Barack Obama, our next President

There are 20 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Aug 13

Bozeman, MT

#983003 Sep 14, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
and Irish Catholics support terrorists too, the IRA. care to guess how many innocent people they've killed and maimed over the years?
A drop in the proverbial bucket compared to radical Islam.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Iris...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#983004 Sep 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney was the best choice of a weak lineup in 2012, but from today's perspective, either of Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, or Marco Rubio would have been better.
Christie was Galt's first choice. Maybe he can rehabilitate himself before 2016.
Christie is an exceptionally likeable (R) politician but in no way conservative enough for FOX-TEA and others.
Christie in the White House would be akin to reelecting DaBammy to a third term.
BTW__UCLA is putting an azz whoopin on the Cornhuskers and that's always a beautiful thing.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#983005 Sep 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Romney was the best choice of a weak lineup in 2012, but from today's perspective, either of Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, or Marco Rubio would have been better.
Christie was Galt's first choice. Maybe he can rehabilitate himself before 2016.
lol! You go from a weak line up to one of symbolic stupidity.

Now that's what I call not representing Americans!

BTW, is Cruz American?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#983006 Sep 14, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's Lois? Hey Lois? Read this one when you get back from church.
Carol is also aware that Galt supports the Planned Parenthood program of black genocide, including lowering standards so that the abortion dollar will go further, even if a few people die along the way.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#983007 Sep 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama armed terrorists in Libya and four Americans paid the price while trying to clean up Obama's mess in Benghazi.
Obama armed drug terrorists in Mexico, resulting in untold deaths.
Obama is currently arming terrorists in Syria.
That's a lie.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#983008 Sep 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama armed terrorists in Libya and four Americans paid the price while trying to clean up Obama's mess in Benghazi.
Obama armed drug terrorists in Mexico, resulting in untold deaths.
Obama is currently arming terrorists in Syria.
Amb. Stevens was told not to to Benghazi. There was also a large CIA operation on going in Benghazi....which Petraeus wanted to keep quite

Home> International
President Obama Authorizes Covert Help for Libyan Rebels
March 30, 2011
By JAKE TAPPER, JON KARL and RUSSELL GOLDMAN
Russell Goldman More from Russell
VIDEO: Barack Obama and Libya
The President's Secret Plan for Libya
Next Video Target Libya: Rebels in Retreat
Auto Start: On | Off

President Obama has a signed a secret presidential finding authorizing covert operations to aid the effort in Libya where rebels are in full retreat despite air support from U.S. and allied forces, a source tells ABC News.

The presidential finding discusses a number of ways to help the opposition to Moammar Gadhafi, authorizing some assistance now and setting up a legal framework for more robust activities in the future.

The finding does not direct covert operatives to provide arms to the rebels immediately, although it does prepare for such a contingency and other contingencies should the president decide to go down that road in the future.

The White House press office issued a statement saying it does not comment on intelligence matters.

"I will reiterate what the President said yesterday no decision has been made about providing arms to the opposition or to any group in Libya. We're not ruling it out or ruling it in," the statement said. "We're assessing and reviewing options for all types of assistance that we could provide to the Libyan people."

http://abcnews.go.com/International/president...

I also suggest you check your sources, those arm shipments came from Qatar, a free and independent country.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#983009 Sep 14, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree we should never arm terrorist groups....
like the Mujahideen, Including a wealthy Saudi by the name of Osama bin Laden
or the Contras
or the Mujahedin e Khalq (MKO)
Oh wait those groups were funded, armed and trained by Republican Presidents Reagan and Dumbo...
so Its okay to arm them right?
BTW It was McCain and Graham, both Republican Senators that called for arming the Syrian Rebels, in fact McCain met with the Rebels and provided a photo op with a known Al Qaeda leader.....
in fact when President Obama finally did allow some small arms shipments it was McCain who complained they needed heavier weapons including MANPAC SAMS
Hey, cupcake, you either agree it is wrong to arm terrorist or not.

Sounds like you are into excuse making. Too many, but,but, buts

So are you or are you not against arming terrorist?
Whatever

Gering, NE

#983010 Sep 14, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
and your point is?????
I know of three other terrorist organizations, the Lehti, Stern Gang and Irgun whose leaders all went on to become leaders of their country. Those leaders were responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians.
care to guess which country they came from?
Sure it wasn't the Church of Christ party-idiot!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#983011 Sep 14, 2013
Ban Ki-Moon says Bashir Assad is a war criminal, brother Maher as well__thanks Putin.

Looks like when it's all said and done Vlad can invite Bashir and Maher to retire in Russia with his new bff Snowden.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#983012 Sep 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
absolutely, and these Irish Catholics who support terrorism are bulwarks of the DemoKKKrat Party in the Northeast...
Joe Kennedy was pro-Nazi because he hated the British and none of the Kennedys have ever objected to IRA terrorism.
and Reagan never objected to Contra terrorist acts,
nor Noriega drug smuggling until he didn't serve a purpose
or the CIA smuggling cocaine into the U.S.

Nixon never objected to the terrorist Pinochet or the thousands of people he killed and tortured. In fact, Nixon put Pinochet in power

Eisenhower never objected to the terrorists acts of the SHAH of Iran and the thousands of people killed and tortured by the SAVAK. In fact Eisenhower put the Shah in power.

LBJ and Nixon never objected to the brutality of Suharto and Nguyen Van Thieu.

so what was your point again, other than some asinine attempt to blame everything on the Democratic party....

I suggest you take an American Foreign policy history course, and try to learn what the phrase American Exceptionalism means
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#983013 Sep 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
absolutely, and these Irish Catholics who support terrorism are bulwarks of the DemoKKKrat Party in the Northeast...
Joe Kennedy was pro-Nazi because he hated the British and none of the Kennedys have ever objected to IRA terrorism.
... and bushie boy was a capitalist, so making a deal with the Nazis was no problem.

It was just.... business.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#983014 Sep 14, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>That's a lie.
Who is this peace loving Gen. Salim Idriss that the US sent weapons to in Syria?

Translation by MEMRI of an interview this guy did with Al Jazeera--
"Israel is an enemy country" and that Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and the Lebanese terrorist group Hizballah are "Israeli collaborators."

"As for us being Israeli collaborators--the only Israeli collaborator in the region is the criminal Bashar," said Idris. "The Israeli collaborators are the people who put on the show of the 2006 war--Hizballah and its leader Hassan Nasrallah. They diverted all their forces to the slaughtering of Syrians. Their scheme is totally clear. They used to hide behind the pretext of resistance and the fight against Israel, but now it has become clear that they are implementing a sectarian, Iranian, Safavid plan in the region."
http://www.memritv.org/clip_transcript/en/383 ...
And Obama is fully aware this and yet chooses to arm them and is willing to go to war to ensure their victory.

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#983015 Sep 14, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure it wasn't the Church of Christ party-idiot!
????

I'm guessing you don't have a clue.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#983016 Sep 14, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, cupcake, you either agree it is wrong to arm terrorist or not.
Sounds like you are into excuse making. Too many, but,but, buts
So are you or are you not against arming terrorist?
Still looking for your dow's son.

You either have them or you don't.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#983017 Sep 14, 2013
Realtime wrote:
Ban Ki-Moon says Bashir Assad is a war criminal, brother Maher as well__thanks Putin.
Looks like when it's all said and done Vlad can invite Bashir and Maher to retire in Russia with his new bff Snowden.
He'll have to reopen the Gulags in Siberia

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#983018 Sep 14, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, cupcake, you either agree it is wrong to arm terrorist or not.
Sounds like you are into excuse making. Too many, but,but, buts
So are you or are you not against arming terrorist?
geesh, you are dense. I was just trying to point out the hypocrisy of Republicans and their supporters.

You try and make a case that President Obama is arming terrorists and we should never do that.

I was just pointing out a few of the terrorist organizations supported by past REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS.

Tell me did you take a stance agains Reagan, Dumbya and Nixon when they were arming terrorists? Or are you only complaining when its done by a black democratic president.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#983019 Sep 14, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>
So it was bad until OBama did it?
unlike when Bush was in office the deficit is dropping so what do i care?

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#983020 Sep 14, 2013
Ray Donovan wrote:
<quoted text>
A drop in the proverbial bucket compared to radical Islam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Iris...
Nearly 3,000 people were killed in the attacks of 2001 but more than 3,700 died and tens of thousands were injured in more than 30 years of violence in Northern Ireland.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#983022 Sep 14, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
????
I'm guessing you don't have a clue.
Were they all home schooled?
Whatever

Gering, NE

#983023 Sep 14, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
really, al Qaeda was not present in Iraq until after we took out Saddam. In fact by invading Iraq, Bush gave Osama bin Laden exactly what he wanted. A place to fight America in a war of attrition, similar to what he and the Mujahideen did to the Soviets in the 80's. He even said the way to beat the U.S. was to drive them into a huge economic debt, and that he preferred the war be fought in Iraq. Osama didn't like Saddam, he considered Saddam a boozing woman chasing infidel. He also didn't like the idea of Saddam keeping al Qaeda out of Iraq.
Bush out sourced the job of fighting al Qaeda in Afghanistan to a bunch of incompetent militias.
The only reason we ended up fighting al Qaeda in Iraq was because President Dumbo and his administration refused to use the Iraqi Army to secure the peace. Bush let his idiotic CIVILIAN administration who didn't know a thing about the Middle East or military operations run the show over the objections of his military commanders.
Dude, I've probably forgotten more about Middle East politics than you ever knew about.
Good grief-The US always had military in Afghanistan since two months after 9-11 until today.

Your lack of knowledge about the Iraq conflict is glaring besides it is BS as none of this proves Bush gave arms to al Qaeda like OBama is.

PS The MIddle East thinks Obama is a total failure at diplomacy so I fail to understand how you thought this was a talking point.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Core Aspects In Testo XTRM Across The Usa 24 min jorgeleone 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 37 min Earthling-1 53,036
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr TRD 69,797
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 3 hr red and right 187,822
College Scandals 9 hr music 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 11 hr Red_Forman 5,947
Word (Dec '08) 11 hr Red_Forman 5,211
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]