house my rules”? Why? Because any kid will vote for candy for breakfast, no curfews or bedtimes, and allowances paying more than the work they do is worth or not working at all (welfare).
What is happening today is that the Democrat party is bribing people for votes with someone else’s money. It boils down to,“vote for me if you want more welfare, more Medicaid, more unemployment benefits, more food stamps, more W.I.C. money, free birth control, free healthcare, free college education, etc.” Essentially the non-producers are voting to redistribute the money from the producers to themselves. This entitlement mentality, this political ideology, is crippling America. This is exactly what our founders feared. Why should someone have the ability to tell me that I have to give them my money? This would be like me walking into a bank and holding a vote to redistribute the money in the vault to everyone who voted for it.

America now has more people receiving government handouts than are working. We now have more “takers” than “makers”.(2) There are more people on food stamps than at any time in history.(3) When does the madness end? The Democrats are cool with it because it means more votes for them.(4) If we continue down this path there will be even less producers and even more takers.http://www.debate.org/d ebates/Citizens-recieving-gove rnment-benefits-should-not-be- allowed-to-vote/1/

THIS IS HOW DEMOCRATS GETS VOTES BY BRIBING PEOPLE!

What is happening today is that the Democrat party is bribing people for votes with someone else’s money. It boils down to,“vote for me if you want more welfare, more Medicaid, more unemployment benefits, more food stamps, more W.I.C. money, free birth control, free healthcare, free college education, etc.” Essentially the non-producers are voting to redistribute the money from the producers to themselves.
Morning, piece of sh it, tea bag terrorist.
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf

United States

#1016189 Nov 1, 2013
I'm sure some of you on the forum are wondering what a creature like "dem" could actually look like? He and I are old acquaintances, as I googled and outed him years ago on topix back when he posted under his real name. Here's the actual pic I posted (in a loving embrace with his actual boyfriend of the time), which I found on one of Chicago's gay chatrooms.

http://fatgay.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/

BTW, he's the fat white slob......:-)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min Rogue Scholar 05 180,787
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 min OzRitz 48,499
Dear Abby 11/24/14 31 min RACE 14
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 36 min Frijoles 70,600
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 37 min RACE 98,683
dear abby 11-25 56 min Mister Tonka 5
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 1 hr Hatti_Hollerand 703
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:04 am PST

NBC Sports 4:04AM
Colts bring back Victor Butler
Bleacher Report 5:39 AM
Vontae Davis Deserves to Make the Pro Bowl for the Indianapolis Colts
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
5 Bold Predictions for the Chicago Bears' Week 13 Matchup
Bleacher Report 7:09 AM
2014 Week 13 Fantasy Football Quarterback Rankings
NBC Sports 9:38 AM
Colts' practice squad adds Griff Whalen, sprinter Jeff Demps