Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1261559 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#988655 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you base everything on what an upset grieving mother understood?
No, you are using this woman's grief to promote the idea that Obama lied.
There was no lie.
I take her word for it. I don't have my head up obamas ass. He lied, come to grips with it

"I asked them,‘What happened? Please tell me,’” Smith said.“And every one of them says it was the video, and we all know it wasn’t the video. They all lied to me"

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#988656 Sep 24, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
We need to question the deaths of those fighting forest fires, such as in Arizona. Many people believe that the effort should be made to save structures, but otherwise forest fires should be allowed to burn themselves out. In fact, that is exactly the practice on the National Park Service.
In the case of the World Trade Center, those on the upper floors could not be saved and the lives of the firefighters were lost needlessly. The culture of dashing into burning buildings without regard to personal safety is brave, but foolish.
I agree and those structures should have some firefighting ability on hand. Fire breaks being the minimum.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#988657 Sep 24, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus was a liberal Carol, in fact he was the ultimate liberal with his message of social justice. I guess that makes him an obnoxious loon too.
Social justice? Loving your neighbor as yourself and giving to the poor was a message given to each and every one of us personally. Christ didn't advocate big government - or Cesar - to be the collective conscience of the people and to take their money involuntarily to waste and squander.

"Give to Cesar's what is Cesar's" was a direct admonishment to pay our taxes - and "give to God what is God's" was a direct admonishment to give our own money to the poor out of love.

Christ's version of "social justice" was the condition of each individual heart. Love God first and then do for others.

Do you think big government is interested in loving God first? You're actually worshipping big government.

Cesar never entered the picture in Christ's teaching. Neither does Obama. We are simply admonished to pray for our leaders. Not put them on a pedestal before God.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988658 Sep 24, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
We need to question the deaths of those fighting forest fires, such as in Arizona. Many people believe that the effort should be made to save structures, but otherwise forest fires should be allowed to burn themselves out. In fact, that is exactly the practice on the National Park Service.
In the case of the World Trade Center, those on the upper floors could not be saved and the lives of the firefighters were lost needlessly. The culture of dashing into burning buildings without regard to personal safety is brave, but foolish.
Galt lets go outside the box for a few could those fire be acts of terror Farrakhan spoke about this stuff being done by al quida the government and media misdirects inorder to maintain control just a thought because we now Know for a fact we have imported AntiAmerican Illegal entrants look to the recent kenyan attacks is this an excuse for America to be caught up funny the Presidents Born land comes under attack mmmmmmmmmmmm he will bring them to justice mmmmmmmmmwhy thats kenyas job we are not kenyans

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#988659 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Businesses requested more time & Obama said OK. I thought you fricken bozos liked businesses & now you give Obama crap for working with them addressing their concerns.
Obama can't just change a law because he wants. Only Congress can do that. Tin horn dictators also.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988661 Sep 24, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Holding hostages who have not committed crimes is the way Muslims operate, not Americans.
So in other words revenge best served cold ok makes sense we have morals good answer you are decent thanks
balls_4_Obama

United States

#988662 Sep 24, 2013
LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Checkmate again !
Now you and dave can give each other sponge baths....
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988663 Sep 24, 2013
An NIB would provide a means to channel public funds into regional and national projects identified by political and community leaders across the country to keep the economy healthy. It could issue bonds, back public-private partnerships and guarantee long-term, low-interest loans to states and investment groups willing to rebuild our schools, hospitals, airports and energy grids. An NIB with $10 billion in capital could leverage hundreds of billions in investments.

What has blocked these bills is opposition to using tax money for the purpose. But Rolando asks:

[W]hat if we set up the NIB without using taxpayer funds? What if we allowed Americans to open savings accounts in the nation’s post offices and directed those funds into national infrastructure bonds that would earn interest for depositors and fund job-creating projects to replace and modernize our crumbling infrastructure?

A post office bank ... would not offer commercial loans or mortgages. But it could serve the unbanked and fund infrastructure projects selected by a non-partisan NIB.

The Unbanked and Underbanked: A Massive Untapped Market

The “unbanked” are not a small segment of the population. In a 2011 survey, the unbanked and underbanked included about one in four households. Without access to conventional financial services, people turn to an expensive alternative banking market of bill-pay, prepaid debit cards, check cashing services, and payday loans. They pay excessive fees and are susceptible to high-cost predatory lenders.

Globally, postal banks are major contributors to financial inclusion. Catering to this underserved population is a revenue-generator for the post office while saving the underbanked large sums in fees. Worldwide, according to the Universal Postal Union, 1 billion people now use the postal sector for savings and deposit accounts, and more than 1.5 billion take advantage of basic transactional services through the post.According to a Discussion Paper of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs:

The essential characteristic distinguishing postal financial services from the private banking sector is the obligation and capacity of the postal system to serve the entire spectrum of the national population, unlike conventional private banks which allocate their institutional resources to service the sectors of the population they deem most profitable.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#988664 Sep 24, 2013
Did realtime and crazy Ron show up at the same time today? Things that make you go hmmmmm.
TSM

El Paso, TX

#988665 Sep 24, 2013
Obama at the UN ‘World Is More Stable than It Was Five Years Ago’ this is delusional and Dangerous, maybe he’s comparing the World vs. Chicago he may have a Point!!
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988666 Sep 24, 2013
Wall Street Is No Longer a Safe Place to Keep Our Money

A postal bank could have appeal not just to the unbanked but to savers generally who are concerned about the safety of their deposits. Traditionally, people have deposited their money in banks for three reasons: safety from theft, the convenience of check writing and bill paying, and to earn some interest. Today, not only do our bank deposits earn virtually no interest, but they are not safe from theft – and the prospective thief is Wall Street itself.

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) in Switzerland has mandated that “systemically important” banks come up with “living wills” stating what they would do in the event of insolvency. The template set out by the FSB is for these too-big-to-fail banks to confiscate their creditors’ funds and convert them to bank equity or stock. Legally,“creditors” include the depositors. In fact depositors compose the largest class of creditors of any bank.

In 2009, President Obama agreed along with other G20 leaders to be bound by the regulations imposed by the FSB, giving them the force of law. This agreement should properly have been a treaty, subject to the approval of two-thirds of the Senate; but the deal was sealed on a handshake, ostensibly to prevent another Lehman-style banking collapse. Thus the next time JPMorganChase or Bank of America finds itself on the wrong side of a massive derivatives bet, it can avoid insolvency by recapitalizing itself with our deposits. Both JPM and BOA hold over $1 trillion in deposits and over $70 trillion in derivatives; and with the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the banks have been able to merge these operations. The FDIC deposit insurance fund has only $32 billion in it to cover losses for the entire country.

For guaranteed safety, we need a network of publicly-owned banks devoted solely to taking deposits and providing check-cashing services – no gambling with deposits allowed. The US Post Office can safely and efficiently provide the infrastructure for such a banking network, as it did from 1911 until 1967. The post office is ubiquitous, with branches in every town and community.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#988667 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that darn Obama making the case for WMDs in Iraq again.
He is making the case for moslems--how did the American moslems from Minnesota decide to the attack the mall on the UN day of Peace--what were the O'bama savages thinking? don't they listen to the United Nations? and what about the children children children that were brutally murdered by the American resident moslems?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#988668 Sep 24, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok, moron. You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.
Not attack iraq son.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#988669 Sep 24, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Talk about big government! Maybe the government can tattoo everyone who acts a little iffy so that they can't get a gun.
Anyone can get a gun on the street faster than going to the store and buying one; those nuts aren't applying for a permit. They're stealing the guns from people who hoard them in their homes. Perhaps we ought to hold the actual gun owners and their manufacturers financially responsible for the carnage.
You are saying that the government should ban guns; video games and movies; what's next? history books? It's already happening in Texas. Schools? Oh, that's on the top of the list. Abortion? Oh, forgot, that's the number one. Ban gay people? You're nuts.
Think of the Fort Hood massacre. That guy had red flags all over his psychiatric records. But political correctness dictated he not be profiled or detained even it meant putting others in danger.

Think of the many people who could have been detained just long enough to determine their mental stability except political correctness dictated psychiatrists could no longer do that.

Nowadays, it's almost impossible to put someone in a hospital to be tested and treated because of political correctness. It's why we have so many mentally ill people who need treatment on the streets and untreated. And when they do snap, we blame guns.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#988671 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Businesses requested more time & Obama said OK. I thought you fricken bozos liked businesses & now you give Obama crap for working with them addressing their concerns.
we like individuals also--why does O'bama hate everyone that does follow his ideology of being in the collective. I hate liberal collectivists. It is a piss poor ideology. Do you think I want to be included with idiots like you? I stand as an individual.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Madrid, Spain

#988672 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll tell you something you don't do.
Declare Bin Laden irrelevant & abandon the search & Afghanistan to invade a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, Bin Laden, or Al Qaeda.
You're the president. Deciding what not to do isn't quite enough. You actually have to make a decision as to what to do.

Let's see how these FACTS of history relate to your post.
When bin Laden was, as you put it, "declared irrelevant", Al Qaeda and the Taliban were confined to caves and couldn't show their heads anywhere in the world.
Today, after 4 years of Obama: the Taliban and Al Qaeda are bombing every village and city in Afghanistan; attacking the United States in several countries thousands of miles away from where Bush had them holed up in caves; and have regrouped sufficiently to be stronger than they ever were previously in the history of their existence, so strong they are able to invade Syria and fight a full scale war with the Syrian army.
Before Obama Al Qaeda was confined to caves in the tribal region along the Pakistan-Afghan border
Since Obama, Al Qaeda attacks the US thousands of miles away in multiple countries and mounts a full scale invasion of Syria.
Only an idiot would think there isn't a connection there.

Now, back to the post you ran away from. How about an answer:

You're the president. It's 9/12(2001). What do you do?
Do you:
1) Surrender? or
2) Do the Bill Clinton thing and lob a few cruise missiles in their general direction? or
3) Do the exact same thing in the exact same place against the exact same enemy as the Soviets, and somehow you expext something different to happen? or
4) You do it differently and fight them in a different place?
You actually have to tell us what you would have done to answer this post.

You have to tell us what you would do to answer the post.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#988673 Sep 24, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>He is making the case for moslems--how did the American moslems from Minnesota decide to the attack the mall on the UN day of Peace--what were the O'bama savages thinking? don't they listen to the United Nations? and what about the children children children that were brutally murdered by the American resident moslems?
They were Somalis going back to fight in their civil war.
WOW

Bronx, NY

#988674 Sep 24, 2013
America will do the right thing no matter what politicians try to do the Concept of America will live on The post office has been made to look inefficient and obsolete, as if public enterprises are incapable of generating public revenues; yet the postal service has been both self-funding and profitable for over two centuries. If we refuse to allow our government to make money through public enterprises, we will be destined to bear the burden of supporting government with our taxes, while we watch countries such as China, Korea and Japan, which do allow public industries, enjoy the fruits of that profitable and efficient arrangement.

Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling Web of Debt. In The Public Bank Solution, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and globally. Her 200-plus blog articles are at EllenBrown.com .

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#988675 Sep 24, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Taxes on medical devices, reduction in health savings accounts, etc.
But why does it matter who is affected by ObamaKKKare taxes, unless you are consumed by class envy?
the tax for not purchasing a policy, tan tax, Cadillac tax (unless all those union members are millionaires). Dumbass Dave says its funded but thinks only the rich are getting taxed.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#988676 Sep 24, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Galt calls the bravery of the 9-11 responders stupidity.
When Galt house catches fire, maybe some stupid firefighters will just let him burn.
Well, in some places in his neck of the woods, you have to pay the fire department out of pocket or they won't save your house!

That must be where his personal experience comes from!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 23 min Enter 194,287
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr OzRitz 54,328
Ask Amy 7-27-15 9 hr mrs gladys kravitz 8
Dear Abby 7-27-15 10 hr mrs gladys kravitz 7
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr CrunchyBacon 100,188
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 13 hr Ariel Sharon 70,139
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Feb '09) 13 hr Majikmon 5,191
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages