Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#994181 Oct 2, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> They will still be covered 90%. You people are all dumber than sh*t.
Oh, give 'em credit.

They worked hard to get that 'smart!'

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#994182 Oct 2, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real dumb"
The 3% deserve no special considerations.
Peace
KMA
Never said they did, moocher Eed.

Try to keep up.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#994183 Oct 2, 2013
tell_it_like_it_IS wrote:
<quoted text>
Where does it say that YOU get everything you scream and holler for?
where does it say that You do?

compromise used to work, but when you have 30 people in Congress who think they knows what's best for us even though they are only speaking for 23% of us then they are the problem.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#994185 Oct 2, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"DBWriter"
"real dumb" has been asked umpteen times to provide proof of the subsidies. As you would expect he does one of two things, he either ignores the post or changes the subject.
Peace
<agree>
<helpful>

....(looking for an "obvious" judgeit)

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#994186 Oct 2, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Congress isn't supposed to need a Cornhusker Kickback and a Louisiana Purchase to get a bill passed, either.
I don't know what planet you live on, but here on Earth there was no debate. Everything was done behind closed doors and any other-than-Democrat input was prohibited.
The people who wrote the bill called it a "penalty". The Supreme Court interpreted the bill and called it a "tax". I guess that makes sense to an idiot like you.
Yes, the new order in DC will be to shut this incompetent, unconstitutional, criminal, corrupt, insane government down if it can't function with some sanity.
The government doesn't spend as much money when it is shut down as it does when it operates ... "normally".
Use any reason or excuse to shut this incompetent government down. Keep it shut down until a budget is passed by both the House and Senate that isn't certain to collapse the government.
Shut the government down until they grow up.
You are naive of you think legislation doesn't pass in Congress without special deals to get votes.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#994187 Oct 2, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course you would say that.
But Obama actually lowered taxes in the stimulus bill.
So why were they protesting Obama. Why weren't they protesting Republican Congressmen & Senators that were voting yes yes yes under Bush? Cantor & Ryan etc.
This makes your premise a joke.
Because "Porkulus" was a hoax.

By the way, wouldn't that be one of those "unfunded tax cuts" (whatever that is in a real world) you are always so upset about?

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#994188 Oct 2, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course you would say that.
But Obama actually lowered taxes in the stimulus bill.
So why were they protesting Obama. Why weren't they protesting Republican Congressmen & Senators that were voting yes yes yes under Bush? Cantor & Ryan etc.
This makes your premise a joke.
Have you ever asked a Tea Party member what they thought of the Bush administration's spending policies?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#994189 Oct 2, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You wouldn't happen to have a source other than a pathological lying Communist Party USA rag, would you?
oh really?

let's see you rectify that with the fact that Huffpost is the #3 news site on the net.

http://www.alexa.com/topsites/category/Top/Ne...
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#994190 Oct 2, 2013
How are we supposed to check how well the shrimps on treadmills are doing now?

"Due to the lapse in government funding, National Science Foundation websites and business applications, including NSF.gov , FastLane, and Research.gov will be unavailable until further notice. We sincerely regret this inconvenience."

http://www.nsf.gov/outage.html
forks_make_us_fa t

Norman, OK

#994191 Oct 2, 2013
How's the weather....

"Due to the Federal government shutdown,
NOAA.gov and most associated web sites
are unavailable.

Only web sites necessary to protect lives
and property will be maintained.

See Weather.gov for critical weather
information or contact USA.gov for more
information about the shutdown.

NOAA Federal Employees: For access to the
Notice to Federal Employees About Unemployment
Insurance (SF-8), please Click Here."

http://governmentshutdown.noaa.gov/

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#994192 Oct 2, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So it was a Republican effort?
There are many differences between conservatives and so-called republicans like Boehner and McConnell.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#994193 Oct 2, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
where does it say that You do?
compromise used to work, but when you have 30 people in Congress who think they knows what's best for us even though they are only speaking for 23% of us then they are the problem.
So, what you're saying is, 30 people can obstruct the activities that require a majority of 535 people to enact, right?
If what you said is anywhere even close to true, the other 505 people would just steamroll over those 30.

Obviously, there is a hell of a lot more than 30, you lying coxucking sackofshit fraudulent dupe.

Do you ever listen to yourself?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#994194 Oct 2, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
You watch the black out media. Have they covered Obama putting a rope around a war monument in D.C. in the great outdoors because of the shutdown?
And asking what president in their right mind would do that?
Just curious.
how can they cover that that didn't happen?

so you guys are really freaking out over that fact that this is starting to look like the run up to the election? though since there is no doubt in any rational mind that the GOP has finally cut it's own throat with their brinkmanship tactics, your freakout is probably warranted.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#994195 Oct 2, 2013
Example of how Obama and Democrats abuse power.

Three years later, TheTeaParty.net finally gets IRS tax-exempt OK

http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/article/25366...

Democrats belong in jail for this corruption.

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#994196 Oct 2, 2013
"George Clooney Hopes Government Shutdown Ends Soon"

Headlines like this are a sign of how completely off the track our priorities have gone.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#994197 Oct 2, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>And Americans will remember to hold them accountable!
i just can tea party freaks committing suicide when the dems win the House.

the Buddhist immolation route would get people's attention. designate an area in front of the WH and let them have at it.
Obama is a joke

Emmaus, PA

#994198 Oct 2, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If they already have medical insurance, why would they decide now to change to PT workers? Why wouldn't they have done it already.
If the policies in the exchanges are not as good a deal as they have now, they don't need to change.
You people are dumber than crap.
Their medical insurance gets cut right along with their full-time hours. You people are dumber than dirt.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#994199 Oct 2, 2013
Ray Donovan wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever asked a Tea Party member what they thought of the Bush administration's spending policies?
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/c...

Since: May 11

Chambersburg, PA

#994200 Oct 2, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you finally found evidence that those mythical subsidies to oil companies exist? Please identify them to us. So far, you haven't been able to identify any. All you can do is regurgitate some party line mantra about some nebulous subsidy to oil companies that nobody can prove exists.
All companies always had the optioin to change full time employees to part time. It wasn't until ObamaKare was forced down everyone's throat that they chose to exercise that option. Obviously, providing health insurance to their employees was acdeptable to those companies before ObamaKare got the Cornhusker Kickback and Louisiana Purchase necessary for it to pass the Senate.
Before ObamaKare was forced on everyone not entitled to any of the exemptions being given to everyone who forced it down our throats, companies had no issue with providing health insurance to their employees. After ObamaKare, there is a big problem.
The only change was ObamaKare.
Therefore, it's either a huge conspiracy involving a multitude of independent companies throughout the country to make Obama look bad, or ObamaKare is the problem.
Now, you're not one of those conspiracy nuts, are you?
I posted all the evidence needed.. All those Senators & Congressmen debating & voting on oil subsidies.

And here you are claiming they don't exist?

As for healthcare, I guess you are saying cheapazz companies that offered health benefits before are now changing people to PT because they can now blame it on Obamacare & dumbasses like you will believe it.

I don't blame you for lying abut this. It has to be embarrassing for a person who b*tches here everyday about the "worthless" Americans getting subsidies when your job is subsidized.

Ouch-a-mundo
Obama is a joke

Emmaus, PA

#994201 Oct 2, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets review what was said
" Full-time workers are being reduced to part-time workers.
Because they are part-time, they loose their medical insurance"
Now, it says that companies are changing people from FT to PT & they are losing their insurance.
If hey are losing their insurance then they must have had it before.
So if the company's goal is to not pay insurance, why haven't they changed to PT work before?
The entire post was based on the idea that companies that currently offer insurance, won't anymore. And that just stupid.
The higher copays & deductibles comment was obviously about the exchanges. People don't have to buy from the exchanges & if they do, they have options relating to out-of-pocket expenses.
"So if the company's goal is to not pay insurance, why haven't they changed to PT work before?"

Many companies have been, continue to do so, and many more will be doing it in the future. You people are dumber than dirt.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 min Ratloder 68,671
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 35 min Beavis 179,467
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 48 min Cali Girl 2014 50,650
Rattlesnake Logic 1 hr i need a bump to 22
food for thought 1 hr reality is a crutch 2
John Wick Brings Stylish Bloody Mayhem to Chica... 3 hr Culture Auditor 1
Amy 10-24 3 hr Sublime1 14
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]