Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
928,761 - 928,780 of 1,084,464 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010668
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

flack wrote:
<quoted text> I don't know. We haven't seen those either.
Barack Obama wet to HS in Hawaii under the name "Barack Obama".(There are yearbooks & newspaper articles that prove that)

Yu claim that he applied to Occidental using the name Barry Soetero as a foreign student
using HS transcripts under the name Barack Obama.

Do you people even realize how stupid that makes you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010669
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a more recent example:
4/23/13
Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp to brief House Republicans on tax reform
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/camp-to...
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/camp-to...
That's a member of Congress briefing other members of Congress, moron. It is not the Executive Branch breifing the Legislative Branch, moron.

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010670
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
If a cop decides to play judge and jury when he shoots a bank robber instead of arresting him, the NAACP and the Magic Negro will fill their pants on national TV.
But when the Magic Negro decides to kill women and children thousands of miles away from TV lights and cameras, you racist pigs are all for it under the guise of Commander-In-Chief bullsh it...
Gee....Where was your outrage when Bush drone attacks were killing innocent women and children? Get over yourself.

"A classified Pakistani government document has revealed that scores of civilians died in dozens of CIA-led drone strikes between 2006 and late 2009 in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) and that Pakistani officials were “aware of those deaths for many years”.

A classified Pakistani government document has revealed that scores of civilians died in dozens of CIA-led drone strikes between 2006 and late 2009 in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) and that Pakistani officials were “aware of those deaths for many years”.

The period defined in the report fell in the presidential term of George W. Bush for the most part. However, drone strikes also increased significantly when Barack Obama took oath of office."

http://dawn.com/news/1031326/secret-govt-docu...
TheIndependentMa jority

East Bernstadt, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010671
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Whoa.
You gonna report me to the IRS for saving my own money.
Yikes.
I won't have to.

Stay out of the registers of my food line vile dem.
TheIndependentMa jority

East Bernstadt, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010674
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
ROTFLMAO!!!!
Obama is an idiot.
Marines might start looking like the French Legion with Girly Hats!!!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/24/ob...
Nothing worse than making good men dress like pusceeeeeeeeees!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010675
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Obamacare hearings: Oversight or heckling?

There’s congressional oversight that answers everyone’s most urgent questions — and then there’s just heckling from the partisan peanut gallery.

Over the next few weeks, Republicans are going to have to decide which path they’re going to take as they open hearings into the broken Obamacare website.

There’s a wealth of real questions to be answered at the hearings, starting with Thursday’s testimony by a group of contractors that worked on the website. What, exactly, went wrong with the development of the federal health insurance exchange? Who dropped the ball? And can it actually be patched up on the fly?

(Understanding Obamacare: A guide to the ACA)

Those are the most urgent questions that will be on lawmakers’ minds at the House Energy & Commerce Committee hearing Thursday and the others that will follow. The problem is, the hearings will be run by the same House Republicans who don’t even want the law in the first place, and have gone through 40-plus repeal votes and a politically disastrous government shutdown to prove it.

So Republicans have a lot to prove in the hearings. They can use the investigative powers of Congress pry out the answers to the serious questions that everyone has about the website — Democrats as well as Republicans — and repair their standing with the public by showing how thoughtful oversight ought to be done.

Or they can spend the whole time yelling,“BOOOOO! This is never going to work.”

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/obamaca...

so far...heckling.

that will really fix their poll problem.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010676
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so when will that Alex Jones themed screed become mainstream?
Who?
What?

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010678
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush did not brief Congress, moron.
This is a brief to Congress, moron.
There's a difference, moron, between a caucus meeting and a Congressional brief from someone like a member of the Cabinet such as the Secretary of HHS.
So, why would the Republicans be excluded from a Congressional brief about the ObamaKare disaster by the Secretary of Health and Human Services?
Got an answer for that, besides "Bush did it, too"?
(You know, yesterday some Democrat moron actually blamed Bush for the ObamaKare disaster. Yesterday, "It's Bush's fault." Today, "Bush did it, too.")
"Gary Cohen, who is in charge of the health insurance exchanges office within HHS, briefed House Democrats at their weekly caucus meeting Wednesday morning. Lawmakers who attended the closed-door session said he promised that the administration would improve the enrollment process."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/democra...

Lets review.

At what event were the Democrats briefed?

Answer:

At their weekly CAUCUS meeting.

How the f*ck did a subsidized pretend oilfield engineer get so GD stupid?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010679
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm currently saving for 415 horse power corvette to park next to my z28 camaro.
I'm not in tune with how you poor people live.
Doesn't yo' momma get upset with all of those little race cars on the living room floor?

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010680
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, we're getting somewhere. Again, like when you posted proof ObamaKare is a Machiavellian plan to subjugate the population, today you post proof of the Democrats' intent to dupe the country with propaganda.
"... it is clear they are not interested in anything other than continuing their desperate drive to sabotage this law...."
This sounds more like campaign propaganda than a rationale for excluding the majority party in the House from a briefing by the administration about a disaster happening in the government.
Let's give Pelosi the "Topix Test".
Show me the link that proves "...it is clear they (Republicans) are not interested in anything other than continuing their desperate drive to sabotage this law...."
Let's go over some facts.
Fact ONE: Every member of the House of Representatives is elected by a constituency that has a vested interest in government.
Fact TWO: That vested interested by that constituency cannot be nullified by some Democrat spewing party line indoctrinated subjective judgmental condemnation.
Fact THREE: Excluding the elected representation of any constituency is disenfranchising that constituency, and eliminating those people from participating in this "government of the people".
Fact FOUR: For any member of Congress to make an informed judgment, they must first be informed. The Democrat plan is simply to keep them from being informed.
No one was disenfranchised. Republicans didn't care to request a briefing. I don't recall Democrats crying like little girls when Republicans received their own private briefings. You really need to grow up.

Besides, it is a dead story since Republicans are going to get their own briefing by HHS.
TheIndependentMa jority

East Bernstadt, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010681
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the part about you buying a wife online.
That Aint NONE of your business either.

Gawd damn vile duhmbo-just how much IGNORANCE is a person supposed to tolerate.

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010682
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
I didn't hear any comment about the quote from John McAfee.
"My Advice Would be Throw it Away and Start Over, You Cannot Fix It."
I know you Democrats are completely ignorant of things like writing programs for computers, so you wouldn't know how completely hosed a computer program has to be from the beginning of its developement to be in a condition where someone like John McAfee can't even fix it.
Didn't Obama threaten to crash the US economy by defaulting on the debt to coerce Congress to fund his ObamaKare so he could roll out this trainwreck?
And he didn't have a clue it was this hosed?
This is just another piece of evidence Obama doesn't have a clue what's going on in government. His only function is to read prescripted messages from a teleprompter and sign documents when he's ordered to by Vallerie Jarrett. He doesn't have a clue what he's talking about or what he's signing.
If the contractor had written the program, instead of stealing it and trying to delete the evidence of their crime, there would be glitches. This is a trainwreck with no survivors because of the complete and total incompetence of this administration.
That's not the guy whose company lost all my information on my computer during an "update" to my security software that took therm 5 days to get it back. That guy has the nerve to talk about some one else's software?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010683
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Barack Obama wet to HS in Hawaii under the name "Barack Obama".(There are yearbooks & newspaper articles that prove that)
Yu claim that he applied to Occidental using the name Barry Soetero as a foreign student
using HS transcripts under the name Barack Obama.
Do you people even realize how stupid that makes you?
Then explain why he enrolled at Occidental as Barry Soetoro?
Explain why his mother calls him Barry Soetoro in the letter she wrote to her employer Ford Foundation requesting use of travel benefits for dependent children in 1981 when Obama somehow went to Pakistan while it was on the US State Department's "no travel" list.
Did Barry Soetoro travel under an Indonesian or UK passport on that trip? He very obviously couldn't have gone to Pakistan with a US passport.

And, how did the name "Barack Obama" get on that list you posted here of supposed graduates from Columbia, since Occidental and his mother knew him as Barry Soetoro?

It would require a conspiracy to put "Barrack Hussein Obama" on a list of graduates from Columbia. It would require a conspiracy to promote the lie that Obama actually attended classes at Columbia. It would require a conspiracy to get a college dropout from Occidental who never attended classes at Columbia admitted to Harvard.
... like the Communist Party USA engages in all the time.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010684
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Who?
What?
for once you hit the nail on the head.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010685
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Nostrilfuckface for sure
Homoerotic fantasy for sure.
dem never met a doorknob he didn't like:)

Since: May 11

Landisburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010687
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to work on your reading and comprehension of the written English language, dumbass. Nobody mentioned applying to any graduate school.
Barry Soetoro never transferred from Occidental to Columbia. Barry Soetoro was enrolled at Occidental. Therefore, it would have to be Barry Soetoro that supposedly transferred from Occidental to Columbia.
Aren't you the indoctrinated clown that posted some pdf list of graduates of Columbia with the name "Barrack Hussein Obama" on it? Now, if Barry Soetoro transferred from Occidental to Columbia, how did Barrack Obama graduate from Columbia?
How about we take a look at Obama's file at Columbia and get to the bottom of this. First thing up is his application. I'd like to know how a poor student at Occidental got admitted to Columbia to begin with. And, who was it that worked and sacrificed to be accepted to Columbia and was denied so that poor student named Barry Soetoro could be admitted?
Obama was a dropout at Occidental, and never attended classes at Columbia. PBS proved that when they, with all their resources, couldn't find the first person who ever met Obama at Columbia.
It was actually a grant set aside for foreign students at a graduate level.
Now, why would Obama, who would become a dropout at Occidental, apply for a grant for graduate students as a foreign student?
Well, if you can get into Harvard after dropping out of Occidental and never attending classes at Columbia, getting a grant would not be a challenge, would it?
Here's another question you ran away from.
How could Obama have travelled to Pakistan in 1981 with a US passport?
Let's see how much of an idiot you really are here....
College dropouts after two years of college do not apply to graduate school.

Since: Sep 08

Santa Barbara, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010688
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans request briefings all the time. The only problem is, Congress has to issue a subpoena to get the Democrats to show up for it. And when they show up, all they do is lie.
So, why is it the Democrats don't want Republicans to know what is said in their briefing to only the Democrats in Congress about the ObamaKare trainwreck?
What are they hiding?


Well, hopefully they are developing their strategizing skills.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010690
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
He could always slide his co ck in the hole in your head, racist Jew.
Someone ought to pat you down with an antiseptic wet wipe you retard... Seeing how we've all wanted too..

It's the culture...

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010691
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Here we go again.
No shit, azz hole.
Now you own it.
You do realize that.
Right?
We've moved on and judge a man by the content of his character and not the color of his skin.

When a black Republican is elected, you'll see your true colors.

Radical liberals use racial injustices of the past perpetrated by their predecessors as a tool for personal and political gain now.

Race baiting is just using blacks for another kind of servitude. Personal and political servitude.

It's radical liberals who apparently have some unresolved racial issues.
Patriot

Louisville, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1010693
Oct 24, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

NOT SO FAST: OBAMACARE “TAX” IS UN-APPORTIONED

Therefore, It’s Constitutionally Prohibited

Editor’s Note: Of all the mandates in the Constitution, there is only one that is repeated twice: direct taxes must be apportioned. Judge Roberts has admitted this. Writing for the majority in the Supreme Court’s decision on Obamacare, Roberts confessed direct taxes “must be apportioned among the states.” To avoid this constitutional restraint, Roberts falsely declared Obamacare’s individual mandate is not a tax on the ownership of personal property and “is thus not a direct tax that must be apportioned among the several states.” The decision is erroneous. Most troubling is the fact that both the majority and the dissent refused to deal honestly with the issue of direct taxes.

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/U...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••