Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#1003767 Oct 14, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure. We have a cadre of regulars here, most all of whom have been here for years. Some change their names regularly, like Nobraina/Galt and Whatever/JasonJay and Carol/Lorac/Battie Lou/Lois Lame. But they're readily identifiable.
You really think new folks suddenly show up in Aug 13 and have knowledge of everyone here like Ray/Gunner does?? Plus, his routine is the same. Easily impeached ignorance, just like Gunner of old.
Get real. Even you can't be that stupid.
But wait, maybe you can be that stupid.
More likely, you're playing a diversion for your old buddy Gunner.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
you claimed to have read posts from "ray Donovan" prior to last election. Link to them.

hahaha

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#1003768 Oct 14, 2013
I'm done here.

Time for the night shift.

That's your cue, Lois Lame!!

Later.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#1003769 Oct 14, 2013
More from our intellectual superiors...
with a nod to SDA...

White House Garden...

"Pounds and pounds of ripe organic bounty have gone to waste,"

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/squirrels-relish-whi...

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1003770 Oct 14, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical stupidity from SlimyRejection.
The Indians had arrived in North America beginning about 15,000 years ago.
If you think 15,000 doesn't make them natives, you're even more ignorant than I gave you credit for.
Whites arrived a few hundred years ago, dummy.
You're as dumb as your phag lover 'Fenfen the big bad dork'.
I figure he'll show up any minute to cover and penetrate your backside.
You're not an immigrant.

You are an ignorant.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#1003771 Oct 14, 2013
11 million words just to make Aetna insure someone with a pre-existing condition>>>> >>

really liberals?

"...Bureaucracies in the Obama Administration have thus far published approximately 11,588,500 words of final Obamacare regulations, while there are only 381,517 words in the Obamacare law itself."

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-sta...

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1003772 Oct 14, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
I'm done here.
Time for the night shift.
That's your cue, Lois Lame!!
Later.
You *are* done.

Like Skunk in a frying pan or sidewalk sausage in a July sun.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#1003773 Oct 14, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical stupidity from SlimyRejection.
The Indians had arrived in North America beginning about 15,000 years ago.
If you think 15,000 doesn't make them natives, you're even more ignorant than I gave you credit for.
Whites arrived a few hundred years ago, dummy.
You're as dumb as your phag lover 'Fenfen the big bad dork'.
I figure he'll show up any minute to cover and penetrate your backside.
<spam>

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1003774 Oct 14, 2013
killtaker wrote:
More from our intellectual superiors...
with a nod to SDA...
White House Garden...
"Pounds and pounds of ripe organic bounty have gone to waste,"
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/squirrels-relish-whi...
Just wait until the squirrels find the nuts in the Oval Office.

America will be free, be free, thank God, be free at last....
Veteran

Denver, CO

#1003775 Oct 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did Cruz vote no on funding the government. The dumbf*ck voted to close the park & then has a fit when it is closed.
You Tea Party jerks are dumber than sh*t.
lying ass diklikker. Ostupida closed the open air monuments,no one believes pathological liars like you and Barry Buttlikk.
Veteran

Denver, CO

#1003776 Oct 14, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Two separate events, "ignoramus". One had nothing to do with the other.
dumbass douchebag cleaner, are there some truckers on here?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1003777 Oct 14, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
People need to stop focusing on the Social Security retirement program and refocus on SSI. That is the program that needs closer scrutiny. After all, SSI isn't self-funded. It is paid for by U.S. Treasury general funds. And it is running amok.
Since 1990, the number of disabled-worker beneficiaries has increased 84%. Repeat 84%!!! And, asa a result, the number of disabled Medicare beneficiaries has increased nearly 70 percent since 1990. This just isn't acceptable. We need to reevaluate how we pay SSI to premature children and take a look at why disability retirements are being handed out like candy.
That's where the red ink is....not in the self-funded Social Security program.
The Social Security Trust Fund is an easy fix....raise the retirement age by one year. Not so much with SSI. It's a monster that is out of control.
Social Security is the problem for the Federal Government especially when someone can contribute $24.75 and recieve back $22,888.92 besides there has never been a Social Security Trust Fund which was confirmed and stated in 1937 in the SCOTUS Case of Helvering v. Davis which stated that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes which the SCOTUS said “The proceeds of both the employee and employer taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like any other internal revenue generally, and are not earmarked in any way.” and the Clinton Adminstration Confirmed it in the fiscal year 2000 budget proposal to congress that the Social Security Trust Fund has never existed just on paper as an accounting practice besides the fact the SCOTUS also confirmed that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.

Ida May Fuller

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_May_Fuller

Social Security’s Sham Guarantee

By Michael D. Tanner

May 29, 2005

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/s...

Is There a Right to Social Security?

By Michael D. Tanner

November 25, 1998

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/i...
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003778 Oct 14, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Sooo Larry, Moe and Curley attended...Those three clowns are the reason why you idiots will never win another election...It's always about them...never the people.Tea baggers are "HISTORY" only morons like you left to support them...
imbecilic buffoon and Oblama ass crack smoocher
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003780 Oct 14, 2013
killtaker wrote:
More from our intellectual superiors...
with a nod to SDA...
White House Garden...
"Pounds and pounds of ripe organic bounty have gone to waste,"
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/squirrels-relish-whi...
What? No big demand for okra and collard greens?
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003781 Oct 14, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text> Save Money on Obamacare — Get Divorced
It's being called Obamacare's "wedding tax." Provisions of the healthcare reform bill discourage marriage — and encourage divorce.
According to a report by PJ Media, married couples can save thousands of dollars on healthcare premiums if they get a divorce and continue to live together.
That's because Obamacare is designed to provide healthcare benefits that are substantially more generous for lower-income people, and the bill counts a married couple's income jointly.
Using a calculator from the Kaiser Family Foundation, PJ Media's Tom Blumer gave the example of a 60-year-old married couple with no children in the household, with identical annual incomes totaling $62,041. Obamacare premiums rise sharply when combined earnings hit $62,041.
If they remain wed, their net premium next year would be $16,382. But unmarried individuals can earn up to $45,960 before losing Obamacare's subsidies, so if the couple divorces and each reports an income of $31,020.50, their combined net premium would be $5,354. That's a savings of $11,028 next year.
Blumer also offers the example of a 40-year-old couple with two children and incomes of $70,000 and $23,000.
Their combined income is $93,000, and subsidies disappear at $92,401 for married pairs with two children. Their combined premium would be $11,547 next year.
But if they divorce and give custody of the children to the lower-earning spouse, one spouse's premium would be $3,857 and the other's would be $460, for a total of $4,317. That's a savings of $7,230 next year.
Blumer observes: "Clearly, many couples who are considering marriage, especially after several years of seeing formerly married couples regress to cohabiting, will look at Obamacare's 'wedding tax' and say,'never mind.'
"The effect on society will be incalculable, and certainly not for the good."
However, the law in many states says a couple cannot cohabit indefinitely and still claim not to be married.
The IRS could find those couples who are claiming they are not wed for healthcare subsidy purposes, leading to this scenario, according to Blumer: "Those caught and punished by the IRS carrying out its new role as the de facto 'marriage police' could get hit with multi-year bills for undeserved 'tax credits' running into tens of thousands of dollars."
*More Moral Decay from the O'bama and his not about care. Liberals must be proud.
libs are so f ing stupid and ignorant
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003782 Oct 14, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dumbo, the "RED STATES" are the biggest receivers of freebies
, ignorance on the right really is bliss.
Lying sack of shit dirtbag, the percentage of blacks in a state determine the amount of welfare and freebies, Buckwheat.
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003783 Oct 14, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Libs think fed monies mean welfare payments and fail to acknowledge that fed monies involves more than entitlements including payments for our national parks.
Because welfare payments vary by state let's look at which states have the largest percentage of their population on welfare.
1 California
2. Maine
3. Tennessee
4. Massachusetts
5. Vermont
6. District of Columbia
7. New York
8. Minnesota
9. Washington (state)
Tie-10. New Mexico
Tie-10. Indiana
12. Rhode Island
13. Michigan
14. Pennsylvania
15. Oregon
http://www.cnbc.com/id/31910310/page/1
Most dumass libs like the poseur grey turd can't think.
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003784 Oct 14, 2013
Grey turd wrote:
<quoted text>
Liars figure and figures lie...Typical twisted bagger. You all live in a world of make believe, programmed minions unable to think independently. Hear it on FOX today post it on here the next.
Lying testicle washer boy.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#1003785 Oct 14, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
New Mexico - Bill Richardson, Tom Udall, Martin Heinrich (Ds)
West Virginia - Robert Byrd, Jay Rockefeller, Joe Manchin (Ds)
Mississippi - well, it's Mississippi. Must be a lot of Great Society money going there, don't you think?
District of Columbia - give us a break. There are no Republicans there.
Hawaii - I don't think there are Republicans living in Hawaii, either.
Alabama -(same as Mississippi)
Alaska - hmmmmmmm. One wonders.
Montana - Indian reservations and farm subsidies?
South Carolina - interesting. Reparations for illegally bringing the first confederate state back into the union?
Maine - August King (I socialist, caucuses with Democrats, they have to buy his association I would guess)
The bottom line is, this list of the biggest leeches per capita is dominated by Democrats.
Mississippi has two major industries that have large contracts with the Dept of Defense-Huntington Ingalls and Northrup Grumman.

South Carolina -Homeland Security provides the major block of Fed funds with its' contract with Savannah River Nuclear Solutions and the Shaw Group.

North Dakota- the funds going to North Dakota is for an insurance company -Noridian Mutual Insurance. Must be providers for a block of federal employees.

Alaska -Companies based in Alaska won about 70 percent of the largest federal purchase contracts. 30% was awarded to Native businesses

Get the idea? A lot of the monies going into states are payments to industries.

Combine these was other federal based interests like national parks, military bases, payments to Native populations, Superfund sites and paying farm supplements for raising crops regarded as essential to the federal government programs the monies add up.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1003786 Oct 14, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not surprised that you missed the point. I didn't defend; I just don't think a persons sex life is anyone's business. I had hoped that Bill Clinton would have told the American people that this is a personal matter. Period. Bill Clinton was a phenomenal President nonetheless. Did he have personal weaknesses? Sure. Who doesn't? Monica Lewinsky was the aggressor; he succumbed. So what?
What did it prove to spend all that $50 million to have that stupid investigation? Nothing. It was absurd.
What would you suggest? Arresting and imprisoning every man who has a sexual indiscretion? Wake up and join the real world Carol.
It happens everyday, in every walk of life. Powerful wealthy men are pursued by women all the time. Sometimes they fall, sometimes they don't. Who cares?
Who is to say what is normal or not normal for each individual?
It wasn't rape, it wasn't child molestation. It was sex. So what.
Clinton redeemed himself in my eyes when he confessed in a televised interview that he did something for the worst possible reason - just because he could - and said, "That's about the most morally indefensible reason anybody could have for doing anything."

That's all he had to say.

I only bring up his past in the Oval Office because you saw - and still see - nothing wrong with what he did and keep talking about how liberal men respect women's rights - but not necessarily women. Even Clinton knows what he did was wrong.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1003787 Oct 14, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
At a rally led by Senator Ted Cruz, Tea Party activists told President Obama to "put the Quran down" and marched to the White House with Confederate flags.
Oh, for heaven's sakes, Lily. That simply isn't true.

But desperation usually makes people exaggerate to the point of hysteria.

One person was spotted with a rebel flag. Probably planted by George Soros, and the liberal media focused on that one person.

But rape, theft, vandalism and defecating on police cars during Occupy Wall Street was completely overlooked by the liberal media and never mentioned by Obama and Pelosi when they stood solidly behind them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Holiday Greetings 7 min Scrooge and Cratchit 2
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Guru 182,050
Mike Brown hidden video. 1 hr StarScum 4
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr TRD 68,910
Chicago Pizza Blows 1 hr StarScum 3
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr J RULES 71,225
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Mike 51,280
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Breaking Down Colts' Game Plan vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Can't-Miss Picks and Matchup Guide
Bleacher Report 8:09 AM
Breaking Down Bears' Game Plan vs. Vikings
NBC Sports 9:15 AM
Lance Briggs "happy" with Robbie Gould's comments
Bleacher Report11:45 AM
Complete Week 17 Preview for Vikings vs. Bears