Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#979875 Sep 10, 2013
JOHN KERRY'S seemingly off-the-cuff challenge for the Assad regime to turn over its chemical weapons has within 24 hours become de facto US policy that Kerry is now heralding as the 'ideal way' to resolve the Syria crisis — who knew?

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

These idiots in the Obama Administration didn't think of this as a mater of policy. It had to come out as a wiseguy remark from Lurch, now it's policy.

Just shows how pathetic Democrats are as leaders.
Buroc Millhouse Obama

Newington, CT

#979877 Sep 10, 2013
Hey libtards!!!!!

Arctic sea ice up 60 percent in 2013

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/09/09/arc...

I - D - I - O - T - S
LCNLin

United States

#979878 Sep 10, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
...fighting for return of the real America and a President that we that can be proud of...
others do the fighting... you seem only to troll?
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#979879 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree that no one wants a proxy war in Syria and hope for a peaceful solution; however, you're giving credit to Putin rather than to your own countries President; who, kept up the pressure that may result in this compromise. That is what I find deplorable in you, that you are anti American because of racism. You should be ashamed of yourself.
These fkn idiots on here hate Obama to the point that they're selling out their own nation. TeaParty scumbags__not patriots.

The Obama administration/CIA/Pentagon ran a game on Assad and his allies Russia and Iran and they all bought in knowing that the alternative was to "put up" which none of them could do.

Syria's a broken pizz pot that couldn't face off with the rebel factions without help from Iran, laughing, and Russia, whose been selling/trading junk weapons for decades and doesn't want to face the embarrassment of the world knowing that it's "junk don't work."

We know that the US weapons of war work as intended__we watched the US Air Force drop a bomb down a smokestack during Shock and Awe and stick a cruise missile through the front door of a hotel during the brief Bush I Iraq escapade.

Russia has nothing to counter Tomahawk missiles__no one does and it's very unlikely that Russia can defy the US stealth systems that shield our aircraft and ships from land based missiles.

Our sht works__theirs doesn't__they understand that!!!

We gave the mutts a way out of a certain azzwhoopin and they jumped all over it.
LCNLin

United States

#979880 Sep 10, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's get to the bottom of this.
Tell us why you believe Assad used the chemical weapons. Please do not use statements by known pathological liars unless that is all the proof you have.
"known pathological liars..."such as your fellow trolls?
Buroc Millhouse Obama

East Hartford, CT

#979881 Sep 10, 2013
Incredibly naïve.
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Incredible.
How's that chess game going lily?

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#979882 Sep 10, 2013
LoisLane59 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree in the short term. But as Assad said, "there are other powers in that region besides his own government" who are ready for "anything to happen".
And if Russia becomes the victor now, so does Iran and China even if indirectly.
Assad is worried about an al Qaeda takeover as are we all. But that seems to be exactly what Iran wants.
So why not just stay out of it and let them duke it out themselves?
And clean up afterwards if necessary?
What exactly does Russia have to gain by helping out his pal, Assad?
Iran is shipping hundreds of tons of weaponry to Syria to kill the Al Qaeda insurgents. Al Qaeda is Suni. Iran is Shi'ite. This is really no more than the usual Suni-Shi'ite medieval mentality war.

Assad has maintained peace with Israel for a long time. Everyone has a vested interest in that.
If the Muslim Brotherhood takes over Syria, that won't be the case anymore.
There is a reason the Muslim Brotherhood was thrown out of the government of Egypt. The Egyptian military thought they were dangerous to have in government. There is a reason they were not able to secure power in Libya. They are considered to be too dangerous there, too.
If you look at the big picture, the United States should be helping prevent them from gaining any influence anywhere in the world.
The Muslim Brotherhood represents the most radical Islamist mentality that is the sole motivation for international terrorism from Sunis.
Why should be help them in any way?

And, how the hell did we end up with a Muslim Brotherhood president and administration?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#979883 Sep 10, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I was born here, and this country belongs to ME.
You and Obama better get used to that fact.
Or, do we have to fight a war over that principle?
Just the fact that you can say that you feel safe if those chemical weapons are kept in Russia is preposterous.
They should be destroyed and disposed of, if that's even possible.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#979884 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree that no one wants a proxy war in Syria and hope for a peaceful solution; however, you're giving credit to Putin rather than to your own countries President; who, kept up the pressure that may result in this compromise. That is what I find deplorable in you, that you are anti American because of racism. You should be ashamed of yourself.
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? you should be ashamed of yourself. Racism. are you kidding me lily?
LCNLin

United States

#979885 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
Assad pursued negotiations for an alternative $10 billion pipeline plan with Iran, across Iraq to Syria, that would also potentially allow Iran to supply gas to Europe from its South Pars field shared with Qatar. The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the project was signed in July 2012 - just as Syria's civil war was spreading to Damascus and Aleppo - and earlier this year Iraq signed a framework agreement for construction of the gas pipelines.
The Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline plan was a "direct slap in the face" to Qatar's plans. No wonder Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan, in a failed attempt to bribe Russia to switch sides, told President Vladmir Putin that "whatever regime comes after" Assad, it will be "completely" in Saudi Arabia's hands and will "not sign any agreement allowing any Gulf country to transport its gas across Syria to Europe and compete with Russian gas exports", according to diplomatic sources. When Putin refused, the Prince vowed military action.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-...
President George Bush has nothing good to say about the dictator of Syria...but supported our President ...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#979886 Sep 10, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
Members of the us military reported that they are training the rebels.
I have heard that; where'd you get that info?

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#979887 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
Assad pursued negotiations for an alternative $10 billion pipeline plan with Iran, across Iraq to Syria, that would also potentially allow Iran to supply gas to Europe from its South Pars field shared with Qatar. The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for the project was signed in July 2012 - just as Syria's civil war was spreading to Damascus and Aleppo - and earlier this year Iraq signed a framework agreement for construction of the gas pipelines.
The Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline plan was a "direct slap in the face" to Qatar's plans. No wonder Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan, in a failed attempt to bribe Russia to switch sides, told President Vladmir Putin that "whatever regime comes after" Assad, it will be "completely" in Saudi Arabia's hands and will "not sign any agreement allowing any Gulf country to transport its gas across Syria to Europe and compete with Russian gas exports", according to diplomatic sources. When Putin refused, the Prince vowed military action.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-...
So then the Prince and O'bama aligned themselves to lie about Asad's imaginary WMD's. Does it make sense to you now? A petro dollar state. mmm mmm mmm. Do you understand? WMD...

“Weak People Blame Others”

Since: Jul 08

Location hidden

#979888 Sep 10, 2013
Buroc Millhouse Obama wrote:
JOHN KERRY'S seemingly off-the-cuff challenge for the Assad regime to turn over its chemical weapons has within 24 hours become de facto US policy that Kerry is now heralding as the 'ideal way' to resolve the Syria crisis — who knew?
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
These idiots in the Obama Administration didn't think of this as a mater of policy. It had to come out as a wiseguy remark from Lurch, now it's policy.
Just shows how pathetic Democrats are as leaders.
Of course, if Bush/Cheney were still in power, a full scale invasion would have been launched months ago for the sole purpose of funneling a few more billions in no bid government contracts to their political cronies. Of course, at least this time, they would have found WMD.
LCNLin

United States

#979889 Sep 10, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>These fkn idiots on here hate Obama to the point that they're selling out their own nation. TeaParty scumbags__not patriots.
The Obama administration/CIA/Pentagon ran a game on Assad and his allies Russia and Iran and they all bought in knowing that the alternative was to "put up" which none of them could do.
Syria's a broken pizz pot that couldn't face off with the rebel factions without help from Iran, laughing, and Russia, whose been selling/trading junk weapons for decades and doesn't want to face the embarrassment of the world knowing that it's "junk don't work."
We know that the US weapons of war work as intended__we watched the US Air Force drop a bomb down a smokestack during Shock and Awe and stick a cruise missile through the front door of a hotel during the brief Bush I Iraq escapade.
Russia has nothing to counter Tomahawk missiles__no one does and it's very unlikely that Russia can defy the US stealth systems that shield our aircraft and ships from land based missiles.
Our sht works__theirs doesn't__they understand that!!!
We gave the mutts a way out of a certain azzwhoopin and they jumped all over it.
President George Bush seems to agree!

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#979890 Sep 10, 2013
fetch almighty wrote:
<quoted text>Everyone (except low information voters) knew where O'bama was going to take the United States of America once he was elected--he is doing exactly what he (O'bama) planned to do. Does this come as a 'surprise' to you? certainly it is not a surprise to me. O'bama has done exactly what I said he would do five years ago. You may not know but I lived in Chicago at the time.
Thank you Rush Limbaugh for creating jackasses like Wretch Almighty.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#979891 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't prove he didn't. Where did AlQuaeda obtain the chemical weapons if they are the ones who did?
I honestly don't give a fk if Assad kills all the rebels if they are in fact AlQuaeda. Why would McCain and Graham push to arm the rebels if they are Al Quaeda?
That's a good question.

For conclusions as to Al Qaeda in Syria, search "al qaeda in syria" and start reading. Consensus ranges from Al Qaeda being strong to bieng dominant and there are not really rebels in Syria. The truth is probably somewhere in between. Al Qaeda is the only organization in Syria that is organized and ruthless enough to take control of the country if the Assad government falls.
That is one fact you should not deny. If the Assad government falls, Al Qaeda takes over.

Now, the only question you need to ask yourself is, do you think Americans should be killed helping the exact same people that attacked us on 9/11?
Obama is on their side. McCain is on their side.

Who's side are you on?

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#979892 Sep 10, 2013
Interesting article shedding some light on Syria's history - worth the read:

Syria has always been a complex place religiously. The country has a substantial Sunni Muslim majority, but it also has large minority communities of Christians, Alawites and others.

Alawites are members of an Islamic sect that draw heavily from Christian roots and who celebrate Christmas. They were long known as “Little Christians.”

Christianity made its cultural and intellectual home in Syria. St. Paul famously visited Damascus, and Antioch was one of the world’s greatest Christian centers flourishing under Islamic rule.

In the 1920s, the French arbitrarily carved out the country’s most Christian sections and designated that region “Lebanon” with its capital at Beirut.

But Syria changed after the First World War, and 1915 marked the beginning of the genocide of perhaps 1.5 million Armenians as well as hundreds of thousands of Assyrians, Maronites, and other Christian groups.

However, by the 1990s, five of seven Hafez al-Assad's (President from 1971 through 2000) closest advisers were Christian. His son Bashar is the current president and America’s nemesis in the region.

Christians in Syria today make up around 3 million people including many refugees and disguised crypto-believers.

Already, Christians have suffered terrible persecution in rebel-controlled areas with countless reports of murder, rape and extortion.

The present nightmare is if the present regime collapses, a radically anti-Western regime would emerge and kill or expel several million Christians and Alawites. This would be a political, religious and humanitarian catastrophe unparalleled since the Armenian genocide almost exactly a century ago.

The United States government may be pushing towards not a commemoration of the genocide but a re-enactment.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articl...

One more reason why we're in such a pickle. We don't know who the "rebels" are and know Assad's regime is evil.

Since: Jun 13

Orlando, FL

#979893 Sep 10, 2013
Here's that link again in case it couldn't be accessed.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articl...
Voluntarist

United States

#979894 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't prove he didn't. Where did AlQuaeda obtain the chemical weapons if they are the ones who did?
I honestly don't give a fk if Assad kills all the rebels if they are in fact AlQuaeda. Why would McCain and Graham push to arm the rebels if they are Al Quaeda?
Prove a negative, that makes sense.
It only shows that you do not believe that the us government wouldn't lie to the people to start a war, do you know the definition of insanity?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#979895 Sep 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did AlQuaeda obtain the chemical weapons if they are the ones who did?
Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, courtesy of Obama's Arab Spring?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 8 min Hey U 50,660
Amy 10-24 1 hr RACE 16
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr _Zoey_ 4,800
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr WelbyMD 179,478
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 5 hr Wolverine33 654
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 6 hr Ratloder 68,672
Rattlesnake Logic 8 hr i need a bump to 22
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]