Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Madrid, Spain

#988672 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll tell you something you don't do.
Declare Bin Laden irrelevant & abandon the search & Afghanistan to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, Bin Laden, or Al Qaeda.
You're the president. Deciding what not to do isn't quite enough. You actually have to make a decision as to what to do.

Let's see how these FACTS of history relate to your post.
When bin Laden was, as you put it, "declared irrelevant", Al Qaeda and the Taliban were confined to caves and couldn't show their heads anywhere in the world.
Today, after 4 years of Obama: the Taliban and Al Qaeda are bombing every village and city in Afghanistan; attacking the United States in several countries thousands of miles away from where Bush had them holed up in caves; and have regrouped sufficiently to be stronger than they ever were previously in the history of their existence, so strong they are able to invade Syria and fight a full scale war with the Syrian army.
Before Obama Al Qaeda was confined to caves in the tribal region along the Pakistan-Afghan border
Since Obama, Al Qaeda attacks the US thousands of miles away in multiple countries and mounts a full scale invasion of Syria.
Only an idiot would think there isn't a connection there.

Now, back to the post you ran away from. How about an answer:

You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.

You have to tell us what you would do to answer the post.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#988673 Sep 24, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>He is making the case for moslems--how did the American moslems from Minnesota decide to the attack the mall on the UN day of Peace--what were the O'bama savages thinking? don't they listen to the United Nations? and what about the children children children that were brutally murdered by the American resident moslems?
They were Somalis going back to fight in their civil war.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988674 Sep 24, 2013
America will do the right thing no matter what politicians try to do the Concept of America will live on The post office has been made to look inefficient and obsolete, as if public enterprises are incapable of generating public revenues; yet the postal service has been both self-funding and profitable for over two centuries. If we refuse to allow our government to make money through public enterprises, we will be destined to bear the burden of supporting government with our taxes, while we watch countries such as China, Korea and Japan, which do allow public industries, enjoy the fruits of that profitable and efficient arrangement.

Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling Web of Debt. In The Public Bank Solution, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and globally. Her 200-plus blog articles are at EllenBrown.com .

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#988675 Sep 24, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Taxes on medical devices, reduction in health savings accounts, etc.
But why does it matter who is affected by ObamaKKKare taxes, unless you are consumed by class envy?
the tax for not purchasing a policy, tan tax, Cadillac tax (unless all those union members are millionaires). Dumbass Dave says its funded but thinks only the rich are getting taxed.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#988676 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt calls the bravery of the 9-11 responders stupidity.
When Galt house catches fire, maybe some stupid firefighters will just let him burn.
Well, in some places in his neck of the woods, you have to pay the fire department out of pocket or they won't save your house!

That must be where his personal experience comes from!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Madrid, Spain

#988677 Sep 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Not attack iraq son.
You're the president. Deciding what not to do isn't quite enough. You actually have to make a decision as to what to do.

You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.

You have to tell us what you would do to answer the post, boy.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#988678 Sep 24, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
She didn't learn that in her Bible; you know, the revised one just like the revised history, revised science etc that she learned in her school or taught herself in later life at the Beck School for Morans.
Christ's teachings were never about looking to big government to meet all of our needs. Quite the contrary. Worshipping big government is, frankly, I believe, many liberals' idea of an equal substitute in place of God.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#988679 Sep 24, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
I take her word for it. I don't have my head up obamas ass. He lied, come to grips with it
"I asked them,‘What happened? Please tell me,’” Smith said.“And every one of them says it was the video, and we all know it wasn’t the video. They all lied to me"
There was no lie. You can jump up & down & use the grief of a mother all you want.

It doesn't chsnge that there was no lie

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#988680 Sep 24, 2013
TSM wrote:
Obama at the UN ‘World Is More Stable than It Was Five Years Ago’ this is delusional and Dangerous, maybe he’s comparing the World vs. Chicago he may have a Point!!
Never before in the history of Chicago, have four black kids been pluked off the street, as the recent shooting of 13, in a sout side park. This will be another law suit paid out by the City. They are not able to caught over 95% of the perps who shoot up the city. But give the shooting international media coverage and poof! we get 4 negroes off the street. And the world applauded.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988681 Sep 24, 2013
Obama makes these pills taste like candy for the parents of the children this will affect Slashing Food Stamp Funding: US Congress Moves to cut billions in Food Aid The US House of Representatives passed a bill Thursday that would slash food stamp funding by nearly $40 billion over ten years, kicking four million people off the program next year.

While the White House and congressional Democrats have said they will not accept the bill in its present form, its passage sets the baseline for a deal by the Democrats, who also favor significant cuts in food aid to the poorest Americans.

On Friday, the House also passed a bill that would link continued government operations to the removal of funding for the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, setting the stage for a potential government shutdown on October 1. The aim of both parties is once again to whip up a crisis atmosphere in which to implement vast cuts to social spending over popular opposition.

The food stamp bill would cut $39 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over ten years. It would force adults between 18 and 50 to either work or attend work training to reapply for benefits, and would also institute drug testing for recipients.

The bill would also force food stamp recipients without children to work, train or volunteer for at least 20 hours per week to continue receiving assistance. This would make food stamp recipients the equivalent of indentured servants, forced to work for free in order to eat.

In addition to the four million eliminated from food stamps next year, three million more would be denied access each subsequent year, according to figures from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bill passed largely along party lines, with 217 Republicans voting for the bill, and 15 Republicans joining all Democrats in voting against it.

“Conspicuously missing from the debate is the impact that cutting these programs will have on needy people and communities,” Dan Reyes, coordinator for the Delaware Food Bank’s Coalition to End Hunger, told the World Socialist Web Site.“These cuts would be incredibly damaging,” he added.

All under Obamas Presidency so really Obama is useless to the people who loves him the Most lololololololhahahahahahaha Wall street got your cookies from Obamahahahahahahahahahahahahah alololol 4 more years hahahahaha you might get that trip back to Africa can anyone say flies for everybody

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#988682 Sep 24, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
what loss? All they've done is hand over a bullsht report. You a fckn idiot.


If you had a brain, you would know that is just step one.

Try to get it together Eman, you're losing it bigtime.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#988683 Sep 24, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Obama can't just change a law because he wants. Only Congress can do that. Tin horn dictators also.
lol! No son. Not even Congress 'do that.'

You're an idiot!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#988684 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So you need to pay extra for your penispump. Big deal.
while dumbass Dave is drooling over enlarged dicks real middle class families will be paying more to get braces on their kids teeth thanks to his man-crush.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#988685 Sep 24, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Well, in some places in his neck of the woods, you have to pay the fire department out of pocket or they won't save your house!
That must be where his personal experience comes from!
so you forgot to change your name to usa1680--you know all about those fire departments out there in California don't cha? scum bag. Let me see if I can find those posts about how you hate the fire fighters.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#988686 Sep 24, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the president. Deciding what not to do isn't quite enough. You actually have to make a decision as to what to do.
Let's see how these FACTS of history relate to your post.
When bin Laden was, as you put it, "declared irrelevant", Al Qaeda and the Taliban were confined to caves and couldn't show their heads anywhere in the world.
Today, after 4 years of Obama: the Taliban and Al Qaeda are bombing every village and city in Afghanistan; attacking the United States in several countries thousands of miles away from where Bush had them holed up in caves; and have regrouped sufficiently to be stronger than they ever were previously in the history of their existence, so strong they are able to invade Syria and fight a full scale war with the Syrian army.
Before Obama Al Qaeda was confined to caves in the tribal region along the Pakistan-Afghan border
Since Obama, Al Qaeda attacks the US thousands of miles away in multiple countries and mounts a full scale invasion of Syria.
Only an idiot would think there isn't a connection there.
Now, back to the post you ran away from. How about an answer:
You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.
You have to tell us what you would do to answer the post.
Well, if bushie boy really was at battle stations as Condi Rice claimed they were under orders to be, then should 9/11 have happened son?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#988687 Sep 24, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense posted.
We can read right wing nut job sites for ourselves... just saying
Liberals are more concerned about a flat tire than the car being totaled.

People kill, not guns. We should be focusing on helping the people who kill with guns first. Which means identifying them before they snap because of political correctness.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#988688 Sep 24, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the president. Deciding what not to do isn't quite enough. You actually have to make a decision as to what to do.
You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.
You have to tell us what you would do to answer the post, boy.
lol! Sorry son.

You people are too narcissistic to think straight!

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#988689 Sep 24, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
the tax for not purchasing a policy, tan tax, Cadillac tax (unless all those union members are millionaires). Dumbass Dave says its funded but thinks only the rich are getting taxed.
Carol said it was funded on Middle Class Taxes.

Certainly you have more than this, right?

I'll even ignore your ignorance in stating the Cadillac tax. It is not a tax on people, it is a tax on insurance companies. Try to become better informed, Eman, you're embarrassing yourself again today.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#988690 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> They were Somalis going back to fight in their civil war.
They were moslem who were residents of the United States. What happens when moslems immigrating to the United States figure out that there are more convenient shopping malls?

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#988691 Sep 24, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the president. Deciding what not to do isn't quite enough. You actually have to make a decision as to what to do.
Let's see how these FACTS of history relate to your post.
When bin Laden was, as you put it, "declared irrelevant", Al Qaeda and the Taliban were confined to caves and couldn't show their heads anywhere in the world.
Today, after 4 years of Obama: the Taliban and Al Qaeda are bombing every village and city in Afghanistan; attacking the United States in several countries thousands of miles away from where Bush had them holed up in caves; and have regrouped sufficiently to be stronger than they ever were previously in the history of their existence, so strong they are able to invade Syria and fight a full scale war with the Syrian army.
Before Obama Al Qaeda was confined to caves in the tribal region along the Pakistan-Afghan border
Since Obama, Al Qaeda attacks the US thousands of miles away in multiple countries and mounts a full scale invasion of Syria.
Only an idiot would think there isn't a connection there.
Now, back to the post you ran away from. How about an answer:
You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.
You have to tell us what you would do to answer the post.
I'll tell you something you don't do.
Declare Bin Laden irrelevant & abandon the search & Afghanistan to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, Bin Laden, or Al Qaeda.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Jacques in Orleans 186,859
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 32 min Mothra 52,708
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr rabbee yehoshooah... 71,942
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 3 hr RJS 8,010
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 10 hr Cold Front 69,605
amy april 17 13 hr duke86 2
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 14 hr PEllen 99,350
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]