Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#1003773 Oct 14, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical stupidity from SlimyRejection.
The Indians had arrived in North America beginning about 15,000 years ago.
If you think 15,000 doesn't make them natives, you're even more ignorant than I gave you credit for.
Whites arrived a few hundred years ago, dummy.
You're as dumb as your phag lover 'Fenfen the big bad dork'.
I figure he'll show up any minute to cover and penetrate your backside.
<spam>

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1003774 Oct 14, 2013
killtaker wrote:
More from our intellectual superiors...
with a nod to SDA...
White House Garden...
"Pounds and pounds of ripe organic bounty have gone to waste,"
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/squirrels-relish-whi...
Just wait until the squirrels find the nuts in the Oval Office.

America will be free, be free, thank God, be free at last....
Veteran

Denver, CO

#1003775 Oct 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did Cruz vote no on funding the government. The dumbf*ck voted to close the park & then has a fit when it is closed.
You Tea Party jerks are dumber than sh*t.
lying ass diklikker. Ostupida closed the open air monuments,no one believes pathological liars like you and Barry Buttlikk.
Veteran

Denver, CO

#1003776 Oct 14, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Two separate events, "ignoramus". One had nothing to do with the other.
dumbass douchebag cleaner, are there some truckers on here?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1003777 Oct 14, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
People need to stop focusing on the Social Security retirement program and refocus on SSI. That is the program that needs closer scrutiny. After all, SSI isn't self-funded. It is paid for by U.S. Treasury general funds. And it is running amok.
Since 1990, the number of disabled-worker beneficiaries has increased 84%. Repeat 84%!!! And, asa a result, the number of disabled Medicare beneficiaries has increased nearly 70 percent since 1990. This just isn't acceptable. We need to reevaluate how we pay SSI to premature children and take a look at why disability retirements are being handed out like candy.
That's where the red ink is....not in the self-funded Social Security program.
The Social Security Trust Fund is an easy fix....raise the retirement age by one year. Not so much with SSI. It's a monster that is out of control.
Social Security is the problem for the Federal Government especially when someone can contribute $24.75 and recieve back $22,888.92 besides there has never been a Social Security Trust Fund which was confirmed and stated in 1937 in the SCOTUS Case of Helvering v. Davis which stated that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes which the SCOTUS said “The proceeds of both the employee and employer taxes are to be paid into the Treasury like any other internal revenue generally, and are not earmarked in any way.” and the Clinton Adminstration Confirmed it in the fiscal year 2000 budget proposal to congress that the Social Security Trust Fund has never existed just on paper as an accounting practice besides the fact the SCOTUS also confirmed that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.

Ida May Fuller

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_May_Fuller

Social Security’s Sham Guarantee

By Michael D. Tanner

May 29, 2005

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/s...

Is There a Right to Social Security?

By Michael D. Tanner

November 25, 1998

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/i...
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003778 Oct 14, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Sooo Larry, Moe and Curley attended...Those three clowns are the reason why you idiots will never win another election...It's always about them...never the people.Tea baggers are "HISTORY" only morons like you left to support them...
imbecilic buffoon and Oblama ass crack smoocher
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003780 Oct 14, 2013
killtaker wrote:
More from our intellectual superiors...
with a nod to SDA...
White House Garden...
"Pounds and pounds of ripe organic bounty have gone to waste,"
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/squirrels-relish-whi...
What? No big demand for okra and collard greens?
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003781 Oct 14, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text> Save Money on Obamacare — Get Divorced
It's being called Obamacare's "wedding tax." Provisions of the healthcare reform bill discourage marriage — and encourage divorce.
According to a report by PJ Media, married couples can save thousands of dollars on healthcare premiums if they get a divorce and continue to live together.
That's because Obamacare is designed to provide healthcare benefits that are substantially more generous for lower-income people, and the bill counts a married couple's income jointly.
Using a calculator from the Kaiser Family Foundation, PJ Media's Tom Blumer gave the example of a 60-year-old married couple with no children in the household, with identical annual incomes totaling $62,041. Obamacare premiums rise sharply when combined earnings hit $62,041.
If they remain wed, their net premium next year would be $16,382. But unmarried individuals can earn up to $45,960 before losing Obamacare's subsidies, so if the couple divorces and each reports an income of $31,020.50, their combined net premium would be $5,354. That's a savings of $11,028 next year.
Blumer also offers the example of a 40-year-old couple with two children and incomes of $70,000 and $23,000.
Their combined income is $93,000, and subsidies disappear at $92,401 for married pairs with two children. Their combined premium would be $11,547 next year.
But if they divorce and give custody of the children to the lower-earning spouse, one spouse's premium would be $3,857 and the other's would be $460, for a total of $4,317. That's a savings of $7,230 next year.
Blumer observes: "Clearly, many couples who are considering marriage, especially after several years of seeing formerly married couples regress to cohabiting, will look at Obamacare's 'wedding tax' and say,'never mind.'
"The effect on society will be incalculable, and certainly not for the good."
However, the law in many states says a couple cannot cohabit indefinitely and still claim not to be married.
The IRS could find those couples who are claiming they are not wed for healthcare subsidy purposes, leading to this scenario, according to Blumer: "Those caught and punished by the IRS carrying out its new role as the de facto 'marriage police' could get hit with multi-year bills for undeserved 'tax credits' running into tens of thousands of dollars."
*More Moral Decay from the O'bama and his not about care. Liberals must be proud.
libs are so f ing stupid and ignorant
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003782 Oct 14, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dumbo, the "RED STATES" are the biggest receivers of freebies
, ignorance on the right really is bliss.
Lying sack of shit dirtbag, the percentage of blacks in a state determine the amount of welfare and freebies, Buckwheat.
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003783 Oct 14, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Libs think fed monies mean welfare payments and fail to acknowledge that fed monies involves more than entitlements including payments for our national parks.
Because welfare payments vary by state let's look at which states have the largest percentage of their population on welfare.
1 California
2. Maine
3. Tennessee
4. Massachusetts
5. Vermont
6. District of Columbia
7. New York
8. Minnesota
9. Washington (state)
Tie-10. New Mexico
Tie-10. Indiana
12. Rhode Island
13. Michigan
14. Pennsylvania
15. Oregon
http://www.cnbc.com/id/31910310/page/1
Most dumass libs like the poseur grey turd can't think.
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003784 Oct 14, 2013
Grey turd wrote:
<quoted text>
Liars figure and figures lie...Typical twisted bagger. You all live in a world of make believe, programmed minions unable to think independently. Hear it on FOX today post it on here the next.
Lying testicle washer boy.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#1003785 Oct 14, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
New Mexico - Bill Richardson, Tom Udall, Martin Heinrich (Ds)
West Virginia - Robert Byrd, Jay Rockefeller, Joe Manchin (Ds)
Mississippi - well, it's Mississippi. Must be a lot of Great Society money going there, don't you think?
District of Columbia - give us a break. There are no Republicans there.
Hawaii - I don't think there are Republicans living in Hawaii, either.
Alabama -(same as Mississippi)
Alaska - hmmmmmmm. One wonders.
Montana - Indian reservations and farm subsidies?
South Carolina - interesting. Reparations for illegally bringing the first confederate state back into the union?
Maine - August King (I socialist, caucuses with Democrats, they have to buy his association I would guess)
The bottom line is, this list of the biggest leeches per capita is dominated by Democrats.
Mississippi has two major industries that have large contracts with the Dept of Defense-Huntington Ingalls and Northrup Grumman.

South Carolina -Homeland Security provides the major block of Fed funds with its' contract with Savannah River Nuclear Solutions and the Shaw Group.

North Dakota- the funds going to North Dakota is for an insurance company -Noridian Mutual Insurance. Must be providers for a block of federal employees.

Alaska -Companies based in Alaska won about 70 percent of the largest federal purchase contracts. 30% was awarded to Native businesses

Get the idea? A lot of the monies going into states are payments to industries.

Combine these was other federal based interests like national parks, military bases, payments to Native populations, Superfund sites and paying farm supplements for raising crops regarded as essential to the federal government programs the monies add up.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1003786 Oct 14, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not surprised that you missed the point. I didn't defend; I just don't think a persons sex life is anyone's business. I had hoped that Bill Clinton would have told the American people that this is a personal matter. Period. Bill Clinton was a phenomenal President nonetheless. Did he have personal weaknesses? Sure. Who doesn't? Monica Lewinsky was the aggressor; he succumbed. So what?
What did it prove to spend all that $50 million to have that stupid investigation? Nothing. It was absurd.
What would you suggest? Arresting and imprisoning every man who has a sexual indiscretion? Wake up and join the real world Carol.
It happens everyday, in every walk of life. Powerful wealthy men are pursued by women all the time. Sometimes they fall, sometimes they don't. Who cares?
Who is to say what is normal or not normal for each individual?
It wasn't rape, it wasn't child molestation. It was sex. So what.
Clinton redeemed himself in my eyes when he confessed in a televised interview that he did something for the worst possible reason - just because he could - and said, "That's about the most morally indefensible reason anybody could have for doing anything."

That's all he had to say.

I only bring up his past in the Oval Office because you saw - and still see - nothing wrong with what he did and keep talking about how liberal men respect women's rights - but not necessarily women. Even Clinton knows what he did was wrong.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1003787 Oct 14, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
At a rally led by Senator Ted Cruz, Tea Party activists told President Obama to "put the Quran down" and marched to the White House with Confederate flags.
Oh, for heaven's sakes, Lily. That simply isn't true.

But desperation usually makes people exaggerate to the point of hysteria.

One person was spotted with a rebel flag. Probably planted by George Soros, and the liberal media focused on that one person.

But rape, theft, vandalism and defecating on police cars during Occupy Wall Street was completely overlooked by the liberal media and never mentioned by Obama and Pelosi when they stood solidly behind them.
Oblamapuke

Denver, CO

#1003788 Oct 14, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Clinton redeemed himself in my eyes when he confessed in a televised interview that he did something for the worst possible reason - just because he could - and said, "That's about the most morally indefensible reason anybody could have for doing anything."
That's all he had to say.
I only bring up his past in the Oval Office because you saw - and still see - nothing wrong with what he did and keep talking about how liberal men respect women's rights - but not necessarily women. Even Clinton knows what he did was wrong.
Americans have every reason to expect our president to have some integrity, except to libs who twice elected a serial sexual abuser and accused rapist. If Manson was released he'd be welcomed at most Hollywood parties.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1003789 Oct 14, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, for heaven's sakes, Lily. That simply isn't true.
But desperation usually makes people exaggerate to the point of hysteria.
One person was spotted with a rebel flag. Probably planted by George Soros, and the liberal media focused on that one person.
But rape, theft, vandalism and defecating on police cars during Occupy Wall Street was completely overlooked by the liberal media and never mentioned by Obama and Pelosi when they stood solidly behind them.
Did you happen to see the arrogant Magic Negro on tonight's news? He donned a green apron for the cameras at a volunteer kitchen for furloughed federal workers(who must be starving to death!!!!) and stood there mealy-mouthed talking about those bad Republicans.

The Liberal Media loves it when the Boy Wonder does his juvenile nyah-nyah routine.

This jerk doesn't know the first thing about the Constitution, the Separation of Powers or how American Government works. It is unimportant to the little boy. Instead, he wants it his way or it's the highway. His knees must be sore from all the foot-stomping he's been doing.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#1003790 Oct 14, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, for heaven's sakes, Lily. That simply isn't true.
But desperation usually makes people exaggerate to the point of hysteria.
One person was spotted with a rebel flag. Probably planted by George Soros, and the liberal media focused on that one person.
But rape, theft, vandalism and defecating on police cars during Occupy Wall Street was completely overlooked by the liberal media and never mentioned by Obama and Pelosi when they stood solidly behind them.
I honestly see less damage to the country is we just keep hobbling along until the Magic Negro's term expires. Just do what needs to be done however painful to rid the country of the incompetent Jerk-Of-The-Century.
Reasonable Doubt

Waynesboro, MS

#1003791 Oct 14, 2013
Oblamapuke wrote:
<quoted text>
Americans have every reason to expect our president to have some integrity, except to libs who twice elected a serial sexual abuser and accused rapist. If Manson was released he'd be welcomed at most Hollywood parties.
Hmmm.... "Hollywood" was created and in controlled by "jews" right? I mean... I'm sure you would agree, it's pretty obvious in 2013.

Let's see what crazy Charlie has to say about "jews".

Charles Manson provides insight into the Jewish mentality
Watch:


I don't think Charlie would have too many friend in "Hollywood".
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#1003792 Oct 14, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I honestly see less damage to the country is we just keep hobbling along until the Magic Negro's term expires. Just do what needs to be done however painful to rid the country of the incompetent Jerk-Of-The-Century.
lol! That's not a problem... since cons don't have anyone ready anyway son!

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#1003793 Oct 14, 2013
GOPidiots wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a total lie.
Obama takes the least blame in EVERY poll, and the GOP beats the Dems in the blame game.
You lise.
Your oarty is full of circus clowns.
I posted the source.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/05/gove...

Here's another one.

CNN/ORC International survey:

63% angry at Republicans.
57% angry at Democrats.
53% angry at President Obama.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/...

Pew Research Center:

Republicans 39%.
Obama administration 36%.
Both 17%.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/09/3...

Again, not wide margins.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 min Red_Forman 5,372
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr Brian_G 51,372
sex 2 hr sunnypathena 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr WelbyMD 183,862
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Earthling-1 50,424
you wont believe what this guy is doing on ebay 7 hr Tatlover 1
Mom & Daughter arrested 4 stabbing school offic... 8 hr The reason 3
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots