Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 45,069)

Showing posts 901,361 - 901,380 of1,034,209
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978931
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

USAsince1680 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush played Congress for fools. Telling them he would seek U.N. approval if they would approve a military action, then going it alone. All you have to do is research the outrage and revulsion that followed his decision which was expressed by members of Congress to see that they felt betrayed.
Bush lied, soldiers died.
The outrage by certain Democrats who knew exactly what everyone else knew at the time they supported military force in Iraq was only for political and personal gain when it was to their advantage to let Bush hang in the wind.

Your weasels lied to you. No one else. Not Bush...not the UN...not the Intel everyone was privy to - including the weasels.

Since: May 11

Shippensburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978932
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Anti-ship weaponry has advanced a long way in the past 40 years, dufus. Just how dumb are you?
"... safer."
You seem to be admitting that sailors won't be safe when Obama uses them to help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood take over Syria. All it takes is just one of the anti-ship missiles launched to hit just one ship, and Obama has a planeload of corpses he can do a photo op with when he pretends to be sad about Americans getting killed. Just how dumb are you?
The term safer is comparative, dipstick.

In Vietnam, were troops safer on the ships than the troops on the ground.

Yet another question you are running from because you are afraid to answer it.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978933
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, sheep dip.
You said l Qaeda was behind the chemical weapon attack.
You avoided ( as usual) the question: If Al Qaeda has chemical weapons, why haven't they used them on their attacks the past few years?
It a simple GD question, why are you afraid of answering it?.
... idiots.

Putis said Al Qaeda was behind the chemical weapons attack.
Obama said Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack.

Which of the above two people habitually lie to you?
Why would you expect Obama to not be lying now?

That may have been all the chemical weapons smuggled to them.
However, after Obama starts a war with Syria, Al Qaeda will be able to get the entire stockpile of chemical weapons there.... which brings us back to the question you've been running away from since Obama threatened to start a war:

Do you support the Obama plan to get Americans killed starting a war with Syria so Al Qaeda can acquire the chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria?

If Obama has always habitually lied to you, why on Earth would you think he's not lying now?

Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Only an idiot would expect him to obey Congress, and not obey the Muslim Brotherhood.
Obama thinks he can start a war and nothing will happen to him.
What do you think? Do you think Obama can start a war and get away with it?
WOW

Brooklyn, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978934
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Conservatives are opposed to use of their tax dollars to support Al Qaeda, in Syria and elsewhere.
Thats what they want a debate on Lib/ Con lets all be Decent Citizens of the world who speaks out against WRONG no matter what PARTY, RACE, RELIGION,NATIONALITY

Since: May 11

Shippensburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978935
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Because Al Qaeda just received the chemical weapons from their people in Libya.
Libya had no sarin stockpiles.

Next you will claim Sadam moved his WMDs to Libya?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978936
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Assad knows he would lose a war with Israel (again).
So, why are Obama and his Muslim Brotherhood masters too stupid to figure that out?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978937
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

RAFAH, Gaza Strip — The ­Egyptian military has launched what appears to be a campaign to shut down, once and for all, the illegal but long-permitted tunnels that provide a vital economic lifeline to the Gaza Strip and supply tax revenue to the Islamist movement Hamas.

The operation seems to be part of an effort to cripple Hamas, which rules the coastal enclave bordered by Egypt and Israel. The group is an offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, whose ­standard-bearer held that country’s presidency before being ousted from power this summer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_ea...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978938
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

LCNLin wrote:
<quoted text>
Filled with hatred for President Obama she does no see.
Good point.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978939
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The term safer is comparative, dipstick.
In Vietnam, were troops safer on the ships than the troops on the ground.
Yet another question you are running from because you are afraid to answer it.
Your ability to read and understand the English language has improved somewhat. You actually realized "safer" as comparative. But, you're still too ignorant to know the difference between "safer" and "safe".
Here's why:
Anti-ship weaponry has advanced a long way in the past 40 years, dufus. Just how dumb are you?
You seem to be admitting that sailors won't be safe when Obama uses them to start a war with Syria and help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood take over there. All it takes is just one of the anti-ship missiles launched to hit just one ship, and Obama has a planeload of corpses he can do a photo op with when he pretends to be sad about Americans getting killed. Just how dumb are you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978940
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Libya had no sarin stockpiles.
Next you will claim Sadam moved his WMDs to Libya?
Do you support the Obama plan to get Americans killed starting a war with Syria so Al Qaeda can acquire the chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978941
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh brother, take another hit jefro
I mean you can believe this or not. Not sure what to think myself.

And, yes, this is an Al Jazeera blog site, but maybe you should just take a peek at it considering the Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center, Shadi Hamid, tweeted out about the Egyptian media depicting Obama as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

http://blogs.aljazeera.com/topic/egypt/egypti...

Here's the tweet that Hamid sent out and responses in Arabic.

https://twitter.com/mlnahas/status/3733822654...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978942
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
U.S. DOCUMENTS SHOW EMBRACE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN IN EARLY 1980s
DESPITE CHEMICAL WEAPONS, EXTERNAL AGGRESSION, HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES
Fear of Iraq Collapse in Iran-Iraq War Motivated Reagan Administration Support;
U.S. Goals Were Access to Oil, Projection of Power, and Protection of Allies;
Rumsfeld Failed to Raise Chemical Weapons Issue in Personal Meeting with Saddam
National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114 of November 26, 1983, "U.S. Policy toward the Iran-Iraq War," delineating U.S. priorities: the ability to project military force in the Persian Gulf and to protect oil supplies, without reference to chemical weapons or human rights concerns.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82...
oil. just like Bush.
US Protected Iraq at UN from Iranian Charges of Chemical Weapons Use

Posted on 08/28/2013 by Juan Cole

http://www.juancole.com/2013/08/protected-cha...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978943
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

5

3

3

MOSCOW — In a surprise move, Russia promised Monday to push its ally Syria to place its chemical weapons under international control and then dismantle them quickly to avert U.S. strikes.

The announcement by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov came a few hours after U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that Syrian President Bashar Assad could resolve the crisis surrounding the alleged use of chemical weapons by his forces by surrendering control of “every single bit” of his arsenal to the international community by the end of the week.

If the establishment of international control over chemical weapons in that country would allow avoiding strikes, we will immediately start working with Damascus,” Lavrov said.

Al-Moallem said his government was ready to host the U.N. team, and insisted that Syria is ready to use all channels to convince the Americans that it wasn’t behind the attack.

He added that Syria was ready for “full cooperation with Russia to remove any pretext for aggression.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_ea...
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Hartford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978944
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh brother; fetch almight, whatever, dbwrider, no surprise, etc. all of them.
If there are that many, then you should easily be able to easily provide a link as an example of one of them rooting for Russia.

Otherwise, you are just doing the typical disingenuous, lying Obama voting liberal routine.
WOW

Brooklyn, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978945
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Libya had no sarin stockpiles.
Next you will claim Sadam moved his WMDs to Libya?
You speak as a KNOW IT ALL YOU ARE not how do you know for sure who had what and who did what it almost as if you would like us to believe you have more information or access than anyone else you have ONE POINT OF VIEW thats It Protect the GLOBAL AGENDA
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978946
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
In the 1980s, the Islamic revolution in Iran changed the entire strategic landscape in that region. America's ally in the Persian Gulf, the Shah, was swept aside overnight, and no one else was on the horizon to replace him as the guarantor of U.S. interests in the region.
With the Shah ousted, Saddam Hussein had ambitions to position himself as the new strong man of the Middle East.
He condemned the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and signed an alliance with Saudi Arabia to block the Soviet-backed attempt to take over North Yemen. In 1979, he also allowed the CIA which he had once so virulently attacked to open an office in Baghdad.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Carter began to look more favorably toward Saddam Hussein as a potential counterweight to the Ayatollah Khomeini and as a force to contain Soviet expansionism in the region.
That's where it all started.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows...
Following further high-level policy review, Ronald Reagan issued National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 114, dated November 26, 1983, concerned specifically with U.S. policy toward the Iran-Iraq war. The directive reflects the administration's priorities: it calls for heightened regional military cooperation to defend oil facilities, and measures to improve U.S. military capabilities in the Persian Gulf, and directs the secretaries of state and defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to take appropriate measures to respond to tensions in the area. It states, "Because of the real and psychological impact of a curtailment in the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf on the international economic system, we must assure our readiness to deal promptly with actions aimed at disrupting that traffic."

http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82...

oil.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978947
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Your ability to read and understand the English language has improved somewhat. You actually realized "safer" as comparative. But, you're still too ignorant to know the difference between "safer" and "safe".
Here's why:
Anti-ship weaponry has advanced a long way in the past 40 years, dufus. Just how dumb are you?
You seem to be admitting that sailors won't be safe when Obama uses them to start a war with Syria and help Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood take over there. All it takes is just one of the anti-ship missiles launched to hit just one ship, and Obama has a planeload of corpses he can do a photo op with when he pretends to be sad about Americans getting killed. Just how dumb are you?
We are calling on the Syrian leadership to not only agree on placing chemical weapons storage sites under international control, but also on its subsequent destruction and fully joining the treaty on prohibition of chemical weapons,” he said.

Lavrov said that he has already handed over the proposal to al-Moallem and expects a “quick, and, hopefully, positive answer.”

His statement followed media reports alleging that Russian President Vladimir Putin, who discussed Syria with President Barack Obama during the group of 20 summit in St. Petersburg last week, sought to negotiate a deal that would have Assad hand over control of chemical weapons

The Russian move comes as Obama, who has blamed Assad for killing hundreds of his own people in a chemical attack last month, is pressing for a limited strike against the Syrian government. It has denied launching the attack, insisting along with its ally Russia that the attack was launched by the rebels to drag the U.S. into war.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_ea...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978948
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>US Protected Iraq at UN from Iranian Charges of Chemical Weapons Use
Posted on 08/28/2013 by Juan Cole
http://www.juancole.com/2013/08/protected-cha...
The turning point came in 1983, as the Reagan administration reevaluated its policy toward the Middle East. Note that it does not appear to have been deterred by a small matter such as Hussein’s propensity to massacre townspeople like those at Dujail.

http://www.juancole.com/2013/08/protected-cha...
WOW

Brooklyn, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978949
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Saudi Arabia’s “Chemical Bandar” behind the Chemical Attacks in Syria?Nothing the US claims about what happened in Syria adds up. We are being asked to believe an illogical story, when it is much more likely that it was Israel and Saudi Arabia who enabled the Obama Administration to threaten Syria with war.

The Obama Administration’s intelligence report on Syria was a rehash of Iraq.“There are lots of things that aren’t spelled out” in the four-page document, according to Richard Guthrie, the former project head of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Project of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. One piece of evidence is the alleged interception of Syrian government communications, but no transcripts were provided.

Just as with the Obama Administration’s speeches which all fall short of conclusively confirming what happened, nothing was categorically confirmed in the intelligence report. Actually it comes across more as a superficial college or university student’s paper put together by wordsmiths instead of genuine experts on the subject.

Going in a circle, the report even depends on “unnamed” social media and accounts as sources of evidence or data. Lacking transparency, it states that “there are accounts from international and Syrian medical personnel, videos, witness accounts, thousands of social media reports from at least 12 different locations in the Damascus area, journalist accounts and reports from highly credible non-governmental organizations.”

OK REAL DAVE READ THIS
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#978950
Sep 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Germany/Russian intelligence indicates it was the Rebels not Assad that used these Weapons; why not 1, 00,000 dead no reaction by the US, Obama’s ‘Red Line’ remark (game changer) makes sense these Rebels would use Chemical Weapons to draw US in to this Conflict!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 901,361 - 901,380 of1,034,209
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

49 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 min JOEL COOL DUDE 65,121
The Official Ashley Tisdale Chat Room (Sep '07) 10 min Justin Bieber 1,837
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 15 min Chicagobunny 47,070
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 17 min Hatti_Hollerand 229
IL Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Illinois ... (Oct '10) 18 min jimtownhounddogsniffing 6,537
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 26 min Poppo 167,625
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Mothra 43,007
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr edogxxx 96,137
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••