Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1550333 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1006216 Oct 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
common practice everywhere to avoid having people wait hours only to be turned away if they don't have the correct information...
Great more government expense, more wasted tax dollars. How about bringing the correct fcking paperwork moron? Why does the government have to coddle everyone?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006217 Oct 17, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Take it up with S&P, their claim is that the shutdown cost the economy 24 billion dollars.
I don't recall S&P posting here. I do recall you posting here.

Here's the post again for your easy refence if you feel like backing up the bullshit you post here:

Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on, show me the ghost.
Show me the government shut down.
Let's go over this again.
Every dollar the government spends has to be taken out of the part of the economy that pays for everything.
"Cost the economy" probably means the part of the economy that is the expense of government paid for by the other part of the economy that pays for everything.
Government is an expense on the economy, not an asset, as it is used in the calculation of the economy.
It goes like this:
The part of the economy that pays for everything is calculated. Then, the government expense on the part of the economy that pays for everything is calculated.
Then, the total economy is ludicrously calculated by adding the part of the economy that pays for everything to the government expense the part of the economy that pays for everything has to pay for.

You probably have trouble with less than exact figures, so I'll give you an exact analogue:

You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.

Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...

Show me the twelve dollars.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006218 Oct 17, 2013
You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.

Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...

Show me the twelve dollars.
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#1006219 Oct 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
common practice everywhere to avoid having people wait hours only to be turned away if they don't have the correct information...
Not everywhere dummy__only in e-verify states and in really busy locales.

Funny that you too sung a different tune when the topic was photo ID's to vote.

And BTW I looked into the various plans that Kaiser Permanente offers and learned that you're clueless and/or lying about that too.

No mas pantalones.
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#1006220 Oct 17, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Birthers are the absolute dumbest, most ignorant, most uninformed morons on the planet.
demokkkRats: We started the "birther" movement before we were against it..

Idiot retard liberals start and are the "proud parents" of the Hillary birther movement, sellout, then blame someone else because they're the idiots..

It's the culture...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

Gauley Bridge WV

#1006221 Oct 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
none require an amendment, just action...
but Demos/Tenzing, who claims to be a Libertarian, supports tax increases and ObamaKKKare...
a hypocrite...
Yes however if part of the constitution and not a law they will be almost impossible to amend or repeal.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#1006222 Oct 17, 2013
Emerging right-wing theme: Obama planned shutdown with Valerie Jarrett as trap for Republicans

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/17/emergin...

so that was easy.

so who's the smart one now? bunch of old whites folks tricked into a trap by some black folks. kinda throws that whole IQ thing out the window.

and carol...you can talk about Val all you want. she evidently kicked some tea party ass so have it it girlfriend.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006223 Oct 17, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>One more time. What did 75% of ALL defaulted home loans have in common during the 2008 collapse??????????
They were ALL less than 5 years old. What happened 5 years before the 2008 collapse??????????
.
President Bush Signs American Dream Downpayment Act of 2003.
.
What did Bush say when he signed it??????????
.
""One of the biggest hurdles to homeownership is getting money for a down payment. This administration has recognized that, and so today I'm honored to be here to sign a law that will help many low-income buyers to overcome that hurdle, and to achieve an important part of the American Dream.
Last year I set a goal to add 5.5 million new homeowners in America by the end of the decade. That is an attainable goal; that is an essential goal.""
.
Well Bush's Dream came true. Because of this Law change Banks started making loans with:
NO Down Payment required
No Background Checks.
Up to 150% loans of home value.
Up to (wait for it, wait for it) 5 years of deferred principal payments.
.
Now tell us all this was NOT the major part of the home loan collapse.
Since you are ignorant of today's lesson, let's review some US history. You may want to take notes.

Here is a link to the Democrats negotiating with Republicans in 2003 for no effective oversight of their CRA program:

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1222905...

(If you want, you can earn extra credit for posting the outright lies from Barney Frank and Maxine Waters in this link.)

2003 was also the year Democrats supported the war in Iraq.

Now, why would the Democrats support the war in Iraq?
Because they had a deal with the Republicans to give them no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program?

When did the Democrats and their lapdog media turn against the war in Iraq?
After there was nothing more the Republicans could give them?

When did the Democrats take over complete oversight of the financial institutions that:
1) Gave so much money to Obama in bribes, it was only Christopher Dodd in the entire Congress they gave more money to; and
2) Collapsed the economy after two years of oversight by Christopher Dodd, from whom we heard a constant stream of lies right up to the collapse.

Class dismissed.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1006224 Oct 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't recall S&P posting here. I do recall you posting here.
Here's the post again for your easy refence if you feel like backing up the bullshit you post here:
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on, show me the ghost.
Show me the government shut down.
Let's go over this again.
Every dollar the government spends has to be taken out of the part of the economy that pays for everything.
"Cost the economy" probably means the part of the economy that is the expense of government paid for by the other part of the economy that pays for everything.
Government is an expense on the economy, not an asset, as it is used in the calculation of the economy.
It goes like this:
The part of the economy that pays for everything is calculated. Then, the government expense on the part of the economy that pays for everything is calculated.
Then, the total economy is ludicrously calculated by adding the part of the economy that pays for everything to the government expense the part of the economy that pays for everything has to pay for.
You probably have trouble with less than exact figures, so I'll give you an exact analogue:
You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...
Show me the twelve dollars.
Take it up with S&P, their claim is that the shutdown cost the economy 24 billion dollars. Me, I think you're insane.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006225 Oct 17, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Where does the government spend most of its money?
IN THE GD ECONOMY YOU DUMBASS
When the government doesn't spend money yet still collets taxes, it just deprives the economy of that put back. It doesn't stop the "take out " part.
I have piles of horse crap in my pasture that are smsarter that you.
My God, get a freakin grip.
So, what you're saying is, if the government took all the money out of the economy, we'd have a stronger economy?
Just how nuts are you?

Here's how the real world works:

You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.

Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...

Show me the twelve dollars.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1006226 Oct 17, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...
Show me the twelve dollars.
I'm just happy for you that you use an accountant.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#1006227 Oct 17, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Emerging right-wing theme: Obama planned shutdown with Valerie Jarrett as trap for Republicans
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/17/emergin...
so that was easy.
so who's the smart one now? bunch of old whites folks tricked into a trap by some black folks. kinda throws that whole IQ thing out the window.
and carol...you can talk about Val all you want. she evidently kicked some tea party ass so have it it girlfriend.
"Rightwingers: If it isn't one spin it's another" - Homer 2016

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#1006228 Oct 17, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"Laney F"
This city Spokane, WA. is about 90 miles from Canada. We have several hospitals, Sacred Heart about 750 bed, Deaconess about 500 beds, Holy Family about 200 beds, Valley General about 250 beds and guess what all of the hospitals particularly Sacred Heart have many many Canadian patients. Patients who do not want to wait months for treatment and procedures readily available here.
Peace
The same goes on in Detroit, if not for the Canadian Patients the Detroit hospitals would have been closed years ago.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006229 Oct 17, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Emerging right-wing theme: Obama planned shutdown with Valerie Jarrett as trap for Republicans
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/17/emergin...
so that was easy.
so who's the smart one now? bunch of old whites folks tricked into a trap by some black folks. kinda throws that whole IQ thing out the window.
and carol...you can talk about Val all you want. she evidently kicked some tea party ass so have it it girlfriend.
Obama didn't plan anything. He's nothing more than a cardboard cutout commercial sign to make it look like someone's actually president. Vallerie Jarrett makes all the decisions. Obama's sole function is to read prescripted speeches on a teleprompter and sign documents when he's ordered to sign them.
Obama has never done anything in his entire life. He didn't start doing something when he moved into the White House, moron. He just continued to do what he's done his entire life, whatever he's ordered to do so he can continue to ride in the gold seat on the government gravy train.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#1006230 Oct 17, 2013
Emeem wrote:
$24 billion hit on US economy to pay for teabagger tantrum.
Good news, Obamacare repels one more dumbass attack from fanatic morons on extreme right.
More good news, Republican party exposed and weakened by internal cancer.
God bless Ted Cruz!
There should be a class action to recover it, then those tea baggers might stick to the moonshine instead of politics.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006231 Oct 17, 2013
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>I'm just happy for you that you use an accountant.
Perhaps you can explain to everyone how an expense on the economy like government gets calculated into the economy in your next post.

You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...
Show me the twelve dollars.
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#1006232 Oct 17, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Emerging right-wing theme: Obama planned shutdown with Valerie Jarrett as trap for Republicans
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/17/emergin...
so that was easy.
so who's the smart one now? bunch of old whites folks tricked into a trap by some black folks. kinda throws that whole IQ thing out the window.
and carol...you can talk about Val all you want. she evidently kicked some tea party ass so have it it girlfriend.
But but but tea party caucus was only reintroducing "it's brand."

And Rafael Cruz claims that John McCain was bombing his own troops Hah, LMAO__that was cruel because McCain actually did that once. But to McCain's credit he's remaining true to the bulk of the nation's Republicans. The smart and nice ones LOL.
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#1006233 Oct 17, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
There should be a class action to recover it, then those tea baggers might stick to the moonshine instead of politics.
An ignorant Australian making a claim, then can't back it up! Talk about looking stupid and working hard to prove it that's Greg Bourke!

It's the culture...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006234 Oct 17, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
There should be a class action to recover it, then those tea baggers might stick to the moonshine instead of politics.
You're running your mouth about everything and running away from this at the same time. How about you explain this to us.

Perhaps you can explain to everyone how an expense on the economy like government gets calculated into the economy in your next post.

You have ten dollars. I cost you two dollars and fifty cents, of which I give back to you two dollars. Now, you have nine dollars and fifty cents. According to the way our government calculates the economy, you have twelve dollars.
Like I say to the television when one of those ghosts-are-real shows is on...
Show me the twelve dollars.

I'll be back Monday to check your homework.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1006235 Oct 17, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>But but but tea party caucus was only reintroducing "it's brand."
And Rafael Cruz claims that John McCain was bombing his own troops Hah, LMAO__that was cruel because McCain actually did that once. But to McCain's credit he's remaining true to the bulk of the nation's Republicans. The smart and nice ones LOL.
Would you be talking about the bulk of Republicans that thrashed the RINOs in 2010 and gave the House to the Republicans?

Do you listen to yourself?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min NotSoDivineMsM 241,705
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 33 min They cannot kill ... 10,873
Why are White men obsessed with Latina women? (Feb '10) 54 min patosm 216
Illinois is in critical financial crisis. 1 hr NewsEveryDay 22
Laughing my Ossoff 1 hr Little ol me 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Common Sense 63,861
Julieanne Zenz 6 hr Julieanne Zenz 5

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages