Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1004180 Oct 15, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
sounds like a threat....
this one will go in your NSA file....
You paranoid extremists, right and left wing, are the only ones afraid of NSA. Normal people don't walk through life looking over their shoulder. Not much scares me.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1004181 Oct 15, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Page 272....
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall to reporting for years beginning with 2012.
SEC. 1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS.
Section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.1395l(t)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:‘‘(18) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CANCER HOSPITALS.—‘‘(A) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine if, under the system under this subsection, costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) with respect to ambulatory payment classification groups exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection (as determined appropriate by the Secretary).
‘‘(B) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT.—
Insofar as the Secretary determines under subparagraph (A) that costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection, the Secretary shall provide for an appropriate adjustment under paragraph (2)(E) to reflect those..,
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr3200i ...
There I wuz, sitting on the lake wondering what lure I'm going to use next. I chose the obnoxious clown-colored lure with more hooks than lure, cast it next to a school of Democrats wondering which one is stupid enough to leave school and hit this obvious lure, I give it some "provide the text" top water action, and look what I caught.
Obviously, you are ignorant of the most significant descriptions of governmental philosophy ever written in the history of civilization.
You don't even recognize that the text you provided could have been from one of Machiavelli's letters that comprise "The Prince".
"The Secretary shall determine...."
Do you even realize what this law means when it gives arbitrary and subjective authority to some person who occupies some position in government?
What you provided is proof there is no law to be enforced. Everything you provided proves ObamaKare intends for subjective enforcement. There is no criteria in the text you provided for the people to read and understand what the law is that they must comply with.
What is written in the law is, the Secretary decides who gets health care, and who doesn't. The Secretary decides what hospitals get paid, and which ones do not.
The ObamaKare law is nothing more than another Democrat Marxist program to give what one individual works for to someone who won't work for it.
The ObamaKare law couldn't have been more Marxist if Karl Marx would have written it himself, and it couldn't be more Machiavellian if Machiavelli had to approve what Karl Marx wrote.
"The Secretary will determine...."
The Secretary will not be reviewing and approving/denying payment. There will be a huge bureaucracy doing that, under the orders and guidance of the Secretary... like the IRS Secretary ordering the opponents of the Democrats be targeted.
Since that same person will be the "Secretary" adjudicating ObamaKare, it's obvious those who oppose the Democrats will be dying on the street without health care.
ObamaKare is a Marxist program with Machiavellian execution.
It's that plain and simple, and obviously medieval.
To remind you of your lie: Page 272. section 1145: At age 76 when you most need it, you are not eligible for cancer treatment.

It is obvious that you are already brain dead so you really don't need to worry about Obamacare.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1004182 Oct 15, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
So the ghosts in your TV, the ones you talk to, gave you new talking points today!!
But you still sounnd like an idiot. Denying all sorts of things that everyone knows to be true.
Now I know where you got your Randy Weaver bullshit from!!
You're running away from the post again.
You're also running away from your own post, too.
Where's that post you were going to show us? You were going to show us a post from me where I said I talked to ghosts in my television. Did you find it and discover you're an idiot?

Now, back to the post from me you ran away from:

Most people have heard the name Machiavelli. Today, almost nobody knows why you heard that name a long time ago, and haven't heard it even whispered in recent memory. Few people are aware Machiavelli has a very negative connotation. Machiavelli wrote an instructional manual on how to administer control of landed wealth, which included peasants bound to the land. He described what he called the fir...st princedom and inherited princedoms. Part of the first princedom is a description of establishing totalitarian government over a newly acquired peasantry and the land they belonged to. This requires adjudication in strict adherence to the agenda of the prince, who owns the land and peasants. A governor of issues is appointed for this purpose, and they are the final word on any issue.
Now, go read the text of the ObamaKare law and pay particular attention to where the text reads "The Secretary will determine...." everything. All issues are resolved when "The Secretary will determine" what is done.
The execution of ObamaKare is right out of Machiavelli's The Prince. The principle content of ObamaKare could have been written by Karl Marx.
And this actually passed through the US Congress and was signed into law.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1004183 Oct 15, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Dr. Jekyll (Demos/Tenzing) prefers his Mr. Hyde persona.....
You know that to be a lie.

You talk to Tenzing.

You're scared shitless of me. When I show up, you run off.

I'm lovin' it. A 'free fire zone'. I've whipped you so badly, you cringe and hide whenever you see me here.

Now I've got Lois Lame, Dweeb (he of ghosts in the TV), and Whatever doing the same.

This is great. Wingnuts are such pfaeries.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1004184 Oct 15, 2013
Homer wrote:
So what's the latest with the death panels?
I've been in a holding pattern my new venture:
Homer's Death Panels
Homer 2016 - "I'll decide who lives and who dies"
Obama's "supervisory panel" already decides that. Lois Lerner and others like her from the IRS are probably on the panel.

So no worries, Homer. You'll be rid of us soon.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1004185 Oct 15, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
<self-constructed original post from a thinking American>
There I wuz, sitting on the lake wondering what lure I'm going to use next. I chose the obnoxious clown-colored lure with more hooks than lure, cast it next to a school of Democrats wondering which one is stupid enough to leave school and hit this obvious lure, I give it some "provide the text" top water action, and look what I caught.
Obviously, you are ignorant of the most significant descriptions of governmental philosophy ever written in the history of civilization.
You don't even recognize that the text you provided could have been from one of Machiavelli's letters that comprise "The Prince".
"The Secretary shall determine...."
Do you even realize what this law means when it gives arbitrary and subjective authority to some person who occupies some position in government?
What you provided is proof there is no law to be enforced. Everything you provided proves ObamaKare intends for subjective enforcement. There is no criteria in the text you provided for the people to read and understand what the law is that they must comply with.
What is written in the law is, the Secretary decides who gets health care, and who doesn't. The Secretary decides what hospitals get paid, and which ones do not.
The ObamaKare law is nothing more than another Democrat Marxist program to give what one individual works for to someone who won't work for it.
The ObamaKare law couldn't have been more Marxist if Karl Marx would have written it himself, and it couldn't be more Machiavellian if Machiavelli had to approve what Karl Marx wrote.
"The Secretary will determine...."
The Secretary will not be reviewing and approving/denying payment. There will be a huge bureaucracy doing that, under the orders and guidance of the Secretary... like the IRS Secretary ordering the opponents of the Democrats be targeted.
Since that same person will be the "Secretary" adjudicating ObamaKare, it's obvious those who oppose the Democrats will be dying on the street without health care.
ObamaKare is a Marxist program with Machiavellian execution.
It's that plain and simple, and obviously medieval.
<spam>

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#1004186 Oct 15, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
So ever time you idiots get a bill you don't like you will hold our nation hostage? Waa, waa. What kind of democracy is that?
"Carol"
"poop" thinks that if democrats offer a bill republican's should simply go along with it no matter what it says. After all he owes his existence to the government, they pay his retirement, they pay his medical, they give him a rent subsidy, they provide his rehab services, they provide his phone, they pay for his food stamps, they supply the TP that he uses to wipe the manure away that comes from his mouth every time he posts.
Peace

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1004187 Oct 15, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
lol. You have to know no one believes that but you posted it anyway. Classic.
Really?? I'll bet most folks believe it.

Your use of projection fails again.

So how's your buddy Gunner/Ray Donovan??

Seems he removed his sorry ass off the thread last evening after I exposed him.

Further proof he's Gunner.
PDUPONT

Belchertown, MA

#1004188 Oct 15, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the whole problem, isn't it? When Obama proclaimed "I won" after his first election, he thought it meant he ruled over us. He never connected leadership with uniting and bringing together.
This has been evident throughout his entire presidency.
Obama's ego and tunnel vision coupled with his far left liberal ideology is why we're here. He has no interest in uniting and bringing together. His desire is to rule by dividing and conquering.
This, too, has been evident throughout his entire presidency.
Only in your delusional, demented and hate filled mind Carol.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#1004189 Oct 15, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
If only his were the only story of being rudely awakened. The same story is being told all over the country.
Decided to ditch the new digs. House didn't appraise high enough. Waiting to find better digs in 6 months.
Hubby's company also cut back on everyone's overtime recently. Decided to hold off and regroup first. We like to think of ourselves as financially responsible.
Maybe I should be the president. It's not that difficult to regroup and still live on a budget.
But thanks for asking.
I assume you get those chain emails that are designed to misinform and fuel the flames of ignorance? Amazing how you all just immediately glom onto that stuff and readily pass it along as if it's some sort of inside information!

But; don't worry, you'll have to face the truth eventually and in the meantime, you entertain us.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#1004190 Oct 15, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
everything the government does is taxpayer funded. Period. Nothing you say will change that.
You will never convince him. He's the same person who believes corporations pay taxes. So it is easy to see. Government pays, not the taxpayer. Corporations pays, not the customer. The same.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1004191 Oct 15, 2013
Laney F wrote:
Republicans should let ObamaCare crash and burn
Hospitals are shedding staff, and insurers are still pulling out of markets, both phenomena will exacerbate consumers' "access shock" in places like California and New Hampshire.
In Massachusetts -- the state-level laboratory for Obamacare -- an acute doctor shortage is becoming more severe, raising access concerns.
Obamacare expands this issue on a national scale.
Don't fund it. It's a vehicle to institute Machiavellilan medieval subjective rule over an intended peasantry bound to the land. The text in the law gives an appointed "Secretary" the authority to allow you to receive health care or not based solely on their subjective judgment. With ObamaKare, the government will be able to actually threaten your life at its whim. ObamaKare legitimizes the government's right to kill anyone.
"You are ordered to visit Dr. Kevorkian for your treatment."
ObamaKare gives the government the authority to give you this command.

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#1004192 Oct 15, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
you have an odd definition of success.
And your definition of success is 25,782 posts without making one intelligent comment. Congratulations no-life moron.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#1004193 Oct 15, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
Hey Sonicfilter, had the DemocRATS passed a budget yet?
When?
You continue to show your ignorance. The Senate passed their 2014 budget back in March. Where have you been? Prison?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1004194 Oct 15, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Your ghosts in the TV are making you even more insane!!
You're running away from the post again.

If the only alternative is the government, then it really doesn't matter how well it works. The people will have no other choice.
That is the end-game the Democrats are working toward.
Machiavelli described the Democrats' agenda very well.
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#1004195 Oct 15, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You lose again, Emaam. You were so enraged over Dave making you look the fool again, you missed the excahnge between Lily and I.
Here it is, you can find it on page 46305.
----------
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Gunner for sure.
<quoted text>
----------
You don't have the good sense to keep your stupid mouth shut.
Shouldn't you be oout collecting scrap metal to pay for your son's Obamacare??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Jewish Geologist....

You work for topix don't you...

What are you...10 dollar an hour IT guy?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#1004196 Oct 15, 2013
Emeem wrote:
<quoted text>
You paranoid extremists, right and left wing, are the only ones afraid of NSA. Normal people don't walk through life looking over their shoulder. Not much scares me.
NSA computer programs automatically red-flag death threats against prominent figures....

your threat will be recorded forever...be ready for the knock on your door if anything happens...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#1004197 Oct 15, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
And you're too stupid to see the irony in your calling someone else a fraud!!
You've been that and more since your arrival here, straight from the Birfer thread!!
Better straighten out those ghosts in your TV. Seems they're the frauds!!
HAHAHAHHAA
You never explained, for one example, how a computer generated signature got on a supposed "birth certificate" generated in 1961.
I'd like to hear that explanation.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#1004198 Oct 15, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Gunner for sure.
<quoted text>
----------
Stupid little Emaam. He can't even read.
"but I went and looked at some of his posts from before the election"

link to the posts. Put up or shut up.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#1004199 Oct 15, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
It's the sicko fanatic evangelicals who use their religion to justify hatefulness, racism, homophobia, xenophobia.
You're all pumping your chests in self righteous indignation in some delusional attempt to imagine yourselves superior to others.
It's not working.
I could care less about religion; it's a business.
It is a good thing for you that you think Jesus loves your feeble mind-lily:"I'm sure Jesus loves the feeble minded as well."

I wasn't the one here proselytizing on Topix Politics about the teachings of Jesus and clucking about failure of people to follow-that was YOU, cupcake and your crony.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chicago Pizza Blows 14 min joey 2
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 25 min KiMare 51,279
AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08) 47 min IUEC 7,564
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr OzRitz 49,304
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr festivus infidel 68,906
Ask Amy 12-23 2 hr Mister Tonka 14
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Sublime1 98,869
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 hr Jacques Ottawa 182,017
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:21 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:21AM
Fantasy Football 2015 Awards
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
What Can Bears Do to Get Back into Playoff Hunt?
NBC Sports11:49 AM
Reggie Wayne needs offseason triceps surgery
NBC Sports 1:29 PM
Colts say they will be all business despite nothing to gain - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:40 PM
Cutler realizes Bears could be in for changes - NBC Sports