Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1249904 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#995486 Oct 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
when management and labor negotiate a contract, they bargain wages, benefits, and working conditions against each other as part of a package...
that's right..however they don't negotiate for what equipment the company is going to invest it, or what products the company is going to develop and invest in.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#995487 Oct 4, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
I do know that as CinC he is responsible for the Military and its operations. I do know that he personally approved the mission, that he refocused the military's efforts to catch Osama bin Laden, unlike Bush who stated he didn't care about getting Osama bin Laden and meting out justice to the victims of 9/11
and most importantly
had the mission failed, you idiots would be blaming him and asking for impeachment charges
had the mission failed, nobody ever would have known...

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#995488 Oct 4, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>G-d Bless the Tea Party.
tick tock, tick tock
WOW

Bronx, NY

#995489 Oct 4, 2013
Not only did the racist democrats become republicans Blacks Have Become Whites WOW patriotic and all no protest anymore they are in charge now woo hooo Obama is the greatest

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#995490 Oct 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
ObamaKKKare was passed by a devious parliamentary move.
your opinion,

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#995491 Oct 4, 2013
forks_make_us_fat wrote:
<quoted text>
Is this how it works?
A Defense Bill..
"Harry Reid said he will add the DREAM Act to a defese policy bill next week"
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/...
then he would be wrong too. I never like riders, no matter who adds them.

BTW Did you see me defend him for planning that?

“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”

Since: Jul 08

Who's dawn?

#995492 Oct 4, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
Republicans Report Much Better Mental Health Than Others
Fifty-eight percent of Republicans report having excellent mental health, compared to 43% of independents and 38% of Democrats.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/102943/republicans...
ROTFLMAO!!!!
Did you fail to notice that the poll measured what the respondents said about THEMSELVES, Idiot? Of course a bunch of Tea Party think they're most excellent, if not totally superior in all areas--hell, carol thinks she's a saint and fenny bate thinks he's human...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#995493 Oct 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
the federal government is immune from such lawsuits....
unlike you ghetto residents, the type of people who visit national parks and monuments do not litter...
Karma is the type of ghetto retard that believes she can sue the government, blaming others because she caused an accident on a Federal Interstate...

If it's ghetto, ignorant, moocher, and idiot, it's free cheese, loser, and liberal..

It's the culture...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#995494 Oct 4, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Still pulling stuff directly from your azz.
You're an idiot Marty!
RealDave dumbass??

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#995495 Oct 4, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a republican fallacy. White House Director of Legislative Affairs Rob Nabors White House Director of Legislative Affairs presented the sequester concept to Republicans on July 25, 2011...six days AFTER House Republicans passed a bill to limit government spending — known as the “Cut, Cap, and Balance Act”— that “had as its fallback a sequester if the objectives of that bill were not reached.”
If Republicans had not been holding America hostage, there would have been no sequester.
FACT:“We (Democrats) obviously would have been OK with just the $900 billion in cuts, and some kind of an agreement to seek more. But because Republicans demanded dollar-for-dollar, we were forced to find a way to get from $900 billion to $2 trillion. It is really ridiculous for them to try to wriggle out now. If they had not insisted on dollar-for-dollar or had been open to revenues, the sequester would not exist.”
It's time to get rid of the radical obstructionist Tea Party. Period. THEY ARE to blame.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/who-b...
Well, somebody should have sent your post to Jay Carney before he said in a press briefing that the sequester came from the White House then.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#995496 Oct 4, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>

The key to GOP congressional success was to cluster the Democratic vote into a handful of districts, while spreading out the Republican vote elsewhere. In Pennsylvania, for example, Republicans won nine of their 13 House seats with less than 60% of the vote, while Democrats carried three of their five with more than 75%.
One of the latter was the Philadelphia–based 2nd District, where 356,386 votes for Congress were tallied. Not only was it the highest number of ballots cast in any district in the state, but Democratic Rep. Chaka Fattah won 318,176 of the votes. It was the largest number received by any House candidate in the country in 2012, Democrat or Republican. If some of these Democratic votes had been “unclustered” and distributed to other districts nearby, the party might have won a couple more seats in the Philadelphia area alone.
Taking your example, this occurs because the DemoKKKrat vote is highly centralized in urban ghettos. Do you propose to sprinkle Fattah's ghetto dwellers in districts throughout the state?

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#995497 Oct 4, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>As a foreign object you would have to take the oath you stated to become a citizen. Are you practicing? I was born a citizen and will never take the Naturalization Oath that you tout-Sick old fool!
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuit...
It is no longer a naturalization oath. Obviously, you didn't notice I removed the words, "of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen" since it doesn't apply to those born here. By your refusal to pledge your unwavering allegiance to the United States of America, you are no better than a homegrown terrorist. You can't be trusted.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#995498 Oct 4, 2013
Why are the new partners the NAACP AND THE KKK not showing our government how to work things out if the Naacp and the KLAN can meet and shake hands why cant the government are African Americans about to get their own homeland is that what this is all about,Also the American Nazi Party and the Nation of Islam also met years ago and shook hands why cant the government do the same

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#995499 Oct 4, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are defending Anwar al-Awlaki, man that is way out there.

as far as I'm concerned
I'm not "defending" Anwar al-Awlaki, I'm defending the Constitution.

I expect a trial for ANY U.S. citizen.

Your concern is irrelevant.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#995500 Oct 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
What cost?
The increased interest rate we must pay on our debt alone is astronomical.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#995501 Oct 4, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Collection of the Penalty for Failure to Maintain Minimum Coverage
"Section 5000A(g)(2) of the IRC limits the means the IRS may employ to collect the penalty established in the section. First, the taxpayer is protected from either criminal prosecution or penalty for failure to pay the penalty. Second, the IRS is prohibited from either filing a NFTL or levying any property in an effort to
collect the penalty. There is no prohibition, however, on establishing a statutory lien against the taxpayer’s property under § 6321. No additional limits are placed on the IRS using correspondence or phone calls, either through its own employees or through private collection agencies, in an effort to collect the amount owed.
Additionally, no restriction was placed on the IRS’s ability to use the refund offset as a means of collecting the amount due. Those who are required to pay the penalty for failure to maintain minimum coverage but choose not to do so will be subject to increases in the amount owed due to interest and late payment penalties imposed on the penalty after it has been assessed by the IRS. The IRS may impose interest on tax, including penalties, under § 6601(a),(e)(2), and it may impose penalties under § 6651(a)(3).
A taxpayer who chooses not to pay the required penalty may ultimately forfeit more than the amount of the penalty if that taxpayer is ever in the position of having an overpayment to the IRS for any reason, since the refund offset applies not only to overpayments shown on original tax returns, but also to any
subsequent adjustments, for example an audit by the IRS that results in an overpayment. Further, it is possible that the IRS could present its claim when property is being sold and collect both the original penalty amount along with accrued interest and applicable penalties."
http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...
Only an Obamabot would lack the intelligence to avoid having a refund that could be confiscated, so this provision is obviously racist.
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#995502 Oct 4, 2013
on polling public opinion...

“If you just set out to be liked, you will be prepared to compromise on anything at anytime, and would achieve nothing.”

M Thatcher...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#995503 Oct 4, 2013
USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is no longer a naturalization oath. Obviously, you didn't notice I removed the words, "of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen" since it doesn't apply to those born here. By your refusal to pledge your unwavering allegiance to the United States of America, you are no better than a homegrown terrorist. You can't be trusted.
homegrown terrorist?? LOL.. A miserable old man, Hairy Reid ring leader... his war on children and veterans...

It's the culture..
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#995504 Oct 4, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
dude, can I have some of that sh!t you're smoking? It must be some real good weed for you to make such a stupid statement
http://www.kab.org/site/PageServer...
http://ournationalparks.us/index.php/site/sto...
urban ghetto parks may be different due to the clientele...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#995505 Oct 4, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again moron, it wasn't the ACA that put Congress into the exchanges, it was an amendment by Chuck Grassley Republican of Iowa. Congress was always in compliance with the law by providing members and staff with health insurance.
You're an idiot Galt!
the Grassley Amendment is part of ObamaKKKare...a part that the King wants to change unilaterally...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 23 min Dr Guru 191,786
Ya gotta listen to the BIG TRUTH. 33 min Someone U Know 1
Tony Rezko's great friends, BH Obama & Valerie ... 43 min TR release me 1
News Should we really be OK with the surgical remova... 52 min jennifer_e_davis1... 64
Fundraiser Help 2 hr Mama 1
Gay/Bi teens in Durham/York region?? 3 hr Reply 1
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 hr Mark 51,983
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr Sublime1 99,856
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages