Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1600711 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#995223 Oct 4, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If blowing strange men in the back seat of a car was grounds for being fired, you'd been unemployed decades ago.
Better keep your day job, libtard. You Reichtards have no sense of humor, so for you to try and be funny is futile. Stick to being ignorant. That, you do very well.
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#995224 Oct 4, 2013
Before and then after...

Sen Harry Reid 'evolved'!

"It’s worth noting that until Reid became Majority Leader, individual spending bills were the norm, as Senator Roy Blunt explained today..."

http://legalinsurrection.com/
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#995225 Oct 4, 2013
Michelle wrote:
<quoted text>Few buy into ObamaCare by day 3
ObamaCare is attracting lots of window shoppers, but not that many buyers.
Figures from the handful of states releasing information show that only a tiny fraction of the people inquiring about President Obama’s controversial, government-mandated insurance have actually agreed to buy it since the policies went on sale Tuesday.
In Connecticut — where ObamaCare was predicted to send prices for individual policies soaring — 498 residents had completed applications for coverage as of midday Thursday, out of 85,000 unique visitors to the Access Health CT Web site and another 4,000 calls to its help line, spokesman Jason Madrak said.
That works out to a minuscule 0.55 percent taking it.
As of Wednesday, Rhode Island reported that 366 people had signed up for ObamaCare, about 1.6 percent of the 19,707 unique visitors to its HealthSource RI Web site, 3,452 calls to its help line and another 82 walk-ins to its “contact center.”
Meanwhile, Kentucky was leading the pack, with 8,309 completed applications representing 6.2 percent of the 117,954 unique visitors to the Kynect Web site and 15,239 calls to its help line as of Thursday morning.
http://nypost.com/2013/10/04/few-buy-into-oba...
Manu states, like Connecticut already had insurance for those that have low incomes, so Obamacare is almost redundant in many cases.

The Democrats didn't care, they just want socialism, control and a way to tax.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#995226 Oct 4, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>If O'bamacare were a person passing you on the sidewalk, he would pull out a gun, stick it to your forehead and scream at you to "Give me all your money or else!" The so-called "O'bamacare" is built on a foundation of coercion and theft. It is not a voluntary program. It does not ask for nor require your consent. It is a grotesque example of government abuses gone terribly wrong at the hands of a wildly deceptive, insidious democrats that honors no law whatsoever.
Are you insured, Wretch?

If you are (likely so), then participation is voluntary.

Keep buying it from the same people you are now.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#995228 Oct 4, 2013
Where is lily?

Today is her day!!!!

http://www.nationalvodkaday.com/

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#995229 Oct 4, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If blowing strange men in the back seat of a car was grounds for being fired, you'd been unemployed decades ago.
Really, so you agree? Reggie Love and O'bama are strange. Larry Sinclair blew O'bama in the back seat of a limo in Chicago and then again in Gurnee, Illinois. She he should have been unemployed decades ago. Finally Dave-we can agree on two things.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#995230 Oct 4, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Republican Hardliners Aren't Conservatives, They're Radicals
The legislators driving the direction of the GOP aren't interested in smart, limited government. They're aiming to eviscerate even the parts that work well.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...
You are supposed to call them terrorists, airhead.

Didn't you get the memo?
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#995231 Oct 4, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so you nutjobs have been making excuses for Bush.
loving the honesty.
Who brought up Bush?

Obama is the president now, and has been for almost 5 years.

WTF you talking about, oddball?

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#995232 Oct 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Corporations don't have "living expenses", dumbass. Stop embarrassing yourself.
You still haven't been able to find any evidence that those mythical subsidies to oil companies exist.
They're called operating expenses.

If you weren't such a subsidized moron, you would they are the same thing.

"This is a political exercise more than anything else. But I do believe the oil subsidies could be reduced or taken away or at least put a floor on them if you got something for it in terms of production." Linsay Graham

What? Oil Subsidies? From one of your Republican heroes no less.(Now Dumbwaiter will claim Graham is bot a Republican).

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#995233 Oct 4, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I see....
You want your way...
Even at the expense of others!!!
I still say you're free to leave son!
There are only three players in this game who don't want to play unless it's by their rules - Obama, Reid and Pelosi.

The solution is so easy even a 3-year-old could figure it out. Let other people play according to the rules of fairness.

Republicans have been treated like the new kid at school and completely snubbed by Obama's snobby elitist crowd.

Egos and a false sense of self-importance may work in high school but not in leadership roles and governance.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hamden, CT

#995234 Oct 4, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Republican Hardliners Aren't Conservatives, They're Radicals
The legislators driving the direction of the GOP aren't interested in smart, limited government. They're aiming to eviscerate even the parts that work well.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...
The name-calling has reached new levels as the Democrats, faced with rising citizen objections to Obamacare, losses on Obamacare court cases, and a box where legislative manipulation, such as that that created Obamacare, isn’t available, are frustrated.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/dems-call-gop-jiha...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#995235 Oct 4, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Who brought up Bush?
Obama is the president now, and has been for almost 5 years.
WTF you talking about, oddball?
zing!

sometimes it seems too easy. did Obama hire you nutjobs to entertain the troops?
Homer

Stroudsburg, PA

#995237 Oct 4, 2013
Michelle wrote:
<quoted text>Few buy into ObamaCare by day 3
ObamaCare is attracting lots of window shoppers, but not that many buyers.
Figures from the handful of states releasing information show that only a tiny fraction of the people inquiring about President Obama’s controversial, government-mandated insurance have actually agreed to buy it since the policies went on sale Tuesday.
In Connecticut — where ObamaCare was predicted to send prices for individual policies soaring — 498 residents had completed applications for coverage as of midday Thursday, out of 85,000 unique visitors to the Access Health CT Web site and another 4,000 calls to its help line, spokesman Jason Madrak said.
That works out to a minuscule 0.55 percent taking it.
As of Wednesday, Rhode Island reported that 366 people had signed up for ObamaCare, about 1.6 percent of the 19,707 unique visitors to its HealthSource RI Web site, 3,452 calls to its help line and another 82 walk-ins to its “contact center.”
Meanwhile, Kentucky was leading the pack, with 8,309 completed applications representing 6.2 percent of the 117,954 unique visitors to the Kynect Web site and 15,239 calls to its help line as of Thursday morning.
http://nypost.com/2013/10/04/few-buy-into-oba...
In 3 days? Those are fantastic numbers. I would take them with a grain of salt too as it's the NY Post. Either way still great numbers, did you expect millions would jump on in the first day/week? Do you make snap decisions regarding healthcare or do you check out all the options and make an intelligent decision? I'm guessing you're a snapper.
No Surprize

Saint Petersburg, FL

#995238 Oct 4, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
Who brought up Bush?
Obama is the president now, and has been for almost 5 years.
WTF you talking about, oddball?
If congress is responsible for obama's govt shut down, then Majority leaders Pelosi and Reid were responsible in 2007--2009 collapse of the economy, losing 750,000 jobs per month, creating the worst recession in 80 years caused by democrats, yet democrats and obama are still blaming congress today for obama's failures........

It's the culture...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#995239 Oct 4, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
You are supposed to call them terrorists, airhead.
Didn't you get the memo?
yes, i did.

If economic sabotage of the United States is terrorism, then most of the House GOP should be sent to Guantanamo. And since they are terrorizing the American economy and precarious financial conditions of so many US citizens with a government shutdown and the threat of not increasing the debt ceiling, they should -- according to the cliche -- get a dose of their own medicine.

So often when US presidents and members of congress talk about the need for military intervention abroad and a humongous military, spy and surveillance budget, they refer to "national security." The politicians and the mass media generally imply that this is a term that means the US needs to use armed forces and to start wars and kill people to protect us from physical harm or death. The elected officials and their appointees hope that this meme will keep American citizens in line and in support of a huge war machine that also happens to profit those in the DC revolving door of the military-industrial complex.

But protecting "national security" -- i.e., about 95 percent of the use of that loaded term -- really means protecting the economic interests and dominance of the United States. Can anyone doubt that is what it means in the Middle East, given that America has about 4 percent of the world's population but consumes about 25 percent of its oil? We wouldn't have the relatively small number of Islamic terrorists wanting to kill US citizens if we weren't pulling the strings in most of the US and using the military and CIA to ensure regional dominance (along with the UK and other European powers).

In short, if one argues that Islamic terrorism -- such as it exists -- is a by-product of US fighting to maintain its role as empire overseer of the Middle East (in order to retain our wealth for those who have it -- and general standard of living), we wouldn't be the occasional targets of Islamic terrorism (and the numbers of Americans who are victims of terror is absolutely miniscule compared to the number of Americans who are shot by other Americans each year, and infinitesimally small in relation to the number who annually die in automobile accidents.)

So, that would mean those who undercut our economy with zealotry and fanaticism are akin to terrorists. That would put the House GOP caucus right in there as part of the jihad against the US financial system.

Financially wounding the US by not passing a budget; threatening a default of the US treasury -- these are economic acts of terrorism that threaten our "national security," just like the groups and individuals (who are relatively small in number) who this nation is going broke spending hundreds of billions of dollars to target.

In our own Congress some elected officials who are either wearing tin foil hats or feeling the jingle of campaign money in their pockets from stirring up the primordial pit of emotions in white Americans feeling the multi-cultural society (and resenting a black president) close around them...these congressional representatives are committing an act of terror against US interests. The National Journal even attributes the current government shutdown to what it calls Newt Gingrich's "permanent insurgency."

It's the GOP jihad alright, obsessed with Obamacare for the simple reason that the repetition of its name rallies its troops against the name of a black president and everything they resent in the fact that a person of a different skin color could be president.

Call it racism, call it political opportunism...but by all means call it terrorism against our "national security."

http://www.truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary...
Homer

Stroudsburg, PA

#995240 Oct 4, 2013
Day 4 rightwing government shutdown continues...

Rightwing domestic terrorist hostage takers refuse to allow clean up/down vote to fund the government.

Most American now see them for what they truly are: obstructionists.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#995241 Oct 4, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
<quoted text>
The name-calling has reached new levels as the Democrats, faced with rising citizen objections to Obamacare, losses on Obamacare court cases, and a box where legislative manipulation, such as that that created Obamacare, isn’t available, are frustrated.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/dems-call-gop-jiha...
whatever birther boy.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#995242 Oct 4, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Corporations don't have "living expenses", dumbass. Stop embarrassing yourself.
You still haven't been able to find any evidence that those mythical subsidies to oil companies exist.
Oil Subsidies & the joke of a fraud Rand Paul.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#995243 Oct 4, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>I believe the word you're looking for is "petty" when describing our POS POTUS.
They've put up a blockade around a local Eisenhower bust and some irate citizens tore it down and took pictures of themselves beside it. We're living under the foot of a petulant god.
Pretty sure Obama's emotional maturity growth was stunted somewhere along his less than stable and turbulent past.

And his base's hysteria in placing him on a ridiculously high pedestal that went straight to his head didn't help.

Now he's like a spoiled adult which is much worse than a spoiled child.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#995245 Oct 4, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
You're living in a fantasy world Carol.
Before Mr. Reagan came to power our National debt was in the billions of dollars. After he left, it was in trillions of dollars. In the eighties the Republicans were boasting about Reagan’s "longest economical expansion". In reality that was the longest period of borrowing and the highest national debt accumulation in the history of our Nation! The Reagan’s “expansion” ended in 1987 with the record numbers of bankruptcies, foreclosures and unemployment. Some expansion! Where did the trillions go? The answer is - to the same 5% of wealthiest Americans, whom the Republicans have always been working for. Under Reagan, they all tripled and quadrupled their fortunes, while the rest of our Country got deeper in debt and recession.
Before Mr. Reagan came to power, the Middle Class America was still strong. After twelve years of Reaganomics the Middle Class was in ruins. Reagan's way of "Union busting" and generous Corporate perks had led to the total domination of Corporate bosses over the “salary caps” for the workers, over the job cuts and moving the jobs abroad. And so, the Middle Class had fallen closer to the poverty line and the Poor had turned into homeless. When the Middle Class goes down, so does the consumer spending. With low consumer spending our Economy hit the skids. That’s how the Reaganomics had thrown entire Country into a deep recession, while some excessive fortunes had “trickled up” into the pockets of the richest Americans with Republican blessings.
Before Mr. Reagan came to power, small businesses, small shopkeepers and small farmers were doing alright. But Republican deregulations had given unfair advantages and tax breaks to the big businesses and to the large farms at the expense of the small ones. That's why by 1987 the small businesses’ and farms' bankruptcies and the unemployment hit the record levels.
Before Mr. Reagan came to power, the Wall Street had been strictly regulated and watched over. After the Republican deregulations, the crooks like Ivan Boskey, Mike Milken and others were given a free hand to swindle and to pillage. Millions of small investors had lost billions of dollars in the "Junk Bonds" frauds and insider trading, while a few over-night billionaires were born at the expense of many ruined American families.
Ronald Reagan might have been a boon for the upper 5% but a disaster for the middle class and the poor.
The crash of the housing market came from nonexistent oversight of mortgage brokers like Countrywide and Indy Mac. It was Republicans who were in charge of both houses of Congress when the housing bubble started so to blame Democrats is totally ridiculous.
Historians disagree with you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
He Fights. 4 hr I fought 3
dead in a freezer in a freaking hotel man. i sw... 5 hr Ko ko 22
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 6 hr KitKaboodle 11,303
Child Molestation at Chicago Cult 7 hr Yes We Can 21
Canada,not so welcoming after all!! 7 hr One Country Down 3
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 9 hr Misses Abiff 242,610
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr RACE 105,266

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages